Reply to "Wind, solar to be cheapest form of power generation by 2030: Study"

Mr. HooberbloobOld Faithful

You need a 500 megawatt solar plant to replace a 100 megawatt nuke plant. It's not cheaper and will never be cheaper than nuclear. That 1 square mile solar plant in Oakland rated at 75 MW is equivalent to a 15 MW Nuke plant. I'm not anti solar, it will not affect my way of life, I'm just realistic.

A nuke can make a megawatt for under 5 bucks. Solar is currently over 30 bucks for the same megawatt. Any article that says solar can compete with a Nuke is fake news.

7/10/177:40 PM

Untitled Document

<ul id="{%=id%}ButtonGroup" class="button-group h-popup-buttons even-button-group even-1">
    <li id="{%=id%}Okay_buttonContainer"><a id="{%=id%}Okay" href="javascript:void(0);" class="button success no-margin-bottom h-alert-modal-ok-button" role="button">OK</a><script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            function {%=id%}Okay_click(event, data) {
            {%=id%}Popup.hide();
        }
        
                $('#{%=id%}Okay').on('click', {%=id%}Okay_click);
        })();
    </script></li></ul><a href="javascript:void(0);" class="close-reveal-modal" aria-label="Close Modal">&#215;</a><div class="last-modal-focus focus-utility-element" tabindex="0"></div>
</div>
<script type="text/javascript">
        (function() {
            {%=id%}Popup = new SS.Popup.ModalPopup('{%=id%}');
        })();
    </script>

Skip to main content

Membership Required

Remove From Your Block List

Manage Follow Preferences

Block

Please wait...