Skip to main content

Old article but very interesting.

 

Jihad comes to Small Town, USA

 

Published: 04/19/2005 at 1:am

 

 

 

It happened again this week. I came out of the office to find a flyer under my windshield wipers inviting me to a special informational presentation on God and family values, and how to bring them back to the forefront in America.



 

 

I’m a parent so the flyer caught my interest. But as an analyst for the Northeast Intelligence Network, my eyes were riveted to the address on the flyer: The session was being held at a nearby mosque.

 

Curiosity got the better of me, and I decided it would be a good time for some onsite investigations of the mosque. In order to not attract undue attention, I dressed conservatively, wearing a navy jumper with a long sleeve white blouse, and low heels. I debated whether or not to put on a hijab (head scarf) then decided not to – after all, I was going to “learn,” not to pretend I was a Muslim.

 

I checked the mosque schedule on the Web, and discovered there was going to be an Arabic language session an hour before. So I showed up an hour early. The imam met me at the door, and told me that the presentation didn’t start for an hour, and suggested I come back in an hour. Fortunately, I had anticipated this. I explained that since I had quite a bit of reading to do for a class I was taking. “Can I just sit here and read?”

 

He hesitated a moment, then agreed. I sat in the back of the room, with my book open, and made a mental note to remember to turn the pages every so often, as I listened to the speakers in Arabic.

 

The first speaker was the head of the Muslim Students’ Association at the nearby university. Although I missed the beginning of the discussion, I caught up quickly. He was talking about the problems he had encountered on a recent trip, when TSA flagged him for extra screening. He joked about the fact that they had stopped him for extensive screening. He had anticipated that he would be screened and he had filled his carryon luggage with printouts of the Quran from the Internet, and had 15 or 16 CDs labeled in Arabic, and he had a notebook computer with him.

 

As he expected, he was delayed – he thought it was very amusing that while several TSA personnel were scrutinizing his personal belongings that his classmate from Jordan was able to walk through security, along with his American girlfriend, without any problems whatsoever.

 

One of the men said, in Arabic: “Blonde Americans are good for something!” Another man advised him to be cautious, since there was an American woman in the room. The imam spoke up and told everyone I didn’t speak Arabic.

 

At that point, another student took the podium. His name was Khaled, and he began to recount his recent trip to New York City. Khaled and three of his companions had gone to New York for several days in January. He told of how uncomfortable his trip up to NYC had been. He felt like he was being watched, and thought he was the victim of racial profiling.

 

Khaled and his friends were pretty unhappy about it, and while in New York, they came up with a plan to “teach a lesson” to the passengers and crew. You can imagine the story Khaled told. He described how he and his friends whispered to each other on the flight, made simultaneous visits to the restroom, and generally tried to “spook” the other passengers. He laughed when he described how several women were in tears, and one man sitting near him was praying.

 

The others in the room thought the story was quite amusing, judging from the laughter. The imam stood up and told the group that this was a kind of peaceful civil disobedience that should be encouraged, and commended Khaled and his friends for their efforts.

 

He pointed out that it was through this kind of civil disobedience that ethnic profiling would fail.

 

One of the other men, Ahmed from Kuwait, gave a brief account of his friend Eyad, who had finally gone to Iraq. Ahmed was in e-mail contact with Eyad, and hoped by the following week to be able to bring them more information about the state of the “mujahideen” in Iraq.

 

As the meeting drew to a close, the imam gave a brief speech calling for the protection of Allah on the mujahideen fighting for Islam throughout the world, and reminded everyone that it was their duty as Muslims to continue in the path of jihad, whether it was simple efforts like those of Khaled and his friends, or the actual physical fighting of men like Eyad.

 

As the meeting broke up, several women in hijabs came in the room, and two of them sat with me. They were very warm and friendly and welcoming, and appeared to be clearly thrilled that I was there. They asked me questions about who I was, and why I was interested in the session.

 

By the time the session began, there were half a dozen American women, four of them African-American. Where the previous session had definite anti-American tones, this session was all American and Apple Pie. The earlier session had been in Arabic – this one was in English.

 

The woman leading the session, Nafisa, told of the concerns she had regarding her daughters in the public-school system. She complained about the influence of the MTV culture, and seemed concerned about the rampant sexuality that pervaded all facets of American life, from television to movies and on into the school system.

 

She explained her personal solution – the local Islamic school, beginning with kindergarten. Instead of worrying about her daughters dressing provocatively and behaving inappropriately with boys, she talked about the modest school uniforms they wore, and the single-gender classes her daughters attended.

 

She then began to discuss Islam, focusing on the commonalities it has with Christianity. The sales pitch had clearly begun. While in the previous section, the men had quoted over and over again sura from the Quran calling for violent jihad, the women’s session focused on the “gentler” side of Islam.

 

The same imam who demanded that the men continue in the path of jihad did a complete 180-degree turn in this session, stressing instead the suras that promoted the “brotherhood” between Muslims, Christians and Jews. “After all, we worship the same God, and follow the teachings in the books he gave each of us. We are all the same, we are all People of the Book,” he stressed.

 

The differences between the sessions were striking. Clearly the second session was a recruiting session.

 

Were the women aware of what was being taught in the first session? Certainly those women who spoke Arabic should have been.

 

The reason for concern is obvious: Two different doctrines are being promoted. One peaceful, friendly, warm and fuzzy doctrine is being used to draw people in, with a focus on the well-being of their children.

 

But the Arabic-speaking sessions clearly have an anti-American tone.

 

It shows clearly that as much as we’d like to pretend it hasn’t, jihad has reached Small-Town, USA. This mosque isn’t in Washington, D.C., or New York City. This is a small mosque in a small town in the deep South.

 

And if it’s in this tiny little quiet southern town, it’s probably in your hometown, too.

 

 


 

 

 

 


 http://www.wnd.com/2005/04/29912/

 

Laura Mansfield is a freelance writer with over 20 years of experience dealing with Middle East issues. She is fluent in written and spoken Arabic, and has an excellent understanding of the complex cultural, religious and historical issues. Her experience includes nearly seven years living and working in the region for a wide range of private and government clients.

 

Laura Mansfield is the pseudonym [1] for an American author specializing in counter-terrorism, the Middle East, Islam, and Islamic terrorism. She is the former Associate Director of the Northeast Intelligence Network. Mansfield writes for various online publications including WorldNetDaily and FrontPageMag.

Mansfield is fluent in written and spoken Arabic, and has spent nearly seven years living in the Middle East, working for a wide range of clients including a U.S. Embassy, the United States Agency for International Development, and international corporations. She was active in the embassy warden system, acting as a liaison between the Embassy security office and her employer during the 1985 Beirut hijacking.[citation needed][edit] Background

Mansfield heads the Strategic Translations and Analysis service which specializes in monitoring and translating Arabic language bulletin boards, news media and communiques from alleged radical Islamists.[citation needed]

[edit] Media and Public Forums

Mansfield frequently appears on a wide array of mainly-US networks such as CNN and CNN International, FoxNews, Fox News UK, Israel National Radio, BBC, and CBN as well as numerous radio stations across the US such as KGO Radio News in San Francisco, America at Night, WDEL, WFED, WTOP, the Laurie Roth Show, the Tom Bauerle Show, and the Carl Wigglesworth Show, as well as working for many unnamed Fortune 500 companies.[citation needed]

She was featured in the headlines in May 2004, as the investigator alleged to have originally downloaded the videotape of Nick Berg's murder from the Al-Ansar website. [2]

Mansfield was the subject of a prominent feature on Arabiya TV in 2005 and was involved in communications with the web-based radical Irhabi 007.[3]

In 2006 Mansfield spoke on the dangers of teaching about Islam in public schools.[4]

In 2007 Mansfield was featured on Yahoo! front page.

CNN has featured purported Osama Bin Laden videos[5] from Laura Mansfield.

[edit]

 

 

More

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laura_Mansfield

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Road Puppy:

....

 

Oh brother. You're not really one of those "SHARIA LAW IS COMING!" nutbags, are ya?

 

I honestly thought better of you...

 

/shrug

No not sharia law but another terrorist attack you bet one just has to look at other countries to see radical muslim never sleeps. Notice the article never mentioned sharia law but continuing jihad.

 

http://www.foxbusiness.com/gov...-suspect-in-custody/

 

http://www.foxbusiness.com/gov...-suspect-in-custody/

 

http://www.heritage.org/resear...rror-plots-since-911

The list goes on and on.

Khaled and his friends were pretty unhappy about it, and while in New York, they came up with a plan to “teach a lesson” to the passengers and crew. You can imagine the story Khaled told. He described how he and his friends whispered to each other on the flight, made simultaneous visits to the restroom, and generally tried to “spook” the other passengers. He laughed when he described how several women were in tears, and one man sitting near him was praying.


===============

And had they "spooked" the other passengers enough to take some sort of action-what then?

I don't care the variety of Religion I will admit that it can be dangerous when adulterated by mankind and BLINDLY followed by people who put full faith in people rather than in God.   Another case in point is the following URL:

 

http://english.alarabiya.net/a...12/11/12/249092.html

 

There have certainly been abuses in the past, of people, under the guise and cover of Religion and there will be again but that does not in any way invalidate or make Religion bad.  Without going into why I choose Christ or to be a Christian and believe it to be the correct path I will try and use the post and opportunity to be more general but yet point out one very dangerous thing about Islam today.

 

Bear in mind that there are more and more countries willingly being taken over by Islamic extremest who want to establish a perfect Islamic state governed by their Religious law.  Again the wisdom of our founders comes through in their desire to isolate the function of Government of our Nation from Religion and it's own laws and commands and rules.  Still though our nation and all the world has or should have reason to fear fundamentalist radical Islam. 

 

As these people, Religious leaders, continue to gain and make gains in nations that have unthinkable weapons there becomes more and more likelihood that we will see the per-emptive use of Weapons of Mass Destruction whether Biological or Nuclear or Chemical.  I speak from the viewpoint of a Religious person when I say that.  For instance IF I was one that believed everything told to me without study and verification of the truth knowing that I'm wanting for Christ to return it could be possible for a person like that to be led to believe, convinced, that there might be something they could honestly do that would precipitate Christ to come.  In other words if a true Christian felt and believed that they could push a button and as the result of that button Christ would be compelled to come (2nd return) then most true Christians would push that button honestly wanting Christ to come rather endure on in a world that is under the control of secular and often evil leaders. 

 

With Islam though this is a very real possibility or so they think.  There are Imam's all around the world that believe and teach, to all too willing followers, that they, Radical Islamist, can actually BRING ABOUT the coming of their successor to Mohammad and the event that they believe will do this is a Nuclear or decisive attack against Israel and the Jewish Nation.  Then they fully feel and believe that their Messiah/12th Imam will come at that time as if summoned from a Genie jar. 

 

http://www.allaboutpopularissues.org/12th-imam.htm

 

For this reason I believe that all people, believers and non-Christians have reason to fear the great and contemporary rise of Islamic States in the world whether or not we feel or believe that America has a chance of being effected by Sharia Law.  When you live in a world, as we do, where Russia, China, and the US possess such weapons of mass destruction the danger is not as much that we will decide that we can actually overcome the other but the danger is in small areas of the World like North Korea, Iran, Egypt etc that not only could but would potentially launch such a weapon and inadvertently, through agreement, or protection, cause such large players to join in and participate in the fray.  Such events could escalate out of hand in such quick succession all without many of us ever knowing what was going on until it was far past the point where we all would be looking at the Stone age again.  

 

In a world where we have technology of such that we do we look at Scriptures and teachings in Revelations that we think could never come about because basically they are far more archaic than our modern days technology.  Who uses horses or the like again or swords or the like.  Other things like that but IF, God forbid, IF such world events got out of hand that the Unthinkable was to occur then very easily it could be seen where major swaths of the World's population could cease to exist and where ancient methods of warfare could be prevalent again in areas of the World's conflicts. 

 

In other words as a Christian that and only that means I accept "End Times' prophecies and believe that such will occur but even if you are not Religious then surely you could envision how our world could mirror prophecy as spoken about in Scriptures.  Will there be profound changes and events on this December's solstice as the Mayan calendar indicates I don't know.  Are we, Christians, living in the "Last Days" as foretold in Daniel, Matthew, and Revelation and other places in Scriptures?  I don't know.  What I do know is that yes Religion can be dangerous but dangerous because of the way mortal mankind does with it and anyone, Religious or not, should be for freedom of Religion where it can be taught and also debated so that people will have other sources to truth and teachings and potentially will not blindly follow everything or anything they hear.  It is also another reason to be thankful and inspired by the type of people our Founding Fathers were who in their wisdom conceived of our form of Government and should be zealous to vote for and hold up people that want to continue  to honor and keep the Constitution and it's principals as the Standard for our Government.

 

My own opinion mind you.

Prisoners under pressure to convert to Muslim 'gang'

Inmates at HMP Whitemoor told researchers commissioned by the Ministry of Justice that they changed their faith for protection or because they were bullied into it.

Prison guards said they had a policy of “appeasement” towards the powerful and growing Islamic population, particularly convicted terrorists who were feared to be recruiting future extremists.

Non-believers avoided confrontation with any Muslim in case it led to retribution from the wider group, and said they even avoided cooking pork or bacon in communal kitchens or undressing in the showers in case it caused offence.

The report, written by researchers at the Cambridge Institute of Criminology, said: “Conflict and tension existed between and within faith groups.

“There were some intimidating ‘heavy players’ among the Muslim population, who appeared to be orchestrating prison power dynamics rather than propagating or following the faith. Many physically powerful prisoners ‘re-established their outside identities’ as leaders in the prison and used their (newly acquired) faith status as a tool for establishing influence. 

 

“Non-Muslim prisoners described wearing underpants in the showers on some spurs (out of ‘respect’ and fear) and some Muslim prisoners described a form of intimidation exerted (‘they probably do feel shamed&rsquo relating to cooking (especially frying bacon) in the kitchens.”

HMP Whitemoor is situated in a “remote Fenland town” far from most inmates’ families, and is home to 440 Category A and B prisoners, almost all of whom are serving more than 10 years behind bars and seven of home are convicted terrorists.

Opened in 1991, three years later it was the scene of an escape by six prisoners including some IRA members.

Following concerns over Islamic radicalisation in a 2008 report by inspectors, researchers visited Whitemoor between 2009 and 2010 to interview staff and inmates.

They found that more than a third (35 to 39 per cent) of prisoners are now Muslims, compared with 11 per cent across all jails.

Many of those they spoke to had converted while inside but they had mixed motivations for doing so, and not all had done so voluntarily.

Reasons included “seeking care and protection”, “gang membership” and “coercion” as well as “rebellion” since Islam was seen as the “underdog”.

Prisoners told the researchers that becoming Muslim was a “cover” for power and influence.

Loners including sex offenders gained safety from joining a large and dominant group, as fellow members would defend them.

Non-Muslims and prison officers claimed that it was an “organised gang” and a “protection racket” rather than a religion, which “glorified terrorist behaviour and exploited the fear related to it”.

Others said they had felt under pressure to convert, with people leaving Islamic literature in their cells and telling them to “read this”, or promising they would be safe from physical assault if they changed faith.

“The threat of assaults motivated by religious fanaticism or extremist ideology added weight to the atmosphere at Whitemoor.”

Guards said there were “proper Al-Qaeda” members in the jail, who were regarded with “awe” by younger inmates, but they avoided confrontation and had “runners” to do their bidding.

Some prisoners described the place as a “recruiting drive for the Taliban” and fertile ground for hatred and a new generation of extremists.

One inmate said he was targeted because he wore a Remembrance Day poppy and his brother served in the Army, with people shouting “your wife’s burning in hell because she’s not a Muslim” at him.

But it was also claimed that non-Muslims felt “envy” at the preferential treatment, including better food, given to Muslims.

The report concluded: “The new population mix, including younger, more black and minority ethnic and mixed race, and high numbers of Muslim prisoners, was disrupting established hierarchies in the prison. Social relations among prisoners had become complex and less visible. Too much power flowed among some groups of prisoners, with some real risks of serious violence. There were high levels of fear in the prison. In particular, there were tensions and fears relating to ‘extremism’ and ‘radicalisation’.

“More prominent, in practice, were pressures (and temptations) felt by some prisoners to convert to Islam. Conditions in the prison made participation in Islamic practices the most ‘available’ option for those looking for belonging, meaning, ‘brotherhood’, trust and friendship." 

 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new...-to-Muslim-gang.html

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×