Skip to main content

Rand Paul at odds with Limbaugh, Coulter and other extreme anti-immigration partisans:

 

http://dailycaller.com/2013/03...oulter-rush-limbaugh

 

I must admit that Paul has some sound ideas here, but soundness is not a big thing with the likes of Coulter, Limbaugh, and most other conservative pundits.

I yam what I yam and that's all I yam--but it is enough!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I can't figure out why limbaugh, coulter, beck, palin, etc bother tender one so much. He just whines and cries about them all the time.  He should be worrying about the radicals that are taking over and destroying the democratic party.

___

You mean those radicals who destroyed the party so badly that it won the presidency by a large margin?

Originally Posted by upsidedehead:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I can't figure out why limbaugh, coulter, beck, palin, etc bother tender one so much. He just whines and cries about them all the time.  He should be worrying about the radicals that are taking over and destroying the democratic party.

___

You mean those radicals who destroyed the party so badly that it won the presidency by a large margin?

=============

They didn't win by a large margin. It wasn't a "cake walk", and obama didn't beat the "brakes off" of Romney. He was sweating it pretty darn good. And yes, it was that bunch that put him in office. In a fair and honest election obama wouldn't have been in office once, much less twice. And that still doesn't answer why you're so obsessed with people that aren't running for office.

Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Completely delusional...

 

He won the popular and the electoral vote. In America that is a real and fair election. Regardless of whether you like it or not, that is the reality of it.

 

As the old saying goes "You can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts"

He won both but not by large margins.

Percent of popular vote

Bush-50.73% 2004

Obama-51.06% 2012

Voter turnout percent

Bush-55.27% 2004

Obama-57.5% 2012

So Obama only got less than one percent of the popular vote MORE than Bush did after both had been in office for 4 years. Since Bush was hated from the moment he got in, you would think that Obama could have gotten a much bigger popular vote.

Originally Posted by Crumbpicker:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Completely delusional...

 

He won the popular and the electoral vote. In America that is a real and fair election. Regardless of whether you like it or not, that is the reality of it.

 

As the old saying goes "You can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts"

He won both but not by large margins.

Percent of popular vote

Bush-50.73% 2004

Obama-51.06% 2012

Voter turnout percent

Bush-55.27% 2004

Obama-57.5% 2012

So Obama only got less than one percent of the popular vote MORE than Bush did after both had been in office for 4 years. Since Bush was hated from the moment he got in, you would think that Obama could have gotten a much bigger popular vote.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Er-uh, Nosepicker--

 

Obama was not running against George W. Bush. It was John McCain that he whupped in 2008.  Just a much-needed refresher course in election history for you.

Originally Posted by upsidedehead:
Originally Posted by Crumbpicker:
Originally Posted by Jankinonya:

Completely delusional...

 

He won the popular and the electoral vote. In America that is a real and fair election. Regardless of whether you like it or not, that is the reality of it.

 

As the old saying goes "You can have your own opinion, but you can't have your own facts"

He won both but not by large margins.

Percent of popular vote

Bush-50.73% 2004

Obama-51.06% 2012

Voter turnout percent

Bush-55.27% 2004

Obama-57.5% 2012

So Obama only got less than one percent of the popular vote MORE than Bush did after both had been in office for 4 years. Since Bush was hated from the moment he got in, you would think that Obama could have gotten a much bigger popular vote.

%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%

Er-uh, Nosepicker--

 

Obama was not running against George W. Bush. It was John McCain that he whupped in 2008.  Just a much-needed refresher course in election history for you.

Uhh, upside down, those numbers refer to the respective popular votes won by each candidate at the same point in their political career. I should have been more specific but I thought that saying

''So Obama only got less than one percent of the popular vote MORE than Bush did after both had been in office for 4 years.'' would have been sufficient for most people. But I forgot that liberals loose all power of thought if you bring up GW Bush.

So since you can't focus, I will make this really simple.

After 4 years in office, both Obama and Bush got almost the same popular vote.

 

Is that easier for your brain to digest?

Originally Posted by mad American:

How come folks that support legal immigration are referred to as anti-immigration?

================

The same reason people who don't like obama because of his actions and his policies are falsely labeled racists by the dems. Unless the ones that oppose him are black that is. The dems call them "uncle toms", "aunt jeminas", "traitors to their race", "oreos" , and other filthy things. 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×