Skip to main content

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Requiring everyone to be armed, or drunk, or stoned will cure neither problem.

When 5 people in the class are armed and the shooter starts firing, they pull their guns and start shooting whoever has a gun and the swat team bursts in, who do they shoot?  They have to react correctly instantly.

 

+++

 

Getting way ahead of yourself there, JT.

 

What you are suggesting is the armed students aren't going to start defending themselves until SWAT arrives.

 

If that's the case, the shooter would have already done his damage before SWATs arrival.

 

Like what happened at Ompqua.

 

I said years ago on this forum . . . when seconds count, the police are only minutes away.

 

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

How about you post it? We know MORE gun laws and restrictions on legal owners will not keep ONE criminal or nut case from getting guns.  How about no more sitting ducks for the crazies? How about instead of stupid signs they have ARMED guards, trained and vetted properly, not hired because of affirmative action or some other bull, that have to undergo constant training and pass physical and mental tests often. How about bullet proof glass guard stands, with armed guards they have to pass through with metal detectors installed? 

-----------------

Sounds good. Who's gonna pay for it?

 

Who's gonna pay for it?

 

How about we divert the dollars the Government spends on, say, housing/feeding/coddling "Illegal Aliens".

You get caught her illegally? You live in a surplus shipping container, with Ramen Noodles and water, until you decide to "go back".

Or! The money the Government doles out to "aid" belligerent countries that HATE us? Pakistan, Chad, Yemen, etc.

Maybe, the "grants" the  Government spends, funding of studies about how many times a Fruit Fly sh*ts?

 

Those BILLIONS should be MORE than enough to fund protecting our citizens/children.

 

Ya think?

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

Requiring everyone to be armed, or drunk, or stoned will cure neither problem.

When 5 people in the class are armed and the shooter starts firing, they pull their guns and start shooting whoever has a gun and the swat team bursts in, who do they shoot?  They have to react correctly instantly.

If someone starts randomly shooting people in a classroom, I'm pretty sure those who are armed for just such an incident will KNOW whom to shoot back at.

Duh!

Last edited by Harald Weissberg
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Every time I think I've read it all from jt, and that his posts couldn't possibly get any dumber, he proves me wrong. Jt, unless you're fibbing when you say you own guns, why do you have them?

____

A silly question, Best.  I too own guns, but never have used them except for hunting and have done very little of that in the last 20 years. I'd rather fish.  One can be in favor of sensible gun control laws and still own guns. You knew that already, but it did not keep you from asking a dumb question. 

===================

How is it a dumb question professor DA? And, I asked jt, not your stupid lying a**.  You get your jollies killing innocent little animals, we know that already. If you like sensible gun laws why do you stinking lefties get bent out of shape when they or any law is enforced? Why do you constantly lie about "gun violence"?  Now, go get some lead boots, go fishing, wade real far out, and butt out until I ask you a question.

 

https://www.tnvalleytalks.com/t...0#457856795993987870

____

Bestworking absolutist extreme all-subsuming unqualified nutterance No. 683:

 

<<<" Why do you constantly lie about "gun violence"?>>>

 

There is the required (by Best's criteria) absolutist term : "constantly".

 

Yet more absolutist drivel from Best--No. 684:: 

 

"...why do you stinking lefties get bent out of shape when they or any law is enforced?"

 

The absolutism here is "any." Any law?  Really?  Will you never learn, Best, not to blither such catch-all un-provable crapola?  Your constant all-or-nothing crabbed and narrow mentality has destroyed any credibility you once might have had.

 

Grow up. And don't think you can make me "butt out."  After all, you are the big offended squawker to rise up in high dudgeon and scream foul if anyone tells you to buzz off.  But now you order me off your case.  Hypocrite!

 

Grow up. And don't think you can make me "butt out."  After all, you are the big offended squawker to rise up in high dudgeon and scream foul if anyone tells you to buzz off.  But now you order me off your case.  Hypocrite!

==================

I am grown you hypocrite, that's why I don't give a flying fig about your ramblings. On my case? Ha! Yeah, I said I wasn't addressing you, when you butted in on the question I asked jt. You really think you matter? To anyone? Now, again, get those lead boots and take a long walk off a short pier.

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×