Skip to main content

Hi to my Forum Friends,

In the discussion, "Gambling And The Religious," Forum Member Cage asked the question: "If a church member wins $100,000 in the lottery -- should his/her church accept tithing from the lottery winnings -- or should the church tell him/her to leave the church for gambling?"

And, BFred responds, "I would say most Churches would be happy to have the tithe from the 100k."

Then, Chick tells BFred, "If what you say is true, why are the "Christian" people and churches the first to raise their head to stop it (gambling) when gambling is mentioned coming to Alabama?"

BFred tells her, "Some Christians believe that all forms of gambling are sin. What you hear from Christians about gambling, drinking, etc., all depends on the point of view of each individual Christian along with the doctrine of each individual Church. The people and Churches that speak so strongly against gambling are quite vocal with their opinions but (are) not necessarily (the) majority all of the time.

If you were to look up the doctrine of each of the major Protestant denominations, you would find a very wide variance and conflicts on many beliefs. Additionally, if you talk to the people in the churches, you would find that, in many cases, their personal beliefs conflict with the doctrine of their church.

From all that I have read in different versions of the Bible, things like gambling and alcoholic beverages really fall into the "It's not a sin, it's ok to do -- but better to not
(do it)" category. Some Church's go to the extreme and condemn these things across the board; but that is not right."


BFred, you mentioned that some churches condemn gambling, drinking, etc. -- while other churches just look the other way. Taken to extremes, both are wrong. To better understand this issue, we must look at the Bible -- the literal, inerrant, inspired Word of God; the sole authority for Christian living. What does the Bible tell us about issues such gambling, drinking, eating, and dancing? I believe you will find that such things fall into several categories: (1) Is it done to excess? -- (2) Does it harm you or your family? -- (3) Does it harm your Christian brother or sister? -- and (4) Does it harm your Christian witness for Jesus Christ?

Is it done to excess? Anything done to excess, i.e., drinking alcoholic beverages, eating, working 24 hours a day just to gain material wealth, etc., will harm your health and ultimately destroy the body which God created. Because these actions can bring harm to yourself -- I do not think God is pleased with these excesses.

Does it harm your family? Are you taking money needed to support and feed your family and spending it on drinking or gambling? If so, this is wrong. Family and God come first -- above all earthly desires and pleasures. And, if you say, "I am gambling (poker, horse races, lottery, etc.) to get money to help my family" -- you are lying, to yourself -- and to others. First, take care of your family properly. Then, if you have an extra dollar and do not need it for anything else -- then, by all means, buy a lottery ticket. However, if this offends your Christian brother or sister -- or if it shines a negative light upon your Christian walk -- it is best to forego this pleasure.

Does it harm your Christian brother or sister? While I believe there is no harm in me having a glass of wine, or a Chivas on the rocks, with dinner -- if I am having dinner with someone who feels this is wrong, I must forego this pleasure -- for it is wrong to stumble or offend my brother or sister. I have a dear pastor Friend who believes drinking any alcoholic beverage is wrong. I hold great respect for this man even though I disagree with him that "a drink" with dinner is wrong. But, if I had that drink in his presence; it is a sin -- for I have offended my Christian brother.

This same pastor Friend does not believe in dancing. On the other hand, I love dancing -- not dirty dancing, i.e, excessive flaunting and belly rubbing; but, socially acceptable dancing. I feel that it is good exercise. But, I respect his feelings and would not do this in his presence. And, all of my Christian brothers and sisters who know him give him this same respect.

Around fifteen years ago, a Christian Friend had a Debutante Ball for her daughter, a coming out party, which is common in the Filipino communities. During the party we had really good music; but, no dancing. I will admit to shaking my booty in my chair. Later, after our pastor left -- people began to dance. Was this a back handed insult aimed at our pastor? No, in no way. It was a fellowship of Christians respecting the belief of our pastor and respecting him enough to forego this pleasure while he was there -- because it would offend him.

Does it harm your Christian witness for Jesus Christ?
How many times have we heard from non-believers? "I want to go to church, but the churches are full of hypocrites." -- and we often come back with the cute little remark, "That is okay. We always have room for one more."

While that response is accurate -- it is walking around the problem and not addressing it. Yes, there are hypocrites in virtually all of our churches. And, while there are
some who are purposely being hypocritical -- many are doing things, such as these issues addressed in this writing, without knowing or feeling that they are doing anything
which could be viewed as hypocritical

As I have often said, I see nothing wrong with having a drink or a glass of wine with dinner. However, I will not go to a restaurant wearing a "Warrior For Christ!" shirt and order a glass of wine or a Chivas Regal on the rocks. That would be casting a shadow over the head of Christ to have all the people in the restaurant seeing this "Warrior For Christ" drinking booze. And, we never want to do anything to harm the image of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

Pastor Greg Laurie has often joked that this is why he does not have a Christian fish on his car bumper -- so that folks on the freeway will not know the car that cut them off is being driven by a Christian. I don't know if he has such an emblem or if he is only joking -- but, his point is valid.

Some years ago, my Friend, Pastor Sam, came to Friday Night Bible study -- and he was upset. It seems that he was driving on the freeway and came up on a car which had a bumper sticker which read: "Honk If You Love Jesus!" Well, Pastor Sam certainly loves Jesus; and Pastor Sam in the most loving, friendly, outgoing person you will ever meet. So, Pastor Sam honked his horn and with a big smile, waved to the driver of the other car. The other driver waved back -- a one finger wave.

Pastor Sam was emphatic when he told us: If and when you sell your car -- and if it has a Christian symbol or bumper sticker -- REMOVE IT before selling the car.

I recall, about fifteen years ago, my Friend, Pastor Freddy Cortez, had left an evening worship team practice at church, and on his way home, stopped by the local Diedrich Coffee House. A comedian was entertaining that evening and right away noticed Pastor Freddy's "Soldier For Christ!" tee shirt. Feeling that he had a perfect patsy in the audience, the comedian told the audience, "I see we have Christ in the audience! Come on up here, Christ, and talk to us!" Everyone clapped their applause -- so, Pastor Freddy walked to the microphone and asked the comedian if he believed there is a God.

Pastor Freddy proceeded to tell the comedian how the watch he, the comedian, was wearing miraculously appeared from small bits of metal flying around the universe millions of years ago. When the comedian responded with a caustic, "Do you know how ridiculous that sounds?" -- Pastor Freddy told him, "It is no more ridiculous than believing that this massive universe and all life form, including humans -- happened by accident."

Pastor Freddy went on to share a brief message about the existence of God -- and, then excused himself -- leaving the comedian with egg on his face.

But, this is what it means to be a witness for Christ. We must strive to be the very best ambassador (2 Corinthians 5:20), the very best witness (Acts 1:8) for Jesus Christ as is humanly possible. This would mean that, if you are wearing a Christian logo or symbol -- make it a positive witness as did Pastor Freddy. Do not belly up to the bar for a drink, wearing your "Warrior For Christ" shirt, and expect anyone to believe your witness.

So, what does the Bible tell us about this?

Romans 14:13-23 (nasb), "Therefore let us not judge one another anymore, but rather determine this -- not to put an obstacle or a stumbling block in a brother's way. I know and am convinced in the Lord Jesus that nothing is unclean in itself; but to him who thinks anything to be unclean, to him it is unclean. For if because of food your brother is hurt, you are no longer walking according to love. Do not destroy with your food him for whom Christ died.

Therefore do not let what is for you a good thing be spoken of as evil; for the kingdom of God is not eating and drinking, but righteousness and peace and joy in the Holy Spirit. For he who in this way serves Christ is acceptable to God and approved by men. So then we pursue the things which make for peace and the building up of one another.

Do not tear down the work of God for the sake of food
(or gambling, drinking, or dancing, etc.). All things indeed are clean, but they are evil for the man who eats and gives offense. It is good not to eat meat or to drink wine, or to do anything by which your brother stumbles. The faith which you have, have as your own conviction before God. Happy is he who does not condemn himself in what he approves. But he who doubts is condemned if he eats, because his eating is not from faith; and whatever is not from faith is sin."

1 Corinthians 8:6-13 (nasb), "Yet for us there is but one God, the Father, from whom are all things and we exist for Him; and one Lord, Jesus Christ, by whom are all things, and we exist through Him. However not all men have this knowledge; but some, being accustomed to the idol until now, eat food as if it were sacrificed to an idol; and their conscience being weak is defiled.

But food will not commend us to God; we are neither the worse if we do not eat, nor the better if we do eat. [b] But take care that this liberty of yours does not somehow become a stumbling block to the weak.[b] For if someone sees you, who have knowledge, dining in an idol's temple (favorite restaurant or bar while drinking alcoholic beverages), will not his conscience, if he is weak, be strengthened to eat things sacrificed to idols?

For through your knowledge he who is weak is ruined, the brother for whose sake Christ died. And so, by sinning against the brethren and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause my brother to stumble."


So, is it sinful to gamble, drink alcoholic beverages, and dance? If not done to excess, I, personally, do not believe the Bible condemns these actions. However, if another is stumbled -- either a Christian in his/her walk with the Lord, or a non-believer who is deterred from seeking the Lord -- because of your actions; then, it is a sin.

Whether you agree or disagree with me on these issues, that is not a problem. But, we must not allow such beliefs to divide us as Christian brothers and sisters.

The apostle Paul tells us in Romans 14, "All things indeed are clean, but they are evil for the man who eats and gives offense." And, in 1 Corinthians 8, "And so, by sinning against the brethren and wounding their conscience when it is weak, you sin against Christ. Therefore, if food causes my brother to stumble, I will never eat meat again, so that I will not cause my brother to stumble."

As Paul tells us in Romans 14, "The faith which you have, have as your own conviction before God." In other words, if you have truly studied the Word of God, the Bible, and are convinced that the Bible tells you that these acts are not wrong -- that is your conviction before God. However, we cannot allow our acceptance of these things to take precedence over the conscience and spiritual well being of our brothers and sisters who do find them to be wrong.

So, before I will offend or stumble my brothers and sisters in Christ -- I will hang up my dancing shoes and put a stopper in the wine bottle.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Would it be reasonable for a person to inquire of a Christian whether or not he/she finds alcohol, dancing, or gambling offensive beforehand? Obviously, no kind person would want to cause offense, any more than they would offend their Muslim or Jewish friends by offering them a ham sandwich. However, with Christians, there are some that would take offense, others who would not. Or is it okay to base your decision on the prevalent local mores? For example, the Catholics and Baptists of southern Louisiana see no evil in dancing or drinking. Therefore, it would be considered good hospitality to offer one a beer while there.

In ambiguous situations, perhaps drys could designation proclaiming (in a modest, non-pugnacious way) some sign of their preference.
quote:
Originally posted by Elvis Wearing a Bra on Head:
Would it be reasonable for a person to inquire of a Christian whether or not he/she finds alcohol, dancing, or gambling offensive beforehand? Obviously, no kind person would want to cause offense, any more than they would offend their Muslim or Jewish friends by offering them a ham sandwich. However, with Christians, there are some that would take offense, others who would not. Or is it okay to base your decision on the prevalent local mores? For example, the Catholics and Baptists of southern Louisiana see no evil in dancing or drinking. Therefore, it would be considered good hospitality to offer one a beer while there.

In ambiguous situations, perhaps drys could designation proclaiming (in a modest, non-pugnacious way) some sign of their preference.

Hi Elvis,

My first gut reaction was, "This from a man who calls himself Elvis -- and wears a bra on his head?" But, I must give you the benefit of the doubt since I do not know where you are coming from, i.e., are you a Christian believer; are you involved in a local church fellowship; or are you just being facetious?

What I wrote is based upon the Bible -- and my twenty plus years of studying the Bible in both private and corporate Bible studies, and from, at times, leading the Bible studies myself. While it may appear that I have written only what "Bill Gray" believes -- this is not so. If you have read what I wrote in the initial post in this discussion -- and you find that, Biblically, I am wrong; please tell me and let's have a discussion.

Yes, there are many who will disagree with me. And, frankly, I welcome these dialogues. For it is through having Biblical dialogues that we all grow and mature in our knowledge of the Word of God. It is these types of dialogues which bring life to our Religion Forum -- and attracts others to join us.

I will be honest with you; since the TD Mods invited some of our more illustrious atheist and secularist members to find other pastures -- the Religion Forum has lost much of its life; it seems often to have a big dose of the doldrums. While I disagreed with what our atheist and secularist Friends wrote -- their comments and questions provided a good platform for sharing the Gospel of Jesus Christ. And, as is typical, our Christian believing Friends tend to be more passive than our atheist/secularist Friends -- often preferring to only read, but not respond with a post. As a result, we have fewer discussions on the Religion Forum.

A few weeks ago, I looked at the Religion Forum and saw the name "Bill Gray" so prevalent that it depressed me. If I had just come on the Religion Forum as a new reader at that time, my immediate reaction would have been, "Who is this character Bill Gray that all the posts seem to carry his name?" For a few days, I purposely did not post, hoping that others would post more frequently. Personally, I do not want this to be a "Bill Gray Religion Forum" -- but, rather, a Religion Forum where many people, believers and non-believers, will come and openly discuss issues within the Christian faith.

So, Elvis, if you or other Religion Forums Friends want to discuss the issues of Christians gambling, drinking, or dancing -- or whatever -- let's all pull up a chair, sit down, and talk about what the Bible has to say.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
Bill, no facetiousness intended. It was a simple expression of preplexity: some Christians are offended by drinking, dancing, and gambling, others are not. Therefore, the Person of Good Will of whatever religious preference would desire cues on how to tell the difference.

It's good to know from your comment that you would fancy some Chivas on occasion; I'm pleased to have read that, because if you are going to drink, you would be better served by drinking a fine quality scotch rather than some inferior product. [I'm a beer drinker; and I'd rather drink one Guinness or Turbo Dog than a six-pack of Bud Lite.]

I see some similarities in your lengthy discussion to Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative:

"Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law."

Specifically: First, do no harm. Treat others well. Hey, this sounds like that "Love Your Neighbor" thing!

My favorite religious billboard:



As for my screen nickname, this was based on an episode while I was back at Auburn, and a girl had a Girls Gone Wild episode and I was the convenient place to hang something. No further details, right?
Hi Elvis,

You tell me, "Bill, no facetiousness intended. It was a simple expression of perplexity: some Christians are offended by drinking, dancing, and gambling, others are not. Therefore, the Person of Good Will of whatever religious preference would desire cues on how to tell the difference."

Yes, on many issues within the Christian community we will find many differing opinions. That is where Christian fellowship and love come into play -- we agree to disagree without allowing these issues to divide us. Once we agree on the Essential Christian doctrines, everything else is a discussion and learning exercise. What are the Essential Christian Doctrines?

A Christian church will teach and a Christian will believe:

1. In the deity of our Lord Jesus Christ, who before His incarnation, existed in the form of God and of His own choice lay aside His divine glory and became a man in every aspect, possessed of all the human characteristics of man.
2. The Bible is the Written Word of God and the sole authority for man's Christian salvation -- and is without error in its moral and spiritual teaching and in its record of historical facts.
3. In one God, eternally existing and manifesting Himself in three persons: the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit.
4. That we are saved -- by grace -- through faith in Jesus Christ -- plus nothing else.
5. That the Holy Spirit indwells and seals all born-again believers at the time of their conversion.
6. That heaven and hell are real places and these are the only two choices man has for his eternal home.
7. That everyone will face judgment before Jesus Christ. The believer to a judgment of eternal rewards, the non-believer to a judgment of eternal punishment in hell, the lake of fire.
8. The Gospel: Jesus Christ's virgin birth, His atoning death on the cross to defeat Satan, His resurrection to defeat death, and His ascension into heaven where He sits at the right hand of God the Father, interceding for all Christian believers -- the only mediator between God and man.

All others issues such as method of baptism, method of worship, church music, eschatology, etc., including gambling, drinking, and dancing -- are all interesting to discuss and we do learn and mature in our Christian walk through discussing such issues. However, our salvation is not dependent upon any of these issues.

Then, you tell me, "It's good to know from your comment that you would fancy some Chivas on occasion; I'm pleased to have read that, because if you are going to drink, you would be better served by drinking a fine quality scotch rather than some inferior product. [I'm a beer drinker; and I'd rather drink one Guinness or Turbo Dog than a six-pack of Bud Lite.]"

I will admit to enjoying the taste of Chivas Regal on the rocks. I haven't had one in a few years; but, only because the occasion has not risen -- not because it is a sin. As a second choice, I will go with Dewar's White Label. I prefer the blended Scotch; never acquired a taste for the single malt variety.

Next, you say, "I see some similarities in your lengthy discussion to Immanuel Kant's Categorical Imperative: 'Act only according to that maxim whereby you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law.' Specifically: First, do no harm. Treat others well. Hey, this sounds like that 'Love Your Neighbor' thing!"

Except for the length of many of my posts; I see no other similarity to Kant. If he were a Christian, which obviously he was not, I might be flattered at the suggestion. But, he had all the qualifications of becoming a liberal theology follower if he had worked at it, i.e., salvation through good works, no accountability to God, do your own thing, etc.

Excerpts from: Immanuel Kant http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Kant stated the practical necessity for a belief in God in his Critique of Practical Reason. As an idea of pure reason, "we do not have the slightest ground to assume in an absolute manner… the object of this idea…", but adds that the idea of God cannot be separated from the relation of happiness with morality as the "ideal of the supreme good."

Kant articulates in Book Four some of his strongest criticisms of the organization and practices of Christianity that encourage what he sees as a religion of counterfeit service to God. Among the major targets of his criticism are external ritual, superstition and a hierarchical church order. He sees all of these as efforts to make oneself pleasing to God in ways other than conscientious adherence to the principle of moral rightness in the choice of one's actions. The severity of Kant's criticisms on these matters, along with his rejection of the possibility of theoretical proofs for the existence of God and his philosophical re-interpretation of some basic Christian doctrines, have provided the basis for interpretations that see Kant as thoroughly hostile to religion in general and Christianity in particular (e.g., Walsh 1967).

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

So, no -- I can never claim any brotherhood with Mr. Kant.

Finally, you tell me, "As for my screen nickname, this was based on an episode while I was back at Auburn, and a girl had a Girls Gone Wild episode and I was the convenient place to hang something. No further details, right?"

True, some things are best left to the imagination.

Elvis, I have enjoyed our dialogue. We must do this more often.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Friends_TiggerToo_Bear_Piggy_On-Limb-TEXT
Kant was one of the most pious philosophers of his era -- right up there with Pascal and Bishop Berkeley. Therefore, it's hard for me to understand how Bill Gray can say he shares no affinity for Kant's core beliefs (could it be that Bill gray has no clue about Kant and has never even read "Critique of Pure Reason?"). Of course, it could be that Bill Gray is a sectarian and believes his "brand" of Christianity is the "right one" while all others are comprised of sinners bound for hell.
quote:
Originally posted by Clover-Dale:
Kant was one of the most pious philosophers of his era -- right up there with Pascal and Bishop Berkeley. Therefore, it's hard for me to understand how Bill Gray can say he shares no affinity for Kant's core beliefs (could it be that Bill gray has no clue about Kant and has never even read "Critique of Pure Reason?"). Of course, it could be that Bill Gray is a sectarian and believes his "brand" of Christianity is the "right one" while all others are comprised of sinners bound for hell.

Hi Clover,

You question why I cannot relate to Kant's religious beliefs? It is because Kant obviously was not a Christian believer. Yes, he believed that God exists; he most likely believed that Jesus exists -- but, so does Satan. As a matter of fact, Satan has greater reason to believe in both -- for he has met them both face to face -- something you, Kant, and I cannot do until we die or are raptured. For those of us who are Christian believers, we will meet Jesus face to face at the Rapture; then, we will meet Him face to face at the Bema Seat Judgment for believer's rewards in heaven -- during the seven year Tribulation.

For those who are not Christian believers when they die -- they will meet Jesus Christ at the Great White Throne Judgment at the end of the Millennium -- a judgment of eternal punishment. Clover, I pray that you are in the first group at the Bema Seat Judgment.

Do I believe that only my church is right and all others are wrong? No. But, I do fervently believe that only those who, by the grace of God, through faith in Jesus Christ (Ephesians 2:8-9) -- invite Jesus Christ into their hearts and into their lives (Revelation 3:20) -- will be saved and spend eternity in the presence of God. All others will spend eternity in the presence of Satan.

How do I know this? The Bible tells me. So, what is my faith? My faith is in Jesus Christ -- I am a Christ Follower, a Christian. Secondary to that, I happen to attend a Baptist Church -- and I believe in the Biblical Christian Doctrinal teachings of the Baptist church, primarily the General Baptist (Baptist General Convention) -- for these doctrinal beliefs are based solely upon the Bible.

Traditions cannot save us; rituals cannot save us; a church cannot save us. Only faith in Jesus Christ, based upon the sole authority of the Bible, can save us.

So, I am a Christian believer because, by the grace of God, through faith in Jesus Christ -- I believed and received (John 1:12) the "free gift" of salvation "paid in full" by the blood of Jesus Christ on the cross of Calvary.

Kant may have been pious; but, so were the Pharisees of Jesus' day. The excerpts below show that Kant had no great love for Christianity, nor any other religion, except possibly for the religion of philosophy and enlightenment.

IMMANUEL KANT
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanuel_Kant

Kant articulates in Book Four some of his strongest criticisms of the organization and practices of Christianity that encourage what he sees as a religion of counterfeit service to God. Among the major targets of his criticism are external ritual, superstition and a hierarchical church order.

He sees all of these as efforts to make oneself pleasing to God in ways other than conscientious adherence to the principle of moral rightness in the choice of one's actions.

The severity of Kant's criticisms on these matters, along with his rejection of the possibility of theoretical proofs for the existence of God and his philosophical re-interpretation of some basic Christian doctrines, have provided the basis for interpretations that see Kant as thoroughly hostile to religion in general and Christianity in particular
(e.g., Walsh 1967).

THE PILLARS OF UNBELIEF - KANT
Catholic Education Resource Center
http://www.catholiceducation.o...lization/cc0011.html

Few philosophers in history have been so unreadable and dry as Immanuel Kant. Yet few have had a more devastating impact on human thought.

Kant's devoted servant, Lumppe, is said to have faithfully read each thing his master published, but when Kant published his most important work, “The Critique of Pure Reason,” Lumppe began but did not finish it because, he said, if he were to finish it, it would have to be in a mental hospital. Many students since then have echoed his sentiments.

Yet this abstract professor, writing in abstract style about abstract questions, is, I believe, the primary source of the idea that today imperils faith (and thus souls) more than any other; the idea that truth is subjective.


Clover, you are new to the Religion Forum and I want to welcome you. I pray that we will have many good dialogues. That is the purpose of the Religion Forum and we welcome all thoughts and ideas. But, if it those thoughts and ideas are anti-Christian -- I will refute them; but, I will do it based upon teachings of the Bible, not just personal beliefs of Bill Gray. Bill Gray is not the authority -- the Bible is the sole authority for Christian living and salvation. So, that will be our guideline and our referee.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c
quote:
Originally posted by Netracer41:
After waiting over two thousand years, everyone can safely say that the Bible was wrong in its predictions. Let's move on to a more reasonable philosophy.

Hi Racer,

Since your comment is completely off topic; I have posted my response as a new discussion -- "Already 2000 Years- And No Return Of Jesus! - God Is A Myth?"

Check it out.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 0_-_CROSS-BIBLE_SAID-IT-1c

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×