Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Clinton Emails Exposed Classified Satellite

 
 

The instructions from Team Clinton to the media in advance of the latest email dump were clear; you can almost imagine what the directives looked like. Trivialize this, make fun of the whole thing, spotlight amusing things said in some of the messages, build a “woman balancing work and home life” narrative to create sympathy between Madame Clinton and female voters.

Clinton’s media was happy to oblige. ABC News, which sees fit to employ Clinton operative George Stephanopoulos as a “journalist” – and lets him handle coverage of the very same Clinton Foundation he donated to! – didn’t cover the new email revelations at all on Tuesday night, even though they teased the release earlier in the day. NBC News claimed the new emails revealed “a secretary of state who was deeply engaged in the minutia of diplomacy and fascinated by Washington intrigue.”

 

MSNBC took a stab at justifying Clinton’s outrageous breach of national security protocols by saying the funny/embarrassing tidbits from the latest release demonstrated that the Clintons were right to keep their correspondence shielded from “enemies” they “feel are embedded all around them.”

“Hillary Clinton’s emails illustrate the difficulties of achieving work-life balance,” argued the Huffington Post, going for the soft-focus approach. Newsweek took top propaganda honors by misinforming its readers that Clinton voluntarily released all these emails to “help alleviate tensions” (no, she was dragged kicking and screaming into doing this, fighting it like a wildcat every step of the way) and sifted through the new release to find the “silliest” emails for a top-five list of comedy “gems.”

 

Somehow Newsweek missed the knee-slapper where Hillary compromised classified satellite intelligence on North Korean nuclear weapons.

 

As the Washington Times reported (while our mighty Mainstream Media was busy ****ering over what Sid Blumenthal said about

Rep. John Boehner (R-OH)

, this is one of those emails that caught the inspector general’s eye, was stripped of its classification markings manually by someone at the State Department, and somehow flew across the “air gap” that’s supposed to make it impossible to compromise classified material by emailing it directly to an unsecured system like Clinton’s.

 

 

The individual who carried it across the “air gap” knew it was classified with 100 percent certainty, and willfully removed the designations and codes marking it as such.  That individual is a criminal under federal law, and should do hard time when his or her identity is discovered by the FBI.

The Washington Times details two reasons why intelligence sources are deeply concerned about the North Korean nuclear email:

First, spy satellite information is frequently classified at the top-secret level and handled within a special compartment called Talent-Keyhole. This means it is one of the most sensitive forms of intelligence gathered by the U.S.

Second, the North Koreans have assembled a massive cyberhacking army under an elite military spy program known as Bureau 121, which is increasingly aggressive in targeting systems for hacking, especially vulnerable private systems. The North Koreans, for instance, have been blamed by the U.S. for the hack of Sony movie studios.

Allowing sensitive U.S. intelligence about North Korea to seep into a more insecure private email server has upset the intelligence community because it threatens to expose its methods and assets for gathering intelligence on the secretive communist nation.

One of these intelligence community sources complained to the Washington Times about “a certain nonchalance at Mrs. Clinton’s State Department” with regard to electronic security, even as the government deals with one spectacular hacker raid after another.

 

Some of the other “hilarious” emails exposed in the new dump have Clinton not only encouraging her staff to partake of that “nonchalance” and send sensitive material to her personal address, but actively berating at least one of them for his reluctance to do so. There are exchanges where her aides try to explain the importance of keeping classified information secure to Her Regal Majesty, who finds the whole subject annoying.

 

And while Big Media’s army of fact-checkers was busy searching for comedy gems in the 7,000 emails that dropped this week, Sean Davis at The Federalist noticed that many of the messages contained information that was “born classified” – indisputably classified at the time Hillary sent or received them, under a 2009 executive order signed by President Obama, contrary to Clinton’s repeated false claims that none of her emails included information that was marked classified at the time she handled it.  Some of these emails had to be redacted in their entirety before they could be released to the public.

 

And yes, Hillary Clinton originated at least six emails containing classified information, contrary to her spin that she was just a helpless unwitting recipient of material others should be blamed for compromising.

 

Not only did Clinton ignore Obama’s executive order, she also ignored the President’s specific instructions not to bring her henchman Sidney Blumenthal into the State Department. The Wall Street Journal notes that the new emails show that Blumenthal had a “large role” and “outsize position” in the Secretary of State’s operation… which makes a liar of Hillary Clinton yet again, because back when a panicked Blumenthal gave the House Benghazi Committee some emails they were never supposed to see, Clinton ran around telling everyone he was just an old pal that sent her crazy stuff from time to time, and she didn’t pay much attention to his unsolicited advice.  Some of the new emails show Clinton was sending classified information to Blumenthal and other private citizens.

 

But please, Clinton media, tell us some more about how these emails are funny and charming, how they illustrate the difficulty of a being a working mom and Having it All with only an eight-figure fortune and a vast army of taxpayer-funded aides to help the poor lady get by.  While we’re on that subject, how come so many of these funny little irrelevant personal messages are among the emails she decided to save, when she supposedly deleted half of her subpoenaed email trove because it contained only irrelevant personal messages?

Originally Posted by direstraits:

Contenduhh, as one of the faithful Obamites, it must gall you to see your little messiah descend to mere mortal status as he leaves the Oval Office as a limping lame duck.  Soon, he will be recognized as truly, THE WORST PRESIDENT, EVER! 

 

Being neither a Trumpeter, nor a Strumpette, I can bloviate at will.

___

From your past performance, it would seem that there never have been any constraints on your bloviating.

Originally Posted by Contendahh:

Thank all of you for all those irrelevant and off-topic entries involving Hillary Clinton.  Strong indicators of just how radically obsessed you are with her, when you place all that Hilleriana into a string that has nothing to do with her.LOL!

You're accusing someone of being obsessed with Hillary?????Give me a break!!!
I wish I had a dollar for every time you make a Trump post.

You are truly one pathetic little man.

 

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:

Thank all of you for all those irrelevant and off-topic entries involving Hillary Clinton.  Strong indicators of just how radically obsessed you are with her, when you place all that Hilleriana into a string that has nothing to do with her.LOL!

You're accusing someone of being obsessed with Hillary?????Give me a break!!!
I wish I had a dollar for every time you make a Trump post.

You are truly one pathetic little man.

 

____

 

As usual your logic is critically, indeed pathetically, flawed. The obsessive aspect of the irrelevant posts lies not in their subject matter, per se, but in its introduction into a string that has nothing whatsoever  to do with that subject matter, Hooberbloob's first reply being a lone exception.  That might be a bit difficult for someone of your limited comprehension to understand, but that is about as plain as I can make it.

 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

Faithful Dupes?

Contendahh, do you realize how many people on this forum doesn't like you? That you are seen as an idiot by the majority?

---------

I am not certain who gives you authority to speak for the "majority," whoever or whatever they are, Given that the majority of contributors to this forum are at the far right of the political spectrum, at least some of them might well be disposed not to like me. That bothers me not one whit; instead I take it as something pretty close to being a compliment. Should such rank nutjobs as Jack Flash. Carl Spackler, or Captain Crusader  express appreciation for my offerings, I would consider that a signal to re-evaluate my viewpoints.

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

Faithful Dupes?

Contendahh, do you realize how many people on this forum doesn't like you? That you are seen as an idiot by the majority?

---------

I am not certain who gives you authority to speak for the "majority," whoever or whatever they are, Given that the majority of contributors to this forum are at the far right of the political spectrum, at least some of them might well be disposed not to like me. That bothers me not one whit; instead I take it as something pretty close to being a compliment. Should such rank nutjobs as Jack Flash. Carl Spackler, or Captain Crusader  express appreciation for my offerings, I would consider that a signal to re-evaluate my viewpoints.

What it means condung, you're too stupid to realize how stupid, ignorant

and against the laws of God, man and animals, socialism has always been.

 

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
-

I am not certain who gives you authority to speak for the "majority," whoever or whatever they are, Given that the majority of contributors to this forum are at the far right of the political spectrum, at least some of them might well be disposed not to like me. That bothers me not one whit; instead I take it as something pretty close to being a compliment. Should such rank nutjobs as Jack Flash. Carl Spackler, or Captain Crusader  express appreciation for my offerings, I would consider that a signal to re-evaluate my viewpoints.

________

Thank you! You just proved my point of what an idiot you really are!

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
-

I am not certain who gives you authority to speak for the "majority," whoever or whatever they are, Given that the majority of contributors to this forum are at the far right of the political spectrum, at least some of them might well be disposed not to like me. That bothers me not one whit; instead I take it as something pretty close to being a compliment. Should such rank nutjobs as Jack Flash. Carl Spackler, or Captain Crusader  express appreciation for my offerings, I would consider that a signal to re-evaluate my viewpoints.

________

Thank you! You just proved my point of what an idiot you really are!

____

Typical semiannualcchick tripe--all opinion, no analytical merit, no substance, seasoned with  name-calling. Pitiful!

Originally Posted by Contendahh:
 

Typical semiannualcchick tripe--all opinion, no analytical merit, no substance, seasoned with  name-calling. Pitiful!

_______

OMG!! You accuse me of being all opinionated, no analytical merit, no substance, & calling people names? You're showing people just how intellectually disabled you really are with each comment you make. Sad!

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Contendahh:
 

Typical semiannualcchick tripe--all opinion, no analytical merit, no substance, seasoned with  name-calling. Pitiful!

_______

OMG!! You accuse me of being all opinionated, no analytical merit, no substance, & calling people names? You're showing people just how intellectually disabled you really are with each comment you make. Sad!

____

Even those follow-up comments  are of the very same character as I described earlier.  FYI, here is what we are referring to, since your short-term memory appears to have deserted you:

 

"Given that the majority of contributors to this forum are at the far right of the political spectrum, at least some of them might well be disposed not to like me. That bothers me not one whit; instead I take it as something pretty close to being a compliment. Should such rank nutjobs as Jack Flash. Carl Spackler, or Captain Crusader  express appreciation for my offerings, I would consider that a signal to re-evaluate my viewpoints."

 

At minimum, will you tell us whether or not you consider the majority of commenters on this forum

are at the far  right end of the political spectrum, and if so that they might well be disposed not to like me??  Do you agree or disagree or will you put up some more unexplicated opinionated insulting tripe?

No, not your politics. It's your "beternU" name, and how you "correct" every little mistype someone makes, and the way you have a come apart when it's done to you. It's because you're probably the biggest hypocrite in the state, even worse than your pal in TN. It's because you're a bully wannabe. It's that sanctimonious attitude you have, and how you like to kill innocent animals just for being innocent animals. Animals that have as much/more right to live as the vermin you pretend you're protecting. It's how you're always wrong but think you can bully people enough to overlook that little fact. That's just a few things, so don't pretend it's JUST your communist politics.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

No, not your politics. It's your "beternU" name, and how you "correct" every little mistype someone makes, and the way you have a come apart when it's done to you. It's because you're probably the biggest hypocrite in the state, even worse than your pal in TN. It's because you're a bully wannabe. It's that sanctimonious attitude you have, and how you like to kill innocent animals just for being innocent animals. Animals that have as much/more right to live as the vermin you pretend you're protecting. It's how you're always wrong but think you can bully people enough to overlook that little fact. That's just a few things, so don't pretend it's JUST your communist politics.

____

Having divested yourself of that much of your disordered opinion, have you left anything out?

Surely you could gin up some more absurd opprobrium if you really tried!

 

You are truly way, way off base, Worstthinking, on the matter of animals (as well as the rest of your above diatribe). If I kill a free-roaming invasive, non-native animal, it is done for environmentally sound and proven purposes, no matter what you, in your ignorance think about the matter.   I do not do it for fun, but for the betterment of the natural systems.  Your attitude in the matter would be viewed with total scorn by any reputable animal population biologist/ecologist.  Go play in a game you actually know something about. 

You kill cats because you don't like cats, and you enjoy killing them using your LAME excuse about the vermin. It doesn't work with me and other decent people. One old bi*** here was coming in to our yards trying to trap the ferals and was told by animal control to leave the ferals alone, and stay away from other's property or be charged with trespass and maybe sued by the property owners. I told the officer I most certainly would press charges against her if I caught her or her delinquent son in my yard again. That needs to happen to you, and one day I hope you get a little of the misery back that you dish out to those poor animals. The entire neighborhood cheered when she moved, much like I bet your neighborhood would. Try any excuse you want, but you're disgusting.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

You kill cats because you don't like cats, and you enjoy killing them using your LAME excuse about the vermin. It doesn't work with me and other decent people. One old bi*** here was coming in to our yards trying to trap the ferals and was told by animal control to leave the ferals alone, and stay away from other's property or be charged with trespass and maybe sued by the property owners. I told the officer I most certainly would press charges against her if I caught her or her delinquent son in my yard again. That needs to happen to you, and one day I hope you get a little of the misery back that you dish out to those poor animals. The entire neighborhood cheered when she moved, much like I bet your neighborhood would. Try any excuse you want, but you're disgusting.

___

 

Oh, M-E-E-E-E-E-E-O-W-W-W!

 

I taught I tilled a puddy tat!

Last edited by Contendahh
Originally Posted by Jack Flash:

The purpose of the religion forum is for the dammnation of Mormon,

Catholic, Atheist, Ohio St., pickled beets and snake handlers. ( There are

some exceptions for the handlers.) And Amish heaters.

=====================

 

LOL! Don't forget cats. The existence of cats and Amish heaters probably keep him awake at night.

 

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×