Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by DHS-86:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Meth heads 0

Decent citizen 1

They called them trespassers instead of the breaking and entering scum they were.

Still shouldn't be self defense when you fire 5 shots, one a head shot, into one unarmed person laying on the ground. One shot should have been plenty.

________

If I'm in a situation where I will have to use my gun to defend myself, I'm going to empty the gun not stop after each shot to check my progress.

 

Last edited by uandurine

What do you do with scum like this? I saw a judge interviewed that said it seemed like everyone was on drugs. I'm beginning to think so too. The scary part is how drug abuse is accepted, and drug abusers are catered to. They are sent to drug treatment programs on the taxpayer's dime, get out of treatment and 're-offend'. Their children are taken and put into a system where taxpayers are forced to pay for their upkeep. This b**** was burned making meth. Her family had the ba**s to place an ad asking for donations for her, saying she was burned in an 'accident'. She went back to making meth.  Who do you suppose paid for her medical bills and surgery? To add insult to injury, we have the push to legalize drugs and drug use, and people are put on trial for killing a meth head that broke into their property. What's the answer?

 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/new...king-drug-again.html

Originally Posted by DHS-86:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Meth heads 0

Decent citizen 1

They called them trespassers instead of the breaking and entering scum they were.

Still shouldn't be self defense when you fire 5 shots, one a head shot, into one unarmed person laying on the ground. One shot should have been plenty.

_______________________________________________________

From lessons dealing with the Tongs in Hong Kong and the Mau mau uprisings in British east Africa, two methods were devised to deal with such. One school advocates a round to the middle section to cause the target to halt, momentarily, then a round to the head -- preferably thru the open mouth to cut the connections from the brain to the body.  The second school advocates a third round to the heart. 

 

If, the best professionals in the business advocate the above, six rounds by a novice is not unwarranted. 

It's that simple mad. It really is. Do meth, crawl your nasty a** into someone's house, they might kill you. They may go to jail, but you will still be dead, and your skanky old meth head gf will be on the stand boo hooing. Break into someone's home and he may be lying in wait for you because he sees you as vermin and how wrong is he really? At that time you are vermin. He'll go to prison, but you will still be dead, and all your 'friends' will boo hoo and tell the world what a wonderful person your thieving little *** was. "They were just robbing the guy, why'd he kill them"! Then they'll hold up your pictures where you were all smiling and happy, show all your 'selfies'. There's also that video of you skunking around someone's property getting ready to break in. For the ones that argue they 'don't need to kill them', don't you think they, the criminals, don't need to be robbing someone or messing with their property? When things like this happen, where is the outrage against the ones that raised these people and didn't teach them what mad posted, "If you don't want to die for stealing a TV, don't try to steal a TV." Leave other peoples things alone!

http://www.nydailynews.com/new...in-article-1.1767305

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×