Replies sorted oldest to newest
quote:Originally posted by walter096:
just to set the record straight...Clinton WAS impeached in the House...this will always be in the history books..as it should be...he was not convicted in the Senate..big mistake..he lied before a Grand Jury..known fact..
quote:Originally posted by Pogo142:
pba:
The media is looking out for Bush!
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yes, once again the media is covering for Bush. They should have questioned his nonsense about Saddam having WMD when he was making these stupid claims like the progressive and world press was but they never did and they have never held him accountable for his lies either.
Both Bush and Cheney lied to congress and the nation about WMD and the war. Bush lied about Saddam trying to buy uranium from Niger when he was told the evidence was a forgery. The Downing Street Memo also exposed that "the facts were being fixed to fit the policy". Lying to start a war is also something that harms the country and could be considered an act of treason.
He and Cheney should have also been held accountable for their failures regarding the 9/11 attacks and shamed out of office.
Both Bush and Cheney have committed impeachable offense's. There is evidence that they are both implicated in the releasing of Plame's name, a political act of revenge, and then instituted a cover up. A real act of Treason.
They are both responsible for overseeing that prisoners of war were tortured and some died. A violation of a US law and the Geneva Convention.
Bush has also admitted that he authorized wire taps without court approval, a federal crime.
Former Federal Prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega has written that his abuse of signing statements are also an abuse of power. Others have stated that Impeachment can be started if a president abuses his power.
The media should be examining this evidence and debating while congress acts upon these crimes. Instead the media keeps us distracted with nonsense about personalities and triva and congress is to timid and beholding to their corporate under writers to act.
More people support the impeachment of Bush then supported the impeachment of Clinton and the people need to demand that our media and congress do their jobs.
quote:Originally posted by meanasasnake:
Being a deranged, incompetent idiot is plenty reason to impeach a president. I still vote for censure instead. Either way - "the shrub" gets what is coming to him.
How about the plan put forward by several organized movements for impeachment, TAKE BOTH Bush and Cheney out of office. This is but one of them. http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/quote:Originally posted by jagorham:
Let's be realistic -- what would be gained by impeaching (and convicting) Mr. Bush?
President Cheney?!?!?
The Republican-led House of Representatives looked like a bunch of boobs with the Clinton impeachment (which didn't even garner a simple majority in the Senate; hardly "Profiles in Courage" stuff). The same thing would happen here.
Besides, by the time it wrapped up, we'd have a new President elected anyway.
quote:Originally posted by Pogo142:
pba:
The media is looking out for Bush!
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yes, once again the media is covering for Bush. They should have questioned his nonsense about Saddam having WMD when he was making these stupid claims like the progressive and world press was but they never did and they have never held him accountable for his lies either.
Both Bush and Cheney lied to congress and the nation about WMD and the war. Bush lied about Saddam trying to buy uranium from Niger when he was told the evidence was a forgery. The Downing Street Memo also exposed that "the facts were being fixed to fit the policy". Lying to start a war is also something that harms the country and could be considered an act of treason.
He and Cheney should have also been held accountable for their failures regarding the 9/11 attacks and shamed out of office.
Both Bush and Cheney have committed impeachable offense's. There is evidence that they are both implicated in the releasing of Plame's name, a political act of revenge, and then instituted a cover up. A real act of Treason.
They are both responsible for overseeing that prisoners of war were tortured and some died. A violation of a US law and the Geneva Convention.
Bush has also admitted that he authorized wire taps without court approval, a federal crime.
Former Federal Prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega has written that his abuse of signing statements are also an abuse of power. Others have stated that Impeachment can be started if a president abuses his power.
The media should be examining this evidence and debating while congress acts upon these crimes. Instead the media keeps us distracted with nonsense about personalities and triva and congress is to timid and beholding to their corporate under writers to act.
More people support the impeachment of Bush then supported the impeachment of Clinton and the people need to demand that our media and congress do their jobs.
quote:Originally posted by pba:
CNN has said they want to be more like FOX. They already are pretty far right (Conservative Network News) and want to go further.
I'm never surprised when they come up with a Bush saving idea.
quote:Originally posted by pba:
Does any one agree that the Bush Family had ties to Hitler?
quote:Originally posted by Southern Patriot:quote:Originally posted by pba:
CNN has said they want to be more like FOX. They already are pretty far right (Conservative Network News) and want to go further.
I'm never surprised when they come up with a Bush saving idea.
Only a kook fringe liberal would believe that CNN is in ANY way right leaning. You are more out there than I thought PBA.
quote:Originally posted by Southern Patriot:quote:Originally posted by Pogo142:
pba:
The media is looking out for Bush!
________________________________________________________________________________________________
Yes, once again the media is covering for Bush. They should have questioned his nonsense about Saddam having WMD when he was making these stupid claims like the progressive and world press was but they never did and they have never held him accountable for his lies either.
Both Bush and Cheney lied to congress and the nation about WMD and the war. Bush lied about Saddam trying to buy uranium from Niger when he was told the evidence was a forgery. The Downing Street Memo also exposed that "the facts were being fixed to fit the policy". Lying to start a war is also something that harms the country and could be considered an act of treason.
He and Cheney should have also been held accountable for their failures regarding the 9/11 attacks and shamed out of office.
Both Bush and Cheney have committed impeachable offense's. There is evidence that they are both implicated in the releasing of Plame's name, a political act of revenge, and then instituted a cover up. A real act of Treason.
They are both responsible for overseeing that prisoners of war were tortured and some died. A violation of a US law and the Geneva Convention.
Bush has also admitted that he authorized wire taps without court approval, a federal crime.
Former Federal Prosecutor Elizabeth de la Vega has written that his abuse of signing statements are also an abuse of power. Others have stated that Impeachment can be started if a president abuses his power.
The media should be examining this evidence and debating while congress acts upon these crimes. Instead the media keeps us distracted with nonsense about personalities and triva and congress is to timid and beholding to their corporate under writers to act.
More people support the impeachment of Bush then supported the impeachment of Clinton and the people need to demand that our media and congress do their jobs.
You are never going to get beyond the lie that "bush and cheney have been implicated in the releasing of Plame's name", are you?
