For those who might believe that the extremist pro-gun enthusiasts have no cogent arguments in defense of their beliefs, this little article should be instructive:
For those who might believe that the extremist pro-gun enthusiasts have no cogent arguments in defense of their beliefs, this little article should be instructive:
Replies sorted oldest to newest
Typical pseudo intellectual drivel by those who possess a rudimentary understanding of logic yet use it as their bailiwick. Case in point... the "gun nut logic" below puts forth two separate and independent propositions, yet the analogy put forth by the "interpretation" reflects only a single condition. And in typical fashion, it is intentionally ascribed in a way that projects a childish mentality to the opposing side in order to deflect scrutiny away from their feeble attempt at achieving some valid equivocation. I understand these folks' burning desire to be something more than just average on the cognitive totem pole, but those pesky standard deviations just won't get out of their way!!
GUN NUT LOGIC: According to leaders of the NRA, any restrictions on types of guns or sizes of magazines sold, or mandatory background checks for all purchasers, particularly in regard to private sales, will lead inevitably—if not immediately—to gun confiscation and an end to all Second Amendment rights.
INTERPRETATION: If a child has a bag of Halloween candy and mom says, “You can only eat one candy bar before bedtime,” or “no candy now, it’s time for supper,” this means mom intends to confiscate the bag of candy. Mom is like Hitler.
Doesn't it ever get tiresome being wrong so often?
http://www.thegatewaypundit.co...ays-to-turn-in-guns/ (just today)
http://www.prisonplanet.com/ar...confiscationguns.htm
http://thestoryoflibertyblog.c...d-buyback-an-option/
Gotta say, the author of head's link is just plain dumb.
The democrats themselves have already proven they want to disarm law abiding citizens, so no need to refute that part of the article.
The rest is hyperbole, nothing more.
Please post the time and date that democrats proved that they want to take all guns away
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G...ants-All-Guns-Banned
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/k...s-over-time-n1496561
Please post the time and date that Republicans proved they wanted to take all womens' reproductive rights away.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G...ants-All-Guns-Banned
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/k...s-over-time-n1496561
Please post the time and date that Republicans proved they wanted to take all womens' reproductive rights away.
==================================================
==================================================
Here:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gkrOt9Qposg
You get to listen to Romney lie about Obamacare for a few minutes, but at 5:26 Romney agrees with that (not known as a Liberal) religious nut Huckabee that he would sign a "personhood amendment" to the Constitution.
Such a personhood amendment would by it's nature , virtually outlaw most forms of birth control in use, and therefore strip a woman of her reproductive rights.
Tod Akin seems to think that most rape is in fact not rape
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LoG0Grs4EEo
Five reasons why a woman should never vote for Paul Ryan
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UWltOO9ciFg
It is not difficult to find many more answers to your question, Google is ready when you are.
Discussions with someone who just denies facts in evidence by their own mouths is useless, and I didn't EVEN get into what was said by the Republican that you really don't want to Google.
http://www.breitbart.com/Big-G...ants-All-Guns-Banned
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/k...s-over-time-n1496561
Please post the time and date that Republicans proved they wanted to take all womens' reproductive rights away.
I am tired of this war on women crap you herd all during election season but now its over have herd one democrat one democrat take up for you woman again. One one word PAWNS.
As passed by the Congress:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
As ratified by the States and authenticated by Thomas Jefferson, Secretary of State:
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
Definition of 'infringed':
Verb
|
More misinterpretation of our Constitution by the left.