Skip to main content

In order not to hurt the tender feelings of murderers, rapists, drug cartel members, and the rest of the dreck in federal prisons, DoJ has a new policy.

"This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,” decoupling past actions from the person being described and anticipating the contributions we expect them to make when they return.  We will be using the new terminology in speeches, solicitations, website content, and social media posts, and I am hopeful that other agencies and organizations will consider doing the same."

https://www.washingtonpost.com...cts-to-ease-reentry/

Good Lord!  The administration has gone beyond any bounds of reality. SNL couldn't make this up.  Poor George Orwell would be accused of going beyond the limits of what readers could believe.  At least, couldn't a "person who committed a crime" be called a criminal.  Perhaps, to make it completely acceptable to liberals and conservatives, just refer to the scum as Democrats.  

TRUTH -- THE NEW HATE SPEECH!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

direstraits posted:

In order not to hurt the tender feelings of murderers, rapists, drug cartel members, and the rest of the dreck in federal prisons, DoJ has a new policy.

"This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,” decoupling past actions from the person being described and anticipating the contributions we expect them to make when they return.  We will be using the new terminology in speeches, solicitations, website content, and social media posts, and I am hopeful that other agencies and organizations will consider doing the same."

https://www.washingtonpost.com...cts-to-ease-reentry/

Good Lord!  The administration has gone beyond any bounds of reality. SNL couldn't make this up.  Poor George Orwell would be accused of going beyond the limits of what readers could believe.  At least, couldn't a "person who committed a crime" be called a criminal.  Perhaps, to make it completely acceptable to liberals and conservatives, just refer to the scum as Democrats.  

Well hey, think of the dance we get from those enlightened folks with with the term illegal aliens. They should call them pre-democrats.

Stanky posted:
direstraits posted:

In order not to hurt the tender feelings of murderers, rapists, drug cartel members, and the rest of the dreck in federal prisons, DoJ has a new policy.

"This new policy statement replaces unnecessarily disparaging labels with terms like “person who committed a crime” and “individual who was incarcerated,” decoupling past actions from the person being described and anticipating the contributions we expect them to make when they return.  We will be using the new terminology in speeches, solicitations, website content, and social media posts, and I am hopeful that other agencies and organizations will consider doing the same."

https://www.washingtonpost.com...cts-to-ease-reentry/

Good Lord!  The administration has gone beyond any bounds of reality. SNL couldn't make this up.  Poor George Orwell would be accused of going beyond the limits of what readers could believe.  At least, couldn't a "person who committed a crime" be called a criminal.  Perhaps, to make it completely acceptable to liberals and conservatives, just refer to the scum as Democrats.  

Well hey, think of the dance we get from those enlightened folks with with the term illegal aliens. They should call them pre-democrats.

That would be derogatory to the tribe of "democrats". Better still
would be "predetermined socialist slaves". If pregnant with twins
it will go as a double yoke of a joke from a poke. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×