Skip to main content

Reply to "Roy Moore files complaint to delay election certification"

My, above, statement had nothing to do with Moore's innocence or guilt in the accusations, I voted for him because I didn't accept the research against him and felt he was unjustly attacked.  My statement was based on Moore coming out strong and with a polygraph AFTER the election had happened and he lost.  

Had Moore had a passed polygraph in hand before the election and called for the women to take one then he very well or surly might have been Senator today and the one who was certified the winner.   His failure to do what should have been obviously apparent, before the election, to me, demonstrates incompetence on his part.  After is not the time to take the steps he took but before and fight like crazy.  Instead Roy Moore did a media "rope a dope" move and essentially did nothing, himself, to actually bring about doubt in the minds of those who were on the fence, about voting for him.   

That's the reason I could never support him now is if he was that incompetent to do what was needed before the election then come around after it, after he was defeated, and cry and stomp that things were unfair then he didn't deserve it in the first place.  That's my opinion, though!  I don't like that Jones got elected and he did it with Millions of outside money and accusations that never should have been made but the fault still lies upon Moore for not doing what should have been done to begin with.  If I had been Moore, having such accusations made and knowing they were false I would have had at least two different polygraphs the week after the accusations came out and then offered to pay for polygraphs for the women doing the accusations.    I'd have had my hand on a very public Bible swearing my innocence to God also in front of everyone and doing so as often as possible.  None of that did Roy Moore do before the election so main fault for his loss doesn't lie in Soros or Democrat finance pacs but on Moore and his Campaign itself.   Secondary blame, above the democrat money, I'd put squarely on Richard Shelby and other Republican Senators and politicians who pretty much agreed with the accusations.  

I voted for Moore, I'd do it again if it was before the election but after seeing how he has handled this I have lost trust that he should be given another chance as I don't think he's used good judgment at all when he needed it most.  Again that is my opinion and if I'm wrong please tell me where Moore did use good judgement and what he did right other than address the yearbook discretion.  They did a good job of addressing that so give them a B+ to A- for that effort but a total F in addressing the more hurtful accusations of the woman who claimed she was 14 at the time.  I wish Mo Brooks had of been our candidate as I did not like Luther Strange at all, either, but that didn't happen and Moore was the candidate and the Republicans lost that seat, I believe, due to Moore's campaign's failure to handle themselves before the Campaign in the same way and with the vigor that they are approaching it after the votes are tallied.  

Last edited by gbrk

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×