The times did it again, the left can't stop lying

jtdavis posted:

"Don't retreat, instead- RELOAD!" was how Palin introduced the map to her Twitter followers. 

Could this be true???

And the wording used on the web page prefacing the page with "bullseye" symbols:

Don’t Get Demoralized! Get Organized! Take Back the 20!

With the president signing this unwanted and “transformative” government takeover of our health care system today with promises impossible to keep, let’s not get discouraged. Don’t get demoralized. Get organized!

We’re going to reclaim the power of the people from those who disregarded the will of the people. We’re going to fire them and send them back to the private sector, which has been shrinking thanks to their destructive government-growing policies. Maybe when they join the millions of unemployed, they’ll understand why Americans wanted them to focus on job creation and an invigorated private sector. Come November, we’re going to print pink slips for members of Congress as fast as they’ve been printing money.

We’re paying particular attention to those House members who voted in favor of Obamacare and represent districts that Senator John McCain and I carried during the 2008 election. Three of these House members are retiring – from Arkansas’s 2nd district, Indiana’s 8th district, and Tennessee’s 6th district – but we’ll be working to make sure that those who replace them are Commonsense Conservatives. The others are running for re-election, and we’re going to hold them accountable for this disastrous Obamacare vote. They are: Ann Kirkpatrick (AZ-1), Harry E. Mitchell (AZ-5), Gabrielle Giffords (AZ-8), John Salazar (CO-3), Betsy Markey (CO-4). Allen Boyd (FL-2), Suzanne M. Kosmas (FL-24), Baron P. Hill (IN-9), Earl Pomeroy (ND-AL), Charlie Wilson (OH-6), John Boccieri (OH-16), Kathy Dahlkemper (PA-3), Christopher Carney (PA-10), John M. Spratt, Jr. (SC-5), Tom Perriello (VA-5), Alan B. Mollohan (WV-1), and Nick J. Rahall II (WV-3).

We’ll aim for these races and many others. This is just the first salvo in a fight to elect people across the nation who will bring common sense to Washington. Please go to sarahpac.com and join me in the fight.

Stand tall, America. Real change is coming!

https://www.facebook.com/notes...-the-20/373854973434

Not exactly violent is it?

 

Sarah Palin has sued The New York Times for defamation.

The former Alaska governor and vice presidential candidate filed a lawsuit against the Times on Tuesday alleging that a recent editorial falsely portrayed her as responsible for inciting the 2011 shooting of Democratic Rep. Gabby Giffords.

 

"Today, Sarah Palin took a stand against The New York Times Company by filing a lawsuit which seeks to hold The Times accountable for stating that Governor Palin is part of a 'sickeningly familiar pattern' of politically motivated violence and that she incited the horrific 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords," lawyers for Palin said in a statement.

Palin is seeking more than $75,000 in damages, according to the lawsuit.

The Times editorial, published in the wake of the shooting of Rep. Steve Scalise earlier this month, accused Palin of "political incitement" ahead of the 2011 Giffords shooting, the lawsuit says. The editorial wrongly claimed an ad from Palin's political action committee put "Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs," according to the lawsuit.

The Times issued a correction a day later, noting that "no such link was established" between Palin's ad and the shooting, and that the ad in question "depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs."

Still, the Times said that the error did not "undercut or weaken the argument of the piece."

Related: 'We're sorry': New York Times issues correction to editorial after controversy

Palin's lawyers say otherwise. In the lawsuit, they claim that "the Times conduct was committed knowingly, intentionally, willfully, wantonly and maliciously, with the intent to harm Mrs. Palin, or in blatant disregard of the substantial likelihood of causing her harm, thereby entitling Mrs. Palin to an award of punitive damages."

Reached for comment, a Times spokesperson told CNNMoney that the paper intended to defend itself against Palin's claims.

"We have not reviewed the claim yet but will defend against any claim vigorously," the spokesperson said.

http://money.cnn.com/2017/06/2...mp;utm_term=july2017

 

Bestworking posted:

Palin isn't suing for enough. They gave the freaking illegal with the muzzie lawyer $190,000 in a BS lawsuit in another state, Palin has a solid case and should get 100 times more than an illegal POS.

When I first this I thought the amount was too small, make'em
pay till it hurts for their lies might slow it down.

We will see how this plays out - JT

You betcha!

MSM is deserting you, JT, just like those middle class blue collar workers did during the election.

Sarah Palin Sues New York Times, Claiming Editorial Defamed Her

That's the NYT headline, but it needs work

Sarah Palin Sues New York Times, Claiming Editorial Defamed Her outright lied about her attempting to make her complicit in an attempted murder.

First, we have the NYT perps confession of guilt with a knowingly woefully inadequate apology followed by, to prove just how stupid we are, we are going to still stand by our remarks all to make it easier to sue us.  To wit:

The Times later issued a correction, saying that there was no established link between political statements and the shooting and that the map circulated by Ms. Palin’s PAC had depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath the stylized cross hairs.

and we had no idea there were liberals who would read our bs and believe it to the extent they would foam at the mouth again and again over the names in the stylized cross hairs.

In a statement, a spokeswoman for The Times said, “We have not reviewed the claim yet but will defend against any claim vigorously.

Meaning our ass is in a deep deep hole and we're going to keep digging.  Why?  Because we're liberals and that's what we do.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/0...-new-york-times.html

Then comes the WaPo

Sarah Palin files convincing lawsuit against the New York Times editorial board

dragging CNN's Tapper into the middle of it.

https://www.washingtonpost.com...m_term=.9205df083be8

We will see how this plays out - JT

Without NYT, WaPo, CNN, and Tapper to slap Palin around, I guess it's going to be up to you JT.

My money's on Caribou Barbie. 

You betcha!

 

jtdavis posted:

I wish I knew you, I'd love to bet a dollar on this. Not for the money, but for the joy of rubbing it in.

What would you "rub in" exactly? The NYT admitted the story was BS and printed a retraction and an apology. Do you understand the meaning of retraction and apology? As far as betting with you, I know you'd just run and never pay.

jtdavis posted:

I wish I knew you, I'd love to bet a dollar on this. Not for the money, but for the joy of rubbing it in.

Well you were wrong about your sure thing hilda and about
a hundred other things, so don't shoot another hole in your foot.

The way the world works now, even if Palin has a case, a New Yawk liberal judge will probably toss the case. Remember Trump's immigration order that went to the 9th Circuit Court. It wasn't just the Marx brothers, I think the whole loony family got in on that deal. Jt would probably get your dollar Gifted, but not for the right reasons.

Stanky posted:

The way the world works now, even if Palin has a case, a New Yawk liberal judge will probably toss the case. Remember Trump's immigration order that went to the 9th Circuit Court. It wasn't just the Marx brothers, I think the whole loony family got in on that deal. Jt would probably get your dollar Gifted, but not for the right reasons.

He wouldn't get my dollar because Palin has won already.  She may not get paid, but she was vindicated and the NYT shown for the liars they are. That's why I said there is  nothing to "rub in" unless we choose to rub it in on Jt how the liberals were once more caught in a web of lies.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×