To those above who demand an apology: None will be forthcoming because I have nothing to apologize for. Trump's campaign manager, Corey Lewandowski, originally told the Washington Post on Monday, May 23 that all the money collected for veterans had been "fully spent." The next day (May 24) the Washington Post printed a major article on the subject, which disclosed confusion and contradictions in the information released by the Trump campaign and by Trump personally. On May 24, the Associated press reported that of 24 veterans group recipients of checks they were able to contact, about half advised that they had received checks dated May 24, the day the Washington Post published their story questioning whether Trump had distributed all of the money. Looks as though the Post article might well have catalyzed the release of those funds. I suspect that the checks were delivered by courier or some other means to get them to recipient groups ASAP, following the Post story.
https://www.washingtonpost.com...n-to-veterans-group/
Besides all these obvious facts, I submit that nothing in my post of May 24, at 9:41 a.m. was incorrect. The Red State link (from a noted conservative source) was provided simply to document the source of quote I provided, but that does not imply that I agree with the remainder of the Red State article. It is my custom to provide links to material I quote from, but in doing so, I am not endorsing the entirety of the source article. Had I not provided a link, I would have been justly open to criticism for failing to do so.
Apology? Not until some one or more of you carping critics can show me where anything I posted was incorrect! You need to improve your reading comprehension such that you do not go off on some knee-jerkedly irrelevant and irrationally critical tangent instead of actually responding to content!