Skip to main content

Reply to "The Beginning?"

The big bang cannot be considered intrinsic to the fact that the universe does exist because it cannot be demonstrated nor falsified by the scientific method.

Lets consider. Premise 1. the universe exists and embodied. Premise 2. A singularity existed before the big bang and embodied only by a rule that has a rule
which explains that rule which has a rule that explains that rule which has a rule which explains that rule and so on to infinity.
Therefore the universe exists and is equal to the singularity which exists by a rule. Premise 3. God exists and embodied by a rule which is explained by a rule
which has a rule which explaines that rule that has a rule which explains that rule and so on into infinity.
Premise 4. God and the singularity are embodied buy a rule that has a rule which has a rule that explains that rule which has a rule which explaines that rule
and to infinity.
Premise 5. Since the rules are infinite there is at some point where a rule in one catagore is equal to a rule in the other catagore.
Premise 6. The existing universe must be by some rule be the same as the singularity and God exists by some rule which is equal to some rule allowing for the
singularity then God, the universe and the singularity are the same thing by some rule that has a rule which explains that rule which has a rule which explains
that rule and so on to infinity.

Conclusion: No message is intrinsic that we can prove.


Untitled Document
×
×
×
×