Skip to main content

Sen. Edward “Ted” Kennedy had “selfish political and ideological motives” when he made secret overtures to the Soviet Union’s spy agency during the Cold War to thwart then-President Ronald Reagan’s re-election, a Reagan biographer said in an interview with The Daily Signal.

When they came to light years later, Kennedy’s secret contacts with the Russians through their KGB spy agency in the early 1980s didn’t cause nearly the tizzy that Russia’s alleged interference with this year’s election has for President-elect Donald Trump among liberal activists and reporters.

Russian President Vladimir Putin, with whom Trump has said he hopes to “get along,” is a former foreign intelligence officer and lieutenant colonel in the KGB.

In the 1980s, Kennedy was “terribly misguided” and “a fool” for seeing Reagan as a greater threat than either the leader of the Soviet Union or the head of its brutal secret police and  intelligence agency, political science professor and writer Paul Kengor told The Daily Signal.

The presidential hopeful’s secret correspondence with the Soviet spy service was first reported Feb. 2, 1992, by the London Times in an article headlined “Teddy, the KGB and the Top Secret File.”

As this reporter wrote in 2010, the story focused on a 1983 document from the spy agency detailing Kennedy’s overtures to top officials in the former Soviet Union. The Massachusetts Democrat had challenged President Jimmy Carter in the 1980 Democratic primaries and was considering the possibility of running again for president.

In a letter addressed to then-Soviet General Secretary Yuri Andropov, dated May 14, 1983, KGB head Viktor Chebrikov explained that Kennedy was eager to “counter the militaristic policies” of Reagan, who defeated Carter as the Republican nominee, and to undermine his prospects for re-election in 1984.

Kennedy was considering another run for president in 1988, but did not rule out running in 1984, Chebrikov informed Andropov in the letter.

Kennedy suggested he could work with the American news media to help organize favorable American press coverage for Andropov and other Soviet officials, according to the 1983 letter.

Here is how the KGB’s Chebrikov described Kennedy’s proposal, in a published English translation:

Kennedy believes that in order to influence Americans it would be important to organize in August-September of this year, televised interviews with Y.V. Andropov in the USA. A direct appeal by the general secretary of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union to the American people will, without a doubt, attract a great deal of attention and interest in the country. The senator is convinced this would receive the maximum resonance in so far as television is the most effective method of mass media and information.

Going a step further, according to the letter, Kennedy then offered up the possibility of having top media personalities such as Walter Cronkite, Barbara Walters, and Elton Raul, president of the board of the ABC television network, travel to Moscow to do television interviews with Andropov.

“The senator underlined the importance that this initiative should be seen as coming from the American side,” the letter to Andropov says.

Kennedy’s proposal also called for “lower level Soviet officials, particularly from the military,” to travel to the United States for a “series of television interviews” where they could “appeal directly to the American people about the peaceful intentions of the USSR.”

Former Sen. John Tunney, D-Calif., who was Kennedy’s law school roommate at the University of Virginia, traveled to Moscow on May 9 and 10, 1983, to meet with KGB officials and inform them of Kennedy’s proposal. (Tunney, also a former congressman, served one Senate term from 1971 to 1977.)

It was not Tunney’s first trip to Moscow on behalf of Kennedy. He also visited the KGB in Moscow three years earlier, on March 5, 1980.

In that earlier visit, Tunney told KGB agents that Kennedy was impressed by the foreign policy statements made by General Secretary Leonid Brezhnev, Andropov’s immediate predecessor as the top Soviet leader. He said Kennedy blamed Carter for becoming overly belligerent toward the Soviets after they invaded Afghanistan in December 1979.

Kennedy, an icon among Democrats who died in office in 2009, was first elected to the Senate in 1962 to fill the seat of brother John F. Kennedy when he became president.

Kennedy’s history with the KGB, and the trips Tunney took to Moscow on his behalf, are documented in what are known as the Mitrokhin papers filed with the Cold War International History Project of the Woodrow Wilson Center in Washington, D.C.

Vasiliy Mitrokhin was a former KGB agent who defected to Britain from the Soviet Union in 1992. Mitrokhin continued to work with British intelligence until his death in 2004.

Andropov died less than eight months after receiving the letter about Kennedy from his KGB head in 1983, and it is not clear if the Soviet Communist Party chief ever acted on the Democrat senator’s proposal.

But what is clear from history is that Russian agents have worked with “dupes” such as Kennedy and other “naïve” Americans to influence U.S. policy to serve their own ends, Kengor, a Grove City College political science professor, told The Daily Signal.

While it’s difficult to determine the truth behind recent allegations that Russian hackers meddled in the U.S. election, Trump and his team would be well advised to revisit Kennedy’s KGB correspondence to glean important lessons about the tactics of Russian intelligence, Kengor suggested:

The lesson to be learned here is, don’t ever make the mistake of thinking that these KGB types are your buddies, and don’t make the mistake that because they are nice to you they are going to work for you in a positive way that’s good for your country. People in the KGB were schooled in the art of manipulation, misinformation. They know how to dupe people and they know how to use people.

Kengor is the author of several books on Reagan, including “The Crusader: Ronald Reagan and the Fall of Communism,” which includes a copy of the entire 1983 KGB document.

In his book, Kengor points out that Tunney, now 82, acknowledged making 15 separate trips to the Soviet Union. The California Democrat served as an emissary not just for Kennedy but for other U.S. senators.

It’s not clear how many, but the KGB chief’s 1983 letter to Andropov says Kennedy suggested the Soviet leader meet with Sen. Mark Hatfield, an Oregon Republican who joined with Kennedy in supporting a freeze on nuclear weapons. Hatfield died in 2011.

The KGB document that blew the lid off Kennedy’s overtures to the Soviets came to light in the early 1990s. Boris Yeltsin, the first president of the Russian Federation after the Soviet Union disintegrated in part because of Reagan’s economic and defense policies, opened the Kremlin archives.

“I think Kennedy did what he honestly thought was in the best interests of the country, and that he thought Reagan was dangerous,” Kengor said, adding:

But this does say something about how terribly misguided Ted Kennedy was and what a fool he was for seeing a greater danger in Reagan than he did in Chebrikov, the head of the KGB, and in Andropov, the leader of the Soviet Union.

Unless Trump surrounds himself with “Russian realists” who understand what they are up against with Putin, Kengor said, he is concerned Trump could be “duped” as many other U.S. policymakers have been.

Trump has expressed admiration for some of Putin’s leadership qualities.

“Personally, I don’t think Trump has the ideological and historical background to understand what he’s dealing with in a Russian president who has spent 16 years in the KGB,” Kengor said.

A Note for our Readers:

Trust in the mainstream media is at a historic low—and rightfully so given the behavior of many journalists in Washington, D.C.

Ever since Donald Trump was elected president, it is painfully clear that the mainstream media covers liberals glowingly and conservatives critically.

Now journalists spread false, negative rumors about President Trump before any evidence is even produced.

 

 

 
Last edited by Bestworking
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I've heard a few times a media person say, I don't believe Obama
would intentionally hurt this country (paraphrasing). We have seen
more than a few decisions/policy that very much hurt the health
of the country and there wasn't two ways about it. It was obvious.
 
Why would anyone feel the need to cover for him if there wasn't
a need to cover for it.?
 
The final straw was hilda in the WH and after four years there
would be no return. My question is how does even a liberal buy
into that plain and simple in your face self destruction.?
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Once again, the true objective for the Democrat party is accumulation of power and wealth.  Its the oldest organized criminal syndicate in the US.  To accomplish their goals, they will do and say practically anything.  No crime is too violent, no lie too vile.  As a reminder, it was Reagan they said would start WW III.  Called him a warmonger -- only place he invaded was the island of Grenada.  

What the Democrat party does from coast to coast is one thing,
when they round up more thugs than they can control is another,
and it became more apparent with the 2016 election.
Clinton was so sure of a win she dropped more information than
she should've which worked against in the end, but all the oldest
crime crap doesn't mean a dam thing when they build Islam
numbers up to 4 or 5%. They'll be voting for themselves.
 
We can forget looking at the wrong history and realize why
European countries have been defeated, Trump is doing all that
can be done to this point. I see America as having too many
people that are absolutely clueless as to what's happening and
what their future looks like, if we continue to fight ourselves we
will defeat ourselves.   
 
 

https://www.bing.com/search?q=...tionid=&pc=EUPP_

http://www.wnd.com/2017/06/ema...-clinton-foundation/

direstraits posted:
giftedamateur posted:

Kennedy was all sorts of a criminal, an all round horrible, evil person, a thug. The left loves their thugs and criminals.

They love what they are.

I like what they are myself, they've totally separated themselves
from conservatives, makes it easier to spot the thugs

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×