I took each of jefft's statements, proved they were wrong. Then, I showed where he drew wrong conclusions about his satements and why what happened did so.
He violated Godwin's law and I called him on it. For that he pretends he's in high dudgeon.
Jefft, your line sounds too much like Nobluedog and Pogo, with the exception that Pogo's grammar usually deteriorates when he's confronted with inconvenient things like facts.
As for nationalism, damm straight! The American form isthe only form that successfully defended freedom and liberties of its citizens. Such alternatives as the UN are corrupt beyond comprehension, when they're not being useless.
quote:Originally posted by interventor12:
I took each of jefft's statements, proved they were wrong. Then, I showed where he drew wrong conclusions about his satements and why what happened did so.
All you have done is give your opinion, quibble numbers and parrot conventional wisdom. You have not disproved anything. BTW, I like how you address the general reader as if I am not involved in the conversation. 'Nicely played stance of superiority.
quote:
He violated Godwin's law and I called him on it. For that he pretends he's in high dudgeon.
Godwin's Law is the comparative invocation of Nazis and/or Hitler. You brought up Germany, not me. If it's the word stormtrooper that's got your shorts in a knot, that was a Star Wars reference.
quote:
Jefft, your line sounds too much like Nobluedog and Pogo, with the exception that Pogo's grammar usually deteriorates when he's confronted with inconvenient things like facts.
So you have the ability to make others sputter through their keyboards? Cool.
quote:
As for nationalism, damm straight! The American form is the only form that successfully defended freedom and liberties of its citizens. Such alternatives as the UN are corrupt beyond comprehension, when they're not being useless.
And so your perception is always clouded from any indications to the contrary with a starting square that says the U.S. is always superior and holds intensions always driven by goodness and light. In reality, this is not always the case and you seem incapable of even considering that possibility. This is one of the primary reasons why I only pop into these boards periodically and for short duration. Most things seem to quickly deteriorate to GO AMERICA!!! NUMBER 1!!! Love it or leave it, Commie! It does get a bit tedious.
I must give credit where credit is due. That was a fine use of profanity for righteously indignant emphasis. Go you!
Now here's where I go away for weeks or months. That would be your cue to respond to this declaring your superiority, obvious victory and maybe even my equally obvious cowardice for not responding. Ready? GO!
quote:Originally posted by marksw59:quote:Originally posted by jefft:quote:
Can't answer the statements in a logical, argument! Check!
I already have. Your nationalism button is apparently stuck in the on position preventing you from seeing the forest for the trees.
So, since you see the big picture so much more clearly than the rest of us, what would you do? Gong back to September 12, 2001, what would you have been doing on this day?
I guess I'll have to check when I get home from work on the Jefft plan...
Originally posted by interventor12:
I took each of jefft's statements, proved they were wrong. Then, I showed where he drew wrong conclusions about his statements and why what happened did so.
“All you have done is give your opinion, quibble numbers and parrot conventional wisdom. You have not disproved anything. BTW, I like how you address the general reader as if I am not involved in the conversation. 'Nicely played stance of superiority.”
Again, only general statements with no proof. I showed the timelines did not match your conclusions and backed it with proof, which you refer to as quibble numbers. Perhaps, that impresses freshmen – high school freshmen.
quote:
He violated Godwin's law and I called him on it. For that he pretends he's in high dudgeon.
Godwin's Law is the comparative invocation of Nazis and/or Hitler. You brought up Germany, not me. If it's the word stormtrooper that's got your shorts in a knot, that was a Star Wars reference.
The only reference to Germany is the bases. No mention of the NSDAP or of Adolf was made by me. Sorry, patawon, the Star Wars reference doesn’t fly.
quote:
Jefft, your line sounds too much like Nobluedog and Pogo, with the exception that Pogo's grammar usually deteriorates when he's confronted with inconvenient things like facts.
So you have the ability to make others sputter through their keyboards? Cool.
quote:
As for nationalism, dam straight! The American form is the only form that successfully defended freedom and liberties of its citizens. Such alternatives as the UN are corrupt beyond comprehension, when they're not being useless.
“And so your perception is always clouded from any indications to the contrary with a starting square that says the U.S. is always superior and holds intensions always driven by goodness and light. In reality, this is not always the case and you seem incapable of even considering that possibility. This is one of the primary reasons why I only pop into these boards periodically and for short duration. Most things seem to quickly deteriorate to GO AMERICA!!! NUMBER 1!!! Love it or leave it, Commie! It does get a bit tedious.
I must give credit where credit is due. That was a fine use of profanity for righteously indignant emphasis. Go you!
Now here's where I go away for weeks or months. That would be your cue to respond to this declaring your superiority, obvious victory and maybe even my equally obvious cowardice for not responding. Ready? GO!”
Again, generalities and sophistries, with no logical argumentation. Anyone may make vacuous statements. However, when confronted with facts and logical argument, you state generalities as proven fact. Scuttle off if you must!
I took each of jefft's statements, proved they were wrong. Then, I showed where he drew wrong conclusions about his statements and why what happened did so.
“All you have done is give your opinion, quibble numbers and parrot conventional wisdom. You have not disproved anything. BTW, I like how you address the general reader as if I am not involved in the conversation. 'Nicely played stance of superiority.”
Again, only general statements with no proof. I showed the timelines did not match your conclusions and backed it with proof, which you refer to as quibble numbers. Perhaps, that impresses freshmen – high school freshmen.
quote:
He violated Godwin's law and I called him on it. For that he pretends he's in high dudgeon.
Godwin's Law is the comparative invocation of Nazis and/or Hitler. You brought up Germany, not me. If it's the word stormtrooper that's got your shorts in a knot, that was a Star Wars reference.
The only reference to Germany is the bases. No mention of the NSDAP or of Adolf was made by me. Sorry, patawon, the Star Wars reference doesn’t fly.
quote:
Jefft, your line sounds too much like Nobluedog and Pogo, with the exception that Pogo's grammar usually deteriorates when he's confronted with inconvenient things like facts.
So you have the ability to make others sputter through their keyboards? Cool.
quote:
As for nationalism, dam straight! The American form is the only form that successfully defended freedom and liberties of its citizens. Such alternatives as the UN are corrupt beyond comprehension, when they're not being useless.
“And so your perception is always clouded from any indications to the contrary with a starting square that says the U.S. is always superior and holds intensions always driven by goodness and light. In reality, this is not always the case and you seem incapable of even considering that possibility. This is one of the primary reasons why I only pop into these boards periodically and for short duration. Most things seem to quickly deteriorate to GO AMERICA!!! NUMBER 1!!! Love it or leave it, Commie! It does get a bit tedious.
I must give credit where credit is due. That was a fine use of profanity for righteously indignant emphasis. Go you!
Now here's where I go away for weeks or months. That would be your cue to respond to this declaring your superiority, obvious victory and maybe even my equally obvious cowardice for not responding. Ready? GO!”
Again, generalities and sophistries, with no logical argumentation. Anyone may make vacuous statements. However, when confronted with facts and logical argument, you state generalities as proven fact. Scuttle off if you must!
She almost looks like Toby Keith!
Also, elinterventor01, work your way into a few more posts before you throw your multi-syllabic intellect into a reply. Otherwise, you sound like a college kid who just tasted the nectar of knowledge and starting barfing it up onto your keyboard. 1. It ruins your computer, 2. it smells so bad it makes other people puke, 3. you turn what could be an ability to influence people through erudition into an ability to nauseate people when they see you coming. None of those scenarios aid the cause of "thinking people."
quote:Originally posted by mad American:
What unnecessary war? Killing terrorist is necessary.
It's the one in Iraq, mad (as in crazy) American. The one we went into to get at those non-existent weapons of mass destruction. The one we entered so we could get at the Al Qaeda 9-11 assassins who were not there. The WAR that was there for the reasons that were NOT. That war. Now you know.
quote:Originally posted by Rowan Oak:
She almost looks like Toby Keith!
Saw Toby in Iraq, he sings better and has more facial hair. Otherwise, they do resemble each other.
quote:Originally posted by Rowan Oak:
Also, elinterventor01, work your way into a few more posts before you throw your multi-syllabic intellect into a reply. Otherwise, you sound like a college kid who just tasted the nectar of knowledge and starting barfing it up onto your keyboard. 1. It ruins your computer, 2. it smells so bad it makes other people puke, 3. you turn what could be an ability to influence people through erudition into an ability to nauseate people when they see you coming. None of those scenarios aid the cause of "thinking people."
Suggest you trace the entire dialogue. jefft made statements without backing them up. Interventor traced the timeline of the US's military's growth and decline to prove there was no plan to keep establish an empire. Jefft dismissed the argument and did not offer any proof to counter the arguments. That, is the true hallmark of the college sophomore and leftist -- its true because I say so.
quote:Originally posted by kperk014:quote:Originally posted by Eastside:
She's not even truly a "dixie chick" anymore. The other 2 chicks have cut an album without Maines. Guess they got tired of her mouth in more ways than one.
ubetern is probably saying: But she does have a purdy mouf. Uh huh uh huh
You have done it! With that post, you have established a new "personal best" for irrelevance and stupidity. Given your past performance, that is quite an accomplishment.
quote:Originally posted by beternU:quote:Originally posted by kperk014:quote:Originally posted by Eastside:
She's not even truly a "dixie chick" anymore. The other 2 chicks have cut an album without Maines. Guess they got tired of her mouth in more ways than one.
ubetern is probably saying: But she does have a purdy mouf. Uh huh uh huh
You have done it! With that post, you have established a new "personal best" for irrelevance and stupidity. Given your past performance, that is quite an accomplishment.
Aww butter-boy, claiming you didn't say that, huh? Well whatever. You need to realize that there's a difference between posting "stupid" things on purpose for fun and posting stupid things out of ignorance. I'm the former and you are the latter.