Crash.Override posted:

BREAKING: ABC Uncovers MILLIONS Of Payments From Russia To Trump, Campaign Panics

Crash,  WHERE do you get these things?   Apparently not from legitimate news sights because I checked over at ABC breaking News and saw nothing of what you are reporting.  IF it was reported, even if it was totally fake or false, all news networks would have reported it.  Sounds like something that came from the Clinton Campaign to me.  Just like the letter that Eric Holder wrote on AG Comey.  That letter was only signed by Holder but was written by the Clinton Campaign.

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/...older-says-how-high/

So back to your topic/post though. 

I assume your emphasis or hope is to make people believe that the Leadership of Russia wants to affect the US Election by donating to Trump.  Okay lets run with that assertion and if that was true then there are some very rich, and possibly corrupt, Russian businesspeople and politicians who have a LOT of money to do with whatever they wish.  Problem is it's just too easy today to discover things like that and stop them.  Our own government has ample notice about movements of money to/from the United States from other nations as well as within our own nation.  Don't believe that just try and make a deposit of $10,000 or more to your own account and see what happens.  The drug trade has caused much of this but it wouldn't take ABC to uncover it the Government would have long stopped it.

Also regarding the email leaks.   Even if it was the Russians or a Russian that leaked them how did they get them?  Maybe an unsecured server?  Then what other secrets might they have discovered or know?   Democrats want to say don't listen, cover your eyes, plug your ears, you shouldn't use anything revealed by WikiLeaks because the Russians exposed it.   Never mind the stuff actually happened and was true we just need to ignore it because of the way it was revealed.  That's the Democratic way .... except for when the information happens to be detrimental to their political enemies.  When the NY Times reveals Trumps tax returns (illegally obtained and reported) then that's news and should be reported and made known to all but when information is harmful to the Democrats it should be snuffed out and eliminated and disregarded.

Sorry but just doesn't pass the smell test!

What you really should (as a loyal Democrat) be up in arms about is how  your own political party could put up such a flawed, criminal, corrupt candidate.  I mean you should be horrified at how the primary being rigged for Hillary was sanctioned by the Democratic leadership and how they steered Hillary into the main position as their chosen Candidate.  You mean there aren't better candidates out there?  I don't buy that Evan Bayh is one of them and there are many more.  Hillary was expecting a coronation back in 2008 but along came a minority, Barry Obama, and Hillary (the first Woman President) was set aside so the first Minority could be elected.  Now they look for a woman and Elizabeth Warren was non-cooperative and they didn't have a backup?  They chose Hillary because she was a great Team Player and paid her dues covering up for her Husband's inadequacies.

If you don't HONESTLY KNOW Hillary is corrupt to the hilt and totally an unsatisfactory candidate then you do have rose colored glasses on.  Even the most ardent skeptic surely has enough material out there to suspect that Hillary is guilty of many of those things she is accused of and at very LEAST NOT FIT TO RUN for the highest office in the land, certainly not fit to occupy the seat of the President, that is unless you really want a crook in there.  If that's the case then you missed your chance with Nixon.