Neither, is a good choice.  Hillary has a  history of failures and non-accomphisnments as senators and secretary of state.  Plus, she is unfamiliar with the truth. 

Liarwatha shares the habit of treating the truth as an inconvenience.  Even more left wing than Hillary, she will not stand up for US interests in the world. She is mainly an academic like Obama.

No executive experience for either of them.

I know someone well that's a Democratic insider.  She's the type that runs campaigns for U.S. Congressmen as a hobby.

At the inauguration, she asked one of Al Gore's senatorial aides if they were going to work at the White House.  They said heaven's no.  Hillary is about the meanest person you'll ever meet, and she'll run off anyone that works for their White House.

I promise you that Hillary seldom if ever returned to Little Rock after leaving for Washington, and she didn't leave a single friend in all of Arkansas.  Can you imagine why anyone would put up with the sexual antics of Bill Clinton?  They're living separate lives.

But the left wing Democrats plus the Mexicans plus the Blacks will probably vote one of them into Office, you know them Entitlements go a long way in who gets elected and you have CBS, ABC, NBC and the rest of the Liberal Stations pushing the Liberal Candidate tthey can steal the election, it has happened before.

there is so much corruption in Washington now I don't know how the Government comes up with enough money to keep operating, they was telling Yesterday that Obama was wantin to put a tax hike on Corporations by executive Order, so he needs more Money.

More right-wingers badmouthing Democrats as nothing more than suck-ups to the 47 percent.

It is not so much the overt Democratic recruitment of votes from the minority communities that will elect another Democratic president in 2016.  It is the demeaning and callous disregard for the underclasses ("welfare cheats", 47 percenters, etc.) that will bring on that outcome.  Whine all you want about minority votes carrying the election.  Minority voters are wise enough to know which party doesn't give a fig for them.

I would like to see something positive for a possible republican candidate instead of slandering any possible democratic candidate.  But wait, is there nothing positive to say about any of the possible republicans? 

___

I am pretty sure that none of them beat their wives, kick puppies, or steal from the poor box,but that is about all I can come up with.

Never heard of Sarah Palin, dumb dumb?  You and Contendah should get together and start your own club, "The Happy Hypocrites".

"Poor people have been voting for Democrats for the last fifty years... and they are still poor." - Sir Charles Barkley. 

So true.

____________________________________________________

But, what does it say about a party that will allow in millions of foreigners to compete and drive down pay in hopes of keeping themselves in power in the future.  Didn't Caligula do some like this to the Senate.

__________________________________________

Well, none lied about the honesty of several innocent people, attempted to have them fired and one imprisoned, like Travelgate, now did they?

Of these replies, only one mentioned one of the right wing hopes, Sarah Palin.  None of the posts mentioned anything good about her. 

Typical

Another democrat is going in.

No, no, no.  " I know we have tried to repeal Obama care 60 times, I think 10 or 15 more times will do it." 

"Why did the dummies elect another dem?"

If, when the congress was in full session, the administration at the WH and the Supremes setting for arguments -- the sensors on the east coast failed and a sudden tsunami inundated the entire place; would we view the event as the wrath of a vengeful God, or divine mercy.

==========================

All the positive, sensible 'talk' in the world won't help with someone that thinks hillary clinton or lizzie warren, any democrit now days, are viable candidates. All the 'good' things about Palin means nothing to the left. She's been discussed a hundred times with good things said about her. Weren't you paying attention?

Well, none lied about the honesty of several innocent people, attempted to have them fired and one imprisoned, like Travelgate, now did they?

--------------

Reagan, the great communicator, how many of his administration were charged with criminal doings?

======================

If, when the congress was in full session, the administration at the WH and the Supremes setting for arguments -- the sensors on the east coast failed and a sudden tsunami inundated the entire place; would we view the event as the wrath of a vengeful God, or divine mercy.

----------

It would be a big improvement wouldn't it?

____________________________________________

The Reagan comment is sheer deflection.  Hillary invented the accusations in an attempt to give the WH travel business to cronies.  She will lie and send the innocent to prison if it helps her.

========

You don't think the Republican candidates would steal from the poor box ? Good grief man, stay informed . Every round of budget negotiation that the Republican led House has put out in years has cuts to Social Security and Medicare, not to mention cuts to Medicaid, food stamps, and any of the other safety nets. Sounds to me exactly like they are stealing from the "poor box" to enrich the , well, already rich.
The entirety of the Republican Congress is out to help the rich class at the expense of the poor. If you wonder if they are out to help YOU,. check your wallet. If you are not a Billionaire by now, then it ain't you they want to help.

When they examine Hillary's e-mails, how many do you think they will find that she sent trying to undermine a sitting US president who is in negotiations with a foreign power on the subject of nuclear arms ?  My bet is, you won't find her to be a traitor like 47 Republican senators.

______________________

Don't count on any of that being true.

_________________________________________________________
Before believing urban legends, check for the truth.

"Ever since Americans were old enough to crawl in front of a television set, they’ve been told that Republicans are the party of rich white guys, and Democrats are the champions of the poor.

Prepare to flip that thinking upside down. Results from an analysis based on Open Secrets reporting shows that the GOP has lost out to the Democrat Party in the eyes of fat cats by $416 million over the last 25 years. This chart comes via Jim Hoft of Gateway Pundit:"

For a detail chart see:

http://www.ijreview.com/2014/0...arty-new-party-rich/

For all practical purposes, George Soros is the DNC. 

________________________________________________

A simple open letter to the leaders of Iran concerning constitutional government is not treason.  Nor, a reminder that many of the blocks on Iran transactions have the force of law -- requiring congress to remove them, not the president, alone.

What would one call congressmen who went in person to leaders when hostilities were immanent -- Democrats,

What would one call congressmen who went in person to leaders when hostilities were immanent -- Democrats,

----------------

Can you name and date them?

______________________________________________________________________________

Pelosi (Who Visited Syria's Assad In 2007 Despite WH Objections) Blasts Boehner's Bibi Invite

In 2007, Pelosi went to Syria to negotiate for the U.S. and for Israel. She had neither government's approval.

http://www.truthrevolt.org/new...boehners-bibi-invite

2002-09-30 04:00:00 PDT Washington -- With Congress nearing a vote on a resolution authorizing war against Iraq, a North Bay congressman visiting Baghdad says he has delivered a blunt message -- U.N. weapons inspectors must be given unfettered access or President Bush will carry out his threatened invasion.

But Rep. Mike Thompson, D-St. Helena, one of three Democratic House members who are on a five-day mission to Baghdad and the southern Iraqi city of Basra, also said by telephone that Bush should give U.N. inspectors a chance to find and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction before invading Iraq.

Lawmakers and White House negotiators are still talking about how a resolution will be worded, with Democrats trying to limit the president's power solely to acting against Iraq, rather than a more open-ended authorization. Congressional leaders said Sunday that a vote could come as soon as this week.

"We're still working on language that can bring the largest number of Democrats and Republicans, House and Senate, together," Senate Minority Leader Sen. Trent Lott, R-Miss., said on "Face the Nation" on CBS.

While all three members who are visiting Iraq have questions about whether they would vote for a congressional resolution authorizing military action, Reps. David Bonior, D-Mich., and James McDermott, D-Wash., sounded more dovish notes than Thompson when they appeared on TV on Sunday.

http://www.sfgate.com/politics...e-to-war-2790877.php

You named 3 or is it 4. I assume you are correct. Use the number 4. The democrats are still 33 behind. Be quite and let us catch up.

__________________________________________

Already named them recently!  At to date, not my type!

"In the fall of 2002, McDermott and fellow Representatives David Bonior of Michigan, Nick Rahall of West Virginia and Mike Thompson of California visited Iraq; in Baghdad they met with members of parliament and the Iraqi Foreign Minister, and in Basra they met with residents who talked about the effect on them of the Iraq sanctions."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jim_McDermott

What did the Republicans state in the letter that is not true?  I see that the UN may attempt an end run around sanctions.  Not a good idea as the US law would probably trump it.  And, the UN still gets about 20 percent of their budget from the US, 

Dire, you are slipping.  You used to be much better at posting.

_____________________________________________---

Get a new line, Answer my first question, if possible.

Get a new line, Answer my first question, if possible.

-------------------

Dire, you must be in the running for right wing spinmeister.

Dire, you should know by now that jt never answers questions or backs up his claims.

________________________________________________
I expected no answer, but like a toreador, I like to wave a cape to see if there is any intelligent reaction -- so far, none.

Get a new line, Answer my first question, if possible.

----------------

Not sure where you're going with this.  Are you referring to "travelgate"?  The answer depends on which news source you chose to listen to.

==================================

Best, I don't really know how to answer your statement. It's the same words that you use for anything that I post. It don't matter what I post, your response is the same. 

JT, that's because no matter what claim you make and you're asked to prove, your 'answer' is the same-nothing. You don't answer questions, you just toss out whatever comes to your mind and then you run and ignore the thread/questions, and claim you and other lefties are getting 'attacked'. Any progress on that Ford and Reynolds thing?

_______________________________________________

Once more,

What did the Republicans state in the letter that is not true?  I see that the UN may attempt an end run around sanctions.  Not a good idea as the US law would probably trump it.  And, the UN still gets about 20 percent of their budget from the US,

What did the Republicans state in the letter that is not true?  I see that the UN may attempt an end run around sanctions.  Not a good idea as the US law would probably trump it.  And, the UN still gets about 20 percent of their budget from the US,

Did the 47 republicans break the law? Did they have authorization for their letter? How much damage did they do? How much good did they do?

The UN may attempt an end run?? US law trumps UN??

JT, that's because no matter what claim you make and you're asked to prove, your 'answer' is the same-nothing. You don't answer questions, you just toss out whatever comes to your mind and then you run and ignore the thread/questions, and claim you and other lefties are getting 'attacked'. Any progress on that Ford and Reynolds thing?

------------------------

First, what are you wanting me to prove?

Next, Reynolds came in 1940, democratic politicians were in office. Alcoa bought them in 2000,

         republican senators in Al

         Ford came in 1950, democratic politicians were in office, closed in 1983, Reagan and one                rep senator in office.

         TVA started in 1933, democratic politicians in office. As the republicans gain more and more            control, TVA is shrinking more and more 

I and others want you to prove the claims/statements you make, or at least link to a site supplying such false information. You make claims, such as the Reynolds/Ford thing, then post nothing to back up your claims. Do you think Reynolds had only the one plant? Bet you do, because it's obvious you know nothing at all about the company. You should know that politics had nothing to do with either of them locating in the shoals.

As Reynolds Metals entered the 1990s, the company was in the best financial condition in its history. Modernization of its plants continued with the construction of a new 120-metric-ton-per-year facility at the company's Baie Comeau, Quebec, smelter, along with expansion and modernization of other company plants in Western Australia, Texas, and Louisiana. Reynolds invested more than $400 million in Alabama to ensure its position as a world-class producer of aluminum-can stock and can-end stock. In addition to its capital investment program, the company expanded its research-and-development efforts. The company has developed new process technologies in aluminum-lithium casting, electromagnetic casting, and various techniques in automation. In 1991 new products included a light-weight, stronger composite architectural panel metal for the construction industry.

============================================

Who was in office during most of the 80s and the first of the 90s? Hmmmm?

=============================

Disappointing sales in 1996, due to low aluminum prices and lower demand for some of its products, led to yet another company restructuring. Effective April 1, 1997, the company was organized into six global units, down from its former 20 operating units, that would focus on the most profitable aluminum markets around the world. The new units were packaging and consumer products, construction and distribution, transportation, metals and carbon products, bauxite and alumina, and cans. The year also saw a milestone for Reynolds Wrap Aluminum Foil, which celebrated its 50th year. In tribute, Reynolds donated $1 million to Meals on Wheels.

Who was in office in 1996? Hmmmm?

I believe Monica Lewinsky was in office in 1996.