Skip to main content

Reply to "Flag Desecration:"

Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Look how happy Contendahh is about being able to desecrate the flag. Look how nasty he posts to someone that doesn't like it. Why not get the word out that people desecrating the flag are pigs, and the ones that think it is OK to do it are even bigger pigs?

____

Your warped reply is utterly without merit. There is NOTHING in what I posted that indicates any happiness on my part about flag desecration or any endorsement of the practice.  I clearly, and with documentation, pointed out a gross error in information posted by DR. PEPPER.  Neither you nor anyone else has found anything incorrect in my interpretation of this Constitutional issue.

Notice that I did not accuse DR.PEPPER of lying. It has become all too common in society and in this forum to characterize mistakenly incorrect information as a "lie."  A lie is an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker or writer to be untrue, with intent to deceive.  Propagating an ignorant misunderstanding is not lying.  Nevertheless, such misinformation should be corrected in a timely manner before it is repeated and misleads others. In the last line of his post, DR.PEPPER encouraged such repetition ("...let's see how many shares we can get to get the word out.").  I suggested instead that he get the CORRECT word out to any whom he might have already misinformed.

Are you interested in TRUTH, Best, or simply in twisting distorting what I have done here in my pursuit of the truth?  SHAME on you.

Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Look how happy Contendahh is about being able to desecrate the flag. Look how nasty he posts to someone that doesn't like it. Why not get the word out that people desecrating the flag are pigs, and the ones that think it is OK to do it are even bigger pigs?

____

Your warped reply is utterly without merit. There is NOTHING in what I posted that indicates any happiness on my part about flag desecration or any endorsement of the practice.  I clearly, and with documentation, pointed out a gross error in information posted by DR. PEPPER.  Neither you nor anyone else has found anything incorrect in my interpretation of this Constitutional issue.

Notice that I did not accuse DR.PEPPER of lying. It has become all too common in society and in this forum to characterize mistakenly incorrect information as a "lie."  A lie is an assertion of something known or believed by the speaker or writer to be untrue, with intent to deceive.  Propagating an ignorant misunderstanding is not lying.  Nevertheless, such misinformation should be corrected in a timely manner before it is repeated and misleads others. In the last line of his post, DR.PEPPER encouraged such repetition ("...let's see how many shares we can get to get the word out.").  I suggested instead that he get the CORRECT word out to any whom he might have already misinformed.

Are you interested in TRUTH, Best, or simply in twisting distorting what I have done here in my pursuit of the truth?  SHAME on you.

Best? There you go again, no idea who you are posting to. You gave Dire a rest this time. LOL!!

__

My mistake-yes. And I acknowledge it.  Now would YOU like to address the substantive issue being discussed here?


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×