Skip to main content

The liberal rag, The New York Times, has an intesting article about the battle between conservatives wanting less government spending, liberals wanting more, the reason both are simultaneously right and wrong on the issue, and why public sector unions are a major problem.

The Paralysis Of The State

You can put me in the camp of "we can't afford it these days," but I'm forced to acknowledge that once-upon-a-time government projects had some benefit to the public as a whole. The size of government is making it increasingly difficult to take on such a project because governments are broke from existing obligations.

Here are some excerpts I found interesting:

quote:
New York City has to strain to finance its schools but must support 10,000 former cops who have retired before age 50.


quote:
California can’t afford new water projects, but state cops often receive 90 percent of their salaries when they retire at 50. The average corrections officer there makes $70,000 a year in base salary and $100,000 with overtime (California spends more on its prison system than on its schools).


quote:
Daniel DiSalvo, a political scientist at the City College of New York, has a superb survey of the problem in the new issue of National Affairs. DiSalvo notes that nationally, state and local workers earn on average $14 more per hour in wages and benefits than their private sector counterparts. A city like Buffalo has as many public workers as it did in 1950, even though it has lost half its population.


quote:
Through much of the 20th century, staunch liberals like Franklin Roosevelt opposed public sector unions. George Meany of the A.F.L.-C.I.O. argued that it is “impossible to bargain collectively with government.”


quote:
In addition, public sector unions can use political power to increase demand for their product. DiSalvo notes that between 1989 ad 2004, the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees was the biggest spender in American politics, giving $40 million to federal candidates. The largest impact is on low-turnout local elections. The California prison guard union recently sent a signal by spending $200,000 to defeat a state assemblyman who had tried to reduce costs.
Original Post

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×