Skip to main content

for smoking out Donald Trump.  Responding to a question posed by Fox, the Trumpster confessed to disloyalty to the GOP.  He alone, of all the Top Ten debaters, acknowledged that he would NOT commit to support the party's ultimate nominee.  Trump's overall performance was surly and antagonistic and did nothing to gain him any more support.

 

"Trump brought his usual bombastic style to the debate, suggesting talk show host Rosie O'Donnell is fat and that he donated money to the Clinton Foundation in part to make sure the Clintons attended his wedding. And Trump's refusal to commit to backing the eventual GOP nominee, which means the businessman is leaving the door open to running as an independent, is likely to irritate further Republican Party leaders."

 

His ungentlemanly and gratuitous attempted put-down of Megan Kelly surely hurt his standing with female voters. Trump undoubtedly flunked out of charm school.

 

http://www.nbcnews.com/news/kn...ies-nbc-news-n405826

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

After the debate I watched all the news channels and every one of them quoted him to saying " I will not support the Republican candidate", even FOX. That is not what he said, he said " if your asking me if I will support the Republican candidate, " I CAN NOT MAKE THAT PROMISE RIGHT NOW". It's not the same thing they are quoting.

Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

___

WoW!

 

You find it "refreshing to see someone speak thier [sic] mind and lie...."!!   Well, help yourself, 

LOFLYER; for myself, I prefer truth to lies, but that's your call, so have at it!

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

___

WoW!

 

You find it "refreshing to see someone speak thier [sic] mind and lie...."!!   Well, help yourself, 

LOFLYER; for myself, I prefer truth to lies, but that's your call, so have at it!

Truth

Rosie could loose a few pounds!

Truth

Mexico and South America is not sending thier brightest,  they are almost exclusively the uneducated and yes many are criminals!

You do not perfer the the truth you perfer whatever the liberal wing of the DNC tells you to perfer!

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

___

WoW!

 

You find it "refreshing to see someone speak thier [sic] mind and lie...."!!   Well, help yourself, 

LOFLYER; for myself, I prefer truth to lies, but that's your call, so have at it!

Truth

Rosie could loose a few pounds!

Truth

Mexico and South America is not sending thier brightest,  they are almost exclusively the uneducated and yes many are criminals!

You do not perfer the the truth you perfer whatever the liberal wing of the DNC tells you to perfer!

____

"not sending thier [sic] brightest,  they are almost exclusively the uneducated and yes many are criminals!"

 

"You do not perfer the the truth you perfer whatever the liberal wing of the DNC tells you to perfer!..." 

 

Seems Mexico and South America are not the sole place where "uneducated" or under-educated people can be found!

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

___

WoW!

 

You find it "refreshing to see someone speak thier [sic] mind and lie...."!!   Well, help yourself, 

LOFLYER; for myself, I prefer truth to lies, but that's your call, so have at it!

Truth

Rosie could loose a few pounds!

Truth

Mexico and South America is not sending thier brightest,  they are almost exclusively the uneducated and yes many are criminals!

You do not perfer the the truth you perfer whatever the liberal wing of the DNC tells you to perfer!

____

"not sending thier [sic] brightest,  they are almost exclusively the uneducated and yes many are criminals!"

 

"You do not perfer the the truth you perfer whatever the liberal wing of the DNC tells you to perfer!..." 

 

Seems Mexico and South America are not the sole place where "uneducated" or under-educated people can be found!

Yes and you are the perfect example of someone who may have a high IQ but still not smart!  I see you did not dispute my truths or do you really claim the illegals crossing the border are highly educated?

 

Imagine that!

Contender praising Faux News.

 

Fox has been exposed as a Propaganda Arm for Establishment Rino's.

I'm still appalled by the blatant anti-Trump-bias, manifested in those insubstantial questions brought to the Donald. As opposed to Bush and the other establishment candidates, he never got a chance to respond to one single substantive question and present ideas, vision or a specific strategy. Every single question was of a personal, highly controversial nature, geared to offer him nothing but a loose-loose proposition or in other words, a no win situation, as the attack was already deeply penetrated in those long winding questions in the first place.

 

In 2014 (election) the republican leadership in the Congress told us to give them a majority and they would stop Obama. Well we did and what did we get? NOTHING. Boehner and McConnel gave Obama everything he wanted. 
Now Trump comes along and promises to stop illegal immigration and other things that are wrong with this country, then Faux acts as the hit men for the GOP ELITIST ESTABLISHMENT.

 

Real numbers.

 

Here is a breakdown of the poll results:

  • Donald Trump: 38 percent
  • Ted Cruz: 15.5 percent
  • Neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson: 10.2 percent
  • Florida Sen. Marco Rubio: 9.7 percent
  • Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul: 9.3 percent
  • Ohio Gov. John Kasich: 4.9 percent
  • Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker: 4.5 percent
  • Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee: 3.5 percent
  • Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush: 2.5 percent
  • New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie: 1.4 percent



Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headlin...66039/#ixzz3iC9RKEex 

 

 

Originally Posted by Harald Weissberg:

Imagine that!

Contender praising Faux News.

 

Fox has been exposed as a Propaganda Arm for Establishment Rino's.

I'm still appalled by the blatant anti-Trump-bias, manifested in those insubstantial questions brought to the Donald. As opposed to Bush and the other establishment candidates, he never got a chance to respond to one single substantive question and present ideas, vision or a specific strategy. Every single question was of a personal, highly controversial nature, geared to offer him nothing but a loose-loose proposition or in other words, a no win situation, as the attack was already deeply penetrated in those long winding questions in the first place.

 

In 2014 (election) the republican leadership in the Congress told us to give them a majority and they would stop Obama. Well we did and what did we get? NOTHING. Boehner and McConnel gave Obama everything he wanted. 
Now Trump comes along and promises to stop illegal immigration and other things that are wrong with this country, then Faux acts as the hit men for the GOP ELITIST ESTABLISHMENT.

 

Real numbers.

 

Here is a breakdown of the poll results:

  • Donald Trump: 38 percent
  • Ted Cruz: 15.5 percent
  • Neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson: 10.2 percent
  • Florida Sen. Marco Rubio: 9.7 percent
  • Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul: 9.3 percent
  • Ohio Gov. John Kasich: 4.9 percent
  • Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker: 4.5 percent
  • Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee: 3.5 percent
  • Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush: 2.5 percent
  • New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie: 1.4 percent



Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Headlin...66039/#ixzz3iC9RKEex 

____

Harald, that unstructured poll is basically MEANINGLESS.  It is a call-in poll and thus narrows

itself to those who access the Drudge Report web site.  It has no statistical credibility. It has built-in bias. It probably does not even have a mechanism for limiting itself to registered voters.  Let's see what the REAL polls say about the Trumpster's standing in the next few days.

He will, of course, hold on to the great majority of his "true believer" constituency, but can he improve his status in other sectors of the electorate?  The real polls will tell the story, not the silly, loosey-goosey Drudge poll.

 

 

Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

Contenduh sez "for myself, I prefer truth to lies, but that's your call, so have at it!"

 

So why do you support the current Liar in Chief?

 

"Selma Got Me Born" - LIAR, your parents felt safe enough to have you in 1961 - Selma had no effect on your birth, as Selma was in 1965.
 
"If you like your doctor you can keep him". LIAR
 
"My Grandmother (doesn't indicate which one he is talking about) Has Always Been A Christian" - LIAR, she does her daily Salat prayers at 5am according to her own interviews. According to the New York Times: "I am a strong believer of the Islamic faith," Ms. Obama, 85, said in a recent interview in Kenya.' Not to mention, Christianity wouldn't allow her to have been one of 14 wives to 1 man.
 
"I passed 900 Bills in the State Senate" - LIAR, you passed 26, most of which you didn't write yourself.
 
Contenduh, don't throw stones at the current Republic candidate hopefuls until you clean your own house. We can play "so's your old man" all day long if you wish.
 
 
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

_____________________________________________________________

I addressed one of your objections in the first sentence and destroyed your second objection.  Be redundant, if you must.

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

_____________________________________________________________

I addressed one of your objections in the first sentence and destroyed your second objection.  Be redundant, if you must.

____

You "destroyed" nothing insofar as the record of discussion goes.  Would you care to elaborate?.

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

_____________________________________________________________

I addressed one of your objections in the first sentence and destroyed your second objection.  Be redundant, if you must.

____

You "destroyed" nothing insofar as the record of discussion goes.  Would you care to elaborate?.

_________________________________________________________

"It is a call-in poll and thus narrowsitself to those who access the Drudge Report web site. " __________________________________________________________

Your statement that there was some limitation as to who has access to the Drudge website.

 

Originally Posted by HIFLYER2:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

His opinions of Rosie are boorish, but close to the truth.  Attacking Megyn Kelly -- big mistake. 

Her questions to him were simply to bait him and make him look bad.  She should have stuck to the bigger issues confronting America!   I personally think the RNC is afraid of Trump because he would not kneel down and kiss the RNC Ring and pledge allegiance to thier platform.  I personally think it refreshing to see someone speak thier mind and lie or be overly concerned with being politically correct!

______________________________________________________

To a point, yes, he was baited.  He took the bait.  In the months to come, Trump must contend with MSM pundits and reporters who will do much worse.  That may strengthen a certain base, but not enough to ensure a majority.  Plus, some of Trump's responses are without content -- tells what he wishes to accomplish, but not how. 

 

Democrats do this all the time -- and rarely deliver.

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

_____________________________________________________________

I addressed one of your objections in the first sentence and destroyed your second objection.  Be redundant, if you must.

____

You "destroyed" nothing insofar as the record of discussion goes.  Would you care to elaborate?.

_________________________________________________________

"It is a call-in poll and thus narrows itself to those who access the Drudge Report web site. " __________________________________________________________

Your statement that there was some limitation as to who has access to the Drudge website.

______

I did not characterize them as those who HAVE access (noun), but as those who ACCESS (verb)  that web site, i.e. those who choose to visit there and participate in such things as call-in polls.. 

ac·cess

/ˈakˌses/

noun

  • 1.a means of approaching or entering a place"the staircase gives access to the top floor"synonyms:entranceentryway inmeans of entryapproach... more
  • 2.an attack or outburst of an emotion"I was suddenly overcome with an access of rage"

verb

  • 1.approach or enter (a place)"single rooms have private baths accessed via the balcony"synonyms:enterapproachgain entry togain access to
  • 2.obtain, examine, or retrieve (data or a file)synonyms:retrievegain access toobtainread 
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Yes, the poll is biased. However, those that have access to Drudge are those who have internet access.

___

BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

_____________________________________________________________

I addressed one of your objections in the first sentence and destroyed your second objection.  Be redundant, if you must.

____

You "destroyed" nothing insofar as the record of discussion goes.  Would you care to elaborate?.

_________________________________________________________

"It is a call-in poll and thus narrows itself to those who access the Drudge Report web site. " __________________________________________________________

Your statement that there was some limitation as to who has access to the Drudge website.

______

I did not characterize them as those who HAVE access (noun), but as those who ACCESS (verb)  that web site, i.e. those who choose to visit there and participate in such things as call-in polls.. 

ac·cess

/ˈakˌses/

noun

  • 1.a means of approaching or entering a place"the staircase gives access to the top floor"synonyms:entranceentryway inmeans of entryapproach... more
  • 2.an attack or outburst of an emotion"I was suddenly overcome with an access of rage"

verb

  • 1.approach or enter (a place)"single rooms have private baths accessed via the balcony"synonyms:enterapproachgain entry togain access to
  • 2.obtain, examine, or retrieve (data or a file)synonyms:retrievegain access toobtainread 

__________________________________________________

So, those who did not have access would be anyone without a laptop, tablet or smartphone and unable to travel to McDs or similar for free WiFi.  Innuit villages in Alaska have such access.  

Originally Posted by direstraits:
 

 

So, those who did not have access would be anyone without a laptop, tablet or smartphone and unable to travel to McDs or similar for free WiFi.  Innuit villages in Alaska have such access.  

___

Read it again: BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

 

  • 1.approach or enter (a place)"single rooms have private baths accessed via the balcony"synonyms:enterapproachgain entry togain access to

Those who do not

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
 

 

So, those who did not have access would be anyone without a laptop, tablet or smartphone and unable to travel to McDs or similar for free WiFi.  Innuit villages in Alaska have such access.  

___

Read it again: BUT--not all those who have internet access will be accessing Drudge and not all those who have access to Drudge will participate in the biased Drudge poll. Bias and sampling error all around this kind of poll!

 

  • 1.approach or enter (a place)"single rooms have private baths accessed via the balcony"synonyms:enterapproachgain entry togain access to

Those who do not

_______________________________________________________

Read your original post "thus narrows itself to those who access the Drudge Report web site."

 

I agreed that the poll had a bias.

 

Contenduhh, at this point your argument is somewhere between arguing with yourself and a dog chasing his own tail  .  You've lost the meaning of your own original post (first point).  Then, arguing with me on the second point (poll bias) which I agreed with.

 

Keep this up and people will suspect you are entering Quail Dog territory -- ALZ. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×