Skip to main content

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...t/?intcmp=latestnews

'The beauty of the Second Amendment is that it will not be needed until they try to take it.'

'When the people fear their government, there is tyranny; when the government fears the people, there is liberty.'

'And what country can preserve its liberties, if its rulers are not warned from time to time, that this people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms.'

'An elective despotism was not the government we fought for.' - Thomas Jefferson

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hillary is another incompetent pretender, like Obama.  As First Lady, she presided over a healthcare program worse than Obamacare.  Between ignoring Bubbah's escapades in the Oval Office.  Did nothing as Senator.  As Secretary of State, she presided over foreign policies, now failed.  Remember Arab Spring and Reset Button for Russia. 

Personally, I'm interested in someone who is an old school free-market capitalist; someone who will take his foot off the neck of businesses. Being a social liberal or conservative is unimportant to me. The Federal goobermint should not be in the business of overseeing everyone's personal affairs.

 

As to choosing between Hillary and Christie, I suspect that there might be a dimes worth of difference between them. I also suspect that what the present president will leave behind will leave the next administration and congress with fewer options. I remember Dems damming Reagan's spending and deficits as a way to limit their expansion of government programs. Reagan was an amateur compared to Obama. With the ticking time bombs from the New Deal and Great Society not defused, it may not really matter which candidate of either party wins.

 

Last edited by Stanky

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×