The leaders of Poland and Hungary have not succumbed to pressures to admit an influx of refugees inside their borders – a policy that has yielded no terrorism problems, unlike many of their European neighbors who have been plagued by jihad at the hand of Islamic migrants.
Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo made her opposition to accepting migrants loud and clear in a statement she delivered between England’s Manchester bombing killing 22 and last weekend’s London Bridge attack killing seven.
https://www.blazingcatfur.ca/2...-rejecting-refugees/
==============================
The leaders of Poland and Hungary have not succumbed to pressures to admit an influx of refugees inside their borders – a policy that has yielded no terrorism problems, unlike many of their European neighbors who have been plagued by jihad at the hand of Islamic migrants.
Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo made her opposition to accepting migrants loud and clear in a statement she delivered between England’s Manchester bombing killing 22 and last weekend’s London Bridge attack killing seven.
Inviting their own destruction?
After the European Union (EU) threatened Poland with economic sanctions if it did not receive more than 6,000 asylum seekers, Syzdlo said that she will not give in to the foolishness of the demands and jeopardize Poland’s national security.
“[Poland] will not participate in the Brussels elites’ folly,” she declared, according to WND.
The PM then insisted that there is a direct link between EU’s problematic migration policy and the Islamic terrorism that has infiltrated and plagued the European continent.
“[I]t is impossible not to connect them,” Suzdlo asserted.
Other Polish leaders agreed that accepting migrants is similar to inviting war inside their borders.
“Polish Interior Minister Mariusz Blaszczak considers the threat of migrants ‘much worse’ than the threat of EU sanctions and has said that such waves of mass migration only harm the ‘security of Poland and the Poles,’” WND’s Liam Clancy reported. “One Polish minister, Ryszard Czarnecki, went even further in his statements on migrants and terror. Czarnecki has said that the only way to protect Poland from terrorist attacks is by not allowing Muslim migrants into the country.”
Because the Poles have stood on the side of caution on the immigration issue, terrorism has not been a problem within its borders – a trend that other European nations will likely adopt after seeing the mayhem Islamic refugees have spread in the countries that freely accept them, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Belgium … just to name a few.
“Foreign travel advice provided by the U.K. government recognizes that ‘there’s no recent history of terrorism in Poland,’” Clancy announced. “And other countries with similar migrant policies can report the same.”
Not Hungary for terrorism
Even stronger opposition to terrorism has been proclaimed by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who referred to migrants as “a poison” in lieu of the terrors they have inflicted on numerous European nations that have opened their doors to them.
“[E]very single migrant poses a public security and terror risk,” Orban asserted while condemning the EU during a recent speech in Malta, where he warned the crowd that runaway immigration is threatening the “Christian identity” of Europe. “Migration turned out to be the Trojan horse of terrorism.”
To make sure that Hungary does not invite the same terror that has been unleashed throughout the continent in recent years, Hungary has taken a number of precautions.
“Last summer, Hungary decided to introduce a strict limit on the number of refugees allowed into the country,” Clancy noted. “The country also further reinforced patrols and defensive measures on its border. Only 10 migrants can enter Hungary on a given weekday.”
And to take things a step further, the leader of Hungary put legislation in place throughout the country to make sure it does not succumb to a jihadist invitation any time soon.
The leaders of Poland and Hungary have not succumbed to pressures to admit an influx of refugees inside their borders – a policy that has yielded no terrorism problems, unlike many of their European neighbors who have been plagued by jihad at the hand of Islamic migrants.
Polish Prime Minister Beata Szydlo made her opposition to accepting migrants loud and clear in a statement she delivered between England’s Manchester bombing killing 22 and last weekend’s London Bridge attack killing seven.
Inviting their own destruction?
After the European Union (EU) threatened Poland with economic sanctions if it did not receive more than 6,000 asylum seekers, Syzdlo said that she will not give in to the foolishness of the demands and jeopardize Poland’s national security.
“[Poland] will not participate in the Brussels elites’ folly,” she declared, according to WND.
The PM then insisted that there is a direct link between EU’s problematic migration policy and the Islamic terrorism that has infiltrated and plagued the European continent.
“[I]t is impossible not to connect them,” Suzdlo asserted.
Other Polish leaders agreed that accepting migrants is similar to inviting war inside their borders.
“Polish Interior Minister Mariusz Blaszczak considers the threat of migrants ‘much worse’ than the threat of EU sanctions and has said that such waves of mass migration only harm the ‘security of Poland and the Poles,’” WND’s Liam Clancy reported. “One Polish minister, Ryszard Czarnecki, went even further in his statements on migrants and terror. Czarnecki has said that the only way to protect Poland from terrorist attacks is by not allowing Muslim migrants into the country.”
Because the Poles have stood on the side of caution on the immigration issue, terrorism has not been a problem within its borders – a trend that other European nations will likely adopt after seeing the mayhem Islamic refugees have spread in the countries that freely accept them, including the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Italy and Belgium … just to name a few.
“Foreign travel advice provided by the U.K. government recognizes that ‘there’s no recent history of terrorism in Poland,’” Clancy announced. “And other countries with similar migrant policies can report the same.”
“Hungarian President János Áder signed a bill recently that will allow asylum seekers to be restricted to detention centers and gives police authority to return them from anywhere in the country to neighboring Serbia,” WND informed.
Being tough on immigration in Hungary and Poland has made it tough for terrorists to set up shop in the two countries so that they cannot inflict terror and spread Islamic rule.
“Poland and Hungary are two of the most restrictive countries in Europe when it comes to accepting overwhelmingly Muslim migrants – and neither have seen a major terror attack in years,” Clancy pointed out.
U.S. learning from anti-terrorism policies?
President Donald Trump’s rumored pick for EU ambassador, Ted Malloch, stands in agreement with Poland’s and Hungary’s tough talk on terrorism and has adopted much of their same language when addressing the topic of immigration.
Commending Poland’s bold move to resist globalization and defend its national sovereignty, Malloch, who serves at the University of Readings’ Henly Business School as its professor of strategic leadership and governance, was happy to see that the northern European nation will not submit to the bullying tactics of the EU and could follow suit with the UK to pull out of the troubled union altogether.
“Poland has seen that the 21st century will be dominated by the nation-state and not glorified by some regional integration mechanisms or process of globalization,” the author of Hired: An Insider’s Look at the Trump Victory explained in an op-ed. “[S]upport for a ‘Polexit’ from European Union oppression is on the rise.”
Acknowledgment of such a move was recently communicated by Luxembourg Minister of Foreign Affairs Jean Asselborn.
“[T]oday’s Poland under [chairman of the ruling Law and Justice party] Jaroslaw Kaczynski could be an EU member no longer,” Asselborn announced, noting that the Pole’s political party is seeking to cease any more integration with the EU.
Many Americans who are pushing for Trump to enforce tough anti-terrorism policies are confident that a future Malloch appointment will work to stem the tide of France and Germany’s aggressive pro-Muslim policies that have put much of Europe in the clutches of Islamization.
“If President Trump does appoint Malloch to the role of EU ambassador, there is little doubt he will align himself with Euro-skeptics such as Orban and Szydło over EU hardliners such as Emmanuel Macron and Angela Merkel,” Clancy impressed.
More story
