Skip to main content

Hi to all my Forum Friends,

In the discussion I began a few days ago titled "The Jesus Film Project - Great Movie!" -- my legalistic Christian Friend, Head, keeps telling me that the movie presents the wrong message, or a watered down message, about salvation.  I remind him the movie is based, virtually verbatim, on the Gospel of Luke; so if he is telling me that the movie is wrong, he must believe that the Gospel of Luke is in error.  And, I ask him if he believes the other three Gospels are also in error.

To this, he replies, "The material at the end of the movie promotes a flawed and incomplete plan of salvation, which is not in the Gospel of Luke, or in any of the other Gospel accounts, or anywhere else in the new Testament.  Thus, in saying that the movie is in error on that point, I am in no way asserting any form of criticism against the Gospel of Luke, any of the other three Gospels, or any other parts of the Old or New Testaments.  Your accusations to the contrary reflect a severe deficiency in your ability to apply fundamentals of reasoned analysis."

You are speaking in generalities when you tell me that the movie "promotes a flawed and incomplete plan of salvation."   I was taught some 25 years ago, by a very wise, very Godly pastor -- to both speak and pray specifically.  Since God knows all our needs, He knows what we will pray for -- but, if we pray in generalities, how will WE know when He answers our prayer?  If we pray for specific needs, and even our wants, when He does answer, we will be able to recognize his answer to our prayers and gives thanks to Him for answered prayers.  The same applies to what we speak.  If we speak in specifics; then both we and others will know what we mean.

So, specifically, what do you find wrong with the movie or the ending?  Is it the suggested Prayer of Faith, i.e., Salvation Prayer:  "Lord Jesus, I need You.  Thank You for dying on the cross for my sins.   I open the door of my life and receive You as my Savior and Lord.  Take control of my life.  Make me the kind of person You want me to be.  Amen."

If so, keep in mind that this is a "suggested" Prayer of Faith -- not the exact words you have to say to be saved.  It is not the words which save you; it is what is in your heart.  If Jesus Christ is in your heart, and you sincerely want Him to be your Lord and Savior -- use any words that you feel are more fitting -- or pray a much longer prayer if that gives you a stronger feeling of eternal security. 

 

Suggesting this prayer is like pointing folks toward the path of safety.  You show them the path, but, they must walk it.  If they choose to stroll slowly, skip, jump, or even run -- there is no problem, as long a they are moving toward that place of safety, eternal life in Jesus Christ.

My Friend, please do not get hung up over the simplicity of the Faith Prayer.  Make it as long or as short, and as simple or as complicated as you wish.  If done sincerely, God will hear -- and you will be a child of God.

Next, you ask me, "Answer this, Bill.  If a sinner were to approach you, realizing that he is in an unsaved state and "pierced in his heart" as were those lost sinners in Acts 2:37, what would YOU tell him that he needed to do?  Would you tell him to do that which Peter instructed in Acts 2:38, or would you tell him something else?"


Acts 2:37-38, "Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, 'Brethren, what shall we do?' (38) Peter said to them, 'Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.' "


I would tell him exactly what Peter said that day -- repent and be baptized.  Please notice the time sequence.  First, REPENT.   And, then be baptized.   What happens at the moment of repenting?


Ephesians 1:13, 4:30, "In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the Gospel of your salvation -- having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,. . . by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption."


This tells us that, at that moment, the very moment we believe -- WE ARE SEALED.  In other words, at that very moment we are saved.  Since a person need be, and can only be, saved once -- it is finished, as Jesus said in John 19:30.  So, if we are already saved at that moment -- how can we later be saved through baptism?  Thus, "baptismal regeneration" is not Biblical.   While baptism is an important step of obedience for a Christian, baptism is not required for salvation, as we see with the thief on the cross (Luke 23:43).

And, when we are sealed with the Holy Spirit, we are told that we are sealed in Him "for (or until) the day of our redemption."   The day of our redemption is the day when we meet our Redeemer Kinsman, Jesus Christ.  When is that?  That is the day we believers die in this mortal body -- or the day we are raptured from this mortal body.

So, to answer your question more specifically, i.e., what would I tell non-believers if they come to me and asks, as those people did on the Day of Pentecost, what they must do to be saved -- I would give them the same answer Jesus gave Nicodemus that late evening, "You must be born again of the water and the Spirit to enter the kingdom of God"  (John 3:3,5).

What does this mean?  To understand what "being born again of the water" means, let's turn to the story of the woman of Samaria in John 4:


John 4:9-14, "Therefore the Samaritan woman said to Him, 'How is it that You, being a Jew, ask me for a drink since I am a Samaritan woman?' (For Jews have no dealings with Samaritans.)  (10) Jesus answered and said to her, 'If you knew the gift of God, and who it is who says to you, "Give Me a drink," you would have asked Him, and He would have given you living water.' 

 

(11) She said to Him, 'Sir, You have nothing to draw with and the well is deep; where then do You get that living water? (12) You are not greater than our father Jacob, are You, who gave us the well, and drank of it himself and his sons and his cattle?'  (13) Jesus answered and said to her, 'Everyone who drinks of this water will thirst again; (14) but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to eternal life.' "

 

Jesus said, in John 3:5, that we must be born again of the water and the Spirit.  No one can dispute that He is speaking of the Holy Spirit, who will indwell and seal all believers at the moment of their salvation.

And, in John 7:37-39, He combines the water and the Spirit, "Now on the last day, the great day of the feast, Jesus stood and cried out, saying, 'If anyone is thirsty, let him come to Me and drink.  (38) He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, "From his innermost being will flow rivers of living water.' "  (39) But this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified."

So, what is this "living water" which Jesus speaks of in both these Scripture passages?  It can only be the Word of God, both the Living Word, Jesus Christ, and the Written Word, Scripture, the Bible.

To summarize, how are we saved?  We are saved through the Word of God (Written and Living) and sealed by the Holy Spirit.

Then, my legalistic Friend, you tell me, "I am no Armstrongite (Herbert W. Armstrong, Worldwide Church of God) and how you ever reached any suspicion that I could be is beyond meI am under no obligation to provide any more details of my religious beliefs or affiliation that I care to on this forum.  I have posted candidly on many, many points of doctrine and if you don't understand where I am coming from relative to my beliefs, then you just have not been paying attention. 


And it is you who have so frequently and so strongly insisted that the name over the church door does not matter and that it is what a person believes that counts with God.  If there is any element of my belief that you desire further comment upon, you should know that I will not be hesitant to discuss it candidly."

Let me reverse the order of my replies to several of your comments here.  First, yes, I have often written that a person is not saved by a church; but, only by having a saving relationship with Jesus Christ.  And, I have often quoted the words of the beautiful Gospel song, "It's Not What's Over The Door" sung by The Cathedrals, The Crimson River Quartet, and many other great Gospel groups:

It's not what's over the door Of the church that you attend,
That makes you a child of God, And a heavenly citizen
As the eyes of the Lord look this world o'er,

There's just one thing He's lookin' for
Can't you see that's what's in your heart,

And not what's over the door.

 

To hear this beautiful song sung by the Crimson River Quartet, a Southern California Gospel group:

 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=okyEALTeKnM

 

To hear it by the Glory Gates Quartet at the Arad Gospel Festival  5-14-2011, Palatul Cultural in Arad, Romania, at the Arad GospelFest:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XebAEWcliUA

 

Then, my Friend, you tell me, "I am under no obligation to provide any more details of my religious beliefs or affiliation that I care to on this forum. "

I agree with you that no one is obligated to tell anyone else which church he/she attends.  But, I do have to suggest that hiding it (like Obama's birth certificate and school records) when one comes on the Religion Forum and shares his beliefs -- does have to create a lot of questions.  I gladly tell folks that I am a Baptist-flavored Christian believer.

Why do I say I am a Baptist-flavored Christian?  I strongly believe that every single Christian believer should put in writing, for his/her own edification, your own Christian Statement of Beliefs, or Statement of Faith.  In other words, making it clear in your own mind -- and to those with whom you share the Gospel -- YOUR (not just your church's) Christian Biblical Beliefs.  I did this years ago and I am happy to share my Statement of Faith with anyone who asks. 

 

Now, to the Baptist-flavored thing:  my Christian Statement of Beliefs very well aligns with the Baptist Statement of Beliefs.  With this, I know that both my church, which is a Baptist General Conference (BGC) Baptist church, and I are in full doctrinal agreement.  Thus, I am a Baptist-flavored Christian believer who attends a Baptist church. 

 

I could just as easily attend another denominational, or non-denominational, church and be right at home -- as long as their Statement of Beliefs (some call it a Statement of Faith) and mine are in alignment on the Essential Christian Beliefs.

Now, back to you and your unmovable resistance to sharing about your church -- yes, I have been asking you for years what church (not the specific church, but, which denomination or flavor of church) you attend.  And, for years, even though you come on the Religion Forum and strongly refute the beliefs and writings of other Christians -- you will not tell us anything about your personal church affiliation.  Why?

Are you ashamed of the church you attend?  Isn't that rather like telling folks, "I am married to the most beautiful woman in the world!"  And, then refusing to be seen with her in public?  Just asking!

You ask why I have often thought you are affiliated with Herbert W. Armstrong's Worldwide Church of God.  Well, your extremely legalistic views of salvation, baptism, separation of church and state, your views on virtually all End Times eschatological beliefs, and your beliefs on heaven and hell -- all seem to align with that church.  So, I had to ask if that is the church you are ashamed to claim as yours.

And, finally, you tell me, "In the meantime, kindly cease and desist from your insulting assertions that I have somehow found the Gospel of Luke, or any of the other Gospels, or any of the epistles to be in error.  That accusation is blatant, unsupported rubbish and it is typical of the kind of cavalier mudslinging that brings down so much deserved criticism upon your arrogant head."

I am happy to see that we still have our close relationship intact.  Let's take a look at your earlier comment in the "The Jesus Film Project - Great Movie!" discussion:


"I have seen this video with its truncated concept of the Gospel plan of salvation.  It has undoubtedly mislead many.  It is the same old compromised evangelical concept of 'Just believe on Jesus and take him as your personal Savior, etc.'  Lost folks on the Day of Pentecost A.D. 33 (a date and scripture that you, Bill, often cite) asked, 'Men and brethren, what shall we do.'  An apostle of Jesus Christ, empowered by the outpouring of the Holy Spirit, responded by telling them to 'Repent and be baptized, every one of you, in the name of Jesus Christ, for the remission of your sins. . .'  


How do the majority of evangelical preachers and teachers of this generation respond to that kind of question from anguished and lost souls?  Same old, same old -- 'Say this sinner's prayer and ask Jesus to come into your heart and take Him as your personal Savior.' "

 

So, you begin by saying this movie, based very closely on the words of the Gospel of Luke -- is a truncated concept of the Gospel plan of salvation.   Then, you go on to recommend the approach taken by Peter and the apostles on the Day of Pentecost -- Repent and be baptized.  As I wrote earlier, I agree 100% with this. But, I also can see the sequence of events:  Repent, i.e., become a believer.  THEN, be baptized.  Exactly what I believe and what I tell folks.

But, you are trying to squeeze them together:  Repent/be Baptized, and then you are saved.  That is not what Scripture tells us.  It tells us to Repent, and then be baptized.

You question the Salvation Prayer (often called the Sinner's Prayer, or Prayer of Faith).  Why?  Isn't that what is meant by REPENT?  To address our own failures, our sins -- to confirm that we believe that Christ died on the cross to pay for our failures and sins -- confess that we know that He was crucified for our sins, that He resurrected so that we, too, will have resurrection, and ascended into heaven where He is continually interceding with the Father on our behalf.  And, then, to ask Him to come into our heart, into our life, and be our personal Lord and Savior.

Isn't this what we do when we repent -- confess and profess Him as our personal Lord and Savior?  What happens at the moment we sincerely do this, i.e, sincerely pray this prayer?  We are saved (Ephesians 2:8-9), we are indwelled and sealed (Ephesians 1:13, 4:30), and we become children of God (John 1:12).

To me, that IS confirming that I am saved and will spend eternity in the presence of God.    Are you saying that the person who sincerely does this -- is NOT yet saved?   If so, you are falling back on legalism, the Law, which Christ brought us out from under when He brought us into His grace.

And, my Friend, repenting in such a manner -- is the same as praying the Salvation Prayer.  How did YOU become saved?

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

 

Luke 5-20 - Rainbow In The Meadow

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Luke 5-20 - Rainbow In The Meadow
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Hi Dove,

You tell me, "My, my, Bill,  You really do have an inflated ego.  It's almost as if you are in a race with yourself to see who can spew forth the greatest amount of verbiage -- content, subject, or fact immaterial.  S - I - G - H."

My Friend, it might seem to be immaterial information to you -- for you are so deeply indoctrinated by the erroneous teachings and doctrines of your religion.

But, God willing there is one soul out there, anywhere, who wants to hear the Gospel spoken in truth and from a Biblical view.   So, I will just keep holding my pants legs high as I walk through the Religion Forum cabal's pasture -- and concentrate on one soul at a time.  It may mean nothing to you; but, to that one soul it could mean eternal life.

You may have heard this story before:


A young man was walking on the beach just before dawn.  In the distance he saw an old man.  As he approached the old man, he saw him picking up stranded starfish and throwing them back into the sea.

The young man gazed in wonder as the old man, again and again, threw the small starfish from the sand back into the water.  Puzzled, he asked, "Old man, why are you throwing the starfish back into the water?  Aren't you just wasting your time?"

The old man explained that the stranded starfish would die if left exposed to the morning sun.  "But there must be thousands of starfish all over this beach!" exclaimed the young man.  "How can you make any difference with so many?"

The old man looked down at the small starfish in his hand, and as he threw it into the safety of the ocean water, he said, "I made a difference for this one."


And, that is the way we Christians should view non-believers, and especially those who are beginning to seek to know more about God -- it may make a difference to that one.

About 13 years ago, I went to the Emergency Room of our local hospital for a sore on my foot which seemed to be infected.  While standing in line, I noticed a young man about 20 years old standing behind me.  He was the perfect stereotype of a White Supremacist; shaved head, muscle shirt, tattoos all over.

After signing in, we went into a waiting room.  I took out my Bible to read and noticed that he also took out a book to read.  His was a Bible also.  As I watched him, I noticed his hand which held the Bible.  On his four fingers he had tattooed: H A T E.

Later, after seeing the doctor, I was in another room waiting for my medication.  He was there also.  So, when the lady who was there left, and it was only the two of us -- I said to him, "I am curious. The book you are reading says L O V E -- yet, your hand says H A T E.  What's the story?"

He told me that he and his whole family had been strong White Supremacists.  Then, one day he was walking in our town and a Christian approached him and began to share the Gospel.  That day, on the sidewalk of our city -- that young man received Jesus Christ and became a born-again believer.

I have often thought of him, and the Christian who witnessed to him -- wondering if I would have the nerve to approach someone who was so obviously a White Supremacist -- and share Jesus Christ with him.  I pray that if ever given the opportunity, I will.  But, we have to admit that most of us, in such a situation, would cross the street and keep walking.

Praise God that one Christian did not -- for he/she saved this young man's eternal life.  And, maybe many more -- for that young man also likes to write and distribute Christian tracts.  That afternoon, he and I spent several hours talking and sharing the tracts we each had written.

Who knows how many more souls that brave Christian will unknowingly affect -- through being brave enough to witness to a White Supremacist on the street that day -- as this young man goes out to share his tracts with the lost of the world?

That is why I write.  Like the old man and his starfish, that Christian made a difference to that young man -- who could make a difference to many more.

Billy Graham was saved on November 1, 1934, a few days before his 16th birthday, when he yielded his life to Jesus Christ at a Mordecai Ham Revival Meeting in Charlotte, N.C.   Mordecai Fowler Ham, Jr., was an American Independent Baptist evangelist.  And, we can be very sure that he had no idea the impact that revival meeting would have on the world -- as a result of that 15 year old boy receiving Jesus Christ that night.

As Christian believers, we are never to count the number -- only keep trying to reach one more, just one more at a time; like the old man and the starfish.

So, my  Friend, what may seem silly, immaterial, and impractical to you -- is just me, hopefully throwing one more starfish onto the road of salvation and eternal life.

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

Bill

 

Lucy - Linus - Sound Theology

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Lucy - Linus - Sound Theology

 

 

From Bill Gray, above:

 

"I would tell him exactly what Peter said that day -- repent and be baptized.  Please notice the time sequence.  First, REPENT.   And, then be baptized."

 

You left out the purpose that Peter associated with  baptism, Bill:  "FOR THE REMISSION OF YOUR SINS."  It is obvious why you did so. A saved person is one whose sins have been remitted.  Baptism is "for the remission of your sins." That is how Peter describes it.  A person is not saved unless his/her sins are remitted.  Thus a person is not saved without baptism.

Hi Quail and Kate,

 

Quail, you seem to have a problem with reading what is written.

 

Acts 2:37-38, "Now when they heard this, they were pierced to the heart, and said to Peter and the rest of the apostles, 'Brethren, what shall we do?' (38) Peter said to them, 'Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit.' "

 

A cartoon went around a while back about where and when to put the comma.   It took the same sentence and left the comma out of it, and then with the comma:

 

Dinner is ready.  Let's eat Grandpa.   (Not too pleasant or appetizing)

 

Dinner is ready.  Let's eat, Grandpa.    (Much better to eat with Grandpa, than to eat Grandpa)

 

Can you see the importance of the simple comma?  Now, let's apply that to our Scripture verse:

 

Acts 2: 38, "Peter said to them, 'Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins.' "

 

Notice that there is a COMMA after Repent.  So, what is it saying?  Repent!  COMMA  And each of you be baptized.  What happens?  A person Repents -- and is forgiven, indwelled, sealed, and saved.  THEN, the person is baptized.  Baptism is a result of salvation, NOT the cause of salvation.

 

And, Kate, you are absolutely right when you say, "Bill, if one didn't repent, what would the purpose of baptism be?  Obviously one has to repent first."

 

You are so right.  A person must repent first.  But, Head wants to combine the two: Repent/Be Baptized -- as one action which cause salvation.  That is not what the Bible, nor this Scripture verse, is telling us.  It is telling us:  Repent -- COMMA -- Be Baptized.   Repent:  Cause of salvation.   Baptism:  Result of salvation.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill 

quote: Originally Posted by Nathan Evans:

God forbid, since OSAS is a lie and a heresy!!    Praised be Jesus forever!!

Hi Nathan,

 

The main problem those in the Roman Catholic world have with "Once Saved, Always Saved" -- is that no one in that church knows if they are Once Saved.  If one is not Once Saved -- how can he/she be Always Saved.

 

So, your problem is not with that Biblically correct statement of "Once Saved, Always Saved."   Your problem is with salvation period.   When the Pope cannot say if he is saved -- how can any other Roman Catholic know if he/she is saved?

 

Food for thought!

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

Ephesians 1-13, 4-30 - Walk In The Park

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Ephesians 1-13, 4-30 - Walk In The Park
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Dove,

You tell me, "My, my, Bill,  You really do have an inflated ego.  It's almost as if you are in a race with yourself to see who can spew forth the greatest amount of verbiage -- content, subject, or fact immaterial.  S - I - G - H."
------------------------------------------

<again much Billie boy verbal garbage snipped for sake of brevity>

-----------------------------------------

Billie boy spurted forth:

------------
My Friend, it might seem to be immaterial information to you -- for you are so deeply indoctrinated by the erroneous teachings and doctrines of your religion.

-------------------------------------------

Ahh Billie Boy... There you go again... I have told you time and again - I am not your friend... And you dare to denigrate my religion while you do not know what my religion is! Further proof that you approve of only one religious belief - Religion according to Billie Boy...You, Billie boy are less than a hypocrite.. You do the work of Satan! Be gone oh evil one!!! 

I can just imagine what kind of lie’s ole Billy boy is spitting out in this topic. In Matthew, (NIV) Jesus rebuked Peter & said “Get behind me, Satan! You are a stumbling block to me; you do not have in mind the concerns of God, but merely human concerns.”  Ole Billy is part of Satan's kingdom, & if the Bible is true, Jesus has authority over that kingdom.

Billy thinks we, & those that he wants to "reach", are all stupid, but his day is coming, & it won't be pretty.

 

Doubt I ever will what, Bill? Be responsible for leading someone to believe in erroneous OSAS? You bet! I would never guide anyone down that dangerous path. But, I can do one thing you can't- I can be the love of Christ to others- atheists, agnostics, gay,straight, whatever. I LOVE people and share my faith with them. I don't claim to have all the answers, an I certainly wouldn't be able to sleep at night if I led someone to believe in OSAS.

Once again I have to thank Bill for opening my eyes and showing me that, no matter what, I am sealed and saved. I don't believe in God, but if, for some strange reason, there happens to be a real deity that the bible is actually, truthfully based on, I already have my ticket to ride. I repented AND I was baptized. Woo hoo!

 

OSAS! It has been so useful when someone tries to talk to me about God, and saving my soul. I just repeat all the stuff Bill has told me here and explain that they are wasting their time. I have already been saved. Decades ago.

 

See you in heaven Bill. Save me a seat next to God. I have A LOT of questions for him.

 

Hi Jan,

 

Walking through barn yard manure -- doesn't make one a horse.  And, making a false, not understood, or insincere profession of faith, does not make one a Christian.  

 

I should know, I have been there.  In 1957, while in the Air Force, a friend and I were in the hospital -- and having time on our hands, we began to read the New Testament.  Then, we decided we wanted to be baptized.  We had no idea what it really meant to be a Christian; but, somewhere back in Sheffield and somewhere between the First Baptist church, the Methodist church, and the Nazarene church -- I heard about Christians being baptized.  So, it seemed the thing to do.  Why it was, I had no clue. 

 

But, my friend and I went to the hospital chaplain and asked to be baptized.  He was from a large denomination, liberal theology church; so, he just took us in his office, sprinkled water on our heads -- and sent us on our way.  No questions, no clarification, no teaching, nothing -- just a few sprinkles and have a nice day.

 

Were we Christians then?  We said we wanted to be Christians, we were baptized -- so, we were Christians - right?  WRONG!   Having water dripped on our heads was not being baptized; only getting wet.  And, that is all we did that day -- get our heads wet.

 

And, to make this episode even more comical; fast forward to the mid-1960s, I was dating a lovely Hispanic programmer at my company -- and we were getting serious.  So, we went to the priest for counseling and catechism. 

 

I asked him if I needed to be baptized again.  This was his reply, exact words, "It all depends upon which way the water ran off your head."  Honest, those are the exact words of this Roman Catholic priest at the Our Lady Of The Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

 

Can any of my Roman Catholic Friends explain that response to me?

 

But, no, Jan -- attending church and getting wet in a baptismal -- does not make one a Christian believer.   That was a good start; but, only that -- a start.  Too bad you did not follow through and really get connected with a good Christ-centered, Bible teaching local church fellowship who could have discipled you.   That could have made an eternal difference.

 

But, my Friend, the Good News is -- it is not to late.  As long as you have not breathed your last breath -- you can still repent and turn to Christ.  Would you like to know more about this?  I will be happy to help you.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

I am cAlling you out on a blatant lie. A priest would not care what way the wAter rolled off your head. You cannot seriously be that stupid (for lack of a kinder word)....but since you brought up horse manure, I will say that statement is full of it. The only response a priest would give as to repeating a baptism would be "we acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins". If the baptism was done in the name of the father, the son and the Holy Spirit it needs not repeating. This is just crap, bill. You know it. If he made a joke of some sort and you could not decipher it, shame on you for not askin clarification. But you and I know very well that baptism is a sacrament in the Catholic Church, and that a priest would not give that response. Perhaps you had beer goggles on and were talking to an altar server?
Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Notice that there is a COMMA after Repent.  So, what is it saying?  Repent!  COMMA  And each of you be baptized.  What happens?  A person Repents -- and is forgiven, indwelled, sealed, and saved.  THEN, the person is baptized.  Baptism is a result of salvation, NOT the cause of salvation.

___

That is not what the verse says Bill.  The comma changes NOTHING. The remaining part of the verse still says to be baptized for remission of sins .  Your interpretaton of the verse does not interpret it at all.  You simply quote it and then proceed to disagree with it.  Baptism washes (Acts 22:16) but your "interpretation" doesn't.

 

Originally Posted by vplee123:
I am cAlling you out on a blatant lie. A priest would not care what way the wAter rolled off your head.
______
Please tell me that Billy did not say that being baptized has something to do with which way the water runs off your head? If he did, that man is much worse off than any of us knew. It's terrible that he's allowed to write his garbage on here & on Facebook. As far as his being a liar, that's his MO & always has been.
I can't wait to see a post from Jank. I wouldn't be surprised if ole Billy says something to her that she wasn't really saved since she's an Atheist. He does, after all, knows who's saved and who isn't.
I wonder if his wife knows he's as bad as he really is?
quote:  Originally Posted by vplee123:
I am cAlling you out on a blatant lie.  A priest would not care what way the wAter rolled off your head.  You cannot seriously be that stupid (for lack of a kinder word)....

Hi VP,

 

Let me just say this.  That DID happen -- just as I wrote it.   And, if I could stand before you today and place my hand on a Bible, I would swear to it.  It did happen.   And, he was a priest at Our Lady of the Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

 

That church has been there for a long time.  Matter of fact, that is the church where Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz were married.  And, it is the church where I went to pray the morning John Kennedy was shot in Dallas.

 

Even at that time, I wondered at his logic -- but, like a good Roman Catholic, I did not question what my priest told me.  I am sure you can understand that.

 

I am sure that many Roman Catholics swore, for a long time, that no priest would sexually abuse young children.  But, it happened.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

quote:  Originally Posted by upsidedehead:
quote:  Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Notice that there is a COMMA after Repent.  So, what is it saying?  Repent!  COMMA  And each of you be baptized.  What happens?  A person Repents -- and is forgiven, indwelled, sealed, and saved.  THEN, the person is baptized.  Baptism is a result of salvation, NOT the cause of salvation.

 

That is not what the verse says Bill.  The comma changes NOTHING.  The remaining part of the verse still says to be baptized for remission of sins .  Your interpretation of the verse does not interpret it at all.  You simply quote it and then proceed to disagree with it.  Baptism washes (Acts 22:16) but your "interpretation" doesn't.

 Head, my Friend,

 

If a comma means nothing -- why bother putting them in our writings?   No, my Friend, the comma is very important -- as in the difference between:  "Let's eat Grandpa!"  AND "Let's eat, Grandpa!"

 

The comma tells us to pause, consider the first word or phrase -- AND THEN, to consider the following phrase.

 

So, when Acts 3:38 tells us, "Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit " -- it means to REPENT, pause for the comma -- and then BE BAPTIZED.   Do you deny that when one repents, he/she is saved?  

 

Look again at Ephesians:

 

Ephesians 1:13, 4:30, "In Him, you also, after listening to the message of truth, the Gospel of your salvation -- having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the Holy Spirit of promise,. . . by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption."

 

Do you see any baptism regeneration there?

 

Ephesians 2:8-9, "For by grace you have been saved through faith; and that not of yourselves, it is the gift of God; not as a result of works, so that no one may boast."

 

Do you see any baptismal regeneration there?

 

In Scripture, Paul tells us that he was not sent to baptize anyone:

 

1 Corinthians 1:17, "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the Gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void."

 

If Paul was not to baptize anyone -- and if a person can only be saved through "baptismal regeneration" -- why did Paul preach the Gospel? 

 

John 4:2, "although Jesus Himself was not baptizing, but His disciples were,"

 

If a person can only be saved through baptism, and Jesus came to offer salvation to all people -- why would Jesus have not wanted to baptize everyone Himself?

 

That said, is baptism important in our Christian life?  YES!  Absolutely YES!  Why?  Because through baptism we identify with Jesus Christ, our Lord and Savior, to whom we have ALREADY repented and chosen to follow into eternal life.

 

And, because Jesus Christ left us two ordinances to do in remembrance of Him (Luke 22:19), until He returns:  Communion, i.e., the Lord's Supper, and Baptism.   Out of love and obedience, we do these things because our Lord commanded them.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Correct Punctuation

Attachments

Images (1)
  • Correct Punctuation

I thought I'd put this here as well, even though a new thread has been started.  I like having the correct interpretation out there for folks to read:

 

Here is the correct interpretation of Acts 2:37-38.  The call for conversion is a calll for Baptism.  Baptism is the sacrament that takes away sin.  Luke, the writer of Acts, notes this also in Acts 22:16, when Paul is recounting his conversion on the road to Damascas:  Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins...

Peter himself reinforces this in 1 Pet 3:21.  Peter is discussing the O.T. prefiguring of baptsim in the story of Noah, and says:  Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ.  Clearly, as noted here and elsewhere in the N.T.  Baptism brings us salvation.  the raging waters of the flood cleansed the earth, and Baptsim cleanses us from sin.  Baptism is the sacrament that brings us new life.  Romans 6:4 also affirms this:  We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.  Baptism joins us to Christ crucified and risen.

 

Praised be Jesus forever!!!

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Hi Jan,

 

Walking through barn yard manure -- doesn't make one a horse.  And, making a false, not understood, or insincere profession of faith, does not make one a Christian.  

 

I should know, I have been there.  In 1957, while in the Air Force, a friend and I were in the hospital -- and having time on our hands, we began to read the New Testament.  Then, we decided we wanted to be baptized.  We had no idea what it really meant to be a Christian; but, somewhere back in Sheffield and somewhere between the First Baptist church, the Methodist church, and the Nazarene church -- I heard about Christians being baptized.  So, it seemed the thing to do.  Why it was, I had no clue. 

 

But, my friend and I went to the hospital chaplain and asked to be baptized.  He was from a large denomination, liberal theology church; so, he just took us in his office, sprinkled water on our heads -- and sent us on our way.  No questions, no clarification, no teaching, nothing -- just a few sprinkles and have a nice day.

 

Were we Christians then?  We said we wanted to be Christians, we were baptized -- so, we were Christians - right?  WRONG!   Having water dripped on our heads was not being baptized; only getting wet.  And, that is all we did that day -- get our heads wet.

 

And, to make this episode even more comical; fast forward to the mid-1960s, I was dating a lovely Hispanic programmer at my company -- and we were getting serious.  So, we went to the priest for counseling and catechism. 

 

I asked him if I needed to be baptized again.  This was his reply, exact words, "It all depends upon which way the water ran off your head."  Honest, those are the exact words of this Roman Catholic priest at the Our Lady Of The Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

 

Can any of my Roman Catholic Friends explain that response to me?

 

But, no, Jan -- attending church and getting wet in a baptismal -- does not make one a Christian believer.   That was a good start; but, only that -- a start.  Too bad you did not follow through and really get connected with a good Christ-centered, Bible teaching local church fellowship who could have discipled you.   That could have made an eternal difference.

 

But, my Friend, the Good News is -- it is not to late.  As long as you have not breathed your last breath -- you can still repent and turn to Christ.  Would you like to know more about this?  I will be happy to help you.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

______________

Ah, Bill.  I see your meds haven't taken affect yet this week.  This is just a big old #6, based on a #12, and ending with a #9.  It's also proof that you are humor-impaired.

Originally Posted by vplee123:
I am cAlling you out on a blatant lie. A priest would not care what way the wAter rolled off your head. You cannot seriously be that stupid (for lack of a kinder word)....but since you brought up horse manure, I will say that statement is full of it. The only response a priest would give as to repeating a baptism would be "we acknowledge one baptism for the forgiveness of sins". If the baptism was done in the name of the father, the son and the Holy Spirit it needs not repeating. This is just crap, bill. You know it. If he made a joke of some sort and you could not decipher it, shame on you for not askin clarification. But you and I know very well that baptism is a sacrament in the Catholic Church, and that a priest would not give that response. Perhaps you had beer goggles on and were talking to an altar server?

________________

Step back a yard or two, and envision the scene.  Assume the priest was Irish. Turn on your "funny bone", it will put everything into perspective.

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
 

 

If a comma means nothing -- why bother putting them in our writings?   No, my Friend, the comma is very important -- as in the difference between:  "Let's eat Grandpa!"  AND "Let's eat, Grandpa!"

 

The comma tells us to pause, consider the first word or phrase -- AND THEN, to consider the following phrase.

 

_______________

#8, Bill.  False premise - AND a basic misunderstanding of English.  If this were true, then please explain the difference between, "Let's eat, Grandpa," and "Grandpa, lets eat." 

quote:   Originally Posted by CrustyMac:
quote:   Originally Posted by vplee123:
I am cAlling you out on a blatant lie. A priest would not care what way the wAter rolled off your head. You cannot seriously be that stupid (for lack of a kinder word)....

Step back a yard or two, and envision the scene.  Assume the priest was Irish. Turn on your "funny bone", it will put everything into perspective.

For my very dear Friends, Crusty and VP,

 

Let me just say this.  That DID happen -- just as I wrote it.   And, if I could stand before you today and place my hand on a Bible, I would swear to it.  It did happen.   And, he was a priest at Our Lady of the Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

 

That church has been there for a long time.  Matter of fact, that is the church where Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz were married.  And, it is the church where I went to pray the morning John Kennedy was shot in Dallas.

 

Even at that time, I wondered at his logic -- but, like a good Roman Catholic, I did not question what my priest told me.  I am sure you can understand that.

 

I am sure that many Roman Catholics swore, for a long time, that no priest would sexually abuse young children.  But, it happened.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:
For my very dear Friends, Crusty and VP,

 

Let me just say this.  That DID happen -- just as I wrote it.   And, if I could stand before you today and place my hand on a Bible, I would swear to it.  It did happen.   And, he was a priest at Our Lady of the Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

 

That church has been there for a long time.  Matter of fact, that is the church where Lucille Ball and Desi Arnaz were married.  And, it is the church where I went to pray the morning John Kennedy was shot in Dallas.

 

Even at that time, I wondered at his logic -- but, like a good Roman Catholic, I did not question what my priest told me.  I am sure you can understand that.

 

I am sure that many Roman Catholics swore, for a long time, that no priest would sexually abuse young children.  But, it happened.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

___________________

I believe every word of your story, Bill.  It is proof to me that you have zero sense of humor.

 

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

quote:  Originally Posted by upsidedehead:

quote:  Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

Notice that there is a COMMA after Repent.  So, what is it saying?  Repent!  COMMA  And each of you be baptized.  What happens?  A person Repents -- and is forgiven, indwelled, sealed, and saved.  THEN, the person is baptized.  Baptism is a result of salvation, NOT the cause of salvation.

 

That is not what the verse says Bill.  The comma changes NOTHING.  The remaining part of the verse still says to be baptized for remission of sins .  Your interpretation of the verse does not interpret it at all.  You simply quote it and then proceed to disagree with it.  Baptism washes (Acts 22:16) but your "interpretation" doesn't.

 Head, my Friend,

 

If a comma means nothing -- why bother putting them in our writings?   No, my Friend, the comma is very important -- as in the difference between:  "Let's eat Grandpa!"  AND "Let's eat, Grandpa!"

 

The comma tells us to pause, consider the first word or phrase -- AND THEN, to consider the following phrase.

 

So, when Acts 3:38 tells us, "Repent, and each of you be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins; and you will receive the gift of the Holy Spirit " -- it means to REPENT, pause for the comma -- and then BE BAPTIZED.   Do you deny that when one repents, he/she is saved? 

 

_________________________

_________________________ 

 

The persons to whom Peter was preaching were already believers, Bill, in that they believed that which Peter preached about Jesus and who He was.  They believed those things so strongly that when they learned that the one whom they had crucified was the Son of God, they were "pric ked in their hearts." Thus there was more for them to do than simply to believe. Among other things, according to the apostle, they needed to repent.  But, Bill, you yourself have acknowledged that there is more for them to do than to just believe, because your argument makes repentance necessary for salvation. You wrote, above: "A person Repents -- and is forgiven, indwelled, sealed, and saved."  So--repentance is essential to forgiveness of sins, without which there can be no salvation. 

 

What does this say about the kind of reliance you place on the verses you cite from Ephesians, below: "...having also believed, you were sealed in Him with the HolySpirit of promise,. . . by whom you were sealed for the day of redemption."? 

 

Those verses say nothing about repentance, but they can not be relied upon to affirm that belief alone will save a person, since  we know from elsewhere in scripture that repentance is also essential to salvation. 

 

You consistently insist, Bill, that it is necessary to consider all that the scriptures say about a given subject, yet you yourself don't consistently follow that principle.  Even when you read scriptures about baptism, you read them for the purpose of finding some means of excluding baptism as a requirement for remission of sins, and hence for salvation. This is seen in the way you interpret Ephesians 2:8 & 9.  In emphasizing   "not as a result of works," as you did below, your obvious intent is to characterize baptism as a “work,” and thus as no part of salvation.  Baptism, as I have pointed out to you many times, is NOT a human “work”of merit; it is where God does HIS saving work.  It is nowhere set forth in scripture as a “work.” Baptism is the place and event where the sinner is “...united with Christ in the likeness of His death”(Romans 6:5). Baptism is “...into His  [Christ’s] death (Romans 6:3).  It was in His death that He shed His blood, and in baptism, that cleansing blood is applied to the sinner. That is how God describes baptism in His word.

 

 Just one more example of how you have distorted scripture in an attempt to make it say something that it does not say.  You write:

 

1 Corinthians 1:17, "For Christ did not send me to baptize, but to preach the Gospel, not in cleverness of speech, so that the cross of Christ would not be made void."

 

If Paul was not to baptize anyone -- and if a person can only be saved through "baptismal regeneration" -- why did Paul preach the Gospel? 

 

 

Paul was sent to baptize.  Paul was as fully subject to the Great Commission as were the other apostles and disciples whom Jesus commanded to,  “Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost....” (Matthew 28: 19).  So the scripture itself affirms that Paul was sent to teach and to baptize.  Is Paul, in I Corinthians 1:17, contradicting this plain directive of Jesus?  By no means.  In every place where Paul preached, the sinners’ responses to his preaching included baptism. We read all about that in the accounts of salvation in the book of Acts. 

 

The best way I know to explain the matter--and to show that without doubt there is no contradiction in these scriptures-- is that what Paul was saying was parallel to something that John wrote in I John 3:18:  “My little children, let us not love in word or speech, but in deed and in love.”  Was John denigrating or forbidding loving words and loving deeds?  By no means!  The concept, reflecting the construction in the Greek, is perhaps expressed as well by J.B. Phillips as by any translator:  “My children, let us not love merely in theory or in words—let us love in sincerity and in practice!” The Geneva Bible captures the meaning thusly:  “My little children, let us not love in word, neither in tongue only, but in deed and in truth.”

 

Similarly, Paul was telling his Corinthian brethren that he had come to them not solely to teach and administer baptism, but to set before them the gospel in its fullness.  That, of course, included baptism, but it included more than baptism, since baptism without faith and repentance would be a meaningless ritual. Remember, also, the context of this verse.  Paul was dealing with immature Christians who were placing inordinate importance upon WHO had baptized them.  In this regard, he observed that, “I thank God that I baptized none of you except Crispus and Gaius; lest anyone should say that I baptized in my name.” Here Paul states HIS reason, in retrospect, for being thankful that he personally baptized only a very few of the Corinthians.  In saying this, Paul was in no way diminishing the importance of baptism.  To the contrary, Paul was concerned that those who were baptized should know that it was in the very name of Jesus Christ  and by His authority that they were baptized.

 

What Paul is teaching in I Corinthians 1 is that the Christian owes his allegiance to CHRIST, not to Paul or to Apollos or to any other man.  Here is how Paul explicates the matter:

 

11 For it hath been declared unto me of you, my brethren, by them which are of the house of Chloe, that there are contentions among you.

12 Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ.

13 Is Christ divided? was Paul crucified for you? or were ye baptized in the name of Paul?

14 I thank God that I baptized none of you, but Crispus and Gaius;

15 Lest any should say that I had baptized in mine own name.

 

Let us look at these questions Paul poses.  They are rhetorical questions and the answers were understood by the Corinthians.

 

Q. Is Christ divided?

A. No.  He alone is supreme and your loyalty is to Him. Thus you are “of Christ,” and not “of Paul” or “of Apollos.”

Q. Was Paul crucified for you?

A Of course not; it was Christ, not Paul, who died on the cross for you and thus you are “of Christ” and not “of Paul.” You owe your love and loyalty to Christ.

Q. Were you baptized in the name of Paul?  

A. Of course not; you were baptized in the name of Jesus Christ. Therefore you are Christ’s.

 

 

Crusty I can see an old Irishman making a joke like that. Can almost hear it in my head... The fact that bill puts this as a testimony to what the Catholic Church is what ticks me off. No priest would give that valid answer. IF he said it, clearly it was a joke. But now we are expected to believe priests really would think that way? Puhhhhlease, bill.

Hi Head,

 

Your Book of Law might throw you back into Judaism -- but, my Bible tells me that when a person repents and believes, that person is saved.  Then, that person is baptized to follow the ordinance given to us by Jesus Christ.

 

My Friend, if you are comfortable living under the Law, God bless you.   I will live under His Grace and be joyful.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

Originally Posted by Bill Gray:

 

 

I asked him if I needed to be baptized again.  This was his reply, exact words, "It all depends upon which way the water ran off your head."  Honest, those are the exact words of this Roman Catholic priest at the Our Lady Of The Valley Roman Catholic church in Canoga Park, California.

--------------------------------------

Ahhh Billie boy, you have just proven something we have all known for a long time - you are absolutely the biggest liar in these parts! Not only that, you are so stupid, or arrogant, that you believe we too are stupid and would believe this inane drivel!

Btw Billie, you have not responded to my last posting to you... Is it because you have no answer or that, as I expected, you ran off and started a new thread and hoped we'd forget you actions?

Still waiting for a response but I shan't hold my breath...

 
 
Originally Posted by Bill Gray

Hey Billie, let's try this again... Perhaps you'll find within you the courage to respond?

--------------------------------

 

Hi Dove,

You tell me, "My, my, Bill,  You really do have an inflated ego.  It's almost as if you are in a race with yourself to see who can spew forth the greatest amount of verbiage -- content, subject, or fact immaterial.  S - I - G - H."
------------------------------------------

<again much Billie boy verbal garbage snipped for sake of brevity>

-----------------------------------------

Billie boy spurted forth:

------------
My Friend, it might seem to be immaterial information to you -- for you are so deeply indoctrinated by the erroneous teachings and doctrines of your religion.

-------------------------------------------

Ahh Billie Boy... There you go again... I have told you time and again - I am not your friend... And you dare to denigrate my religion while you do not know what my religion is! Further proof that you approve of only one religious belief - Religion according to Billie Boy...You, Billie boy are less than a hypocrite.. You do the work of Satan! Be gone oh evil one!!! 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×