Coming soon to a school near you.

quote:

Originally posted by Extra260:

quote:

Originally posted by David L.:

quote:

Originally posted by dolemitejb:
dogsoldier,

I am not disputing anything you claim in your post, nor am I disputing that people trying to push a misguided agenda of tolerance have made stupid decisions. I am challenging this silly implication that the gay community had a meeting to answer the question, "how can we convert children?"

So true. The whole notion is idiotic. We may be concerned about how gay teens are being treated and of course, attitudes like the ones the bozos are spewing on here, need to be changed. But, trying to "convert" a kid to be gay? No way! This just shows how uneducated most people are on the subject. You don't just become gay by someone's influence - you either are or you aren't.

So David,
What is the purpose of teaching "fisting" to all children in a public school setting?

Will you, as a self admitted practicing homosexual, then condemn the actions of homosexual organizations to push homosexual sex techniques to school children? Or do you agree with their actions?

quote:

Originally posted by David L.:
I have never heard of this being taught in school and I don't believe it. If it is true, I certainly don't agree with it.

quote:

Originally posted by David L.:
That it "out there" I agree but I have reservations about these web sites. Yesterday a woman was arrested for having sex with one of her students in Colbert County. Where is your outrage over that? Oh yeah, it didn't involve a gay person.

quote:

Originally posted by David L.:
But you want to make every gay person on earth look bad because of a few individuals.

quote:

Originally posted by ferrellj:

quote:

Originally posted by pineywoodscat:

quote:

Originally posted by The Raven:
It appears the judge who made this ruling, Chief Judge The Honorable Mark L Wolf, was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1985.
If so, wouldn't this be a strong possibility he is a republican? This ruling going against what the republican party stands for? A contradiction in terms?

http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/boston/wolf.htm

What difference does it make what party it is?
A Q**** is a Q**** regardeless of what they belong too. Pay attention to the subject and get off the lame brain rhetoric about parties.

Exactly, why do people try to hijack a thread and change the subject.

quote:

Originally posted by ferrellj:

quote:

Originally posted by The Raven:

quote:

Originally posted by pineywoodscat:

quote:

Originally posted by The Raven:
It appears the judge who made this ruling, Chief Judge The Honorable Mark L Wolf, was appointed by President Ronald Reagan in 1985.
If so, wouldn't this be a strong possibility he is a republican? This ruling going against what the republican party stands for? A contradiction in terms?

http://www.mad.uscourts.gov/boston/wolf.htm

What difference does it make what party it is?
A Q**** is a Q**** regardeless of what they belong too. Pay attention to the subject and get off the lame brain rhetoric about parties.

Can't read either, uh? I'm gonna type as slowly as I can. R-E-A-D my entry, I just think its I-R-O-N-I-C that the P-A-R-T-Y that P-U-S-H-E-S the A-N-T-I-H-O-M-O-S-E-X-U-A-L-I-T-Y Agenda, has a U-L-T-R-A-C-O-N-S-E-R-A-T-I-V-E president nominator, elect this agenda.

U-N-D-E-R-S-T-A-N-D, PW? I'm not trying to start a debate over the fact.

It's very clear what you were trying to do. Your post was out of place.