Skip to main content

LOOK OVER THE DESCRIPTIONS OF THE FOLLOWING TWO HOUSES AND SEE IF YOU CAN TELL WHICH BELONGS TO AN ENVIRONMENTALIST.

HOUSE # 1:

A 20-room mansion (not including 8 bathrooms) heated by natural gas. Add on a pool (and a pool house) and a separate guest house all heated by gas. In ONE MONTH ALONE this mansion consumes more energy than the average American household in an ENTIRE YEAR. The average bill for electricity and natural gas runs over $2,400.00 per month. In natural gas alone (which last time we checked was a fossil fuel), this property consumes more than 20 times the national average for an American home. This house is not in a northern or Midwestern “snow belt,” either. It’s in the South.


HOUSE # 2:

Designed by an architecture professor at a leading national university, this house incorporates every “green” feature current home construction can provide. The house contains 4,000 square feet (4 bedrooms) and is nestled on an arid high prairie in the American southwest. A central closet in the house holds geothermal heat pumps drawing ground water through pipes sunk 300 feet into the ground. The water (usually 67 degrees F.) heats the house in winter and cools it in summer. The system uses no fossil fuels such as oil or natural gas, and it consumes 25% of the electricity required for a conventional heating/cooling system. Rainwater from the roof is collected and funneled into a 25,000 gallon underground cistern. Wastewater from showers, sinks and toilets goes into underground purifying tanks and then into the cistern. The collected water then irrigates the land surrounding the house. Flowers and shrubs native to the area blend the property into the surrounding rural landscape.

HOUSE # 1 (20 room energy guzzling mansion) is outside of Nashville, Tennessee. It is the abode of that renowned environmentalist (and filmmaker) Al Gore.

HOUSE # 2 (model eco-friendly house) is on a ranch near Crawford, Texas. Also known as “the Texas White House,” it is the private residence of the President of the United States, George W. Bush.

So whose house is gentler on the environment? Yet another story you WON’T hear on CNN, CBS, ABC, NBC, MSNBC or read about in the New York Times or the Washington Post. Indeed, for Mr. Gore, it’s truly “an inconvenient truth".

You can verify this (and anything else that pops into your email inbox) at http://www.snopes.com/politics//bush/house.asp
It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it. It's the end of the world as we know it and I feel fine.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by excelman:
Actually SC, I did hear about both those houses on CNN, but not compared as you just did.
I have not been able to find the construction dates for the two houses in question, and I think that is important to an intelligent discussion of the issue of who is the environmentalist
I have been able to find some details of the Crawford Texas climate, which plays a huge part in the energy consumption of any home. The lowest average monthly temperature in Crawford Texas is above freezing. The use of 67 degree water from wells for cooling purposes would make sense in Crawford. That particular engineering is not permitted in Arizona unless the water pumped out of the aquifer is pumped back into it. Even then, getting necessary permits for the wells may be impossible in Arizona. Wells are very tightly regulated in this state.

Without knowing when Gore's home was built, or the impact of tearing it down and replacing it, it is impossible to judge which homeowner is the more environmentally conscious.

Regarding support for legislation protecting the environment, a comparison of the two puts Gore ahead of Bush by light years.
Many factors should be considered in deciding environmental impact, and I don't believe we know all we need to know about Gore's house, and probably don't know much more about Bush's house.
Some things to consider in how much carbon load a house in Tenn. would have vs. one in Texas.
Can't speak to Texas, but in Tenn 64% of his electricity comes from coal (carbon emmitting), 29% comes from nuclear (no carbon emmitted), 6% hydro, and the remainder from wind turbines, solar arrays, methane from suage gas, and some natural gas and diesel.
With the addition of BFN unit 1 coming back on-line next month, that mix above will change to be even less carbon , and I understtand that TVA is evaluating finishing Watts Bar unit 2, which will change it even more.
However, that is not to make excuses for excessive electricity use, or natural gas use, if in fact he uses it, but I really wish I knew more about his house. Maybe I'll drive up there this summer and check it out.
Another comment on Gore vs. Bush greenness.

We will never know for sure, but I would be willing to bet the ranch that Gore would NEVER ,EVER have given tax credits for the biggest, most gas-guzzeling SUV's built.
My bet is that he would have offered, instead, tax credits on the most energy efficient cars that used the least gasoline.
Maybe if this country had not seen fit to elect a Republican congress, we would have gotten back the tax credits Carter instilled, but Ragan took away , to individuals like you and me to put up solar water heaters, and other energy savers.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×