I have just been insulted by PTW in a PM that I can only say is spineless and makes my blood boil. I wish I could say more by my rearing keeps me from it.
You wanted a rise out of me and you sure got it but I promise it will be the last stupid remark of yours I will read. I am a very peaceful person but to take it to such a low level in a PM is below what I consider below. Talk about hitting below the belt. and insulting in such a vulger way. Everone this forum know I don't see eye to eye wit everyones post but SUCH a VULGER attack only reinforces my thoughts of you. SHAME ON YOU AND MY GOD FORGIVE YOU.
I know you don't want to say what he sent you, but I can't decide if a vulgar PM is SL's style. SL likes to be looked upon as the good guy & he is subtle. Was the PM vulgar outright or was it subtle?
His posts definately resemble SL's but would he have mistaken RED (think it was RED) for a Vietnam Vet if it was him? I don't know.
...I'll be able to sleep if I'm being ignored by a guy whose screen name is defined as "the area between nutsack and *******"...but I'll try...I'll really, really try... Registered: 03 January 2007
Oh, you have it. I've had similar problems. That is why I'm asking. It was not with this guy. I don't accept PMs now. If I have to send a PM, I'll reverse it for short time & then back to not accepting.
See, I'm thinking the same thing, Brentenman. SL is sometimes a little intense, for lack of a better word, and somewhat crude (but I think that's because he's in the medical field & used to discussing what I might consider gross ), but this PM just doesn't sound like him.
Okay, so I'm just feeling this is wrong, not taint's problems with the new guy, but accusing people of being someone else. We may be getting paranoid. I've been on the receiving end of one of these accusations & let me tell you, it's not fun. SL, if you come back on here, I apologize for talking about you.
I know you aren't reading this, Taint, but, just to let others know: the private message I sent you was virtually word-for-word as the one I posted publicly on the forum.
YOU chose a vulgar nic-- ask any 15-year-old to define "taint" and watch him/her crack up laughing...
And my deepest, deepest pity goes to Shoal's Lover, who by now must be wondering how on Earth HE got dragged into this fray...
I also wonder which of us should be insulted by the insinuation that we're the same person...
Oh, and on the subject of "Taint's" presumably top-notch rearing being the key factor in his remarkable restraint: had his folks worked a little harder on the lad, they might have taught him that it's hardly polite to choose a well-known, vulgar slang term for his forum nickname...maybe someone whom he hasn't been forced to block in order to avoid facing the reality of the world will let him know I said so...
PatriotWITHaBrain ... I see you are under full attack from the hit mob here. In the end you will find they are pretty shallow. They band together because they can't stand on their own. I believe the word 'troll' is the 'que' ...then like a pack of dogs...multi identities and all...here they come.
I may or may not agree with you...but I do not feel as if I am superior to you.
When you block a person, they can no longer invite you to a private message or post to your profile wall. Replies and comments they make will be collapsed/hidden by default. Finally, you'll never receive email notifications about content they create or likes they designate for your content.
Note: if you proceed, you will no longer be following .