Skip to main content

WorldNetDaily:


It's about time... the Mainstream Media is finally asking if Barack Obama's economic polices are FAILING... but is the media asking the WRONG question?

Is it entirely possible that the problem with Obama's policies is not that they ARE FAILING, but rather, that they were specifically and purposefully DESIGNED TO FAIL and break the back of the United States?

Is it entirely possible that every move Barack Hussein Obama has made was specifically designed to destroy the United States of America... a country he clearly detests?

Some conservative pundits and politicians are hopelessly in the dark... far too many of them are willing to give Obama the benefit of the doubt and simply proclaim him incompetent... or out of his league when it comes to fulfilling his duties as President of the United States.

What they don't realize is that the undeniable and shocking truth is that Barack Obama (perhaps purposefully... perhaps unknowingly) is actually following a carefully laid-out strategy for destroying the United States of America that was initially proposed and published by two socialist faculty members at Columbia University (an institution that Barack Obama attended from 1981-83).

Of course you won't read about this open secret on the front page of the New York Times or The Washington Post... and you won't see any reports on this strategy to destroy the United States or on Barack Obama's direct connections to those who formulated and implemented this strategy on ABC, NBC, CBS or CNN.


Questions That Demand Answers...

The American people know less about Barack Hussein Obama than any other occupant of the White House... EVER. His past and his rhetoric are shrouded in mystery.

More to the point... during the presidential campaign, Obama spoke repeatedly of "change" ... but he never gave the American people any specifics... and the Mainstream Media never bothered to demand that he give the American people any details... and perhaps if we had known more about Obama's past, the American people would have known precisely what Obama really meant when of spoke of "change."

Here are a few questions that might lead to an explanation of what Obama meant when he spoke of "change."

Did you know that there is an actual strategy, formulated some 40 years ago, to effect radical change in the United States and that this strategy specifically calls for the deliberate sabotage of our economy, our livelihoods, and our position in the world?

Did you know that this strategy calls for the deliberate flooding of government systems in order to cause the government to implode under its own weight?

But, wait a minute, how does sabotaging the economy and causing it to implode, further this strategy? Well... according to the strategy... the American way of life, as we know it, MUST be destroyed and discredited because the American people will NOT ACCEPT STATISM UNTIL the present system is destroyed and discredited.

And how does one go about destroying and discrediting the system? If you need an example, look no further than the so-called economic stimulus schemes that the Obama Administration and Congress have implemented.

By now, most Americans have come to realize that throwing ungodly amounts of money... money that American taxpayers do not have... at wasteful government programs is NOT STIMULATING the economy... it's BREAKING the economy. And... plainly put... that's what these so-called stimulus schemes were designed to do... break the economy.

And, according to the strategy... once the economy is broken... once unemployment rises even further... once increasing numbers of private businesses, unable to shoulder the tax burden, shut their doors... once crushing debt and the reckless printing of money drives our nation into insolvency... liberals will simply continue shouting a mantra that you have already heard... "Capitalism Has Failed" ... and their cure for what ails us will be... direct government intervention... greater levels of dependency by individuals on the federal government... and more government control over our day-to-day lives.

Of course, the Obama stimulus schemes are just one example of the strategy at work. ObamaCare... open borders and amnesty for millions of illegal aliens... so-called Cap-and-Trade policies... in fact, ALL of Obama's domestic policies fit into this master strategy to sabotage the American economy?

Now, you might be asking... can this strategy actually work? If you're asking that question, know that this strategy WAS successfully implemented (on a smaller scale) over 30 years ago and actually bankrupted one of the largest cities in the world... right here in the United States?

Has Obama not flooded the government with an impossible list of demands that will overwhelm the bureaucracy and cause a systemic failure at every level of government from the local to state to national level?

Have Obama?s associates and allies not inundated the electoral system with millions of new voters (fraudulently and otherwise), who will be beholden to the current political party to obtain, preserve and extend the government handouts they are receiving?

Has Obama not printed ungodly amounts of money and blown the federal deficit through the roof? Has Obama not poisoned our financial system and private industry, setting them up for an inevitable failure that can only be remedied by government intervention, and consequential control?

Is it not true that even though real employment is around 16-17 percent, Obama and his allies in Congress - instead of giving tax relief to private businesses? a strategy that is sure to put people back to work... simply continue to extend unemployment benefits?

And does any rational person still doubt that Obama seeks to create a socialist society upon which he can strengthen his political grip and maintain power though Putin-esque measures?


You already know, in your heart, the answers to those questions. What you may not know is the WHY and the HOW.
Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

I knew I heard this stuff before. date 1966

quote:
Cloward–Piven strategy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Cloward-Piven Strategy)
Jump to: navigation, search

The Cloward–Piven strategy is a political strategy outlined by Richard Cloward and Frances Fox Piven, then both sociologists and political activists at the Columbia University School of Social Work, in a 1966 article in The Nation entitled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty".[1] The two argued that many Americans who were eligible for welfare were not receiving benefits, and that a welfare enrollment drive would create a political crisis that would force U.S. politicians, particularly the Democratic Party, to enact legislation "establishing a guaranteed national income."[2]

The strategy

Cloward and Piven’s article is focused on forcing the Democratic Party, which in 1966 controlled the presidency and both houses of the United States Congress, to take federal action to help the poor. They argued that full enrollment of those eligible for welfare “would produce bureaucratic disruption in welfare agencies and fiscal disruption in local and state governments” that would “deepen existing divisions among elements in the big-city Democratic coalition: the remaining white middle class, the white working-class ethnic groups and the growing minority poor. To avoid a further weakening of that historic coalition, a national Democratic administration would be constrained to advance a federal solution to poverty that would override local welfare failures, local class and racial conflicts and local revenue dilemmas.”[3] They wrote:

The ultimate objective of this strategy—to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some. Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.[3]
quote:
Originally posted by O No!:
quote:
And does any rational person still doubt that Obama seeks to create a socialist society upon which he can strengthen his political grip and maintain power though Putin-esque measures?



Does any rational person actually believe this hogwash??!!!


Doesn't matter if you believe it or not. The question is what does the evidence indicate?
George Bush, Queen Elizabeth, and Vladimir
Putin all die and go to hell.
While there, they spy a red phone and ask what the phone is for. The
devil tells them it is for calling back to Earth.

Putin asks to call Russia and talks for 5 minutes. When he is
finished the devil informs him that the cost is a million dollars,
so Putin writes him a check.

Next Queen Elizabeth calls England and talks for 30 minutes. When
she is finished the devil informs her that the cost is 6 million dollars,
so she writes him a check.

Finally George Bush gets his turn and talks for 4 hours. When
he is finished the devil informs him that the cost is $5.00.

When Putin hears this he goes ballistic and asks the devil why Bush
got to call the USA so cheaply.

The devil smiles and replies: "Since Obama took over, the country has
gone to hell, so it's a local call."

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×