MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:budsfarm posted:MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:budsfarm posted:MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:This thread is perplexing. By Buds defense of Uandurine and then dire's apology for his comment, it makes me think that the responses on these threads are simply predicated on whom is posting and not the content of what is being posted.
What defense of Uandurine?
What content? That I pointed out that he didn't say what he was believed to have said? To someone I agree with more often than not?
How is that predicated anything?
I point out to JT and Contendahh their errors all the time.
And yours too, apparently.
A true shame that I have to explain this to what I presume to be a grown man, but your line ""U and Urine" is a good guy! Not dumb.", after dire made his remark is definitely defending him.
For the record, I find no issue with anyone defending anyone, my point was that as I often see with the political forum, this forum is no different. People do not pay attention to the content being posted, they respond based on whom has actually posted.
A true shame that what I presume to be a grown man would cherry pick. I also referred to Uandurnine as a smart ass extraordinaire. You don't seem to have any issues with that.
For the record, were I to defend someone, I can do better than that.
Don't be disingenuous, if you can. You and I both know that calling someone a smartass extraordinaire is not an insult, especially when you are friendly. How am I cherry picking? I was pointing out something that is pervasive in these forums. Just using this particular entry as a perfect example.
It is the reason that no logical, rational discussion can be had on the political forums here. Shame to see it spilling over into other forums now.
How is what I wrote in any way pervasive?
Don't be disingenuous, if you can.