Skip to main content

Have you noticed that the more the media attacks Donald Trump the stronger his chances gets of winning the nomination. The majority of the U.S. voters are fed up with politicians and the hypocritical media that has been chicken crap to expose the weaknesses of the current administration. They say “black lives matter“, it must, because the media has kissed Obamanation’s glass for his seven years in office. Refuses to condemn him about anything. It appear that the liberals and the media are going to bad mouth Trump right into office and it will serve them right. You can bet your last dollar the media and late night host will have a free for all for four years if Trump becomes President. Happy Trails to you!!!

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

What I have always said, the corrupt obama administration and the gimmethat's eagerness to go along with anything the corrupt, criminal, anti-American dems want to do is what will put Trump in office. We have not had a president in this country for almost 8 years. We've had an unqualified for ANYTHING deceiver,  racist, divider, usurper, any awful thing you can name. It will definitely be interesting, if nothing else, to see how the criminal left steals this election if they manage to overcome Trump. At this point the left has visited so much carnage and destruction on the country, that Trump looks like a glimmer of hope to a lot of folks that remember what a great country this was until the likes of obama, hilLIARy, bill, gore, sanders, et al lefty corrupt trash got their fangs in.

Last edited by Bestworking

I'm beginning to believe a Trump/Cruz ticket would be for the best.  Trump has executive experience, plus knows how to get people together of a point.  Trump admitted he needed a politician VP in an interview.  Cruz has political experience and is a non-establishment conservative.  Unfortunately, he also has the personality of razor wire.  Perhaps, with four or more years with Trump, he could learn the art of schmoozing. That Cruz is a Hispanic is a plus, as well.

Since we are playing, WHAT IF's: Have Rubio-Pres. & Trump as VP? 

I would see Trump constantly taking all the Spot Light of a Rubio president. Trump would be over talking Rubio's view points and soon nobody would be listing to Rubio, All would be focusing on Trumps ideas..Rubio would be secondary, so to speak.

More logical in my opinion, Trump - Pres and Rubio for VP. I like Cruz, but he needs a whole lot of polishing up on his personality, if that's do-able... maybe he could learn from the Trump-master of "Art of the Deal"..., but Trump will need a political VP to sort through the quagmire process.

budsfarm posted:

Rubio beats Cruz / Cruz beats Rubio.  Since Trump has insulted all other Republican candidates, those candidates throw their votes to Rubio/Cruz.  Cruz/Rubio wins.  Trump pouts, runs as 3rd party.  Hillary wins.

Unless . . .

At this point in time, I don't think either Cruz or Rubio will win because Cruz's anti-establishment people won't vote for Rubio and likewise Rubio's establishment voters won't vote for Cruz. Trump then doesn't need to pout or run third party.

The next question is what happens if Hillary is referred by the FBI to the DoJ for indictment or if several civil servants resign in protest if she isn't indited. Does she bow out and Sanders wins or does she stay in the race with the right-wing conspiracy evil bad press dogging her? Does Bloomberg enter the race as a third party candidate?

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...be.html?intcmp=hpbt1

Last edited by Stanky

Doesn't like either Cruz or Rubio are in a position to win their home states.  If either entertains any hopes of defeating Trump, they're going to have to join forces.

Honestly, I think Trump has the best shot of defeating Hillary.  I haven't been following the numbers of voters participating in the primaries, but I think Trump is going to need some of these disenfranchised Republican voters to win.  After all, how many times has he topped 50%.

The Clinton scenario you propose is the one I'll focus on.

Thanks. 

Stanky posted:
budsfarm posted:

Rubio beats Cruz / Cruz beats Rubio.  Since Trump has insulted all other Republican candidates, those candidates throw their votes to Rubio/Cruz.  Cruz/Rubio wins.  Trump pouts, runs as 3rd party.  Hillary wins.

Unless . . .

At this point in time, I don't think either Cruz or Rubio will win because Cruz's anti-establishment people won't vote for Rubio and likewise Rubio's establishment voters won't vote for Cruz. Trump then doesn't need to pout or run third party.

The next question is what happens if Hillary is referred by the FBI to the DoJ for indictment or if several civil servants resign in protest if she isn't indited. Does she bow out and Sanders wins or does she stay in the race with the right-wing conspiracy evil bad press dogging her? Does Bloomberg enter the race as a third party candidate?

http://www.foxnews.com/politic...be.html?intcmp=hpbt1

Most Cruz voters are anti-Republican establishment, so would go for Trump. If, Trump picks Cruz for VP, previous bad mouthing will go by the wayside.  Remember Bush's remarks about Reagan's voodoo economics.

I heard Loretta Lynch state that career attorneys at DoJ, not political appointees, are involved in the investigation of Hillary, not to mention 150 FBI agents.  I suspect Lynch hates the case -- either way, she is in trouble,  If, she prosecutes Hillary, the left will scream for her hide.  If, she doesn't prosecute and a Republican wins, she could be investigated, herself. 

Worse case for Dems. a brokered convention and Biden runs.

direstraits posted:

I heard Loretta Lynch state that career attorneys at DoJ, not political appointees, are involved in the investigation of Hillary, not to mention 150 FBI agents.  I suspect Lynch hates the case -- either way, she is in trouble,  If, she prosecutes Hillary, the left will scream for her hide.  If, she doesn't prosecute and a Republican wins, she could be investigated, herself. 

Worse case for Dems. a brokered convention and Biden runs.

___

Bring on Biden, then.  He is smart, experienced and would be a fine president.

He is the antithesis of the bombastic, blithering  bozo now leading the GOP primary.

Last edited by Contendahh
Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

I heard Loretta Lynch state that career attorneys at DoJ, not political appointees, are involved in the investigation of Hillary, not to mention 150 FBI agents.  I suspect Lynch hates the case -- either way, she is in trouble,  If, she prosecutes Hillary, the left will scream for her hide.  If, she doesn't prosecute and a Republican wins, she could be investigated, herself. 

Worse case for Dems. a brokered convention and Biden runs.

___

Bring on Biden, then.  He is smart, experienced and would be a fine president.

He is the antithesis of the bombastic, blithering  bozo now leading the GOP primary.

Well, Contenduhh, you have a better sense of humor than I thought.  Old bombastic Biden has a crew following him around as damage control.

 

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

I heard Loretta Lynch state that career attorneys at DoJ, not political appointees, are involved in the investigation of Hillary, not to mention 150 FBI agents.  I suspect Lynch hates the case -- either way, she is in trouble,  If, she prosecutes Hillary, the left will scream for her hide.  If, she doesn't prosecute and a Republican wins, she could be investigated, herself. 

Worse case for Dems. a brokered convention and Biden runs.

___

Bring on Biden, then.  He is smart, experienced and would be a fine president.

He is the antithesis of the bombastic, blithering  bozo now leading the GOP primary.

I remember conalinsky believed the mother of Chelsea,
webb hubbell roadie, was the honest and honorable next
POS illegal wipehouse occupier. 75% of America hope Not.
direstraits posted:

Biden plagiarized frequently, before, I guess he could afford a speech writer.  Worse, he plagiarized a somewhat famous speech from  Brit Labour party leader.  A speech most lefties and a few that study such, would recognize.

____

I would much rather hear a speech by Biden with plagiarized content than to listen to the jumbled, jangled, chaotic, blithering, disjunct stream-of- consciousness, all-over-the-place noise pollution emanating from the curiously pursed lips of the red-faced brawling lout currently leading the GOP primary.

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Biden plagiarized frequently, before, I guess he could afford a speech writer.  Worse, he plagiarized a somewhat famous speech from  Brit Labour party leader.  A speech most lefties and a few that study such, would recognize.

____

I would much rather hear a speech by Biden with plagiarized content than to listen to the jumbled, jangled, chaotic, blithering, disjunct stream-of- consciousness, all-over-the-place noise pollution emanating from the curiously pursed lips of the red-faced brawling lout currently leading the GOP primary.

Condie responds with his equivalent of "you kids get out of my yard" rant.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×