Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Billionaire (Amazon.com founder) Bezos purchased the failing Washington Post and has no problem printing stories based solely in innuendo and or rumor.  Facts no longer have to be there for a story to be a story only negative information about someone, or something,  Bezos or the liberals don't like. 

It's also interesting to note that on any revolutionary's first things to do, list, is to take over the news media in the country/nation that is being taken over because when you control the source of information then you can control the people by getting them to think what you want them to think  Propaganda is also a very important thing when you want to control people as Hitler and Stalin were well aware of and they used it to their advantage constantly portraying themselves to be kind, companionate, caring about people, women, and children all the while incarcerating millions into their concentration camps, re-education camps and slaughtering other millions either with mass burials or  open pit burning/cremations before covering up the evidence.   It's sobering to just think about the number of people that died under just those two horrible, ruthless, people who exterminated their closest political friends before or while going after their political enemies and the media all played a pivotal part in their plans.

What we are seeing today, at least to me, is no more than a concerted, colluded effort by the liberal press/media to overthrow a legally elected President that they can't stand or tolerate and an equally concerted and colluded attempt to turn their viewers and readership's opinions about Trump into negative things based almost totally in either false or unproven information, rumors and innuendo.  The Hypocrisy is so thick and evident that new lows involving it are available weekly only exceeding the Hypocrisy that existed the week before.  One only has to listen to a montage of "news" stories and reports to realize that there is collusion and planning on behalf of even competitors as they get together to create the narrative of the day/week to conform to the agenda that they have long held.  Only when an "off the range" off the hinge, reporter goes ballistic with their seething hatred for Trump out of their Trump derangement syndrome does their moderated consistent theme and tone become challenged.

It's a concerted, colluded effort to overthrow the legally elected Government that they never thought they would see elected and they still cannot come to grips with what happened back on November 8th, 2016.   They (the media) are but one part, playing one part, in the effort to either overthrow the legally elected Conservative  Government of Donald Trump or at least slow it's progress down and establish general distrust and hatred of it in the minds of their listeners and/or readers.  Their willing accomplices, also colluding with them, are the Democrats, as a whole, political party working in opposition along with certain and various rogue liberal Justices/Judges with their own agenda and desire to create law(s) and stop whatever legal (Conservative) move that Trump makes forcing things to bog down to a legislative crawl from whence the media and some Democrats then claim that Trump violates and doesn't keep his promises to the voters.  Lastly the most destructive members of the team colluding against Trump is those in his own party (the Republicans) such as Lindsey Graham and McCain, even the Bush's, who can't get past their hurt feelings and personal animosity toward a Candidate that they feel is beneath them and that they are better than.  Together it appears as a concerted effort to overturn a legal and legitimate election by the people of the Nation  seeking to identify actual threats to our Nation's well being and existence as our founders created it and wanted it to be.  A group seeking globalization and conformity to the World at the expense of National Pride and desire to see America profit and become strong again. 

For the first time, in our history, we are faced with elected leaders, politicians, who seek to alter America and change America and cater to and for illegals who come here not to adapt and conform to our nations rule, government and social norms but seeking to change and alter them.  People who come here hating our Nation as it is and was crated long ago who seek to make it something unrecognizable and socialistic seeking to conform to a globalism and general group of nations mainly in Europe but many whom are in greater positions of authority here in our own Nation, again working in collusion with an even larger group who were only, if not temporarily stopped and halted by an election that they didn't see coming and they are still responding to it attempting to overthrow and challenge that outcome they didn't see coming nor did they want. 

Crash.Override posted:

this week fox news walked back the story of 'seth rich' and what did their #1 mouthpiece, sean hannity,  do after fox recanted the story? well, he doubled down on the fake news and vowed to 'get the news out'.  forum republicons also double down on the story.

 

Fox News host Sean Hannity has been in the hot seat over his coverage of a controversial story many are calling a conspiracy theory. On his radio show Tuesday he angrily and defiantly said he would press on, despite Fox News pulling one of their articles on the story.

“Just to close the circle here,” he said, “I never, I – the family’s actually on the internet saying they want to find the truth. I, I, feel so badly for this family and what they have been through, and what they are going through, and my thoughts and prayers are with them.”

“This issue is so big now,” Hannity continued. “That the entire Russia-collusion narrative is hanging by a thread, if in fact, take Seth out of it – there was a whistleblower within the DNC, a truth-teller, that actually was the source for WikiLeaks and not Russia, working with the Trump campaign.”

“That, these are questions that I have a moral obligation to ask,” he explained. “And I will do the mainstream media’s job like I have most of my career.”

“Like we got it right on Obama,” he added, “his radicalism, his record, on Trump having a chance to win, on Michael Brown, on Trayvon Martin, on Cambridge police, on Baltimore, we’re right they’re wrong. Like I was right in Atlanta in the Jewell case – when everybody else said, ‘oh he fits the profile of a lone bomber,’ Richard Jewell. I was right then too.”

“And all you in the liberal media,” he concluded, “I am not Fox.com, or FoxNews.com, I retracted nothing!”“And all you in the liberal media,” he concluded, “I am not Fox.com, or FoxNews.com, I retracted nothing!”

Hannity insists that he has a moral obligation to continue peddling the story despite the family of the victim, Seth Rich, pleading with him to stop. In a letter from Seth’s brother Aaron, he appealed to the decency of the executive producer of the Hannity show.

“It is a travesty that you would prompt false conspiracy theories and other people’s agendas rather than work with the family to learn the truth,” it read. “We appeal do your decency to not cause a grieving family more pain and suffering by allowing your platform to be used by someone to drag our family name through the mud.”

According to Hannity, if Seth Rich was murdered for leaking emails to WikiLeaks, then it would exonerate the Russians in the cyber hacking of the DNC, which has been widely blamed as one of the reasons Hillary Clinton lost the election.

In apparent response to his detractors, Hannity tweeted about the story Tuesday, giving no hint that he was to back off:

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2...ws-pulls-this-story/

GBRK, as for taking over the information industry, have you listened to what news is on 90% of the radio stations? Let me give you a hint, it's the same as the TV news channel that is owned by a foreigner.  And as for investigating the president, what did the right wingnuts do to Obama for 8 years? Of course you think that's different. And Kraven, If Hannity says it's so, it probably ain't

The liberal media protected and covered for Obama, they still do, no matter what his un-American azz did/does. So how about you back up your claim and tell us just what the right "did to obama"? What's your problem with Hannity? How do you feel about all the liberal media hacks that alter tapes and make up stories about the right, especially Trump?

Journalist Katie Couric is being criticized after it came to light that a gun documentary she participated in allegedly edited footage to make its participants look bad. The film in question is Under the Gun, a movie by Stephanie Soechtig that examines the aftermath of the Sandy Hook massacre and questions why this event did not lead to any major changes in federal gun laws. It is available to watch through Epix.

A gun rights group has accused veteran television journalist Katie Couric of editing interview footage for her new documentary to intentionally make their organization appear foolish — and they have the audio recording to back it up.

Couric narrated and executive produced the new documentary, “Under the Gun,” which purports to present both sides of the debate over gun control. In the film, Couric interviews a group called the Virginia Citizens Defense League to get their perspective.

http://www.theblaze.com/news/2...-in-new-documentary/

http://heavy.com/news/2016/05/...ary-gun-what-did-do/

Couric makes over 10 million a year jt. 10+ million to LIE to the public. She's not a reporter, she's a liberal shill spreading fake news. Why don't you have a problem with her salary??

*******************

In December 2013, Katie Couric found herself struck in a controversy.  Katie hosted a segment on HPV Vaccine. Critics accused her of supporting the unsciencetific claims which stated the vaccine to be harmful.

Last edited by Bestworking

"Katie and her husband John Molner bought a new home for $12 million at 151 E. 78th St. This Upper East Side property  close to Lexington Avenue is a sprawling piece of real estate, extending to 3,966 square-foot area. It includes five bathrooms, five bedrooms, heated flooring, eight-jet stream shower, walk-in closet, gym and a private garden".

But hey jt, that's OK with you, right? Just as long as no Republican makes that kind of money to spend on such a house for two people you're cool with it.

Here we have a conundrum. The only two activities presented as collusion are the exposure of the DNC servers and email, plus fake news items targeted for areas where the voting stats were close. John Podesta, despite warnings from the FBI, did not install anti-hacking software. Then, exposed his password (PASSWORD, really!) thru a catphishing ploy. All of which was exposed on WikiLeaks. Julian Assange claims that the information exposed was provided by a disgruntled DNC employee. If Assange is lying. Then, the odds are he is a Russian agent. If, Assange is not lying, who was the DNC employee, if not Seth Rich? Was it Podesta, who now screams the loudest against Trump for collusion? Does Podesta loudly protest to hide his incompetence and inept actions, or is he a mole? And, if so, who does he work for -- Assange or the Russians. Podesta received 75,000 shares of Joules Unlimited stock, an energy company with connections to Russian oligarchs.  As to the fake news items, the few I viewed read like something from The Onion. In all of this mess, where is Trump supposed to have colluded?

 

Crash.Override posted:

poor poor dire... he has no clue what to do.. fox is walking back his story and the special council is investigating his president.. poor little snowflake just keeps on whining.

when does the winning start?

Must be really bad, How much JD does it take to *** *** *****

** ****** **** *** ** **** *****..??  .... huh..

Kraven posted:
Crash.Override posted:

poor poor dire... he has no clue what to do.. fox is walking back his story and the special council is investigating his president.. poor little snowflake just keeps on whining.

when does the winning start?

Must be really bad, How much JD does it take to *** *** *****

** ****** **** *** ** **** *****..??  .... huh..

Kraven, I submitted the problem with charges of collusion and the possible means that WikiLeaks used to obtain the information.  In none of the scenarios could Trump have been of use as to collusion.  Dems are panicking about the lack of evidence concerning collusion.   None can state how such a collusion would occur.  As Assange is a great leftist hero, the Dems are caught in a quandary.  Either, Assange is a Russian agent or there was a DNC employee who betrayed them to WikiLeaks.  If, the latter, then Russia's entire interference was a few fake news stories. 

You can take it to the end of all that is known to point in time and
they still won't buy it. I've never seem this amount of hate toward
a president. He's basically a good guy. Berry committed felonies
before, during and after his elections. he's still an obstruction of
justice today but supported by his juvenile gang. nonsense
Kraven posted:
You can take it to the end of all that is known to point in time and
they still won't buy it. I've never seem this amount of hate toward
a president. He's basically a good guy. Berry committed felonies
before, during and after his elections. he's still an obstruction of
justice today but supported by his juvenile gang. nonsense

Dems had more hatred for the first Republican.  

From Lincoln's Cooper's Union speech in 1860"

"when you speak of us Republicans, you do so only to denounce us as reptiles [!], or, at the best, as no better than outlaws. You will grant a hearing to pirates or murderers, but nothing like it to [Republicans]. In all your contentions with one another, each of you deems an unconditional condemnation of [Republicanism] as the first thing to be attended to. Indeed, such condemnation of us seems to be an indispensable prerequisite license, so to speak among you to be admitted or permitted to speak at all. Now, can you, or not, be prevailed upon to pause and to consider whether this is quite just to us, or even to yourselves? Bring forward your charges and specifications, and then be patient long enough to hear us deny or justify."

They haven't changed their tune much.  Just hope makes it alive thru his two terms.  

Democrat Party -- oldest organized criminal syndicate in the US.  

Crash.Override posted:

i wonder if dire even knows that lincoln what's even on the ballot in the southern states... yet, alabama republicons sure do like to claim him... were he alive, he'd be outraged at what his party has become today.

I would say ditto with regards to Franklin Roosevelt, John Kennedy and Lindon Johnson.  I very much doubt that they would recognize the current day Democratic party as being "their" party.  Furthermore I very much believe that Kennedy would believe that the current day Democratic party was one that was Socialist or even borderline Communistic.  Based upon their actions and work while they were President, and in office, I believe that they would much more identify with today's Republican or Libertarian parties but, certainly, I don't think they would call themselves Democrats based on what the current day Democratic party has become and represents.  There is no way that I believe Kennedy or Roosevelt would back and support Abortion and Planned Parenthood and many other things that the current day Democratic party has championed.   

With regards to Civil Rights legislation which President Johnson gets credit for it would have never passed except for the Republicans.  Johnson had so many of his own party's politicians (many in the South) who absolutely opposed the Civil Rights legislation.  

With regards to Bill Clinton's balancing the budget and achieving elimination of the Debt that also would have never happened without the Republicans who held majorities in both the House and Senate and Clinton essentially worked with them and passed legislation that they sent to him which enabled the balanced budget to happen.  That can be researched and verified and came greatly account of Newt Gingrich and the Republican's "Contract with America".  Which was greatly responsible for the Republicans achieving a win over Democrats and taking the House and Senate control away. 

Under George Bush it's true that the economy had problems and things started going downward in a fast way but a few things should be considered.  An attack upon America on September 11th but essentially the thing that sunk the American economy was the Housing Market going south and the enormous bankruptcies and foreclosures which required bail outs.  That housing failure could be directly attributable back to Bill Clinton and his Presidency where banks and lending institutions were essentially told to ignore the rules for lending money to people and GIVE people who didn't deserve loans housing loans so that they could get them a home equal to the homes that people with great credit scores could get. 

According to Clinton and his Administration it just wasn't fair that so many people couldn't get loans for home and buy homes in the better neighborhoods so banks were essentially threatened that if they didn't make these risky loans or set aside common sense rules for lending that they would be put out of business and prosecuted.  As a result many people who otherwise would not have qualified for loans were given loans and many with conditions that even people with great credit couldn't get.   Then when these people couldn't make their payments and defaulted on the loans the banks and lending institutions were caught with homes and loans they couldn't get rid of and the whole market sunk like a rock.  That happened when Bush was in office but it happened not because of Bush or his policies but rather because of Clinton and his administrations policies.  That's something that never would have occurred under Roosevelt or Kennedy either. 

But that is just my own opinion, little as it's worth these days.

Last edited by gbrk
jtdavis posted:
jtdavis posted:

As I posted, both sides do it and I wish both would quit.

Bull. If it's true "both sides do it", it's funny you only whine about one side doing it.

Do you want to read what I posted just before you posted?  Also, Katie Couric ain't worth $10 million either.

I read what you posted, and my statement stands. You only whine and post about ONE side. Now, katie couric is worth MORE than 10 million. That's why I posted 10+ million. But, again, because she is a demoslop shill, altering the news and putting the demoslop slant on it, her salary is OK with you.

Last edited by Bestworking
jtdavis posted:

If you read the posts that you respond to, do you realize how  stupid you sound?

I realize how stupid you sound and how stupid you are. You call everyone names that doesn't agree with you, and then claiming you're being attacked/insulted, although you can't produce proof, and never answering questions. Want to tell me where I got it wrong? You're always saying things like "lock them all up, make them all pay", but then you make your silly little threads, and it's always Republicans you're whining about. Then you say you'd vote slop again. So whatever "they" are doing doesn't bother you that much.

Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

If you read the posts that you respond to, do you realize how  stupid you sound?

I realize how stupid you sound and how stupid you are. You call everyone names that doesn't agree with you, and then claiming you're being attacked/insulted, although you can't produce proof, and never answering questions. like the term 'demoslop'? Want to tell me where I got it wrong? You're always saying things like "lock them all up, make them all pay", but then you make your silly little threads, and it's always Republicans you're whining about. "like agreeing with killing all the demoslops"'? Then you say you'd vote slop again. So whatever "they" are doing doesn't bother you that much.not near as much as the anti-american policies of the republicons.

 

Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

If you read the posts that you respond to, do you realize how  stupid you sound?

I realize how stupid you sound and how stupid you are. You call everyone names that doesn't agree with you, and then claiming you're being attacked/insulted, although you can't produce proof, and never answering questions. Want to tell me where I got it wrong? You're always saying things like "lock them all up, make them all pay", but then you make your silly little threads, and it's always Republicans you're whining about. Then you say you'd vote slop again. So whatever "they" are doing doesn't bother you that much.

I don't think I've ever seen him post "lock Hillary or Bill up", although he's quick to talk about Trump.

Crash.Override posted:

funny, the dehumanizing of democrats , on these very forums, is astounding... but the republicon snowflakes are going crazy if everyone doesn't support trump... how about democrats support trump in the EXACT same why the republicons supported obama.

Demodummies are the only snowflakes/mudflakes, but show your
ignorance anyway you want, you're pitied, like any dummy is pitied. 

 

Kraven posted:
Crash.Override posted:

funny, the dehumanizing of democrats , on these very forums, is astounding... but the republicon snowflakes are going crazy if everyone doesn't support trump... how about democrats support trump in the EXACT same why the republicons supported obama.

Demodummies are the only snowflakes/mudflakes, but show your
ignorance anyway you want, you're pitied, like any dummy is pitied. 

 

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×