Skip to main content

Now, that there's a chance, those in the know are telling the truth.

"A former FBI official said Sunday that Bill and Hillary Clinton are part of a “crime family” and argued top officials hindered the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of State.

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom heaped praise on Republican presidential nominee  before taking aim at the Clintons. 

“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”

Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”

He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.

“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”

“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.

Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.

“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo...s-are-a-crime-family

TRUTH -- THE NEW HATE SPEECH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

hahahaha... the majority of those organizations support the republicans.

as far as  your 'communists support the democrats' claims... they issued a blanket statement about 20 years ago.. and haven't issued another one... keep up the rt. wingnuts propaganda, though.

next, the rt. wingnuts have been demonizing the fbi since they didn't prosecute hillary... now, its' the 'democrats demonizing the wonderful fbi'... the hypocrisy is Hillaryous.

From CPUSA.org

"This election will be a national referendum on racism, misogyny, homophobia, xenophobia and Islamophobia. The aim should be a landslide defeat of Trump and a decisive rejection of hate.

The election of Clinton as the first woman president would make history. A landslide would not end sexism, but it would represent a mighty blow just as the election of President Obama was a blow against racism. It would advance democracy.

A landslide makes it more likely that GOP Congressional and state legislative majorities can be ousted and an end put to the politics of obstruction. Most people tend to vote straight ticket.

A landslide will give added weight to the progressive platform adopted at the Democratic Convention and give encouragement to appoint progressive Supreme Court justices. It would be added pressure against backsliding on opposition to TPP and other trade deals. It will put public opinion and the movements in a better position to pressure against Clinton's tendency toward military adventurism and policies of regime change.

With a Democratic president and Congress the post-election political terrain will shift and give immediate momentum to the new Clinton administration."

 

Saw Hillary on the tube this morning. Its Sunday, she was sitting at a bar with a large wine glass and about a dozen people around, talking on her phone. Bet she was ensuring cash was transferred to holding accounts in the Caymans, Singapore and Switzerland in preparation for a final destination -- local bank in Hong Kong with no business in the US.  Then, giving orders to buy more bearer bonds.  Plus, finalizing reservations for Hong Kong on a late 9 November or early 10 November flight.  Lose and scoot.  Obama's not going to pardon her and place an even darker stain on his alleged legacy.  With Huma in seclusion, the rats are already planning their own outs -- making deals with the Feds if they are implicated or selling their sordid tales to the MSM if they didn't participate in the myriad felonies.

direstraits posted:

Now, that there's a chance, those in the know are telling the truth.

"A former FBI official said Sunday that Bill and Hillary Clinton are part of a “crime family” and argued top officials hindered the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of State.

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom heaped praise on Republican presidential nominee  before taking aim at the Clintons. 

“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”

Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”

He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.

“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”

“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.

Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.

“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo...s-are-a-crime-family

High Officials ARE standing in the way, big surprise!. Congress should move immediately to impeach her or free up the way for the FBI to investigate.

The whole lot of them should face justice if Trump is elected and pay for their crimes and for obstruction.

gbrk posted:
direstraits posted:

Now, that there's a chance, those in the know are telling the truth.

"A former FBI official said Sunday that Bill and Hillary Clinton are part of a “crime family” and argued top officials hindered the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of State.

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom heaped praise on Republican presidential nominee  before taking aim at the Clintons. 

“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”

Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”

He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.

“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”

“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.

Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.

“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo...s-are-a-crime-family

High Officials ARE standing in the way, big surprise!. Congress should move immediately to impeach her or free up the way for the FBI to investigate.

The whole lot of them should face justice if Trump is elected and pay for their crimes and for obstruction.

Can't impeach her, she holds no office.  God willing, the only government building she will inhabit is Club Fed.

Reportedly, the resignations from FBI agents and higher ups were piling up on Comey's desk.  Even his wife was mad at him for not recommending Hillary be charged. 

jtdavis posted:

John Catsimatidis, a greek american billionaire businessman and talk show host interviewed an x FBI guy who heaped praise on Trump before condemning the Clintons. Do you think somebody might have been a little biased?

As opposed to the biased N a z i billionaire Soros heaping praise and money on Hillary, and funding thugs to disrupt Trump's speeches and attack and harass his supporters? 

direstraits posted:
gbrk posted:
direstraits posted:

Now, that there's a chance, those in the know are telling the truth.

"A former FBI official said Sunday that Bill and Hillary Clinton are part of a “crime family” and argued top officials hindered the investigation into Hillary Clinton’s private email server while she was secretary of State.

During a radio interview with John Catsimatidis, former assistant FBI director James Kallstrom heaped praise on Republican presidential nominee  before taking aim at the Clintons. 

“The Clintons, that’s a crime family, basically,” Kallstrom said. “It’s like organized crime. I mean the Clinton Foundation is a cesspool.”

Kallstrom, best known for leading the investigation into the explosion of TWA flight 800 in the late '90s, said that Hillary Clinton, the Democratic presidential nominee, was a “pathological liar.”

He also blasted Attorney General Loretta Lynch, claiming that she impeded the investigation into Clinton’s private server.

“The problem here is this investigation was never a real investigation,” he said. “That’s the problem. They never had a grand jury empanelled, and the reason they never had a grand jury empanelled, I’m sure, is Loretta Lynch would not go along with that.”

“God forbid we put someone like that in the White House,” he added of Clinton.

Kallstrom also said that FBI Director James Comey and the rest of the FBI’s leadership were responsible for holding back the investigation, not the rest of the bureau.

“The agents are furious with what’s going on, I know that for a fact,” he said."

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo...s-are-a-crime-family

High Officials ARE standing in the way, big surprise!. Congress should move immediately to impeach her or free up the way for the FBI to investigate.

The whole lot of them should face justice if Trump is elected and pay for their crimes and for obstruction.

Can't impeach her, she holds no office.  God willing, the only government building she will inhabit is Club Fed.

Reportedly, the resignations from FBI agents and higher ups were piling up on Comey's desk.  Even his wife was mad at him for not recommending Hillary be charged. 

I wasn't referring to Chilling Clinton but Lunch if she obstructs the FBI's attempt to investigate the new emails.

I will though tell readers I am a little suspicious about the source so I will just say IF the story is true and accurate my comments remain.  If there is obstruction from the AG to protect Hillary Clinton especially after the meeting with Bill Clinton, then SHE should be impeached and a special  prosecutor be assigned to go after All the corruption and ALL who assisted in it and/or attempted to hide it or cover it up knowing it to be true.  Up to and including  Obama  himself.

I think if Trump is elected a serious Attorney General might do just that for my own belief is the current Democratic administration is totally criminal and corrupt extending back to fast and furious putting guns in the hands of Mexican criminals to the IRS to knowledge of the unsecured server and possible knowledge of the connections between government and the use of the Clinton Foundation in pay for play government access.

I don't think the public knows one fourth of what's being done.  I know the resident democrats don't believe that, I am friends with some of them and respect their opinion even if I don't share them, but I just ask my Democratic friends this.  

If these alleged things happened to George Bush or was said to have now been found out about the prior Bush administration would they be as supportive our suspicious of the allegations? I understand the timing of Comey's revelation is in question but I do believe he has been UNDER PRESSURE to not indict Hillary and his conscious has been at him, as a conscientious agent, and with Wienner's case providing a new chance to right the wrongs, he, Comey, took it.  

Could also be Winer looking at doing hard time for child charges and feeling the democrats betrayed him has chosen to sacrifice his allegiance to the democrats and exact revenge on Huma and in turn over info on Clinton, the Democrats, and take a scorched earth policy against the democrats in order to protect himself.

If so then what he knows having access to, and being married to Hillary's aid, Huma, could put him in a very informative bargaining position with the FBI so it's just possible some of Hillary's deepest secrets may be available now to the FBI.

The Dems were warned that Tony (Hot dog) Weiner-Schnitzel could be a security threat because of his perv past and, apparent, present.  Trump repeated the claim about 2 months ago. 

Again, Hillary is the author of her misery.  She bypassed security for her own convenience, and, probably, to mask her Foundation quid pro quo. 

BTW, WikiLeaks will release the third tranche of email this week.

A little more clarification to my last post.  It appears the obstruction that Attorney General Lynch is providing is for the Clinton Foundation and not toward the emails found on Wiener's computer.  Either way an AG that stands in the way of the FBI on any investigation should be suspicious to anyone, especially when that investigation is a political figure either currently serving or with potential to serve in the near future with power to hire the very one that is standing in the way.

Can you say "Conflict of Interest"?  at the very best that's what it is.

uandurine posted:

I wish Hillary, whether elected or not, would just come clean and tell all about her corruption and how she really feels about all the little people, but it will never happen and some would still worship her.

We know how she feels about the "little" people. Just give her the Muslim money and her Muslim gf, and the "little" people can all drop dead as far as that greedy witch cares.

uandurine posted:

I wish Hillary, whether elected or not, would just come clean and tell all about her corruption and how she really feels about all the little people, but it will never happen and some would still worship her.

Possibly the best way you will know the "real" unprotected Hillary is to read the book by one of her previous Secret Service agents.  The things he reports gives you ample insight (as if you needed to see it before) as to what she thinks about anyone outside her own inner circle.

Crash.Override posted:

BREAKING: ABC Uncovers MILLIONS Of Payments From Russia To Trump, Campaign Panics

Crash,  WHERE do you get these things?   Apparently not from legitimate news sights because I checked over at ABC breaking News and saw nothing of what you are reporting.  IF it was reported, even if it was totally fake or false, all news networks would have reported it.  Sounds like something that came from the Clinton Campaign to me.  Just like the letter that Eric Holder wrote on AG Comey.  That letter was only signed by Holder but was written by the Clinton Campaign.

http://twitchy.com/gregp-3534/...older-says-how-high/

So back to your topic/post though. 

I assume your emphasis or hope is to make people believe that the Leadership of Russia wants to affect the US Election by donating to Trump.  Okay lets run with that assertion and if that was true then there are some very rich, and possibly corrupt, Russian businesspeople and politicians who have a LOT of money to do with whatever they wish.  Problem is it's just too easy today to discover things like that and stop them.  Our own government has ample notice about movements of money to/from the United States from other nations as well as within our own nation.  Don't believe that just try and make a deposit of $10,000 or more to your own account and see what happens.  The drug trade has caused much of this but it wouldn't take ABC to uncover it the Government would have long stopped it.

Also regarding the email leaks.   Even if it was the Russians or a Russian that leaked them how did they get them?  Maybe an unsecured server?  Then what other secrets might they have discovered or know?   Democrats want to say don't listen, cover your eyes, plug your ears, you shouldn't use anything revealed by WikiLeaks because the Russians exposed it.   Never mind the stuff actually happened and was true we just need to ignore it because of the way it was revealed.  That's the Democratic way .... except for when the information happens to be detrimental to their political enemies.  When the NY Times reveals Trumps tax returns (illegally obtained and reported) then that's news and should be reported and made known to all but when information is harmful to the Democrats it should be snuffed out and eliminated and disregarded.

Sorry but just doesn't pass the smell test!

What you really should (as a loyal Democrat) be up in arms about is how  your own political party could put up such a flawed, criminal, corrupt candidate.  I mean you should be horrified at how the primary being rigged for Hillary was sanctioned by the Democratic leadership and how they steered Hillary into the main position as their chosen Candidate.  You mean there aren't better candidates out there?  I don't buy that Evan Bayh is one of them and there are many more.  Hillary was expecting a coronation back in 2008 but along came a minority, Barry Obama, and Hillary (the first Woman President) was set aside so the first Minority could be elected.  Now they look for a woman and Elizabeth Warren was non-cooperative and they didn't have a backup?  They chose Hillary because she was a great Team Player and paid her dues covering up for her Husband's inadequacies.

If you don't HONESTLY KNOW Hillary is corrupt to the hilt and totally an unsatisfactory candidate then you do have rose colored glasses on.  Even the most ardent skeptic surely has enough material out there to suspect that Hillary is guilty of many of those things she is accused of and at very LEAST NOT FIT TO RUN for the highest office in the land, certainly not fit to occupy the seat of the President, that is unless you really want a crook in there.  If that's the case then you missed your chance with Nixon. 

What you really should (as a loyal Democrat) be up in arms about is how  your own political party could put up such a flawed, criminal, corrupt candidate. 

 

and there it is, folks... straight from the hypocrites mouth... how can a **** republican run donald trump and a candidate and ever have the words 'flawed, criminal, or corrupt candidate' even come out of their mouth? the butt hurt will be strong with these people, just give it a few more days. ha!

Crash.Override posted:

What you really should (as a loyal Democrat) be up in arms about is how  your own political party could put up such a flawed, criminal, corrupt candidate. 

 

and there it is, folks... straight from the hypocrites mouth... how can a **** republican run donald trump and a candidate and ever have the words 'flawed, criminal, or corrupt candidate' even come out of their mouth? the butt hurt will be strong with these people, just give it a few more days. ha!

Who's responsible for Trump?

12 Million Democrats Voted In The Republican Primaries

 

After a lot of work I have finished my math calculations. A simple effort will show that from 2000 to 2008 there was a change in Primary votes of 10-12 million. Ten million more Republicans and 12 million less Democrats. But this is child’s play. Getting deeper, examining States with close polling prior to the registration requirements, States with a clear winner in polls prior to registration change requirements, and you can set patterns.

Using 2000 and 2008 as baselines, the conclusion was staggering. Trump only got about 3.3 million Republican Votes. The rest are Democrats, approximately 12 million of them.

http://www.redstate.com/diary/...epublican-primaries/

for someone who chastises the times daily for 'not checking their facts'.... you sure do have a problem with 'facts.' like i said earlier... i doubt you'd recognize facts... if they 'trumped' you.

"Throughout all of this, Trump has insisted that he has no business ties to Russia. “For the record, I have ZERO investments in Russia” he tweeted in July. Now – brace yourself, this might come as a shock – it appears he’s been lying to us the whole time."

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...ia/story?id=42325517

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics...ne/story?id=42263092

Last edited by Crash.Override

there's more to the story.....

it seems fbi director comey didn't wish to release this information because of 'the timing of the election'.... now, idk what you rt. wingers will say... with all that hypocrisy... but, if the fbi has an investigation into alleged dealings between russia and donald trump... after releasing the info on the 'hillary investigation'... don't you think that should be viewed as well????

From the articles, it appears the Trump company sold some condos in Miami to Russians.  That's hardly a significant amount of business with Russia. 

As to a blind trust to his children if he becomes president.  All blind trusts begin with the holder knowing what's in the trust.  They just don't know what happens afterwards until the trust is returned to him.  The owner of the trust receives information of the gains and losses from the trust for his taxes.  However, what caused those financial activities in unknown to the holder. 

Sum total of Trump's Russian holdings:

Donald Trump is being accused of having business ties to Russia. In reality, he'd love to have them -- but he hasn't scored there yet.

Trump was forced to disavow any Russian links this week after suspicions were raised that Russia was behind the hack of the Democratic National Committee's emails.

 

The head of Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign suggested the hack and subsequent leak of the emails was carried out by Russia to help Trump's campaign -- without backing that up with any evidence. President Obama fueled the rumor, saying: "Anything's possible."

Two private investigations have determined the hack is somehow linked to Russia, but no definitive proof has been presented. The FBI is examing the hack, but hasn't publicly pointed the finger at Russia.

While Trump and Russian strongman Vladimir Putin have traded compliments, that bromance has not blossomed into a Trump Tower in Moscow.

Here's what we know about Trump's business deals involving Russians:

trump russia trademarks

Trump's trademarks in Russia

These are a sign of how eager Trump has been to expand into Russia. In 1996, he filed to register "Trump Tower." In the last decade, he's also laid legal claim to "Trump," "Trump International Hotel and Tower," "Trump Home" and "the Trump crest design." CNNMoney obtained the records from the Russian intellectual property law firm Sojuzpatent, which he hired to file the trademarks in that country.

None of the real estate projects have come to life.

http://money.cnn.com/2016/07/2...d-trump-russia-ties/

Other than selling a few condo units in this country to Russians, Trump doesn't have many dealings with Russia or Russians. On the other hand:

Cash Flowed to Clinton Foundation Amid Russian Uranium Deal

http://www.nytimes.com/2015/04...um-company.html?_r=0

Firms Paid Bill Clinton Millions As They Lobbied Hillary Clinton

http://www.ibtimes.com/firms-p...lary-clinton-1899107

Clinton Foundation Donors Got Weapons Deals From Hillary Clinton's State Department

http://www.ibtimes.com/clinton...e-department-1934187

And most importantly, this is what China got for those Buddhist bucks that low carbon emitting Al Gore picked up in 1996:

Costly Trade With ChinaMillions of U.S. jobs displaced with net job loss in every state

http://www.epi.org/publication/bp188/

Crash.Override posted:

really? an article from july? you did see where the article i posted was from like, today, right?

you do know trump took all his manufacturing jobs to china, right???

can you provide a link to where the clinton foundation owned any uranium? i can't seem to find where they sold any?

The older article article has much the same info: Trump owns copy rights in Russia and sells condos in this country to Russians. The only thing different is that Russians invested in Trump properties outside Russia to get money out of Russia to safer places. If anything, Putin should be pizzed at Trump as much as the Swiss banks, and Americans should be pleased to get the investment. Property built with Russian money employs American workers and weakens Russia.

The Clinton Foundation may not own uranium mines, but some of that uranium that gets exported might return with a bang because of the ties of Russia to Iran.

Also Trump is a hypocrite on trade, I didn't vote for him in the primary like those 12 million Dem crossover voters. The biggest difference between Trump and Clinton is that Trump didn't create the problem, but he did exploit the trade deal that bubba Clinton crafted to compete with other businesses that also moved.   

 

who exactly brokered that 'trade deal'  you attribute to 'bubba clinton'? i agree clinton signed it.. but, where did it come from? who negotiated that deal... and be honest about it. ha.

so far, you have managed to back that 'democrat elected' republican party candidate.... as have the majority of your republican brothers in congress... less talk of 'democrats got him here'... especially after your party backed his ragged ass, to the hilt.

he'll come out of this election with millions from his devout followers ... and it'll all be 'crooked hillary's' fault. ha!

Crash.Override posted:

who exactly brokered that 'trade deal'  you attribute to 'bubba clinton'? i agree clinton signed it.. but, where did it come from? who negotiated that deal... and be honest about it. ha.

so far, you have managed to back that 'democrat elected' republican party candidate.... as have the majority of your republican brothers in congress... less talk of 'democrats got him here'... especially after your party backed his ragged ass, to the hilt.

he'll come out of this election with millions from his devout followers ... and it'll all be 'crooked hillary's' fault. ha!

The Clinton administration brokered the deal naturally, congress had the authority to pass it or reject it. There were objections by both parties in congress but the deal was everything or nothing and agricultural and other interests won out. I know Dems think all things rendered by goobermint is by the magic wand, so try reading the Constitution to see what powers each branch of government has been given.

Most Republicans I know have some unease about Trump, but they will vote for the flawed former Dem because he is seen as a lesser threat to the Constitution than Hellery. Trust me, If it weren't for the Hildabeast, I would be gladly voting for Gary Johnson.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×