Mr. Hooberbloob posted:budsfarm posted:You should consider reading in depth rather than skimming, whatever the source. Stands to reason that if the occupants had been kids/children, Taylor would have been charged for endangerment in addition to DUI, speeding, and open container. In fact, child endangerment would led the list of the charges. That fact clearly went right over your head.
But it didn't mine. I continued to research till I found the reason why.
I've told you numerous times before, the news/facts are not in the headlines.
Just one of many examples of Contendy posting false contents. He's become a half azzed Woz.
___
Absurd, Hoob. I posted content reported in an early article on this subject in a reputable newspaper. You and others are quibbling about details that are not 100% accurate but that changes little if anything about the meat of this story, which is the story of a drunken, reckless action by a legislator. There is no such obligation as budsfarm alleges, namely to perform an in-depth fact-checking search to verify or disprove every single element of a breaking news report. What you conservatives are doing is obvious. You are picking at a minor point to try to deflect the focus of the article, which in its essence is about the irresponsible, drunken and dangerous behavior of a particular GOP politician currently running for re-election.