Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
The writers at SNL have a new skit about Teahadist O'Donnell having super Top Secret knowledge about a plan by China to overtake the US. And no, it does not involve witches, or flying monkeys.

"I can see a Chinese restaurant from my house"


So, no 16 year old dabbling in witchcraft. You do realize SNL in satire! Haven't watched it for years as I usually have plans on Saturday night. I thought SNL was mainly for teen nerdy types who had nothing better to do on Saturday night.
quote:
Sez elinterventor01:
So, no 16 year old dabbling in witchcraft. You do realize SNL in satire! Haven't watched it for years as I usually have plans on Saturday night. I thought SNL was mainly for teen nerdy types who had nothing better to do on Saturday night.


YOU SILLY TWIT!
Don't you know that SNL broke the "I can see Russia from my door" story, and blessed us with the Hon. Senator Stewart Smalley!

That's pretty "relevant" stuff...
quote:
My mistake. Its not an SNL skit, its O;Donnell that claims to have info on a plan by China to take over the US. Truth is stranger than fiction.



Truth really is stranger than fiction. We know the Chinese have been attempting to push their agenda in the US by giving campaign cash to their favored candidates back to the 1996 election cycle when Al Gore acted as a bag man at Buddhist temples.

quote:
The report describes what it calls "strong circumstantial evidence" that six individuals with strong ties to the Chinese, including the Riadys, may have funneled foreign money into political campaigns during the 1996 U.S. election cycle. It singles out one of the six, California immigration consultant and longtime Democratic fund-raiser Maria Hsia, as "an agent of the Chinese government," although it cites no specific actions taken in support of this alleged role.

Hsia's lawyer, Nancy Luque, angrily denied last night that Hsia was a Chinese agent or that she participated in any campaign fund-raising illegalities. "The allegations are false, and have been proven false. They are not under investigation by anyone, anywhere."

Concern about Chinese activities began in 1996, when the CIA determined that China, which worried that it lacked sufficient influence in U.S. politics and policymaking, planned to raise $3 million for an effort to buy influence with U.S. politicians, according to officials familiar with sensitive intelligence. These sources have said that most of the money was to be allocated to the Chinese Embassy in Washington and to various Chinese consulates across the United State
http://www.washingtonpost.com/...stories/cf021098.htm
quote:
The point is, she said she had top secret, classified information on this. When called into question, she admitted that her "classified" info came from a non-profit group!

http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/s...=2010-10-04-17-03-28


The word "classified" is not owned wholly by the government. A nonprofit organization can have information that it does not wish to be widely known because the Chinese would put a bullet in the head of an informer. Can you prove that this is not the case? Also your link does not link to an article.
quote:
If she were not trying to mislead people into believing she had GOVERNMENT classified clearance, she would have SAID she was trying to protect someone from this non-profit. I'm afraid her, and your, agrument is very weak


Show me where she said she had a secret government clearance. All I see is that she could not comment on the source of her information. Secrets are not just for the government. Your argument is even weaker. I would worry more about what Cris Coons learned from his Marxist Kenyan instructor.
Is there no end to the length that defenders of this fluffheaded, ditzy dame will go to try to defend her gaffes? Apparently not.

Now look here. When a politician refers to information that is "classified" and states that he/she can not release that information because it is "classified," it is reasonable to conclude that the alleged "classified" imformation is "classified" for national security purposes. So Ms. O'Donnell gets no exoneration from her latest fabrication by alleging that the "classified" material was "classified" by some unnamed "nonprofit group."

The woman is a total irremediable flake! And if she has any chance at all of being elected to the U.S. Senate, then this country is in trouble for that reason alone. It is deplorable that even as many as a half dozen citizens of Delaware would cast their votes for this kind of blithering nonentity! I thought Sarah Palin had set the standard for such dingbattery, but then along comes O'Donnell and raises the bar to a new and astonishing height!
And it gets better. The comment referenced was made in 2006, 2006!!! US Senate primary debate with two other candidates, one pictured here.




As you can see, the man appears to be of Asian/Chinese descent, so her attack was founded on promoting bigotry, not on any made up info form some unnamed non-profit. I guess there are not enough Mexicans in DE to make illegal immigrants into a viable platform plank, so she took the next choice.
I wish I wasn't privy to some of the classified information that I am privy to."


Once again, if she hadn't wanted to mislead people, she would have said this "classified" info came from a non-profit. By ommitting that fact, she IMPLIED it was government classified. If you can't see that, it is only because you don't WANT to.
quote:
Originally posted by JuanHunt:
The writers at SNL have a new skit about Teahadist O'Donnell having super Top Secret knowledge about a plan by China to overtake the US. And no, it does not involve witches, or flying monkeys.

"I can see a Chinese restaurant from my house"


If you read carefully the post reads overtake, not take over. there is a difference in the two words, I am sure that the Chinese would like to take over America, but by the time that the war was over whatever is left wouldn't be worth having. I don't know whether you Wimps would fight for your Homeland or not, you might just say Please don't hurt us and you can have it.

but as long as my two Guns would shoot and I have Ammunition there are going to be dead Chinese nearby, sure they would kill me but I had rather be dead than live under Chinese rule anyhow.
quote:
Once again, if she hadn't wanted to mislead people, she would have said this "classified" info came from a non-profit. By ommitting that fact, she IMPLIED it was government classified. If you can't see that, it is only because you don't WANT to.


Once again you are trying to impugn someones message without proving that the crux of the issue is a lie. You have not proven that O'Donnell had no secret knowledge. Your only point is that she and Merriam-Webster both don't know that the word "classified" is owned by the US government. I guess for that she should be placed on the pillory.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×