More Disgraceful Garbage From the Race Baiting Left-Outraged Cop Complains After Seeing This Painting At His Daughter’s School

I have never been ashamed of any vote I made EXCEPT for the time I voted for a dem. I learned my lesson with that one and will never, ever do that again. But you know all that, don't you? Oh, and look at jt copying and pasting. But he just can't do that with links. Hmmmmm

The truth is coming out. You voted to reelect the ones that are screwing up america and you want to put the blame on democrats. Typical

jtdavis posted:

I have never been ashamed of any vote I made EXCEPT for the time I voted for a dem. I learned my lesson with that one and will never, ever do that again. But you know all that, don't you? Oh, and look at jt copying and pasting. But he just can't do that with links. Hmmmmm

The truth is coming out. You voted to reelect the ones that are screwing up america and you want to put the blame on democrats. Typical

Because you obvioulsly didn't understand it the first time:

.

Because you obvioulsly didn't understand it the first time:

I do understand it. It's plain that y'all don't. When was the budget balanced? Under democrats. What has the republican controlled congress got us that was good? Nothing. Keep your eyes closed tight, as for me, I will continue to look and see at events that are happening.

jtdavis posted:

I have never been ashamed of any vote I made EXCEPT for the time I voted for a dem. I learned my lesson with that one and will never, ever do that again. But you know all that, don't you? Oh, and look at jt copying and pasting. But he just can't do that with links. Hmmmmm

The truth is coming out. You voted to reelect the ones that are screwing up america and you want to put the blame on democrats. Typical

Pay attention jt, I'm a Republican, you should have known that before but I am beginning to believe your dumb act is no act. I don't vote for the people that have already screwed up America and wants to finish dragging it to he**. IF I did that, I would be a democrat like you and your black panther and muslim terrorist pals. What's the deal? Do you feel you have sufficiently messed up TN and think it's time to move over to Alabama and stick your nose in? You need to educate yourself before you attempt that. Remember the charter school "debate"? LOL!!!

jtdavis posted:

Because you obvioulsly didn't understand it the first time:

I do understand it. It's plain that y'all don't. When was the budget balanced? Under democrats. What has the republican controlled congress got us that was good? Nothing. Keep your eyes closed tight, as for me, I will continue to look and see at events that are happening.

Once more, JT repeats the fiction about a balanced budget under Clinton -- proving he's either clueless or a hypocrite.  I've explained this several times, even including a schedule and source -- Whitehouse. gov Office of Manpower and Budget records.  Clinton raided about a dozen trust funds to balance the annual budget, by borrowing against those funds, simultaneously increasing the national debt.  Rather like having a hole in the household budget near yearend, and getting a bank loan, with payments starting next year, and stating your financial problems are solved.  JT observes the future with eyes and brain wide shut.

direstraits posted:
jtdavis posted:

Because you obvioulsly didn't understand it the first time:

I do understand it. It's plain that y'all don't. When was the budget balanced? Under democrats. What has the republican controlled congress got us that was good? Nothing. Keep your eyes closed tight, as for me, I will continue to look and see at events that are happening.

Once more, JT repeats the fiction about a balanced budget under Clinton -- proving he's either clueless or a hypocrite.  I've explained this several times, even including a schedule and source -- Whitehouse. gov Office of Manpower and Budget records.  Clinton raided about a dozen trust funds to balance the annual budget, by borrowing against those funds, simultaneously increasing the national debt.  Rather like having a hole in the household budget near yearend, and getting a bank loan, with payments starting next year, and stating your financial problems are solved.  JT observes the future with eyes and brain wide shut.

Clinton said himself there was no surplus. Now before anyone gets to thinking he was all honorable and s***, understand why he admitted it. BECAUSE there was NO surplus and he knew that intelligent folks would know better and call him on it. Instead, he let the uneducated dems run with and keep repeating the lie. He can shrug and say, "I said there was no surplus". Only problem, he won't do it and ask them to stop spreading the lie, it's in his best interest that they can get all the uneducated and gullible to believe it.

jtdavis posted:

Because you obvioulsly didn't understand it the first time:

I do understand it. It's plain that y'all don't. When was the budget balanced? Under democrats. What has the republican controlled congress got us that was good? Nothing. Keep your eyes closed tight, as for me, I will continue to look and see at events that are happening.

Well, while you are "looking and seeing events", take a look at the black panthers and your racist self.

I don't vote for the people that have already screwed up America and wants to finish dragging it to he**. 

The republicans have been in the majority for over one cycle. If you vote republican, you are voting to reelect the ones currently screwing things up.

Once more, JT repeats the fiction about a balanced budget under Clinton -- proving he's either clueless or a hypocrite.  I've explained this several times, even including a schedule and source -- Whitehouse. gov Office of Manpower and Budget records.  

Dire, I went to the source you cited. This is what I found in table 7.1                                   1998,  + 69,270      or   -29,925                                                                                                 1999,  +125,610     or    1,920                                                                                                   2000    +236,241     or  +86422                                                                                                 2001   +128,236     or  +32,445                                                                                                 2002    -157,758     or   -317,417                                                                                               2009    -1,412,688  or   -1,549,681                                                                                           2015   -438,406      or   -465,701

These are billions of dollars. I'm not sure why two different numbers are given. One is column C, the second is column G. 

I'm sure you will want to call these numbers fiction numbers, but they came from you listed source. You can tell from this that the budget does much better when a democrat is in office and much worse when a tax cutting (for the .005) republican is in.

jtdavis posted:

I don't vote for the people that have already screwed up America and wants to finish dragging it to he**. 

The republicans have been in the majority for over one cycle. If you vote republican, you are voting to reelect the ones currently screwing things up.

What have they "screwed up" jt? You just sling **** and hope some of it sticks. It's like you have turrets syndrome and just "bark" out nonsense.

Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

I don't vote for the people that have already screwed up America and wants to finish dragging it to he**. 

The republicans have been in the majority for over one cycle. If you vote republican, you are voting to reelect the ones currently screwing things up.

What have they "screwed up" jt? You just sling **** and hope some of it sticks. It's like you have turrets syndrome and just "bark" out nonsense.

_____

Help for the vocabulary impaired:

tur·ret
[ˈtərət]
 

NOUN

  1. a small tower on top of a larger tower or at the corner of a building or wall, typically of a castle.
  2. a mollusk with a long, slender, pointed spiral shell, typically brightly colored and living in tropical seas.
    _____________________________________________________________
    Tou·rette's syn·drome
    [to͝oˈrets ˌsindrōm]
     

    NOUN

    1. a neurological disorder characterized by involuntary tics and vocalizations and often the compulsive utterance of obscenities.
     

What have they "screwed up" jt? You just sling **** and hope some of it sticks. It's like you have turrets syndrome and just "bark" out nonsense.

You live in Alabama and don't know what the republicans have screwed up? That seems impossible. But on second thought, it isn't for you.

jtdavis posted:

Once more, JT repeats the fiction about a balanced budget under Clinton -- proving he's either clueless or a hypocrite.  I've explained this several times, even including a schedule and source -- Whitehouse. gov Office of Manpower and Budget records.  

Dire, I went to the source you cited. This is what I found in table 7.1                                   1998,  + 69,270      or   -29,925                                                                                                 1999,  +125,610     or    1,920                                                                                                   2000    +236,241     or  +86422                                                                                                 2001   +128,236     or  +32,445                                                                                                 2002    -157,758     or   -317,417                                                                                               2009    -1,412,688  or   -1,549,681                                                                                           2015   -438,406      or   -465,701

These are billions of dollars. I'm not sure why two different numbers are given. One is column C, the second is column G. 

I'm sure you will want to call these numbers fiction numbers, but they came from you listed source. You can tell from this that the budget does much better when a democrat is in office and much worse when a tax cutting (for the .005) republican is in.

JT,  what you've posted doesn't prove what you stated.  Suggest you go back and interpret the data.  Then, get back.  As to the tax cuts, as I've shown, when taxes were cut, revenue went up.  Guess who were among those who paid the most of the extra revenue ?  Hint, it was the lower 95 percent.  One keep more of what one makes, one makes more in the future, paying taxes on a higher amount.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×