Skip to main content

They are convinced Trump as standard-bearer would lead the GOP to a devastating defeat in November, costing the party the Senate and potentially the House.

But these brilliant morons never consider the fact Trump wasn't
beat by any of the other sixteen. They would've less chance than
Trump.
 

Rep. Justin AmashJustin AmashRepublicans who vow to never back TrumpTrump Capitol Hill surrogate says Cruz should drop outLawmakers react to Villanova's buzzer-beater NCAA winMORE (Mich.)

Gov. Charlie Baker (Mass.)

Brian Bartlett, former Mitt Romney aide and GOP communications strategist

Glenn Beck, radio host

Michael Berry, radio host

Max Boot, former foreign policy adviser to Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.)

Brent Bozell, conservative activist

Bruce Carroll, creator GayPatriot.org

Jay Caruso, RedState

Mona Charen, senior fellow at Ethics and Public Policy Center

Linda Chavez, columnist

Dean Clancy, former FreedomWorks vice president

Eliot Cohen, former George W. Bush official

Former Sen. Norm Coleman (Minn.)

Charles C. W. Cooke, writer for National Review

Doug Coon, Stay Right podcast

Rory Cooper, GOP strategist, managing director Purple Strategies

Jim Cunneen, former Calif. assemblyman

Rep. Carlos Curbelo (Fla.)

Steve Deace, radio host

Rep. Bob Dold (Ill.)

Erick Erickson, writer

Mindy Finn, president, Empowered Women

David French, writer at National Review

Jon Gabriel, editor-in-chief, Ricochet.com

Michael Graham, radio host

Jonah Goldberg, writer

Alan Goldsmith, former staffer, House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Stephen Gutowski, writer Washington Free Beacon

Rep. Richard Hanna (N.Y.)

Jamie Brown Hantman, former special assistant for legislative affairs for President George W. Bush

Stephen Hayes, senior writer at The Weekly Standard

Doug Heye, former RNC communications director

Quin Hillyer, contributing editor at National Review Online; senior editor at the American Spectator

Ben Howe, RedState writer

Former Rep. Bob Inglis (S.C.)

Cheri Jacobus, GOP consultant and former Hill columnist

Robert Kagan, former Reagan official

Randy Kendrick, GOP mega-donor

Matt Kibbe, former FreedomWorks CEO

Rep. Adam Kinzinger (R-Ill.)

Philip Klein, managing editor at the Washington Examiner

Bill Kristol, The Weekly Standard editor

Mark Levin, radio host

Justin LoFranco, former Scott Walker aide

Kevin Madden, former Mitt Romney aide

Bethany Mandel, senior contributor at The Federalist

Tucker Martin, former Gov. Bob McDonnell's (R-Va.) communications director

Former RNC Chairman Mel Martínez (Fla.)

Liz Mair, GOP strategist

Lachlan Markey, writer for the Free Beacon

David McIntosh, Club for Growth president

Dan McLaughlin, editor at RedState.com

Ken Mehlman, former RNC chairman

Tim Miller, Our Principles PAC

Joyce Mulliken, former Washington state senator

Ted Newton, political consultant & former Mitt Romney aide

James Nuzzo, former White House aide

Katie Packer, chairwoman of Our Principles PAC

Former Gov. George Pataki (N.Y.)

Former Rep. Ron Paul (Texas)

Katie Pavlich, Townhall editor and Hill columnist

Brittany Pounders, conservative writer

Rep. Reid RibbleReid RibbleRepublicans who vow to never back TrumpWho will be winners in Wisconsin? Our pundits weigh inTen House seats Dems hope Trump will tilt MORE (Wis.)

The Ricketts family, GOP mega-donors

Former Gov. Tom Ridge (Pa.)

Rep. Scott RigellScott RigellRepublicans who vow to never back TrumpGOP lawmaker: I wouldn't vote for Cruz or Trump in NovemberPotential Trump adviser claimed role in secret Libya peace talksMORE (Va.)

Mitt Romney, 2012 GOP presidential nominee

Paul Rosenzweig, former deputy assistant secretary, Department of Homeland Security

Jennifer Rubin, Washington Post conservative blogger

Patrick Ruffini, partner, Echelon Insights

Sarah Rumpf, former BreitBart contributor

Mark Salter, writer and former aide to John McCainJohn McCainJohn Boehner to attend GOP conventionDole alone in not shunning GOP conventionTrump plans visit to Capitol HillMORE

Rep. Mark Sanford (S.C.)

Sen. Ben Sasse (Neb.)

Elliott Schwartz, Our Principles PAC

Gabriel Schoenfeld, senior fellow, Hudson Institute

Tara Setmayer, CNN analyst and former GOP staffer

Ben Shapiro, editor-in-chief The Daily Wire

Evan Siegfried, GOP strategist and commentator

Ben Stein, actor and political commentator

Brendan Steinhauser, GOP consultant

Stuart Stevens, former Romney strategist

Paul Singer, GOP mega-donor

Erik Soderstrom, former field director for Carly Fiorina

Charlie Sykes, radio host

Brad Thor, writer

Michael R. Treiser, former Mitt Romney aide

Daniel P. Vajdich, former national security adviser to Ted CruzTed CruzJohn Boehner to attend GOP conventionClinton, Trump both have Goldman Sachs alums in key jobsTrump: I never considered Nikki Haley for VPMORE

Connor Walsh, former digital director for former Rep. Eric CantorEric CantorWis. Republican launches long-shot bid to oust RyanRepublicans who vow to never back TrumpNRCC upgrades 11 'Young Guns' candidatesMORE (R-Va.), founder Build Digital

Former Rep. J.C. Watts (Okla.)

Peter Wehner, New York Times contributor

Former Gov. Christine Todd Whitman (N.J.)

George Will, writer

Rick Wilson, Republican strategist 

Nathan Wurtzel, Make America Awesome super-PAC

Bill Yarbrough, chairman of the Republican Liberty Caucus of Ohio

Dave Yost, Ohio auditor of state

Talk about a crybaby clique that might be voting for a raghead next time........

 http://thehill.com/blogs/ballo...-to-never-back-trump

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Conservatives have bit their lips and crossed their fingers while voting for the lesser of two evils -- the GOP establishmentarian selection.  Trump will go against one of the worst campaigners the Dems have ever launched.  Last time, she was bested by an unknown first term senator. 

In a society where honor was at play, they would be sharpening their wakasashi and planning seppuku.   

I can see why some would have trouble with Trump; one doesn't need to look too far in Trump's past to find him supporting most of the liberal agenda. Could he be the Manchurian Manhattan Candidate? Maybe, but it's a sure bet Hillary will tact hard left unless bushels of money are thrown at her, which might explain Charles Koch saying that Hillary might be a better candidate.

Trump isn't running as much as a conservative as he is running as a populist. The old trade deals that always favored the other country might have made sense during the Cold War to save friendly countries from being destroyed from within, but the legacy of those deals has impacted our manufacturing capacity. Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

Where I worry about Trump is that he might not just be throwing out his first offer. A Smoot-Hawley style tariff system will wreck us just like in the Depression and I do believe in open borders as long as our guests can be vetted and behave like good guests.

Last edited by Stanky
Stanky posted:

I can see why some would have trouble with Trump; one doesn't need to look too far in Trump's past to find him supporting most of the liberal agenda. Could he be the Manchurian Manhattan Candidate? Maybe, but it's a sure bet Hillary will tact hard left unless bushels of money are thrown at her, which might explain Charles Koch saying that Hillary might be a better candidate.

Trump isn't running as much as a conservative as he is running as a populist. The old trade deals that always favored the other country might have made sense during the Cold War to save friendly countries from being destroyed from within, but the legacy of those deals has impacted our manufacturing capacity. Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

Where I worry about Trump is that he might not just be throwing out his first offer. A Smoot-Hawley style tariff system will wreck us just like in the Depression and I do believe in open borders as long as our guests can be vetted and behave like good guests.

Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

 

I almost think any response to the muzzie invasion is too little too late. I'd love to be wrong, but they've been awfully busy the last few years and have crept, been put in by the left, into every branch of our government. Russia doesn't look so bad now, does it?

Last edited by Bestworking
Bestworking posted:
Stanky posted:

I can see why some would have trouble with Trump; one doesn't need to look too far in Trump's past to find him supporting most of the liberal agenda. Could he be the Manchurian Manhattan Candidate? Maybe, but it's a sure bet Hillary will tact hard left unless bushels of money are thrown at her, which might explain Charles Koch saying that Hillary might be a better candidate.

Trump isn't running as much as a conservative as he is running as a populist. The old trade deals that always favored the other country might have made sense during the Cold War to save friendly countries from being destroyed from within, but the legacy of those deals has impacted our manufacturing capacity. Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

Where I worry about Trump is that he might not just be throwing out his first offer. A Smoot-Hawley style tariff system will wreck us just like in the Depression and I do believe in open borders as long as our guests can be vetted and behave like good guests.

Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

 

I almost think any response to the muzzie invasion is too little too late. I'd love to be wrong, but they've been awfully busy the last few years and have crept, been put in by the left, into every branch of our government. Russia doesn't look so bad now, does it?

Russia have several southern states completely infiltrated by Muslims.  They've run off the Slavs. Many are from the Caucus mountains and physically are hard to identify unlike Persians and Arabs.

direstraits posted:
Bestworking posted:
Stanky posted:

I can see why some would have trouble with Trump; one doesn't need to look too far in Trump's past to find him supporting most of the liberal agenda. Could he be the Manchurian Manhattan Candidate? Maybe, but it's a sure bet Hillary will tact hard left unless bushels of money are thrown at her, which might explain Charles Koch saying that Hillary might be a better candidate.

Trump isn't running as much as a conservative as he is running as a populist. The old trade deals that always favored the other country might have made sense during the Cold War to save friendly countries from being destroyed from within, but the legacy of those deals has impacted our manufacturing capacity. Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

Where I worry about Trump is that he might not just be throwing out his first offer. A Smoot-Hawley style tariff system will wreck us just like in the Depression and I do believe in open borders as long as our guests can be vetted and behave like good guests.

Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

 

I almost think any response to the muzzie invasion is too little too late. I'd love to be wrong, but they've been awfully busy the last few years and have crept, been put in by the left, into every branch of our government. Russia doesn't look so bad now, does it?

Russia have several southern states completely infiltrated by Muslims.  They've run off the Slavs. Many are from the Caucus mountains and physically are hard to identify unlike Persians and Arabs.

____

Are those "Caucus mountains" high-elevation places where people of like politics gather for discussions?

Russia have several southern states completely infiltrated by Muslims.  They've run off the Slavs. Many are from the Caucus mountains and physically are hard to identify unlike Persians and Arabs.

==================

Oh I'm sure. They're taking over everywhere. My comment was about how we were all warned about Russia, and now that we see where the real threat is coming from, the muzzies, the "Russian threat" doesn't look that bad.

Last edited by Bestworking
jtdavis posted:

Trump kicked all the candidates butts.If the republican leaders wants to run the most popular candidate off, it makes one wonder how many democrates in a row will be elected with leadership like this?

Democrats have their own problems with a Hillary candidacy. If she is indited or if there is a mass wave of retirements at the FBI and the DoJ and a subsequent rise in leaks about the free intel for our enemies; many Dem voters might stay home and independents will likely go in mass to the Republican brand and the Senate and the House stay Republican. Also the Bernie Sanders wing of the party know that Hillary will sell her soul to the highest bidder, so they may not vote. After NAFTA and the Chinese trade deal in sent their jobs out of the country, many blue collar voters don't trust the Clinton's; in fact Trump won open primary states where those voters crossed into the Republican primaries, but in closed primaries, Ted Cruz won. In fact, many people who voted for Bernie Sanders because of his foreign trade position are saying they're voting for Trump if Hillary wins the Democrat(?) primary.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:
Bestworking posted:
Stanky posted:

I can see why some would have trouble with Trump; one doesn't need to look too far in Trump's past to find him supporting most of the liberal agenda. Could he be the Manchurian Manhattan Candidate? Maybe, but it's a sure bet Hillary will tact hard left unless bushels of money are thrown at her, which might explain Charles Koch saying that Hillary might be a better candidate.

Trump isn't running as much as a conservative as he is running as a populist. The old trade deals that always favored the other country might have made sense during the Cold War to save friendly countries from being destroyed from within, but the legacy of those deals has impacted our manufacturing capacity. Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

Where I worry about Trump is that he might not just be throwing out his first offer. A Smoot-Hawley style tariff system will wreck us just like in the Depression and I do believe in open borders as long as our guests can be vetted and behave like good guests.

Liberals might want to return to the pre-911 days, but insecure borders in the era of jihadism is suicide.

 

I almost think any response to the muzzie invasion is too little too late. I'd love to be wrong, but they've been awfully busy the last few years and have crept, been put in by the left, into every branch of our government. Russia doesn't look so bad now, does it?

Russia have several southern states completely infiltrated by Muslims.  They've run off the Slavs. Many are from the Caucus mountains and physically are hard to identify unlike Persians and Arabs.

____

Are those "Caucus mountains" high-elevation places where people of like politics gather for discussions?

Yes, Mrs. Grundy, I misspelled  Caucasus.  However, I do know how to spell LIBEL and how not to commit it.

jtdavis posted:

Do you remember in grade school, some spoiled kid would bring a bat and ball to the playground. If he didn't get his way, he'd take his bat and ball and go home. That kid grew up to be a republican leader. They didn't want Trump and they ain't gonna play. What a bunch of spoiled grownups.

 The little spoiled kid/bully that thinks he's entitled to what the others have, grew up to be a demoslop, and if they won't give it to you willingly, you want someone to force them to give you the "toy", and you will whine, pitch a fit, and tear up everything until you get your way. You post like you are about five years old. BTW, you never did give a link to the claim you made about Hastert. You can't finish one tall tale until you are off to another!  

Last edited by Bestworking
Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

Do you remember in grade school, some spoiled kid would bring a bat and ball to the playground. If he didn't get his way, he'd take his bat and ball and go home. That kid grew up to be a republican leader. They didn't want Trump and they ain't gonna play. What a bunch of spoiled grownups.

 The little spoiled kid/bully that thinks he's entitled to what the others have, grew up to be a demoslop, and if they won't give it to you willingly, you want someone to force them to give you the "toy", and you will whine, pitch a fit, and tear up everything until you get your way. You post like you are about five years old. BTW, you never did give a link to the claim you made about Hastert. You can't finish one tall tale until you are off to another!  

____

And YOU post as usual, like the absolutist, tunnel-visioned, deluded harridan you show yourself to be.

Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

Do you remember in grade school, some spoiled kid would bring a bat and ball to the playground. If he didn't get his way, he'd take his bat and ball and go home. That kid grew up to be a republican leader. They didn't want Trump and they ain't gonna play. What a bunch of spoiled grownups.

 The little spoiled kid/bully that thinks he's entitled to what the others have, grew up to be a demoslop, and if they won't give it to you willingly, you want someone to force them to give you the "toy", and you will whine, pitch a fit, and tear up everything until you get your way. You post like you are about five years old. BTW, you never did give a link to the claim you made about Hastert. You can't finish one tall tale until you are off to another!  

____

And YOU post as usual, like the absolutist, tunnel-visioned, deluded harridan you show yourself to be.

Ah, there he is. Butting in and attacking. Go fix your hypocritical, lying, racist self and leave others alone.

Beternnun is still a bully wannabe. Go tell your old lady what you think of women. But I'm sure the poor old thing knows. She's probably been called it so much by you that she has begun to think her name is "harridan". Look at what you have shown yourself to be-a lying, devious, woman hating, hypocritical racist. And those are your good qualities!

Last edited by Bestworking
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
jtdavis posted:

Do you remember in grade school, some spoiled kid would bring a bat and ball to the playground. If he didn't get his way, he'd take his bat and ball and go home. That kid grew up to be a republican leader. They didn't want Trump and they ain't gonna play. What a bunch of spoiled grownups.

 The little spoiled kid/bully that thinks he's entitled to what the others have, grew up to be a demoslop, and if they won't give it to you willingly, you want someone to force them to give you the "toy", and you will whine, pitch a fit, and tear up everything until you get your way. You post like you are about five years old. BTW, you never did give a link to the claim you made about Hastert. You can't finish one tall tale until you are off to another!  

____

And YOU post as usual, like the absolutist, tunnel-visioned, deluded harridan you show yourself to be.

Contenduhh,

You regularly refer to best as an absolutist. Perhaps, you could be more specific. Which of these definitions do you refer to?

  1. a political theory that absolute power should be vested in one or more rulersb :  government by an absolute ruler or authority :  despotism
  2. 2 :  advocacy of a rule by absolute standards or principles

  3. 3 :  an absolute standard or principle

    http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/absolutism

 

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×