Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Bush Bashes for all occasions.

He lies for the fun of it.

He makes war for the fun of it.

He switches tax burdens to the middle class.

He spends borrowed money like a gold digger on a binge.

He has a bad hair day EVERYDAY.

His flight suit fits funny.

His foreign policy is alien to the principals of the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Statue of Liberty, and the mind of reasonable humanity.

If he and I were on a desert Island and there was one bottle of beer left he would pour it out rather than share it.

He couldn't find oil in Texas.

Republicans love him. all four of the remaining ones.

He starts riots by just showing up.

He hides when he is needed, and shows up a couple of days later to take credit for all the good things, and none of the bad.

He is a political animal, who will do anything for an advantage including damaging the effectiveness of American Defenses.

and finally, this from "The People Judge Bush: Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and other criminal acts in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, International Law, the Constitution of the United States and Laws Made in Pursuance Thereof.
http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/crimes.shtml

The Crimes Charged are:

1. Waging a War of Aggression against the sovereignty of Iraq and the rights of its people, resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and injuries among the people of Iraq, most civilians, from military violence and thousands of U.S. G.I’s. War of aggression is defined as “the Supreme international crime” in the Nuremberg Judgment.
2. Authorizing, encouraging and condoning the use of excessive force, in terrorem, tactics called “Shock and Awe”, targeting defenseless civilians, civilians facilities and indiscriminate bombing and assaults.
3. Authorizing and ordering the use of illegal weapons including super bombs, cluster bombs, depleted uranium enhanced bombs, missiles, shells and bullets and threatening the use of nuclear weapons.
4. Authorizing, ordering, concealing and condoning assassinations, summary executions, murders, disappearances, kidnappings and torture.
5. Authorizing, financing, utilizing and condoning illegal violence, use of force and torture by highly paid paramilitary civilian forces operating anonymously and not accountable to U.S. supervisors for their acts, who kill, coerce, control and contain the Iraqi population.
6. Authorizing, ordering and condoning the systematic destruction of economic, social, cultural, medical, educational, governmental and diplomatic resources, properties and facilities throughout Iraq.
7. Authorizing, ordering and condoning acts designed to divide the Iraqi population to cause internal conflict and violence among major segments of the society, ethnic, religious, political and economic, in order to weaken and exhaust the population and bring all segments under the control of a new surrogate government submissive to U.S. command.
8. Authorizing, imposing and maintaining a violent, criminal military occupation over Iraq which kills defenseless Iraqi’s daily and fans the flames of anti-U.S. anger worldwide.
9. Defying and incapacitating the peace making capacity and role of the United Nations by unilateral actions to undermine its potential effectiveness while continuing to coerce and use the U.N. to pursue U.S. policies in Iraq and elsewhere, and coercing and enticing other nations to support U.S. policies and actions in violation of international law in the U.N. Security Council and against Iraq and other nations.
10. Engaging in systematic acts to undermine and destroy international laws and treaties designed to prevent and control war, weapons of mass and indiscriminate destruction; limit participants in military service; protect the environment; prevent the economic exploitation of poor nations; and engaging systematic acts to obstruct justice by the evisceration of the International Criminal Court and manipulation or defiance of other international judicial and regulatory bodies that might seek to hold the U.S. accountable to international law and the will of the majority of the people of the international community.
11. Manifesting their continuing commitment to world domination by ordering, directing and condoning violent regime change in Haiti in March 2004 to replace the independent, elected democratic President Jean Bertrand Aristide with a U.S. selected and controlled neo Duvalierist surrogate causing growing violence, hundreds of deaths and further improvishment of the Haitian people.
12. Threatening the sovereignty and independence of nations, and acting to change regimes that refuse to yield to U.S. demands for economic subservience and political control for U.S. corporate and government interests, including most prominently Cuba, Iran, a divided Korea, the Philippines, Syria, Sudan and Venezuela; and supporting Israel’s illegal occupation, brutalization and expanding settlement of Palestine in defiance of the United Nations, international law and world opinion; all of which adds to international anger and violence against the United States and its citizens.
13. Destroying the sovereignty, right to self determination, cultural integrity and control of its own resources of Iraq and its peoples by imposing an interim government headed by a long time C.I.A. asset who directed violence against Iraqi civilians for the U.S. in the 1990's; and manipulating procedures for the imposition of a new Constitution drafted by and installation of a new government chosen through controlled electoral processes and subservient to the will and command of the U.S. government.
14. Usurping the war powers delegated in the constitution to the Congress to pursue wars of aggression and other unlawful military actions; and attempting to pack the federal courts with judges committed to ideologies in conflict with the Constitution of the United States to achieve judicial decisions supporting those ideologies.
15. Systematically weakening fundamental human rights globally and the Bill of Rights of the U.S. Constitution within the U.S. enabling U.S. forces to unlawfully seize individuals in 100 countries, including U.S. citizens and arrest thousands of aliens in the U.S. and hold them, transport them, torture many, deny all access to courts to determine the legality of such seizures, arrest and treatment.
16. Making Guantanamo a symbol of U.S. power to imprison and abuse persons on the soil of a foreign sovereign nation, Cuba, against its will and to publicize U.S. contempt for human rights by displaying its power to arbitrarily seize, confine and abuse persons without revealing who they are, any charges against them, or what their future may be, placing U.S. power above all laws, international and national, and beyond the reach of all courts, including those of the U.S.
17. Giving economic preferences to favored corporations and business interests to extract enormous profits in both war and peace sectors of the economy from impoverished Iraq and U.S. taxpayers.
18. Systematically utilizing, controlling, directing, manipulating, misinforming and restricting press and media coverage and deliberately presenting false and misleading reports to obtain support for U.S. military and political and actions; and to deprive the American people of knowledge essential to develop an informed opinion which is essential to democratic processes and elections.
19. All for the purpose of dominating, controlling, and exploiting Iraq and other non compliant nations by military force and economic coercion.

In addition to full accountability for the foregoing crimes and full reparation to victims, the offenses constitute “high Crimes and Misdemeanors” under Article II, Section 4 of the Constitution of the United States requiring the removal from office of all the participating civil Officers of the United States upon impeachment for and conviction for their acts."
Last edited by Karl Leuba
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
themax:

Good idea...however, your thread has been around for several hours, and not one negative post about GWB (I consider FatNoMo's post as tongue in check humor). I figured that it would have no less than 5-10 posts by now (1500 CST).

I know there are alot of Bush bashers, when you going to post....????


Well Big Guy, where is yours? I would expect any true American Patriot to be on this band wagon in the drivers seat and cheering on the crowds in Sao Palo, Brazil. Cat got your toung?
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by FatNoMo:
Ed: Did you write this all by yourself?

No, the major part, the indictment part, the part that makes sense is lifted in tact from a websste. but, I am no longer willing to expose all my sources to the critique of the various and sundry


Some “sundry” know how to Google, Ed.
These come from 5 August 2004 charges.
And, let me know if I am incorrect Times Daily, but aren’t quotes like these supposed to be acknowledged?
quote:
Originally posted by domaphile:
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
themax:

Good idea...however, your thread has been around for several hours, and not one negative post about GWB (I consider FatNoMo's post as tongue in check humor). I figured that it would have no less than 5-10 posts by now (1500 CST).

I know there are alot of Bush bashers, when you going to post....????


Well Big Guy, where is yours? I would expect any true American Patriot to be on this band wagon in the drivers seat and cheering on the crowds in Sao Palo, Brazil. Cat got your toung?


Hmmm...not sure of what you mean....explain further please...I thought my post you quoted was pretty self explanitory.
quote:
Originally posted by FatNoMo:
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by FatNoMo:
Ed: Did you write this all by yourself?

No, the major part, the indictment part, the part that makes sense is lifted in tact from a websste. but, I am no longer willing to expose all my sources to the critique of the various and sundry

I would hate to be accused of NOT attributing. This is how it was attributed.

and finally, this from The People Judge Bush: Crimes Against Peace, War Crimes, Crimes Against Humanity and other criminal acts in violation of the Charter of the United Nations, International Law, the Constitution of the United States and Laws Made in Pursuance Thereof

Some “sundry” know how to Google, Ed.
These come from 5 August 2004 charges.
And, let me know if I am incorrect Times Daily, but aren’t quotes like these supposed to be acknowledged?

The source is, "The People Judge Bush."
quote:
Originally posted by meanasasnake:
Bushs approval rating nationally is a ***ping 30%. The worst for a "acting" president since Watergate. Hes been an awful president, and now is a lame duck, leading a minority party. He lost the senate and the house for his party and looks as weak as water - nuf said.


Surely you jest???? Post the LINK.. .You mean his support has RISEN that much in this last month?????? It was down in the lower 20% of support!!!! NO WAY could it have risen, not with all the heck he is getting from the protesters in Latin America!!! They are raking him over the coals!!! I actually think he was SURPRISED over their reaction to his arrival... guess he had THAT one figured wrong, LOL!!!
quote:
Originally posted by domaphile:
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
themax:

Good idea...however, your thread has been around for several hours, and not one negative post about GWB (I consider FatNoMo's post as tongue in check humor). I figured that it would have no less than 5-10 posts by now (1500 CST).

I know there are alot of Bush bashers, when you going to post....????


Well Big Guy, where is yours? I would expect any true American Patriot to be on this band wagon in the drivers seat and cheering on the crowds in Sao Palo, Brazil. Cat got your toung?



LOL!!!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by FatNoMo:
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by FatNoMo:
Ed: Did you write this all by yourself?

No, the major part, the indictment part, the part that makes sense is lifted in tact from a websste. but, I am no longer willing to expose all my sources to the critique of the various and sundry


Some “sundry” know how to Google, Ed.
These come from 5 August 2004 charges.
And, let me know if I am incorrect Times Daily, but aren’t quotes like these supposed to be acknowledged?



This is freaking hilarious... I needed this laugh, really bad!!!!! LOLOLOL!!!
Now the LA Times has joined in, at least at the Libby Level, quoting other Newpapers regarding their support for the President, with a negative spin.

I guess this means the LA Times really is claiming to be a "Liberal" newspaper.

They quote Lanny J. Davis, Special Counsel to President Clinton, criticising the Conservative Press for decrying the conviction of Libby after Cheering on the Impeachment of Clinton.

They also go into some details of the Iran Contra Prosecutions.

What may be the most damaging part of the Libby Case, at least to Bush and the Administration is the motivation for the outing of Plame in the first place.
"According to testimony at Libby's trial, administration officials were outraged by Wilson's public criticism and sought to cast doubt on his conclusions by suggesting to reporters that his wife may have been involved in arranging his trip — a point Novak raised in his column."http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-libby8mar08,1,7687369.story
All in all, the Wilsongate scandal is just a small window into the Administration, and its willingness to act the Vigilante when their ox is gored.

Anything that can be done and survived is illegal somewhere, under some circumstances, including praying.
So what you're saying, is that the fact Wilson's report was a lie and the fact that his wife truly is the reason he was selected to go doesn't have anything to do with the White House trying to make it known that this was a hatch job by Wilson from the get go. Besides, this case boiled down to a he said, she said. It was a case of who you believed. Every witness, even the FBI guy, had issues with their memory. Why is it a crime for Libby but not a crime for the rest? There was no underlying crime. What reason did Libby have to purposly lie?
quote:
Originally posted by themax:
Here is a new thread so everone that wants can blame The prez for any and everything.
This way I can just skip over it. Oh I almost forgot the V.P. is fair game also.



Well for starters Bush lied about the war!

We have more GOVERNMENT NOT LESS!
We have a big huge deficite that you and your kids, grandkids will enjoy paying taxes on for years to come.

Bush made you think that because of his tax break is why the economy is good,but we know its the war that has made the economy good for most, but not all people.the economy has not been good for everyone,just ask people who are losing their homes.


Bush wants another war!

The Rich enjoyed the tax breaks,the middle class are saying what tax breaks!
You say "bush lied about the war". What did he "lie" about? WMD's, everybody (too include your buddies on the left) believed Iraq had WMD's and you know it's a **** lie to say otherwise. Were mistakes made in Iraq? Of course there were. In hind site we could have:
1. Not disbanded the Iraqi military
2. Better expectations of the "insurgent" problem (should have went in with more troops at first)
I'm sure if the President had a crystal ball, before the war, he would have covered these things. Unfortunately, he doesn't have one. So you go on with your "Bush Lied" line. Just remember that your left leaning buddies had the same intel that the President had and they voted for the war too.
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
So what you're saying, is that the fact Wilson's report was a lie and the fact that his wife truly is the reason he was selected to go doesn't have anything to do with the White House trying to make it known that this was a hatch job by Wilson from the get go. Besides, this case boiled down to a he said, she said. It was a case of who you believed. Every witness, even the FBI guy, had issues with their memory. Why is it a crime for Libby but not a crime for the rest? There was no underlying crime. What reason did Libby have to purposly lie?

Southern Patriot, Wilson's report was ACCURATE, AND TRUE. The original "intell" that claimed Hussain was trying to buy yellowcake was delivered to an Italian Security Agent, by CIA operatives, and turned over to the British by the Italians who had assumed that since they were given the information by Amreican sources the Americans already had the information. The British were then credited with having the information.

I think, at the personal level, that the only reason yellowcake was an issue at all is the fact that Iraq was storing several hundred tons of the stuff under International Atomic Energy Agency supervision. The only reason we did not "find" it was the fact that the IAEA inspectors did not leave Iraq with the UN Weapons inspectors. And they survived only because of the Accuracy of Wilson's report on the Nigerian connection. If he had not presented the report, and if the information had not been made public, I think the legitimately held yellowcake in Iraq would have been miraculously converted into the yellowcake from Nigeria. I think that, I cannot prove it, and it did not happen. I think it because the yellowcake under IAEA supervision did not become a cause for war after the fact.
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
You say "bush lied about the war". What did he "lie" about? WMD's, everybody (too include your buddies on the left) believed Iraq had WMD's and you know it's a **** lie to say otherwise. Were mistakes made in Iraq? Of course there were. In hind site we could have:
1. Not disbanded the Iraqi military
2. Better expectations of the "insurgent" problem (should have went in with more troops at first)
I'm sure if the President had a crystal ball, before the war, he would have covered these things. Unfortunately, he doesn't have one. So you go on with your "Bush Lied" line. Just remember that your left leaning buddies had the same intel that the President had and they voted for the war too.


EVERYTHING!!!!! Absolutely EVERYTHING!!!! Right from DAY ONE!
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
quote:
Originally posted by domaphile:
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
themax:

Good idea...however, your thread has been around for several hours, and not one negative post about GWB (I consider FatNoMo's post as tongue in check humor). I figured that it would have no less than 5-10 posts by now (1500 CST).

I know there are alot of Bush bashers, when you going to post....????


Well Big Guy, where is yours? I would expect any true American Patriot to be on this band wagon in the drivers seat and cheering on the crowds in Sao Palo, Brazil. Cat got your toung?


Hmmm...not sure of what you mean....explain further please...I thought my post you quoted was pretty self explanitory.

I guess I have to be REALLY REALLY BLUNT with you. I ASKED, ". . . WHERE IS YOUR'S?" I meant your Bush Bash. All you did was Bash or "Flame" the subject. I want to know what you think is wrong with Bush's Policy, or behavior, or personal appearance.

I personally think the President is a Pathological Liar, and would rather fabricate a story of how the television was on in the School Hallway when the First Plane Hit the WTC than explain that he was TOLD the plane hit the tower, and envisioned it. I could have accepted that as truth, and reasonable for any person. Instead, he made up a fantastic story of how he saw a television picture of the First Plane Hitting the WTC while he was waiting to go into the classroom.
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
You say "bush lied about the war". What did he "lie" about? WMD's, everybody (too include your buddies on the left) believed Iraq had WMD's and you know it's a **** lie to say otherwise. Were mistakes made in Iraq? Of course there were. In hind site we could have:
1. Not disbanded the Iraqi military
2. Better expectations of the "insurgent" problem (should have went in with more troops at first)
I'm sure if the President had a crystal ball, before the war, he would have covered these things. Unfortunately, he doesn't have one. So you go on with your "Bush Lied" line. Just remember that your left leaning buddies had the same intel that the President had and they voted for the war too.

I cannot speak for others, but I SAY that Bush Lied about the war in Iraq before the 2000 election by NOT saying that he was going to "solve" the Saddam Hussain problem by invading Iraq. It was on the top of his agenda by the time he was sworn in. It was a goal for at least three years before he was sworn in, and he not only never mentioned regime change in Iraq in the Campaign, HE SAID HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN NATION BUILDING.

THAT WAS A LIE.

He cooked the books on the intell regarding Iraq, and said that he would wait for the inspectors to finish searching before deciding to invade. THEN he cooked up a tall tale about mushroom clouds and an Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program that did not exist to create a sense of urgency to INVADE Iraq before the UN had an opportunity to lift or modify the sanctions that were starving Iraq's economy. I say that was a LIE.

I say that telling War Planners in the Pentagon to find a way to accomplish the "mission" of regime change with 35 thousand troops, and then rejecting their force level of half a million was incompetence in support of the LIE that the Iraqi people would welcome an invasion with Roses and parades.

IF YOU LIVE IN DENIAL, YOU BETTER HAVE A BOAT, AND AN ADDRESS IN EGYPT.
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
At this point I will give up. You absolutely can't have a discussion, based on fact, with people who are irrational about the subject.

See above post if you question what I mean.


What has he NOT got on National Television and LIED to America concerning Iraq? Remember, he has give at least SEVEN State of the Union Addresses concerning this, and YES, I have watched, as OTHER people on this site...

So again... What has he NOT lied about???

What TRUTH has he told?????

And please, DO be rational with your replies Big Grin
quote:
Originally posted by domaphile:
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
quote:
Originally posted by domaphile:
quote:
Originally posted by Brentenman:
themax:

Good idea...however, your thread has been around for several hours, and not one negative post about GWB (I consider FatNoMo's post as tongue in check humor). I figured that it would have no less than 5-10 posts by now (1500 CST).

I know there are alot of Bush bashers, when you going to post....????


Well Big Guy, where is yours? I would expect any true American Patriot to be on this band wagon in the drivers seat and cheering on the crowds in Sao Palo, Brazil. Cat got your toung?


Hmmm...not sure of what you mean....explain further please...I thought my post you quoted was pretty self explanitory.


Domophile, you can forget an answer to that one... this man loves Bush and Company with ALL his heart and soul... Big Grin
I guess I have to be REALLY REALLY BLUNT with you. I ASKED, ". . . WHERE IS YOUR'S?" I meant your Bush Bash. All you did was Bash or "Flame" the subject. I want to know what you think is wrong with Bush's Policy, or behavior, or personal appearance.

I personally think the President is a Pathological Liar, and would rather fabricate a story of how the television was on in the School Hallway when the First Plane Hit the WTC than explain that he was TOLD the plane hit the tower, and envisioned it. I could have accepted that as truth, and reasonable for any person. Instead, he made up a fantastic story of how he saw a television picture of the First Plane Hitting the WTC while he was waiting to go into the classroom.
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
You say "bush lied about the war". What did he "lie" about? WMD's, everybody (too include your buddies on the left) believed Iraq had WMD's and you know it's a **** lie to say otherwise. Were mistakes made in Iraq? Of course there were. In hind site we could have:
1. Not disbanded the Iraqi military
2. Better expectations of the "insurgent" problem (should have went in with more troops at first)
I'm sure if the President had a crystal ball, before the war, he would have covered these things. Unfortunately, he doesn't have one. So you go on with your "Bush Lied" line. Just remember that your left leaning buddies had the same intel that the President had and they voted for the war too.

I cannot speak for others, but I SAY that Bush Lied about the war in Iraq before the 2000 election by NOT saying that he was going to "solve" the Saddam Hussain problem by invading Iraq. It was on the top of his agenda by the time he was sworn in. It was a goal for at least three years before he was sworn in, and he not only never mentioned regime change in Iraq in the Campaign, HE SAID HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN NATION BUILDING.

THAT WAS A LIE.

He cooked the books on the intell regarding Iraq, and said that he would wait for the inspectors to finish searching before deciding to invade. THEN he cooked up a tall tale about mushroom clouds and an Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program that did not exist to create a sense of urgency to INVADE Iraq before the UN had an opportunity to lift or modify the sanctions that were starving Iraq's economy. I say that was a LIE.

I say that telling War Planners in the Pentagon to find a way to accomplish the "mission" of regime change with 35 thousand troops, and then rejecting their force level of half a million was incompetence in support of the LIE that the Iraqi people would welcome an invasion with Roses and parades.

IF YOU LIVE IN DENIAL, YOU BETTER HAVE A BOAT, AND AN ADDRESS IN EGYPT.


ONE GOOD ANSWER HERE!!!! Wow, Ed, Glad to see your homework signed and graded... because on this post, you da man!!!

You go far past just OPINION, and watching TV, and reading papers like the rest of us do... Thank you for THAT answer, it explains so much more than even I could ever imagine!!!!
quote:
Originally posted by EdEKit:
quote:
Originally posted by Southern Patriot:
You say "bush lied about the war". What did he "lie" about? WMD's, everybody (too include your buddies on the left) believed Iraq had WMD's and you know it's a **** lie to say otherwise. Were mistakes made in Iraq? Of course there were. In hind site we could have:
1. Not disbanded the Iraqi military
2. Better expectations of the "insurgent" problem (should have went in with more troops at first)
I'm sure if the President had a crystal ball, before the war, he would have covered these things. Unfortunately, he doesn't have one. So you go on with your "Bush Lied" line. Just remember that your left leaning buddies had the same intel that the President had and they voted for the war too.

I cannot speak for others, but I SAY that Bush Lied about the war in Iraq before the 2000 election by NOT saying that he was going to "solve" the Saddam Hussain problem by invading Iraq. It was on the top of his agenda by the time he was sworn in. It was a goal for at least three years before he was sworn in, and he not only never mentioned regime change in Iraq in the Campaign, HE SAID HE WAS NOT INTERESTED IN NATION BUILDING.

THAT WAS A LIE.

He cooked the books on the intell regarding Iraq, and said that he would wait for the inspectors to finish searching before deciding to invade. THEN he cooked up a tall tale about mushroom clouds and an Iraqi Nuclear Weapons Program that did not exist to create a sense of urgency to INVADE Iraq before the UN had an opportunity to lift or modify the sanctions that were starving Iraq's economy. I say that was a LIE.

I say that telling War Planners in the Pentagon to find a way to accomplish the "mission" of regime change with 35 thousand troops, and then rejecting their force level of half a million was incompetence in support of the LIE that the Iraqi people would welcome an invasion with Roses and parades.

IF YOU LIVE IN DENIAL, YOU BETTER HAVE A BOAT, AND AN ADDRESS IN EGYPT.


How did he "cook the books that your left eaning buddies looked at? No matter how you spin it, the Dems voted for the **** war and there isn't a **** thing you can do about it. The reason we went in with the smaller force can be laid directly at the feet of Rumsfelds feet. He had the mistaken impression that the Iraqi's would be able to pickup the country on their own after Saddam was gone. It sucks not to have the 20/20 vision that hindsight has when you are making the decisions in real time. The president wasn't interested in nation building, just as you said. He has said on more than one occasion that Iraq is not the fight now that we expected at first. However, it is the fight we are dealing with now and we have to see it through to the end. Besides, you can think everything he has ever said is a lie if you want. You already have that preconceived notion and nothing anybody else says or does is going to change that. I will, however, jump in any time I feel like you are distorting the facts on any subject so that others aren't lead astray by the deception.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×