Let's see what our resident liberals have to say.
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Let's see what our resident liberals have to say.
___
THIS resident liberal says that your post is a jumbled mess.The questions you ask have nothing whatsoever to do with the topic you have selected. There are tests for early onset dementia. Perhaps you should schedule one.
Perfect response by the resident Liberal. Change the subject and call the questioner a name. Better watch it or next you will be a racist of the first order.
I should ad that he will not answer the question along with all the other dodges listed.
Let's see what our resident liberals have to say.
___
THIS resident liberal says that your post is a jumbled mess.The questions you ask have nothing whatsoever to do with the topic you have selected. There are tests for early onset dementia. Perhaps you should schedule one.
---------------------------
The question, question, not questions, asked in the title of the thread is pretty straight forward, so how is his post a "jumbled mess"? What's that you're always saying about others? Knee jerk reaction? Your response would actually qualify as a knee jerk reaction.
I try not to hate anybody. I had to make an exception in the case of W Bush tho.
And my exception is the Clinton's. Since they both claim to have served in the Presidency that is the reason I treat them as one.
there are no conservative blacks ; only black moles
There's more black conservatives than black liberals want to admit.
And the black liberals do indeed hate them.
I don't hate *any* black folks.....Or even conservatives, for that matter.
Ya gotta try harder than that to make me *hate* ya.
Ya know..
It makes me wonder if the hamster is still alive when yer signature is bigger than ~anything~ ya post.
or every item you post has something to do with 'racism'.
Your whole party platform involves diving people by race and income I think it's fair topic to discuss. Hows is that whole Obama thing working out for Black folks? The labor participation rate is hasn't been lower since 1977. Great society indeed.......
You're right, I just forgot some basic socialist ideas, liberals can't be racist
and obama said blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites just
to name two. Riding in on a short bus shouldn't stop a liberal roadie pup
from riding out on one.
THIS resident liberal says that your post is a jumbled mess.
I agree, nothing ties the title and the post to each other. The two words, love and hate are being used too many times. I like Alabama football, I'm not having a love affair with it. I'm not a Auburn fan, but I don't hate them.
By the way, Putin and Bush. Two real fine heroes.
You're right, I just forgot some basic socialist ideas, liberals can't be racist
and obama said blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites just
to name two. Riding in on a short bus shouldn't stop a liberal roadie pup
from riding out on one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, yeah...yadda, yadda... *YAWN*....How original.
If blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites-then how'n th' hell do ya explain all the black faces in jail?
Crimes is crimes no matter the color.
Whoever said I'm a liberal? Or a socialist? Sure I lean to the left some (because I just can't stomach that whole stupid 'theocracy' idea, I have nothing against anybody who is of different ethnicity than me, and I consider women to be my equals-so much unlike the conservative, bible-thumpedy right neanderthals...)
I don't want your money and I never asked for anything for free.
Do *you* hate yankees?
It must really suck havin' to do all that hatin' all the time.
Relax, Frank-seesss..
Have a belt an' a smoke.
Life's too short to waste time hatin' folks.
Observing how Ben Carson, an extremely competent surgeon and conservative, is denigrated after he made his views public. One wonders, if after decades as a brain surgeon, he felt guilty for charging Democrats full price.
The same may be said for conservative women. Look up comments on the more public ones like Palin, Malkin and Noonan. One may disagree with them, but the vile filth one observes from the left isn't just hate speech -- a two minute hate, it's atrocious.
it's funny to watch all the regressives 'project' their fears on the democrats.
You're right, I just forgot some basic socialist ideas, liberals can't be racist
and obama said blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites just
to name two. Riding in on a short bus shouldn't stop a liberal roadie pup
from riding out on one.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, yeah...yadda, yadda... *YAWN*....How original.
If blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites-then how'n th' hell do ya explain all the black faces in jail?
Crimes is crimes no matter the color.
Whoever said I'm a liberal? Or a socialist? Sure I lean to the left some (because I just can't stomach that whole stupid 'theocracy' idea, I have nothing against anybody who is of different ethnicity than me, and I consider women to be my equals-so much unlike the conservative, bible-thumpedy right neanderthals...)
I don't want your money and I never asked for anything for free.
Do *you* hate yankees?
It must really suck havin' to do all that hatin' all the time.
Relax, Frank-seesss..
Have a belt an' a smoke.
Life's too short to waste time hatin' folks.
Well pup can I assume then that yo hate thumpities ?
You're right, I just forgot some basic socialist ideas, liberals can't be racist
and obama said blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites just
to name two. Riding in on a short bus shouldn't stop a liberal roadie pup
from riding out on one.
ineek your cute comment about the "short bus" ; does that represent a disdain on your part for the mentally challenged? One should puke when they see your name.
You're right, I just forgot some basic socialist ideas, liberals can't be racist
and obama said blacks can't be disciplined for crimes against whites just
to name two. Riding in on a short bus shouldn't stop a liberal roadie pup
from riding out on one.
ineek your cute comment about the "short bus" ; does that represent a disdain on your part for the mentally challenged? One should puke when they see your name.
~~~~~~~~~
Use your own sink.....
Dire, concerning your last post, slurs and degrading comments about the other side is a two way street. Both sides do it. At times, judging from the behavior and comments, all of them need to be sent to bed without supper and have their tv privileges restricted for two weeks.
Observing how Ben Carson, an extremely competent surgeon and conservative, is denigrated after he made his views public. One wonders, if after decades as a brain surgeon, he felt guilty for charging Democrats full price.
The same may be said for conservative women. Look up comments on the more public ones like Palin, Malkin and Noonan. One may disagree with them, but the vile filth one observes from the left isn't just hate speech -- a two minute hate, it's atrocious.
Don't forget that Ben Carson was also audited by the IRS immediately after his comments on the ACA. However, I'm sure that was just a coincidence.
Dire, concerning your last post, slurs and degrading comments about the other side is a two way street. Both sides do it. At times, judging from the behavior and comments, all of them need to be sent to bed without supper and have their tv privileges restricted for two weeks.
____________________________________________
As I stated when I started posting, I will not attack anyone directly. However, after a personal attack, I reserve the right to defend myself. I've never wished anyone dead, especially in a slow painful way, nor that they be raped or suffer from a terrible disease.
The liberals on this forum have not answered the question first posed by the "dogsoldier" but they have successfully changed the subject and started the name calling.
No, we embrace them. They have a right to be what they want to be..
Dire, concerning your last post, slurs and degrading comments about the other side is a two way street. Both sides do it. At times, judging from the behavior and comments, all of them need to be sent to bed without supper and have their tv privileges restricted for two weeks.
=================
gbrk: There are union workers and nonunion workers. I read your post that says you were a union member for 20+ years in the IBEW. You then chose to drop your union book.
I have worked for 40 years with a union book, retired in October and will pay union dues to that union for the rest of my life. I was not always happy with the union, but I was loyal to it.
In my experiences, there are union workers, non union workers, and rats. If a union goes on strike, the workers crossing the picket lines are scabs.
From the information you gave in your post, You are a RATTY, SCAB, SUCK A S S.
Actually jt, I'm surprised you didn't get banned for that one, but I guess no one reported you.
best, the p*orographic content in your avatar got by censorship.
Perfect response by the resident Liberal. Change the subject and call the questioner a name. Better watch it or next you will be a racist of the first order.
___
I simply called attention to the obvious fact that the message in dogsoldier's had no relevance to his topic. That is NOT changing the subject.
The liberals on this forum have not answered the question first posed by the "dogsoldier" but they have successfully changed the subject and started the name calling.
___
ANSWER: No--we do not hate them. As to name calling, tell us what YOU think of conservatives who invent and prolifically employ such names for our African-American President as "Obummer", "Ovomit,"and "Odumbo"? Then tell us whether it is hatred or some other disorder that prompts them to invent and use such slurs.
Best, if you kept that post for that long, you must have really liked it
If I kept it? It's posted, I didn't "keep" anything. You posted it and it didn't go anywhere, I just copied and pasted it. You should be ashamed of it, but then again, it just shows the mentality of union thugs.
Here's where it's "kept".
I picked up the idea from the people who called and still do call President Bush so many names that were outrageous. Tit for Tat only, only Tat yells foul when someone does it to their guy.
I've made statements of disdain about Obama, however, refrained from most name calling, except for the term Obamessiah, which shows my disdain for his sycophant followers.
The liberals on this forum have not answered the question first posed by the "dogsoldier" but they have successfully changed the subject and started the name calling.
I never really expected any of them to answer it.
Perfect response by the resident Liberal. Change the subject and call the questioner a name. Better watch it or next you will be a racist of the first order.
___
I simply called attention to the obvious fact that the message in dogsoldier's had no relevance to his topic. That is NOT changing the subject.
Please point out 'the message' to which you refer. I asked a SIMPLE question and directed it to a group of SPECIFIC forum members for an answer. It isn't 'rocket science'.
The liberals on this forum have not answered the question first posed by the "dogsoldier" but they have successfully changed the subject and started the name calling.
I never really expected any of them to answer it.
__
WRONG... I answered it, above, as follows:
"ANSWER: No--we do not hate them. As to name calling, tell us what YOU think of conservatives who invent and prolifically employ such names for our African-American President as "Obummer", "Ovomit,"and "Odumbo"? Then tell us whether it is hatred or some other disorder that prompts them to invent and use such slurs."
It was a silly, dumbass question to begin with. It is posed in an absolutist, all-inclusive fashion based on the dichotomous, and irrelevant, proposition that liberals, as a class, either do or do not hate conservative blacks. Liberals recognize American individualism and resist lumping people together into implied monolithic categories. But many simplistic and naive conservatives find it difficult to adopt that perspective, and such seems to be the case with dogsoldier and his poorly-posed question.
There--I have given that question, so enthusiastically cheered on by some of you knee-jerk wingers, far more time and effort than it deserves. Now go back to your hero worship of every noteworthy African American conservative you can dredge up. But the last Presidential election should have informed you black conservatives, and therefore black Republicans, are in a small minority. And the widespread efforts of state GOP organizations and GOP-dominated state legislatures to suppress black voter participation in the next Presidential election should tell you something else about political preferences within the black community.
Perfect response by the resident Liberal. Change the subject and call the questioner a name. Better watch it or next you will be a racist of the first order.
___
I simply called attention to the obvious fact that the message in dogsoldier's had no relevance to his topic. That is NOT changing the subject.
Please point out 'the message' to which you refer. I asked a SIMPLE question and directed it to a group of SPECIFIC forum members for an answer. It isn't 'rocket science'.
___
His QUESTION was the TOPIC at the top of his post. The MESSAGE was the unrelated content in the box below the topic. Again--the Message was utterly unrelated to the TOPIC, something that should be obvious, even to you.
My answer to the question is elsewhere in this string, but since you seem to have missed it, I will post it in this reply as well. I colored it blue, with bold type for the most relevant part, as further assistance to your compromised ability to recognize things for what they are:
ANSWER: No--we do not hate them. As to name calling, tell us what YOU think of conservatives who invent and prolifically employ such names for our African-American President as "Obummer", "Ovomit,"and "Odumbo"? Then tell us whether it is hatred or some other disorder that prompts them to invent and use such slurs."
It was a silly, dumbass question to begin with. It is posed in an absolutist, all-inclusive fashion based on the dichotomous, and irrelevant, proposition that liberals, as a class, either do or do not hate conservative blacks. Liberals recognize American individualism and resist lumping people together into implied monolithic categories. But many simplistic and naive conservatives find it difficult to adopt that perspective, and such seems to be the case with dogsoldier and his poorly-posed question.
There--I have given that question, so enthusiastically cheered on by some of you knee-jerk wingers, far more time and effort than it deserves. Now go back to your hero worship of every noteworthy African American conservative you can dredge up. But the last Presidential election should have informed you black conservatives, and therefore black Republicans, are in a small minority. And the widespread efforts of state GOP organizations and GOP-dominated state legislatures to suppress black voter participation in the next Presidential election should tell you something else about political preferences within the black community.