1.) Travel Ban shot down more than once.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
+1 - Beat the dog snot out of HildaBeast, taking the WH for the win, and nominating a an extremely awesome candidate for the US Supreme Court!
+1 - Prevents me from having to look at Obama and his smart mouthed wife every day on the TV!
Please list his personal failures elsewhere, this thread is simply for his mounting Presidential failures.
Agree Teyates the biggy, whupped Hillary and the Dem's a****.
I might consider the vote on Healthcare as a valid failure, on his part, failure to get his party to go along with it but selecting the travel bans is not Trump's failure but a GROSS Unconstitutional FAILURE of our Judicial system. What Trump did was constitutional and legal but as President he must follow the rules and abide by the Constitution himself and thus when a District Judge grossly over rules and makes a bad judgment it will stand will overruled, which it will be. Trump didn't lose but rather it is more a judicial coup in effect.
As for the wall and other agenda items TIME is the issue that must be considered as "Rome wasn't built in a day" neither will the wall be.
One of his major failures so far is not following up on the prosecution of the Clinton crimes.
Accomplishment, he keeps the lefties' bowels in an uproar.
I'm probably going to have to pay more taxes due to the increasing value of my stocks.
i wonder if flynn offering to testify on russiagate in exchange for immunity is considered a trump loss? just asking for a friend.
I'm gonna post all of Trumps successes, I'm still waiting.
Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
teyates posted:Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.
answer truthfully..
if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?
BTW, the announcements for bids on the wall are out. Submissions expected soon. Some companies are getting death threats. Even called racists -- the company was based in Mexico.
Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.
answer truthfully..
if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?
Crash,
The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think. He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better. I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.
MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:5.) Stated Obama wiretapped him with no proof. Has since been rebuked by Republicans, Senate Intelligence Committee and FBI.
Uho truth is coming out that Obamas people and the NSA did eavesdrop on Trumps communications.
HIFLYER2 posted:MonkeysUncleByMarriage posted:5.) Stated Obama wiretapped him with no proof. Has since been rebuked by Republicans, Senate Intelligence Committee and FBI.
Uho truth is coming out that Obamas people and the NSA did eavesdrop on Trumps communications.
total BS, again.. the reports say the director of NSA saw reports.. well, at least she was doing her job.. next up, more rt. wingnut fake news.
teyates posted:Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.
answer truthfully..
if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?
Crash,
The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think. He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better. I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.
so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians. if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy.
up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!
Kraven posted:Why would anyone be proud of Van Jones, jail bird. -- EPAEric Holder, white hating racist. Loretta Lynch, thug.John Kerry, idiot. When the books start to roll out aboutthis administration and the gang it might open some eyes.
when the fbi reports start to roll out, i bet you'll be on here, still whining about obama and hillary.
Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.
answer truthfully..
if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?
Crash,
The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think. He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better. I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.
so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians. if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy.
up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!
I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time. At least with him you know where you stand.
teyates posted:Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:Heard he was also stealing cable at the Trump Tower. Better get right on that Barney Fife, before the Russians swoop in and cover it up for him.....haha.....you guys are more fun to watch than crazy squirrels in the yard....
i really thought you were better than this.. now, you're just another conservative who got conned an having a hard time admitting it.
answer truthfully..
if this were obama and his cabinet choices.. and his first 100 days, do you think you'd still feel the same way?
Crash,
The only cabinet member you will find that I did not agree with, was the admitted Communist which Obama nominated for the EPA I think. He now works for CNN. Can't remember his name but luckily his nomination got pulled before he placed. Other than that the former AG was a slimeball, but I did not call for his head. What a president does in his nominations is typically reflected in the people who helped to get him elected. Since I voted for Trump, I don't have a problem with any of his nominations, and certainly not his SCOTUS pick. So far his first 100 days are no worse than those of BO, heck from my POV they are much better. I am just glad to see the former slimeball gone. I am sure from your POV things look terrible, but I assure you, I have been there, and you will learn to live with it, accept it, and move on with your life.
so, while hillary was under investigation the norm was 'no person under fbi investigation can govern correctly'... now,' he's doing a great job.' and all the while, more reports come out headed to the outcome of collusion between team trump and the russians. if this were obama, you would be in vapor lock... i'm sure, from your POV, we'd be better off under putin than a democrat. that's the new republican norm... to go along side the old republican norm, hypocrisy.
up next.. it's all obama's fault.. because, obama!
I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time. At least with him you know where you stand.
I perfer the Russians over the Muslims.
Running Tally of Trump's Failures Thus Far
Gifted, pick your poision
Kraven, open your eyes
jtdavis posted:Gifted, pick your poision
Kraven, open your eyes
Poison-Democrats and Muslims.
add to the list, didn't 'attack syria' after criticizing obama for not attacking syria. funny how trump has gone backwards on just about every issue and yet, 'the base' proclaim how well he's doing... that's how it goes when you rely on twitter and alternative facts.
I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time. At least with him you know where you stand.
i just wanted to make sure i could find this again, later... thanks for admitting it. now, we all know where you stand. russians good, liberals bad. got it.
Trump blamed Obama for the poision gas attack, blame him if you want, it's Trumps turn to respond to the attack.
forbes magazine predicts a $1.8billion loss in america's travel industry by the end of 2018. i'm guessing trump's 'base' will feel that's a 'win'.
jtdavis posted:Trump blamed Obama for the poision gas attack, blame him if you want, it's Trumps turn to respond to the attack.
No, Trump blamed Obama for stating there would be consequences (red line). Then, doing nothing, which is worse than keeping silent.
this is one of those times where rt. wingnuts know what trump meant to say, instead of what he said. ha!
Crash.Override posted:teyates posted:I must be pretty dense this morning, but did not understand a single thing you said nor what it had to do with the question which you asked. Other than my POV about Putin, and yes, I might would prefer Putin over Clinton the majority of the time. At least with him you know where you stand.
i just wanted to make sure i could find this again, later... thanks for admitting it. now, we all know where you stand. russians good, liberals bad. got it.
You don't have to find it. I will be happy to tell it to you any time you ask. I have sat with Russians and talked to them. I had dinner and vodka with them under the wing of B52 in the Air Force Museum in Dayton Ohio. I have friends in Russia. They are a heck of lot less "communistic" than the current leftist leaning Democratic party. If Hillary Clinton had her way, the days of Joseph Stalin would look like a birthday party. The only difference in Putin and Hillary is that Putin doesn't try to hide his bad attributes behind a fake smile and a dress. I would rather drink a gallon of Mexican tap water than to be locked in a closet with Hillary,
and finally one rt. wingnut admits it.... giving america to the russians is better than letting a democrat be president. let that sink in for a minute. because of the rt. wingnut 'alternative facts' believed by the republicans, hillary would be a worse leader for america than putin. just wow.
Crash.Override posted:and finally one rt. wingnut admits it.... giving america to the russians is better than letting a democrat be president. let that sink in for a minute. because of the rt. wingnut 'alternative facts' believed by the republicans, hillary would be a worse leader for america than putin. just wow.
No, just the opposite....there you have it....Liberals had rather run us into the dirt than to open their eyes and see that continuing to do the same thing over and over again is simple idiocy. Hillary Clinton is a recycled version of the same Democratic crap that has circulated for the past 15 years. The only thing that Liberal democrats are concerned with is redistribution of wealth. You don't care if this country has any defense. You don't care if business continue to flee to foreign countries, while foreigners flee here for more freebies. You simple want bigger government, and higher taxes for everyone but yourselves. you sit around on Saturday mornings, and at the barber shop, blaming all of your problems on some fictious "man" who is holding you down, and keep you from being rich. You blame the "rich", but cannot define them. your simple definition of "rich" is someone who make a dollar more than yourself. You have been blinded by greed and coveting for your "neighbors". Rather than being satisfied with what you have, you want more as long as it comes out of someone else's pocket. After having seen the Russians up close and talking to them I see people who are not of the same mentality. If Putin had rather fight ISIS than dig in my pockets, yeah I would rather have him at the helm. It is not about giving the country away to Russia, it is about stopping it from becoming a failed socialist experiment like Venezuela.
The left has damaged the country to the point I say giving the country to Russia is way better then giving it to the Muslims/ middle east like the left wants to do.
teyates posted:Crash.Override posted:and finally one rt. wingnut admits it.... giving america to the russians is better than letting a democrat be president. let that sink in for a minute. because of the rt. wingnut 'alternative facts' believed by the republicans, hillary would be a worse leader for america than putin. just wow.
No, just the opposite....there you have it....Liberals had rather run us into the dirt than to open their eyes and see that continuing to do the same thing over and over again is simple idiocy. Hillary Clinton is a recycled version of the same Democratic crap that has circulated for the past 15 years. The only thing that Liberal democrats are concerned with is redistribution of wealth. You don't care if this country has any defense. You don't care if business continue to flee to foreign countries, while foreigners flee here for more freebies. You simple want bigger government, and higher taxes for everyone but yourselves. you sit around on Saturday mornings, and at the barber shop, blaming all of your problems on some fictious "man" who is holding you down, and keep you from being rich. You blame the "rich", but cannot define them. your simple definition of "rich" is someone who make a dollar more than yourself. You have been blinded by greed and coveting for your "neighbors". Rather than being satisfied with what you have, you want more as long as it comes out of someone else's pocket. After having seen the Russians up close and talking to them I see people who are not of the same mentality. If Putin had rather fight ISIS than dig in my pockets, yeah I would rather have him at the helm. It is not about giving the country away to Russia, it is about stopping it from becoming a failed socialist experiment like Venezuela.
what's to be confused about? putin good. hillary bad. republicans idiots. not much to be confused about.
neither of you have a clue about my 'social status' or 'economic status'... yet, you both think i'm only out for what i can get from the system... that's hilarious to anyone that knows me. trust me, i'm not jealous of anything anyone else has... i have all i need. more rt. wingnut babble and still not a clue what you're talking about... more rt. wingnut BS and talking points. not one fact in either post. period.
And you don't know squat about anyone else on here, yet you continue to label us "wingnuts" because it makes you feel better about your ideals. I am not concerned what you pay in taxes, nor you economic status. If you NEED help I am more than willing to help you out, but to take from one group to give to another simply based upon their race or sex, or sexual preferences, is a plan hatched in depths of socialist Hell.