Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What Condie leaves out is that Hillary used a private server to send personal and private email, which is not allowed.  Other Secretaries of State had private email accounts, as well as, a government email account.  Hillary never had a government email account, which is a violation of  the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Classified information was sent on the private server via the private email account -- that is a violation of law.  Top Secret information was handled the same way.  TS is to be sent by courier only.  The last items are violations of the Espionage Act, for which intent is not required, only the action.

This why one must never trust MSM or lefties in general to tell the truth.

direstraits posted:

What Condie leaves out is that Hillary used a private server to send personal and private email, which is not allowed.  Other Secretaries of State had private email accounts, as well as, a government email account.  Hillary never had a government email account, which is a violation of  the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Classified information was sent on the private server via the private email account -- that is a violation of law.  Top Secret information was handled the same way.  TS is to be sent by courier only.  The last items are violations of the Espionage Act, for which intent is not required, only the action.

This why one must never trust MSM or lefties in general to tell the truth.

If memory serves me, I believe just taking sensitive information outside of secured areas is good for up to a year in prison and/or stiff fines, like in Gen. Petraeus's case. Giving such information to foreign countries even unwittingly is good for up to 10 years in prison and much stiffer fines.

Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

What Condie leaves out is that Hillary used a private server to send personal and private email, which is not allowed.  Other Secretaries of State had private email accounts, as well as, a government email account.  Hillary never had a government email account, which is a violation of  the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Classified information was sent on the private server via the private email account -- that is a violation of law.  Top Secret information was handled the same way.  TS is to be sent by courier only.  The last items are violations of the Espionage Act, for which intent is not required, only the action.

This why one must never trust MSM or lefties in general to tell the truth.

If memory serves me, I believe just taking sensitive information outside of secured areas is good for up to a year in prison and/or stiff fines, like in Gen. Petraeus's case. Giving such information to foreign countries even unwittingly is good for up to 10 years in prison and much stiffer fines.

Simple transportation, as long as it is retained with one's person, is not a crime.  Letting someone see it, with no security clearance, or leaving the information, in a non-approved container is a crime.

direstraits posted:
Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

What Condie leaves out is that Hillary used a private server to send personal and private email, which is not allowed.  Other Secretaries of State had private email accounts, as well as, a government email account.  Hillary never had a government email account, which is a violation of  the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Classified information was sent on the private server via the private email account -- that is a violation of law.  Top Secret information was handled the same way.  TS is to be sent by courier only.  The last items are violations of the Espionage Act, for which intent is not required, only the action.

This why one must never trust MSM or lefties in general to tell the truth.

If memory serves me, I believe just taking sensitive information outside of secured areas is good for up to a year in prison and/or stiff fines, like in Gen. Petraeus's case. Giving such information to foreign countries even unwittingly is good for up to 10 years in prison and much stiffer fines.

Simple transportation, as long as it is retained with one's person, is not a crime.  Letting someone see it, with no security clearance, or leaving the information, in a non-approved container is a crime.

I guess Hillary's bathroom server was at least as secure as Sandy Berger's skivvies.

Last edited by Stanky
Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:
Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

What Condie leaves out is that Hillary used a private server to send personal and private email, which is not allowed.  Other Secretaries of State had private email accounts, as well as, a government email account.  Hillary never had a government email account, which is a violation of  the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).  Classified information was sent on the private server via the private email account -- that is a violation of law.  Top Secret information was handled the same way.  TS is to be sent by courier only.  The last items are violations of the Espionage Act, for which intent is not required, only the action.

This why one must never trust MSM or lefties in general to tell the truth.

If memory serves me, I believe just taking sensitive information outside of secured areas is good for up to a year in prison and/or stiff fines, like in Gen. Petraeus's case. Giving such information to foreign countries even unwittingly is good for up to 10 years in prison and much stiffer fines.

Simple transportation, as long as it is retained with one's person, is not a crime.  Letting someone see it, with no security clearance, or leaving the information, in a non-approved container is a crime.

I guess Hillary's bathroom server was at least as secure as Sandy Berger's skivvies.

The documents on Berger's buns were probably more secure. plus who would want to touch it.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×