Skip to main content

An Alabama republican takes on Mama Grizzly of the Tea Party???? Big Grin

Shelby County Reporter
Spencer Bachus: Sarah Palin cost GOP control of U.S. Senate
Published 12:44pm Sunday, November 7, 2010
By JAN GRIFFEY/Editor

COLUMBIANA — Shelby County’s congressman, U.S. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin likely cost the Republican Party control of the U.S. Senate.

Bachus made his remarks on Nov. 4 at the monthly luncheon meeting of the South Shelby Chamber of Commerce, held at the Columbiana United Methodist Church.

“The Senate would be Republican today except for states (in which Palin endorsed candidates) like Christine O’Donnell in Delaware,” Bachus said. “Sarah Palin cost us control of the Senate.”

He said Tea Party candidates did well in U.S. House races, but in the U.S. Senate races, “They didn’t do well at all.”

Bachus shared other thoughts on the outcome of the Nov. 2 general election.

“What happened Tuesday was interesting,” Bachus said, “but underneath, it may be something a little different than you may think.

“If you think Republicans are in charge in Washington, you can wipe that thought from your mind. Democrats are in control of the presidency and the Senate. It would take 67 votes to override any veto,” Bachus said.

He said the outcome of the national election, while heralded as a Republican victory, is one that actually belongs to the nation’s independent voters.

Bachus said the number of voters who identify themselves as Republican in the Nov. 2 election is only slightly higher than those who went to the polls two years ago — 38 percent to 36 percent. And, the number of voters identified as Democratic was the same in both elections — 36 percent.

The group making the difference in the election is independents.

“Their party ID didn’t change. The difference is in the last election, 58 percent of independents voted with Democrats. In this election, 59 percent voted with Republicans,” he said. “Two years ago, independent voters were not happy with (President George W.) Bush. They were tired of spending, tired of taxing, tired of war, and the Democrats profited from that. Two years later, independent voters don’t like where the country is heading with (President) Obama.”

Bachus said unless 60 to 70 percent of the people agree, it’s difficult to govern.

“We are getting more and more partisan. There seems to be no middle ground,” he said. “Thank goodness for independents.

“The American people don’t trust either political party. They simply choose what they think is the lesser of two evils. The Republican party must prove to people we mean it this time, that we are serious about less government.”

Bachus said Americans no longer want to be told what is good for them. Voters want to decide for themselves what is good for them.

“I hope my Republican colleagues have gotten the message this time. Voters want the local county school board to spend their money, not the federal government,” he said.

One issue that united voters in the Nov. 2 election was health care reform.

“However, we must have health care reform,” just not in the form proposed by Obama. “For instance, we must do something about health insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions,” he said. “People no longer work their entire lives at one job.”
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by rocky:
An Alabama republican takes on Mama Grizzly of the Tea Party???? Big Grin

Shelby County Reporter
Spencer Bachus: Sarah Palin cost GOP control of U.S. Senate
Published 12:44pm Sunday, November 7, 2010
By JAN GRIFFEY/Editor

COLUMBIANA — Shelby County’s congressman, U.S. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin likely cost the Republican Party control of the U.S. Senate.

Bachus made his remarks on Nov. 4 at the monthly luncheon meeting of the South Shelby Chamber of Commerce, held at the Columbiana United Methodist Church.

“The Senate would be Republican today except for states (in which Palin endorsed candidates) like Christine O’Donnell in Delaware,” Bachus said. “Sarah Palin cost us control of the Senate.”

He said Tea Party candidates did well in U.S. House races, but in the U.S. Senate races, “They didn’t do well at all.”

Bachus shared other thoughts on the outcome of the Nov. 2 general election.

“What happened Tuesday was interesting,” Bachus said, “but underneath, it may be something a little different than you may think.

“If you think Republicans are in charge in Washington, you can wipe that thought from your mind. Democrats are in control of the presidency and the Senate. It would take 67 votes to override any veto,” Bachus said.

He said the outcome of the national election, while heralded as a Republican victory, is one that actually belongs to the nation’s independent voters.

Bachus said the number of voters who identify themselves as Republican in the Nov. 2 election is only slightly higher than those who went to the polls two years ago — 38 percent to 36 percent. And, the number of voters identified as Democratic was the same in both elections — 36 percent.

The group making the difference in the election is independents.

“Their party ID didn’t change. The difference is in the last election, 58 percent of independents voted with Democrats. In this election, 59 percent voted with Republicans,” he said. “Two years ago, independent voters were not happy with (President George W.) Bush. They were tired of spending, tired of taxing, tired of war, and the Democrats profited from that. Two years later, independent voters don’t like where the country is heading with (President) Obama.”

Bachus said unless 60 to 70 percent of the people agree, it’s difficult to govern.

“We are getting more and more partisan. There seems to be no middle ground,” he said. “Thank goodness for independents.

“The American people don’t trust either political party. They simply choose what they think is the lesser of two evils. The Republican party must prove to people we mean it this time, that we are serious about less government.”

Bachus said Americans no longer want to be told what is good for them. Voters want to decide for themselves what is good for them.

“I hope my Republican colleagues have gotten the message this time. Voters want the local county school board to spend their money, not the federal government,” he said.

One issue that united voters in the Nov. 2 election was health care reform.

“However, we must have health care reform,” just not in the form proposed by Obama. “For instance, we must do something about health insurance coverage of pre-existing conditions,” he said. “People no longer work their entire lives at one job.”




SO WHAT?????????
The congressman is not quite fully in tune with reality. The hapless nitwit, Christine O'Donnell, would have lost irrespective of Palin's endorsement. She is a perennial LOSER who seems to undertake political campaigns as much for the livelihood they provide as for the ostensible purpose of seeking office.

Otherwise, it is somewhat speculative to attribute GOP losses to Palin's blithering endorsements. More likely, in my opinion, it was the glaring incompetence of the losing candidates themselves. The best example of this is that incredible doofus, Sharron Angle. It is miraculous that she got as many votes as she did, but thank goodness there were enough intelligent folks in Nevada who decided not to embarrass their state by sending one of its village idiots to Washington.

Linda McMahan, the Mother Superior of World Wrestling, Violence and Sexual Explanation pseudo-Entertainment, lost in spite of her multi-million-dollar subsidizing of her own campaign, because she faced an obviously much more qualified and proven performer and that was obvious to the great majority of voters in her state. I don't know if Palin endorsed McMahan, but if she did not, it probably helped McMahan, since (1) Democrats are a majority in that state; (2) New Yorkers generally have a high regard for the Cuomo family; and (3)Palin would not have made much headway in New York with her standard attack mode, which comes off as cooked and canned rhetoric to the more-than-usually-sophisticated voters of that state (as compared to states like Alabama, with a high percentage of naive sheeple in its electorate).
quote:
COLUMBIANA — Shelby County’s congressman, U.S. Rep. Spencer Bachus, R-Ala., said former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate Sarah Palin likely cost the Republican Party control of the U.S. Senate.

How can that be possible? I mean for months all we heard was how the Tea Party was made up of white rich Republicans only, and ALL Republicans marched in lockstep with them. Hmmmmm, could the dems have been wrong as some tried to tell them? Even though they were wrong you will never get them to admit it. And should we also assume that all democrats support all democrats, and all Republicans support all Republicans? Didn't Nov. 2nd tell them anything?
The concept that all Reps and RepubTeaCons vote together was the hope of many Rep candidates, but O'Donnell and Miller are two that surely lost because of the Palin-effect. Turns out that many Reps are much more pragmatic than many ReubTeaCons, something that will be self-evident in 6 weeks when business as usual returns to DC
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
The concept that all Reps and RepubTeaCons vote together was the hope of many Rep candidates, but O'Donnell and Miller are two that surely lost because of the Palin-effect. Turns out that many Reps are much more pragmatic than many ReubTeaCons, something that will be self-evident in 6 weeks when business as usual returns to DC
So what? My point was that the Ds INSISTED they were one and the same even though they were told differently and indeed knew differently. They were just trying their best not to lose their voter base.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×