Alabama Republican Gummint--in a nutshell

 

About as bad as it gets:

<<<The governor is an embarrassment.

The lieutenant governor is distrusted.

The state's top cop is fired under a cloud.

The House Speaker is indicted.

The Legislature looks away.

The attorney general, who is supposed to clean it all up, has a habit of stepping aside.

And if any of this comes before the courts Roy Moore is there to decide right and wrong.

This is not a war. It's a massacre, and annihilation. The very people Alabama elected to manage the state and help it to prosper are the ones who burned our village to the ground and salted the fields.

And the only one – the only one – to make sense these days is Zeigler [who has initiated an ethics investigation of the Goobernor and his inamorata], who was the guy in this inaugural class voted least likely to make sense. Now he looks like the best Alabama has to offer.>>>

http://www.al.com/opinion/inde...ley_tries_to_ke.html

Original Post

Contenduhh, we've all enjoyed your outrage concerning two consenting adults doing the nasty.  Perhaps, for contrast, you could post some of the commentaries you posted about Bill and a barely legal aide doing much the same.  Or, his advances on unwilling women.  I'm certain those must be really entertaining.  Please post a few excerpts.

direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, we've all enjoyed your outrage concerning two consenting adults doing the nasty.  Perhaps, for contrast, you could post some of the commentaries you posted about Bill and a barely legal aide doing much the same.  Or, his advances on unwilling women.  I'm certain those must be really entertaining.  Please post a few excerpts.

___

Alternative suggestion for you, dire:  Why don't YOU stick to the topic at hand instead of deflecting to "So's yer old Clinton"?  The entire state of Alabama is in an uproar over the GOOBERNOR's scandalous behavior.  The topic is being energetically pursued in print and electronic media in this state and beyond. Sure, Clinton messed around and no one is denying it, but neither his lecherous activities nor those of JFK or Wilt Chamberlain or Giacomo Casanova have anything to do with the GOOBERNOR's miscreant behavior and deceitful "explanations."

This is the Spring of 2016. The chief executive of THIS STATE has scandalized himself and is in big trouble, facing possible impeachment proceedings and an ethics investigation.  Keep diggin' up bones if you wish, but you are just making yourself look irrelevant by detouring around the real issues here. Grow up!

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, we've all enjoyed your outrage concerning two consenting adults doing the nasty.  Perhaps, for contrast, you could post some of the commentaries you posted about Bill and a barely legal aide doing much the same.  Or, his advances on unwilling women.  I'm certain those must be really entertaining.  Please post a few excerpts.

___

Alternative suggestion for you, dire:  Why don't YOU stick to the topic at hand instead of deflecting to "So's yer old Clinton"?  The entire state of Alabama is in an uproar over the GOOBERNOR's scandalous behavior.  The topic is being energetically pursued in print and electronic media in this state and beyond. Sure, Clinton messed around and no one is denying it, but neither his lecherous activities nor those of JFK or Wilt Chamberlain or Giacomo Casanova have anything to do with the GOOBERNOR's miscreant behavior and deceitful "explanations."

This is the Spring of 2016. The chief executive of THIS STATE has scandalized himself and is in big trouble, facing possible impeachment proceedings and an ethics investigation.  Keep diggin' up bones if you wish, but you are just making yourself look irrelevant by detouring around the real issues here. Grow up!

Contenduhh, I'm only suggesting that on another thread you show examples of your outrage at similar to worse actions by the Democrats. Such would prove you are not a hypocrite, but truly deride all such misbehavior. Such would enhance your reputation. 

direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, we've all enjoyed your outrage concerning two consenting adults doing the nasty.  Perhaps, for contrast, you could post some of the commentaries you posted about Bill and a barely legal aide doing much the same.  Or, his advances on unwilling women.  I'm certain those must be really entertaining.  Please post a few excerpts.

___

Alternative suggestion for you, dire:  Why don't YOU stick to the topic at hand instead of deflecting to "So's yer old Clinton"?  The entire state of Alabama is in an uproar over the GOOBERNOR's scandalous behavior.  The topic is being energetically pursued in print and electronic media in this state and beyond. Sure, Clinton messed around and no one is denying it, but neither his lecherous activities nor those of JFK or Wilt Chamberlain or Giacomo Casanova have anything to do with the GOOBERNOR's miscreant behavior and deceitful "explanations."

This is the Spring of 2016. The chief executive of THIS STATE has scandalized himself and is in big trouble, facing possible impeachment proceedings and an ethics investigation.  Keep diggin' up bones if you wish, but you are just making yourself look irrelevant by detouring around the real issues here. Grow up!

Contenduhh, I'm only suggesting that on another thread you show examples of your outrage at similar to worse actions by the Democrats. Such would prove you are not a hypocrite, but truly deride all such misbehavior. Such would enhance your reputation. 

________

My reputation is not dependent upon meeting your insistence that I ante up criticisms of Democrat lotharios or any other miscreant public figures of that party. I happen to live and vote in the state whose GOOBERNOR happens currently to be under heavy scrutiny of the public and state investigative and disciplinary agencies,  with the prospect of an embarrassing resignation, or being impeached, or being found to have violated ethics laws.  I was not even participating in this forum during those long ago Clinton escapades.  It is absurd of you to insist upon my giving equal effort to critique his moral laxity or that of other political figures.  You and other wingers stay bent out of shape because of the exceptionally high level of approval Bill Clinton is enjoying in this nation and internationally.  I will be no party to your cheap efforts to undercut that status. Do it yourself if you believe it is necessary.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, we've all enjoyed your outrage concerning two consenting adults doing the nasty.  Perhaps, for contrast, you could post some of the commentaries you posted about Bill and a barely legal aide doing much the same.  Or, his advances on unwilling women.  I'm certain those must be really entertaining.  Please post a few excerpts.

___

Alternative suggestion for you, dire:  Why don't YOU stick to the topic at hand instead of deflecting to "So's yer old Clinton"?  The entire state of Alabama is in an uproar over the GOOBERNOR's scandalous behavior.  The topic is being energetically pursued in print and electronic media in this state and beyond. Sure, Clinton messed around and no one is denying it, but neither his lecherous activities nor those of JFK or Wilt Chamberlain or Giacomo Casanova have anything to do with the GOOBERNOR's miscreant behavior and deceitful "explanations."

This is the Spring of 2016. The chief executive of THIS STATE has scandalized himself and is in big trouble, facing possible impeachment proceedings and an ethics investigation.  Keep diggin' up bones if you wish, but you are just making yourself look irrelevant by detouring around the real issues here. Grow up!

Contenduhh, I'm only suggesting that on another thread you show examples of your outrage at similar to worse actions by the Democrats. Such would prove you are not a hypocrite, but truly deride all such misbehavior. Such would enhance your reputation. 

________

My reputation is not dependent upon meeting your insistence that I ante up criticisms of Democrat lotharios or any other miscreant public figures of that party. I happen to live and vote in the state whose GOOBERNOR happens currently to be under heavy scrutiny of the public and state investigative and disciplinary agencies,  with the prospect of an embarrassing resignation, or being impeached, or being found to have violated ethics laws.  I was not even participating in this forum during those long ago Clinton escapades.  It is absurd of you to insist upon my giving equal effort to critique his moral laxity or that of other political figures.  You and other wingers stay bent out of shape because of the exceptionally high level of approval Bill Clinton is enjoying in this nation and internationally.  I will be no party to your cheap efforts to undercut that status. Do it yourself if you believe it is necessary.

So, if the parameters in a sexual predator include being a Democrat and being popular, its OK.  Got it!  AKA known as hypocrisy.  Would bring your reputation into the argument,  That's not a winning argument.

direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, your arguments have more contradictions than Victor Hugo's treatise on grimoires.  I have a mind picture of an old TV show where the poor robot is constantly chanting, "Illogical, does not compute! Illogical, does not compute!"

____

When you have been shown to be shabby and shallow in your attempts at rebuttal, as above, the generalized and arcane insults you deliver in place of meaningful dialog make you look downright silly and desperate to stay in the game. Contrived mind pictures and references to obscure literary works do absolutely nothing to bail you out.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, your arguments have more contradictions than Victor Hugo's treatise on grimoires.  I have a mind picture of an old TV show where the poor robot is constantly chanting, "Illogical, does not compute! Illogical, does not compute!"

____

When you have been shown to be shabby and shallow in your attempts at rebuttal, as above, the generalized and arcane insults you deliver in place of meaningful dialog make you look downright silly and desperate to stay in the game. Contrived mind pictures and references to obscure literary works do absolutely nothing to bail you out.

Contenduhh, you've proven that you only pontificate upon Republican wrong doings and immoral activities, while ignoring the same and much worse among Democrats.  Your prejudices are as obvious as a purple elephant in the Windsor dog show.  Although, reading your bloviating rants is mildly amusing.

direstraits posted:
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Contenduhh, your arguments have more contradictions than Victor Hugo's treatise on grimoires.  I have a mind picture of an old TV show where the poor robot is constantly chanting, "Illogical, does not compute! Illogical, does not compute!"

____

When you have been shown to be shabby and shallow in your attempts at rebuttal, as above, the generalized and arcane insults you deliver in place of meaningful dialog make you look downright silly and desperate to stay in the game. Contrived mind pictures and references to obscure literary works do absolutely nothing to bail you out.

Contenduhh, you've proven that you only pontificate upon Republican wrong doings and immoral activities, while ignoring the same and much worse among Democrats.  Your prejudices are as obvious as a purple elephant in the Windsor dog show.  Although, reading your bloviating rants is mildly amusing.

___

To recognize and critique a thing does not equate to pontification, except in your distorted sense of things. You obviously do not know the meaning of "pontificate" anyway, else you would not have applied that misnomer to the products of my coolly analytical endeavors. BTW, that comma in your last sentence is unnecessary and incorrect.  Also, you have committed the common error of placing "only" in the wrong location in your first sentence.  I will not elaborate on that, since you are not worth the time and trouble.

direstraits posted:

Condie hates it when one points out the obvious concerning him. Again with the silly grammar lesson, when he has nothing else to add.

___

I did not find it necessary to "add" to what I posted, which, by the way, you avoided entirely. The friendly guidance on correct English usage was just a little bonus especially for you.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×