Skip to main content

I also edited the sentence to read "it was her chance" instead of her way. But whatever, I'm going to bed. You can stew about it all you want, but you need to stop the lying.

 

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way chance of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him

JDawg, I gave you the link of the story about the Janitor, in which you never once commented, except to accuse me of lying. Guess I wrote, created & edited that story all on my own!

I have told you, countless times, where the information came about the pastor talking "from the Pulpit". I got it thru family members/friends that attend that church, just as you do. Why should I believe you instead of them? You scream at me & Best for proof, well, how about you give us proof of what you're saying? You're going to defend that Pastor & the monster that molested those kids come Hell or high water. I'm thru with you!!

Oh, BTW, why did the church pay for Mrs. Eddie's cell phone? Did they also pay for an attorney for her divorce? Seems to me if she couldn't afford a cell phone, she couldn't afford a lawyer. 

Sorta makes you go hmmm.....

Saw this in the Times Daily:

MUSCLE SHOALS — More new commercial development is coming to the Woodward Avenue area of Muscle Shoals.

         

The City Council, after a public hearing Monday with no comments in opposition or support, approved a sales tax sharing agreement with PGM Properties LL C, a development company from Brentwood, Tennessee. Company officials said they will build a retail shopping center on the former Highland Park Baptist Church site.

         

         

                           

         
 


Now I remember!

The council agreed to refund the development company one-half of the 3.5 percent city sales tax generated from the development for the next five years up to a $250,000 cap or substantiated development costs.

Muscle Shoals Mayor David Bradford said the amount likely will be eaten by demolition costs. Demolition of the church building is expected to start in September.

It has been rumored, almost since the opening of the Publix Super Market in Florence, that a store from the same chain would open in Muscle Shoals.

A spokeswoman from Publix would not comment on the development in Muscle Shoals. Brenda Reid, manager of media and community relations at Publix, said in an email it is Publix’s “policy to only comment on sites where we have a confirmed lease.” Reid said there is not a confirmed lease in Muscle Shoals.

A portion of the property, the original footprint of the church, was rezoned in April to put the entire lot in general business zoning.

This was the fourth tax-sharing agreement presented and subsequently approved by the council in the past two years.

The first, Goody’s shopping center on Woodward Avenue, developed by Pounders & Associates, is the only one receiving tax refund payments.

Napa Auto Parts, opened by Long-Lewis Ford owner Todd Ouelette, was given approval for a tax incentive in April. Ouelette is eligible to receive up to $250,000 in tax refunds during the next five years.

Chick-fil-A was approved last week to have up to $200,000 returned in sales tax payments for building the quick-service chicken restaurant in the parking lot of Southgate mall.

Last edited by riverzurinsky
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

JDawg you are a liar and as such you fit right in at that church. I never once posted his wife knew. I posted that it was almost impossible to believe she didn't know. You sure are rabid in your defense of her, not even allowing for the fact it very well could be true that she knew. What's the big deal? It doesn't seem the church would care. I said the fact she went to a lawyer means nothing except she lawyered up. It says nothing about what she knew and when she knew it. Lawyering up is what hiring a lawyer is called by some.

lawyer up

verb

  • to retain legal counsel.

 Below is what I posted, and it's quite a bit different than what you lied and said I posted.

 

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years.  

 

Now, I did say I heard, but what will you do if that does turn out to be true like all the other stories? Will you continue to call people 'miserable humans' for doubting the BS stories? BTW, your actions have been a lot less than 'christian' in my opinion.

 

Your lie.

You absolutely did. You said she knew and had known for years. Your words, not mine. That makes her complicit. That makes her guilty (as you point out later in this post about "clean hands").

 

______________________

I'm well aware of what it means to "lawyer up". Again, that's NOT WHAT IT SAYS. IT SAYS she FILED FOR DIVORCE ON MONDAY! Not went to a lawyer, not retained counsel. It says COURT RECORDS SHOW she FILED FOR DIVORCE on Monday. It's there, all you have to do is read it...

 

My lie, huh? Your own words look familiar here?

 

and who really believes his wife didn't have a clue? I think she held her cards until she was ready to be rid of him.

 

Yes, here I am, repeating what others have said

 

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years. 

 

There they are. Your words.

It strikes me as ironic that you have accused me of using some kind of tactic in this thread. Shameful, I think you called it. But I notice you have gone to the old standard twice now in this thread. The one that says "that's not very Christian", when someone says something you don't agree with. I won't call it shameful. Tired? Maybe. Predictable? Absolutely.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

JDawg, I gave you the link of the story about the Janitor, in which you never once commented, except to accuse me of lying. Guess I wrote, created & edited that story all on my own!

I have told you, countless times, where the information came about the pastor talking "from the Pulpit". I got it thru family members/friends that attend that church, just as you do. Why should I believe you instead of them? You scream at me & Best for proof, well, how about you give us proof of what you're saying? You're going to defend that Pastor & the monster that molested those kids come Hell or high water. I'm thru with you!!

Oh, BTW, why did the church pay for Mrs. Eddie's cell phone? Did they also pay for an attorney for her divorce? Seems to me if she couldn't afford a cell phone, she couldn't afford a lawyer. 

Sorta makes you go hmmm.....

 

_________________

You talked about something "you heard". That's the entire issue. Look, I don't care if you believe me or not. I'm not slandering a pastor's name by claiming he defended a child molester from the pulpit, all because "someone" "told me". That's your thing. As I've told you, I know, because I've been there, not because of second or third hand information.

 

As I said, people talk. Often, without knowing what is and isn't true. Just like the "nasty divorce" talked about in this thread, that I proved was not occurring prior to this incident. There are plenty of disgusting details in this story that are true. No need to "spice it up" with rumors.

 

As to what Mrs. Eddie could or could not afford, and who paid what, if any, of her bills. That answer is easy to obtain. Any one of your friends/family that are so connected at HPBC could answer that for you. And since they sooooo like to talk about this subject, just ask 'em. Let me know what they tell you. I'll wait...

 

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years. 

 

There they are. Your words.

It strikes me as ironic that you have accused me of using some kind of tactic in this thread. Shameful, I think you called it. But I notice you have gone to the old standard twice now in this thread. The one that says "that's not very Christian", when someone says something you don't agree with. I won't call it shameful. Tired? Maybe. Predictable? Absolutely

=======================================

JDawg, I don't know what it is about you trying to say that the phrase "I heard" means I know for a fact it's true. Not only did I stress that I heard it, I also asked what you'd do if it turned out to be true. Why would I ask you that if I had already deemed it to be true? This is exactly why I say you fit in just fine at that deceitful church. If you are going to be their apologist and attack dog you need to do a lot better than you're doing. I see you left out the post under my original post where I 'corrected' my wording from 'her way' to 'her chance'. I will call you unchristian as many times as I want. You are very unchristian and you are flat out lying about what I posted, even with the words still on the thread. When you get a chance look up the word ironic.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years. 

 

There they are. Your words.

It strikes me as ironic that you have accused me of using some kind of tactic in this thread. Shameful, I think you called it. But I notice you have gone to the old standard twice now in this thread. The one that says "that's not very Christian", when someone says something you don't agree with. I won't call it shameful. Tired? Maybe. Predictable? Absolutely

=======================================

JDawg, I don't know what it is about you trying to say that the phrase "I heard" means I know for a fact it's true. Not only did I stress that I heard it, I also asked what you'd do if it turned out to be true. Why would I ask you that if I had already deemed it to be true? This is exactly why I say you fit in just fine at that deceitful church. If you are going to be their apologist and attack dog you need to do a lot better than you're doing. I see you left out the post under my original post where I 'corrected' my wording from 'her way' to 'her chance'. I will call you unchristian as many times as I want. You are very unchristian and you are flat out lying about what I posted, even with the words still on the thread. When you get a chance look up the word ironic.

 

__________________

No need to look up a definition for ironic. Your posts drip with irony. I left out your correction, simply because whether you say "her way" or "her chance" is really irrelevant. The intent of your message was the same. Your implication was that Mrs. Eddie knew and had known for years about her husband's activities. You want to stress it was what "you heard", but that's exactly what I've talked about this entire thread. You're rumormongering. That's it. Plain and simple. And it's unnecessary. I've given you verifiable evidence regarding when when the divorce was filed for.

 

Again, I point you to your own words:

and who really believes his wife didn't have a clue? I think she held her cards until she was ready to be rid of him.

 

See, there you are, implicating Mrs. Eddie in the coverup of Jeff's crimes. You've even gone so far as to implicate others (although unnamed) in having knowledge of these crimes long before they were discovered. See here:

 

You know darn well people had an idea before it all came out. But I guess not rocking the boat meant more than the kids.

 

It's fine for you to call me "unChristian". Again, its just so very predictable. But it's obvious to see here whose posts are vitriolic, name-calling, rumormongering, and include telling me to STHU. See, irony.

 

 

 

Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years. 

 

There they are. Your words.

It strikes me as ironic that you have accused me of using some kind of tactic in this thread. Shameful, I think you called it. But I notice you have gone to the old standard twice now in this thread. The one that says "that's not very Christian", when someone says something you don't agree with. I won't call it shameful. Tired? Maybe. Predictable? Absolutely

=======================================

JDawg, I don't know what it is about you trying to say that the phrase "I heard" means I know for a fact it's true. Not only did I stress that I heard it, I also asked what you'd do if it turned out to be true. Why would I ask you that if I had already deemed it to be true? This is exactly why I say you fit in just fine at that deceitful church. If you are going to be their apologist and attack dog you need to do a lot better than you're doing. I see you left out the post under my original post where I 'corrected' my wording from 'her way' to 'her chance'. I will call you unchristian as many times as I want. You are very unchristian and you are flat out lying about what I posted, even with the words still on the thread. When you get a chance look up the word ironic.

 

__________________

No need to look up a definition for ironic. Your posts drip with irony. I left out your correction, simply because whether you say "her way" or "her chance" is really irrelevant. The intent of your message was the same. Your implication was that Mrs. Eddie knew and had known for years about her husband's activities. You want to stress it was what "you heard", but that's exactly what I've talked about this entire thread. You're rumormongering. That's it. Plain and simple. And it's unnecessary. I've given you verifiable evidence regarding when when the divorce was filed for.

 

Again, I point you to your own words:

and who really believes his wife didn't have a clue? I think she held her cards until she was ready to be rid of him.

 

See, there you are, implicating Mrs. Eddie in the coverup of Jeff's crimes. You've even gone so far as to implicate others (although unnamed) in having knowledge of these crimes long before they were discovered. See here:

 

You know darn well people had an idea before it all came out. But I guess not rocking the boat meant more than the kids.

 

It's fine for you to call me "unChristian". Again, its just so very predictable. But it's obvious to see here whose posts are vitriolic, name-calling, rumormongering, and include telling me to STHU. See, irony.

 ========================

 Jdawg, you are truly an idiot.  I don't see any name calling in those two posts. You really need to get a grip on your lying. Yes, I do think she knew. I have no problem saying that. I also asked you if you really believed she didn't know. You won't answer. I also asked you what you'd do if you found out she knew, you wouldn't answer. Now with that "said", I ask you if you know what an opinion is? It is MY opinion she knew. It is also my opinion other people knew. Other people have the same opinion about her as I do. Now what? He had done this for years. His victims grew up. They knew what he did. Why didn't they speak up? IF you had ever read any of the other discussions last year you would have seen that I, and others, asked not only how Eddie got away with it for years, but how other molesters managed to do it for so long too, because dawg, the victims BECOME ADULTS and KNOW WHAT HE DID AND WAS MOST LIKELY STILL DOING. I sure hope you don't get paid a lot to try to cover and protect, and twist other's words and meanings, because YOU STINK AT IT. Find a dictionary and look up the meaning of irony. Then look up the meaning of opinion, after that get someone to explain the meaning of 'I heard'.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

I also heard they were in the middle of a nasty divorce and this was her way of getting rid of him and getting the kids with no fight from him, and that she did know and had known for years. 

 

There they are. Your words.

It strikes me as ironic that you have accused me of using some kind of tactic in this thread. Shameful, I think you called it. But I notice you have gone to the old standard twice now in this thread. The one that says "that's not very Christian", when someone says something you don't agree with. I won't call it shameful. Tired? Maybe. Predictable? Absolutely

=======================================

JDawg, I don't know what it is about you trying to say that the phrase "I heard" means I know for a fact it's true. Not only did I stress that I heard it, I also asked what you'd do if it turned out to be true. Why would I ask you that if I had already deemed it to be true? This is exactly why I say you fit in just fine at that deceitful church. If you are going to be their apologist and attack dog you need to do a lot better than you're doing. I see you left out the post under my original post where I 'corrected' my wording from 'her way' to 'her chance'. I will call you unchristian as many times as I want. You are very unchristian and you are flat out lying about what I posted, even with the words still on the thread. When you get a chance look up the word ironic.

 

__________________

No need to look up a definition for ironic. Your posts drip with irony. I left out your correction, simply because whether you say "her way" or "her chance" is really irrelevant. The intent of your message was the same. Your implication was that Mrs. Eddie knew and had known for years about her husband's activities. You want to stress it was what "you heard", but that's exactly what I've talked about this entire thread. You're rumormongering. That's it. Plain and simple. And it's unnecessary. I've given you verifiable evidence regarding when when the divorce was filed for.

 

Again, I point you to your own words:

and who really believes his wife didn't have a clue? I think she held her cards until she was ready to be rid of him.

 

See, there you are, implicating Mrs. Eddie in the coverup of Jeff's crimes. You've even gone so far as to implicate others (although unnamed) in having knowledge of these crimes long before they were discovered. See here:

 

You know darn well people had an idea before it all came out. But I guess not rocking the boat meant more than the kids.

 

It's fine for you to call me "unChristian". Again, its just so very predictable. But it's obvious to see here whose posts are vitriolic, name-calling, rumormongering, and include telling me to STHU. See, irony.

 ========================

 Jdawg, you are truly an idiot. Yes, I do think she knew. I have no problem saying that. I also asked you if you really believed she didn't know. You won't answer. I also asked you what you'd do if you found out she knew, you wouldn't answer. Now with that "said", I ask you if you know what an opinion is? It is MY opinion she knew. It is also my opinion other people knew. Other people have the same opinion about her as I do. Now what? He had done this for years. His victims grew up. They knew what he did. Why didn't they speak up? IF you had ever read any of the other discussions last year you would have seen that I, and maybe others, asked not only how Eddie got away with it for years, but other molesters too, because dawg, the victims BECOME ADULTS and KNEW WHAT HE WAS DOING. I sure hope you don't get paid a lot to try to cover and protect, and twist other's words and meanings, because YOU STINK AT IT. Find a dictionary and look up the meaning of irony. Then look up the meaning of opinion, after that get someone to explain the meaning of 'I heard'.

 ________________________

More name-calling vitriol being spewed here. Never would've seen it coming.

 

You didn't ask me directly if I thought she knew. But for the record, I absolutely do not. Ive answered already about "what I'd do if...". Again, it's there for you to read.

 

Opinions are fine, everyone has them and is certainly entitled to them. Especially about opinions as they relate to actual facts. But you specialize in rumormongering. That's a different thing. I've tried to show you the difference in this thread, but I'm still not sure you get it.

 

 

More name-calling vitriol being spewed here. Never would've seen it coming.

 What name calling? Show me in those two posts. If you mean calling you an idiot in other posts, well what do you expect. I think you know very well you're acting like one.

 

You didn't ask me directly if I thought she knew. But for the record, I absolutely do not. Ive answered already about "what I'd do if...". Again, it's there for you to read.

 Pretty sure I did ask you directly. Maybe you should go back and read, you seem to get your posts mixed up and you have a hard time understanding. Your opinion is she didn't know, my opinion is she did know.

Wasn't this directly enough for you?

"Now I will ask you-as sick as this man was, doing it on a church phone, a church computer, and inside the church building, as unable to control himself as he was and as immersed in child **** as he was, are you going to honestly put forth the claim as 100% true that his wife and others had no clue? I don't see how that is even possible. After all, one person we know saw him and he was still allowed to continue for 2 weeks. How many more didn't speak up at all"?

 

Opinions are fine, everyone has them and is certainly entitled to them. Especially about opinions as they relate to actual facts. But you specialize in rumormongering. That's a different thing. I've tried to show you the difference in this thread, but I'm still not sure you get it.

You mean opinions are fine and everyone is entitled to them as long as they're the same as yours. How do I specialize in rumormongering? I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except the part about his wife, and I did make it a point to say it was just something I heard. I would almost bet money you have heard that too along with a lot of other stuff. And who knows what is true and what isn't. So there we have it. You want to keep everyone quiet, and you can't. Free country. Maybe your church should be more careful in the future.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

How do I specialize in rumormongering? I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except the part about his wife, and I did make it a point to say it was just something I heard.

 

___________________________

Holy cow!?! Is this real life? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Do you suppose that is what the kids were thinking when Eddie was molesting them? What do you think the child thought when a grown up walked in on them, and instead of saving him, left him with Eddie? Do you suppose he ask himself if it was 'real life'? How about this person, do you think he wonders if it's 'real life'?

The lawsuit alleges that the church waited 10 days after a reported incident and insisted on doing its own investigation before disclosing the allegation of sexual abuse to police as required by Alabama law.

The lawsuit alleges that Eddie repeatedly and consistently sexually abused other children and that the church continues to pay Eddie's salary and benefits including cell phone service to his wife, a non-employee. "At all times relevant to the acts of sexual abuse against J.G., Jeffrey Eddie was acting as a spiritual counselor and was providing spiritual guidance and instruction to J.G.," the lawsuit states.

http://www.al.com/news/birming...m_files_lawsuit.html

 

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

You live in such a world of deceit and denial that I doubt you'd recognize 'real life'.

Says the one who posted:

How do I specialize in rumormongering? I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

And I'm in denial??? HAHAHAHAHA

 

Nice deflection, BTW. Is this like when you were asked in another thread about when "never" means "never"? I noticed over there you like to talk about things "you heard". Seems as though rumormongering is just your thing...

 

In before you call me the next name. What's it gonna be? JA, DA, Ahole, idiot, etc.? Or do you just want to tell me to STHU again?

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

You live in such a world of deceit and denial that I doubt you'd recognize 'real life'.

_______

If someone were standing naked on the church steps, Dawg would be ok with it & swear God told'em to.

 _____________

Your response reminds me of a quote from the movie Billy Madison:

 

Mr. Madison, what you've just said is one of the most insanely idiotic things I have ever heard. At no point in your rambling, incoherent response were you even close to anything that could be considered a rational thought. Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it. I award you no points, and may God have mercy on your soul.

 

Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

You live in such a world of deceit and denial that I doubt you'd recognize 'real life'.

Says the one who posted:

How do I specialize in rumormongering? I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

And I'm in denial??? HAHAHAHAHA

 

Nice deflection, BTW. Is this like when you were asked in another thread about when "never" means "never"? I noticed over there you like to talk about things "you heard". Seems as though rumormongering is just your thing...

 

In before you call me the next name. What's it gonna be? JA, DA, Ahole, idiot, etc.? Or do you just want to tell me to STHU again?

==============

Yes, one thing I posted and was upstanding enough to say in the post I'd heard  it. You, not being upstanding tried to make it that I had said I knew it for a fact. Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread. At least I'm not having to run around trying to clean up a mess like you have. You don't have to shut up at all. With every post the mind set becomes clearer and clearer. Less wondering how someone could have ignored something for two weeks.

 
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

If someone were standing naked on the church steps, Dawg would be ok with it & swear God told'em to.

 _____________

Originally Posted by JDawg:

Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.

may God have mercy on your soul.

_______

So now, everyone reading this is dumb? Did God give you that little tidbit too?

As far as your little "God have mercy on your soul".......coming from you...BLASPHEMY!

(I don't care if it was a quote from a movie, you quoted it)

 

You're a very sad example of a "Christian"!

Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

You live in such a world of deceit and denial that I doubt you'd recognize 'real life'.

Says the one who posted:

How do I specialize in rumormongering? I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

And I'm in denial??? HAHAHAHAHA

 

Nice deflection, BTW. Is this like when you were asked in another thread about when "never" means "never"? I noticed over there you like to talk about things "you heard". Seems as though rumormongering is just your thing...

 

In before you call me the next name. What's it gonna be? JA, DA, Ahole, idiot, etc.? Or do you just want to tell me to STHU again?

==============

Yes, one thing I posted and was straightforward and honest enough to say in the post I'd heard  it. You, not being upstanding, honest or straightforward tried to make it appear that I had said I knew it for a fact. Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread. At least I'm not having to run around trying to clean up a mess like you have. You don't have to shut up at all. With every post the mind set becomes clearer and clearer. Less wondering how someone could have been cold hearted enough to have ignored something for two weeks. Birds of a feather???

 

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Yes, one thing I posted and was upstanding enough to say in the post I'd heard  it. You, not being upstanding tried to make it that I had said I knew it for a fact. Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread. At least I'm not having to run around trying to clean up a mess like you have. You don't have to shut up at all. With every post the mind set becomes clearer and clearer. Less wondering how someone could have ignored something for two weeks.

 

__________________

So, you were UPSTANDING enough to let everybody know you were spreading a rumor before you spread it?!? Well, congrats! You surely deserve a medal. But again, you said in the same post:

 

I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

Wow, that's funny.....

 

As for what you said you "heard" in the other thread. I would ask you if you can't do your own searching, but the irony of that statement would probably be lost on you. So, I'll give you just the salient quote here:

"That's certainly not what I heard."

 

Looks like you make a habit of repeating things you hear. Do you ever have original thoughts?

 

 

Originally Posted by semiannualchick:
 
Originally Posted by semiannualchick:

If someone were standing naked on the church steps, Dawg would be ok with it & swear God told'em to.

 _____________

Originally Posted by JDawg:

Everyone in this room is now dumber for having listened to it.

may God have mercy on your soul.

_______

So now, everyone reading this is dumb? Did God give you that little tidbit too?

As far as your little "God have mercy on your soul".......coming from you...BLASPHEMY!

(I don't care if it was a quote from a movie, you quoted it)

 

You're a very sad example of a "Christian"!

_________________

No, Adam Sandler gave me that tidbit. Just seemed appropriate here.

 

Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Yes, one thing I posted and was upstanding enough to say in the post I'd heard  it. You, not being upstanding tried to make it that I had said I knew it for a fact. Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread. At least I'm not having to run around trying to clean up a mess like you have. You don't have to shut up at all. With every post the mind set becomes clearer and clearer. Less wondering how someone could have ignored something for two weeks.

 

__________________

So, you were UPSTANDING enough to let everybody know you were spreading a rumor before you spread it?!? Well, congrats! You surely deserve a medal. But again, you said in the same post:

 

I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

Wow, that's funny.....

 

As for what you said you "heard" in the other thread. I would ask you if you can't do your own searching, but the irony of that statement would probably be lost on you. So, I'll give you just the salient quote here:

"That's certainly not what I heard."

 

Looks like you make a habit of repeating things you hear. Do you ever have original thoughts?

 

  I already 'searched'. So I see once more you are making false allegations against me. All my thoughts are original thoughts, and I don't have to run them by anyone for their approval. How about you, any chance you'll have an original thought? Something tells me if you ever did have a thought it would die of loneliness, No one ever said to you, "I'll tell you what I heard but I can't swear it's true"? Sure they have, and most likely all sorts of things about this subject.

 

 

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:
Originally Posted by JDawg:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Yes, one thing I posted and was upstanding enough to say in the post I'd heard  it. You, not being upstanding tried to make it that I had said I knew it for a fact. Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread. At least I'm not having to run around trying to clean up a mess like you have. You don't have to shut up at all. With every post the mind set becomes clearer and clearer. Less wondering how someone could have ignored something for two weeks.

 

__________________

So, you were UPSTANDING enough to let everybody know you were spreading a rumor before you spread it?!? Well, congrats! You surely deserve a medal. But again, you said in the same post:

 

I have posted NOTHING that wasn't in the news except

 

Wow, that's funny.....

 

As for what you said you "heard" in the other thread. I would ask you if you can't do your own searching, but the irony of that statement would probably be lost on you. So, I'll give you just the salient quote here:

"That's certainly not what I heard."

 

Looks like you make a habit of repeating things you hear. Do you ever have original thoughts?

 

  I already 'searched'. So I see once more you are making false allegations against me. All my thoughts are original thoughts, and I don't have to run them by anyone for their approval. How about you, any chance you'll have an original thought? Something tells me if you ever did have a thought it would die of loneliness,

 _______________

And ONCE AGAIN, I've given you proof. There's the quote. Form the thread entitled Bill?, page 2. I even made it bold text so you would see it. But I suppose you would like to deny it belongs to you as well. Certainly you can, but anyone literate knows better.

 

They're your words, not mine. Allllll you have to do is read them.

 

 

 He thought he owned the forum. How do you know others never took the time to report him? That's certainly not what I heard.

 

OMG how weak. That is a statement to the very person that 'heard' the same thing at the same time as I did from the ones that reported him, unless he wasn't in the PM. Pretty sure he was. I guess it should 'say', "that's not what I read", or even that's not what WE read when it was posted TO US IN PM. That's not a rumor you idiot, the people 'told' us in print and so I 'heard', actually read it. Again, you need to stop 'helping' that poor church, you suck at it and you're killing them.

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

 He thought he owned the forum. How do you know others never took the time to report him? That's certainly not what I heard.

 

OMG how weak. That is a statement to the very person that 'heard' the same thing at the same time as I did from the ones that reported him. I guess it should 'say', "that's not what I read", or even that's not what WE read when it was posted TO US. That's not a rumor you idiot, the people 'told' us and so I 'heard' of it. Again, you need to stop 'helping' that poor church, you suck at it.

 

________________

AH, there it is. The name calling. I'm the idiot says the person who two posts above couldn't pull off a 5 line response without an edit.....

 

I just pointed out that you have shown a pattern of behavior as it relates to talking about what you "hear". It's interesting that in that same quote, all of a sudden YOU want to know how someone else knows "others never took the time to report him". All of a sudden, sources are important to you. Did they ask you to do your own searching?

 

You demanded:

Now, tell me what I 'heard' on the other thread.

I did. Then, you declared I was making false allegations against you. Until I gave you the quote. Twice. Now it's out of context. It's weak. You sure have a hard time making up your mind...

 

 

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

 He thought he owned the forum. How do you know others never took the time to report him? That's certainly not what I heard.

 

OMG how weak. That is a statement to the very person that 'heard' the same thing at the same time as I did from the ones that reported him, unless he wasn't in the PM. Pretty sure he was. I guess it should 'say', "that's not what I read", or even that's not what WE read when it was posted TO US IN PM. That's not a rumor you idiot, the people 'told' us in print and so I 'heard', actually read it. Again, you need to stop 'helping' that poor church, you suck at it and you're killing them.

 

_________________

Good grief, another edit? Is a single paragraph at once too much to handle?

 

Yes, I edited to add read to heard. Get over it. Editing is common practice. Maybe you should edit a bit, then you wouldn't look so stupid. Yes, the 'heard' you read actually happened. I heard it from the source. In other words I 'heard'/ read it when the person posted it. Tell us jdawg, are you the smartest they have? Is that why you were chosen?

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Yes, I edited to add read to heard. Get over it. Editing is common practice. Maybe you should edit a bit, then you wouldn't look so stupid. Yes, the 'heard' you read actually happened. I heard it from the source. In other words I 'heard'/ read it when the person posted it. Tell us jdawg, are you the smartest they have? Is that why you were chosen?

_____________________

More name calling. At least you're consistent. Editing seems to be a common practice for some. Others can form complete, rational thoughts the first time.

 

Which edit are we talking about here, the one above, or the other one to add:

"and you're killing them."

 

 

And, at least this time when you "heard" it, it actually happened. Is that different from when you "heard" about Mrs. Eddie?

 

 

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

It should be obvious that it's different, and to sane people I'm sure it is. The mizzus didn't post/write/tell me. In the other case they did, and the other poster, being in on the PMs, unless left out of that one, would have heard/read/been told at the same time. So you call her Mrs. Eddie? How quaint.

_____________

Sure you don't need to edit this one? It's a whole 5 sentences....

 

How would you prefer I refer to her? Is "his now ex-wife" better?

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×