Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

funny.. that doesn't say 'there's no voter fraud'. it shows the percent of voter fraud.... this case, in this thread, constitutes a 0.4% account.. wow! still not enough to change the election.

And there "they" is.....haha.......people like this will NEVER be convinced of the sanctity of the vote and how in order to actually preserve our right to vote, the quality of the vote should be protected.  For every clown out there voting in this manner you actually have to double the rate of fraud, since it actually cancels out someone who voted legitimately.  Of course getting that point across to the "progressive liberal" is like trying to teach a chicken to play the piano.

Don't be so hard on yourself Crash, if you will study a little harder, practice with your **** and Jane book, and pay attention, one day you will be able to actually interpret the news without having to have someone explain it to you.  It's OK to be a little slow, sooner or later, you will catch up with the rest of us.

There has been more and more of these stories every week of how voter fraud is showing up when the authorites actually look for it.  We have counties here in Alabama who have more registered voters than actual citizens.  Amazingly, these are some of the same counties where their representatives are crying "voter discrimination" if they are asked to provide a picture ID.  Yet, they have no problem using such an ID to cash their government issued check each month....haha

Originally Posted by teyates:

Don't be so hard on yourself Crash, if you will study a little harder, practice with your **** and Jane book, and pay attention, one day you will be able to actually interpret the news without having to have someone explain it to you.  It's OK to be a little slow, sooner or later, you will catch up with the rest of us.

There has been more and more of these stories every week of how voter fraud is showing up when the authorites actually look for it.  We have counties here in Alabama who have more registered voters than actual citizens.  Amazingly, these are some of the same counties where their representatives are crying "voter discrimination" if they are asked to provide a picture ID.  Yet, they have no problem using such an ID to cash their government issued check each month....haha

 

http://www.bizpacreview.com/20...n-both-states-114554

 

Let us start with Lesadolla Sowers of Tunica, MS, who has been convicted on TEN counts of voter
fraud, including voting in the names of four DEAD people.

http://dailycaller.com/2011/07...unts-of-voter-fraud/

Get back to me when you actually have something that will convince me that voterfraud does not exist in this country.

You are so worried about rich corporations who influence the vote, yet you care not if an individual does it.  Where is the difference?

You could the brain of some of the "progrssive intellectuals" and put them on a razor blade and it would look like a BB rolling down a four lane highway. I don't need any assitance from you in interpreting the news nor what I see happening around me.  I choose not to bury my head in the sand and condone such shenanigans.  The rest of the country is growing tired of it as well.

Last edited by teyates

Perhaps even more disturbing in the story I highlighted above, in case your compreshension is a little skewed, is the fact that a large number of the people this women voted as were men....I am sure the "voting officials" in that area should be able to tell the difference in a man and woman, but again that would be highlighted on a voter ID card....

In a 2004 investigation, 48 of 325 voter ID cards filed by an Ohio chapter of the NAACP were found to be fraudulent.

Now I know math is not one of your strong points, but that equals about 14.7%, which is a lot larger than the miniscule amount you quoted.  BTW, all of those are tradional Democrat voters, so I guess it is OK.

I am not dodging the question, I am pointing out that you are using flawed logic.  You are referring to statements made when GWB was president, guess what Crash, he ain't in office any more.  People are discovering new information daily as to the extent of the fraud in this country, but since your party is currently in power, you choose to negate it.

Originally Posted by teyates:

I am not dodging the question, I am pointing out that you are using flawed logic.  You are referring to statements made when GWB was president, guess what Crash, he ain't in office any more.  People are discovering new information daily as to the extent of the fraud in this country, but since your party is currently in power, you choose to negate it.

__________

why do you ignore ALL the cases of regressive voter fraud.. there have been tons of them, in the news , lately.. and all the while you claim i'm the one with my 'head in the sand'.. you are blinded by your hatred for obama.. and i'm starting to feel sorry for you.

Haha....whose is ignoring it?  I simply asked for voter ID, which would stop it on BOTH sides.  You however, along with the rest of the liberal progrssives, would choose to ignore ANY solution to the problem because it would put an end to it.  The only reason the typical Liberal would discourage voter ID laws is because they know that more of it occurs in the Democratic voting box. A compromise to the issue is to make voter registration and ID cards mandatory to vote and stop it in both parties, but you choose to belive the lie that it is neglible....haha....and then you want to school me on math and reading comprehension?  Better pack a lunch Buckwheat.

Originally Posted by teyates:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

funny.. that doesn't say 'there's no voter fraud'. it shows the percent of voter fraud.... this case, in this thread, constitutes a 0.4% account.. wow! still not enough to change the election.

And there "they" is.....haha.......people like this will NEVER be convinced of the sanctity of the vote and how in order to actually preserve our right to vote, the quality of the vote should be protected.  For every clown out there voting in this manner you actually have to double the rate of fraud, since it actually cancels out someone who voted legitimately.  Of course getting that point across to the "progressive liberal" is like trying to teach a chicken to play the piano.

_______________________________
Tourist traps in Florida used to have that act with caged chickens.  You just know where to place the corn on the keys to train them. Works  for Dems, as well, although, the hens catch on faster.

Originally Posted by direstraits:

Crash's first  posts were mainly, fingers in ears while humming a mantra, "There's no voter fraud."  Then, at rhe last, there's tons of right wing voter fraud. Whatta maroon!

____________________

can you provide proof where i said 'there is no voter fraud'? or are you just talking out of your ass again? why do you regressives have such a problem with reading comprehension? it would be funny, if it weren't so sad. more proof of the 'dumbing down' of america.. and perpetuation of the rt. wingnut lies.. by the forum regressive.

Last edited by Crash.Override
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by direstraits:

Crash's first  posts were mainly, fingers in ears while humming a mantra, "There's no voter fraud."  Then, at rhe last, there's tons of right wing voter fraud. Whatta maroon!

____________________

can you provide proof where i said 'there is no voter fraud'? or are you just talking out of your ass again? why do you regressives have such a problem with reading comprehension? it would be funny, if it weren't so sad. more proof of the 'dumbing down' of america.. and perpetuation of the rt. wingnut lies.. by the forum regressive.

________________________________

You mentioned a study that showed 0.34 percent -- almost negligible  Then, mentioned that there were numerous Republican voter fraud cases -- without attribution. 

Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

bahahahahaha! you're hilarious.

_______________________________
I try to list Crash's intellectual dishonesty, intellectual curiosity and intellect in descending order.  However, its difficult to determine which to list at the bottom.

__________________________________

you're a flat out liar. i challenge you to show where i was dishonest in any way.. or a formal public apology. you're a liar and an idiot .. i'll be posting this in every comment you make, until you show proof or apologize. idiot!

Originally Posted by Crash.Override:
Originally Posted by direstraits:
Originally Posted by Crash.Override:

bahahahahaha! you're hilarious.

_______________________________
I try to list Crash's intellectual dishonesty, intellectual curiosity and intellect in descending order.  However, its difficult to determine which to list at the bottom.

__________________________________

you're a flat out liar. i challenge you to show where i was dishonest in any way.. or a formal public apology. you're a liar and an idiot .. i'll be posting this in every comment you make, until you show proof or apologize. idiot!

____________________________________
Thank you for providing proof of being s thin skinned little troll, who can dish it out, but not take it.  Opinion needs no proof or attribution, although you post does lean towards intellect as the LCD.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×