BIAS ALERT: New York Times Finds Latest Clinton Foundation Bombshell Unfit to Print

Published August 24, 2016  |

If you look hard enough, you find there's usually a reason for everything -- even at The New York Times.

But whatever the reason -- maybe it was the story about a parasite jeopardizing fly fishing in Montana, or those Russian hackers who attacked the Gray Lady's Moscow bureau -- the latest Clinton Foundation bombshell couldn't be found among "All the News That's Fit to Print."

The Associated Press scoop Tuesday found that at least 85 of 154 people who got an audience with Hillary Clinton while she led the State Department had donated to her family charity. Combined, the 85 donors contributed as much as $156 million and included private citizens with business before the government. It’s as close to a “pay to play” smoking gun as has emerged to date.

“The meetings between the Democratic presidential nominee and foundation donors do not appear to violate legal agreements Clinton and former president Bill Clinton signed before she joined the State Department in 2009,” the AP wrote. “But the frequency of the overlaps shows the intermingling of access and donations, and fuels perceptions that giving the foundation money was a price of admission for face time with Clinton.”

Yet, the investigative report appeared nowhere in Wednesday’s 46-page print edition. Coming weeks after a front-page story basically saying journalists feel free to be subjective in the current race because Trump is such a threat to the Republic, critics of the “paper of record” say it smells like fish wrap.

Despite the paper's famed "Fit to Print" motto, "The truth is that only news that fits the party line gets printed,” said Michael Goodwin, a New York Post columnist and Fox News contributor who worked at the Times for 10 years.

It is unlikely publication of the story was affected by a Tuesday hack the U.S. officials believe was launched by groups working for the Russian government. 

Original Post

Actually, FDR would be considered a mean-spirited conservative considering how far the national moral fiber has disintegrated. After a while, reality finally sunk in with the father of US liberalism.

"A large proportion of these unemployed and their dependents have been forced on the relief rolls. The burden on the Federal Government has grown with great rapidity. We have here a human as well as an economic problem. When humane considerations are concerned, Americans give them precedence. The lessons of history, confirmed by the evidence immediately before me, show conclusively that continued dependence upon relief induces a spiritual disintegration fundamentally destructive to the national fiber. To dole our relief in this way is to administer a narcotic, a subtle destroyer of the human spirit. It is inimical to the dictates of a sound policy. It is in violation of the traditions of America. Work must be found for able-bodied but destitute workers.

The Federal Government must and shall quit this business of relief.

I am not willing that the vitality of our people be further sapped by the giving of cash, of market baskets, of a few hours of weekly work cutting grass, raking leaves, or picking up papers in the public parks. We must preserve not only the bodies of the unemployed from destitution but also their self-respect, their self-reliance, and courage and determination."------FDR

Jack Flash posted:
Is there any doubt why "freedom of speech" will be among
the first ones to go if the communist steal the office.... 

Right now, "freedom of speech" as to incite riots and to spread anarchy is working pretty well for the liberal / socialist / commie-wannabees.

And if they steal the office, you can bet their version of the 1st Amendment will remain . . . hate speech and right to assemble, burn, and loot.

But number one on their hit list is the Second Amendment.

After that, the rest of the Bill of Rights fall like dominos.



There being so much disinformation on social media as there is, liberals already believe what the Party tells them.  Start a little rumor here and there, and the first thing you know the Party followers will be breaking windows.

Oh!  Forget that.  Already been done.

Tell em, Dire.


giftedamateur posted:
direstraits posted:

The NY Times always was a flack for the Democrats.  Now, its a complete tool of the extreme left wing. If, anyone thought FDR was a leftie, now he would be considered a moderate.

The Washington Post is another Democratic tool.

OMG! That liberal rag!!

Add Reply

Likes (0)