Skip to main content

EDINBURG — An 83-year-old former priest has pleaded not guilty to murder in the slaying of a South Texas teacher and former beauty queen more than a half-century ago.

John Feit used a walker as he arrived in court Monday in Hidalgo County. He is accused of the April 1960 beating and suffocation of 25-year-old Irene Garza.

State District Judge Luis Singleterry set bail at $1 million.

Ex-priest, 83, pleads not guilty to Texas woman’s 1960 death photo
Nathan Lambrecht

Feit was returned to Texas last week from Phoenix, where he had been jailed since his arrest last month after prosecutors said they had new evidence against him. The nature of that evidence hasn’t been disclosed. He long had been suspected in her death.

Authorities say Feit, then 27, killed Garza after hearing her confession at a Roman Catholic church in McAllen.

Her body was found days later. An autopsy determined that Garza, who was named Miss All South Texas Sweetheart 1958, had been raped while unconscious and had been beaten and suffocated.

Feit was arrested Feb. 9 in the Phoenix suburb of Scottsdale, where he had lived for years. He had been indicted in Texas.

His arrest followed other investigations over the years, including a grand jury probe in 2004 that concluded there was insufficient evidence to charge him.

So there you go .............. puts an end to it..........

Maybe they should beat the s*** out of him to be on the safe side,,,,, right,, sheet starter conni. ..???

http://www.statesman.com/news/...as-womans-196/nqkgn/

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

gbrk posted:

So how did they catch him?  Did he figure he better confess before meeting his ultimate Judge or did they catch him some other way?  Somehow I don't buy that he has any remorse as he did plead not guilty.  So guess he didn't turn himself in.

They didn't catch him. He was never on the run or hiding out. They just went to his home and arrested him.

Last edited by giftedamateur

I read about it under another topic on the forum here.  Sounds like they got the right guy but there is no remorse in the man at all except that he got caught.   Sadly he will never really pay for his crime at least here on earth in this physical life but in the afterlife is where his penalty and judgment awaits.

Pled just sounds better.

================

Anyone notice the banishment of “pled” about 5 years or so ago? The newspapers used to say “The defendant pled not guilty.” Suddenly, everything became “pleaded.” I contend that this is an improper imposition of some kind of twisted “grammar correctness,” except it is incorrect. “Pled” is a less emotional word than “pleaded”. I plead when I am begging for something. Unless the defendant is on his knees weeping, he is not pleading, he is entering a plea. In the past tense, he pled, not pleaded.

http://painintheenglish.com/case/4191

Anyone notice the fairly recent--and accelerating-- use of "concerning," once exclusively  a preposition, now encroaching deeply into adjective territory, as in "This is very concerning"?     A synonym for "concerning" is "regarding."  Will we eventually see such constructions as "This is very regarding?

The adjectival use of concerning only gradually crept into the vernacular, as described in the link below, which intelligently and dispassionately explores the etymological evolution of the word:

http://www.dailywritingtips.co...ing-as-an-adjective/

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×