Skip to main content

For your discernment

 

What is the true story behind the terrifying film, The Exorcist? The last living eye witness to some of the most frightening proceedings from modern history has come off his deathbed to separate fact from fiction and say the horror movie The Exorcist was based on true events.

 

The scientific community has often declared demonic possession to be a condition of psychosis. New investigations into demonic possession have determined there is more going on in these situations than the general public may have originally thought.

 

In 1973 the movie The Exorcist was released. This was the harrowing story of a child possessed by the Devil himself and the events which took place during an exorcism to have the evil entity removed. The Devil was reintroduced to mainstream society through this tale. People were beginning to reexamine the existence of evil in the world today. What many people may not know is that the events depicted in the movie actually took place to a young boy in 1949.

 

The Catholic Church tried to keep the case private, not wishing to draw attention to the supernatural side of their activities. Talk of exorcisms and demonic possession can seem a bit backward and old fashioned to some and the Church likes to present itself as scientific and well-educated for today’s world. But in reality this case confirmed a horrifying truth, the Devil is real and actively working his evil in our world. He is capable of striking anyone.

 

Troy Taylor, historian and author of The Devil came to St. Louis, was fortunate to interview one of the participants to the infamous exorcism. Brother Greg Holewinski, 90, a retired Catholic monk, decided to break his life-long silence and discuss the events he witnessed first-hand during the boy’s exorcism. He wanted the world to hear what he had to say before he died from cancer.

 

In 1949 Holewinski was working at the Alexian Hospital in St. Louis, MO. He heard hushed rumors of a special patient just admitted and housed on an upper level in the hospital. It was said the child was possessed by the Devil. He described walking into the room for the first time and seeing three exorcists around a young boy.

 

Holewinski detailed how the boy’s demeanor would change when the possession was active. Every once in a while the Devil’s voice would come out of the child’s mouth, shouting profanities.

 

Holewinski said he was stationed at the foot of the bed to hold down the boy’s legs, which were thrashing about. He admits being very frightened.

 

Brother Greg describes feeling the power of evil present in the room and said he even saw the boy’s body levitate off the bed. He says it all was real and it is an experience he will never be able to forget. To him anybody who witnessed what he saw would never question whether or not this was a hoax or misdiagnosed mental disease.

 

To those directly involved with the case, dark forces were clearly at work and it is an experience they will never forget. Something convinced the priests there were dealing with the supernatural in this case. But were scientific possibilities even considered?

 

Historian Troy Taylor investigated the detailed diary kept by one of the priests. He was interested in looking into whether or not psychiatric conditions could be the actual cause of the boy’s symptoms.

 

Mr. Taylor set out to try and scientifically debunk the supernatural aspect to this case. His first step was to look into whether the holy men involved were under some sort of mass-illusion or group religious delusion. He figured since they all had the same beliefs in the Devil and the supernatural going in, maybe they just saw what they were expecting to see, not what really happened.

 

Professor of Psychology, Terry Cooper, explains why this could not have been what happened in this case. Prior to the Catholic involvement in the case other people, such as the doctors, teachers, scientists and Lutheran clergy witnessed the same supernatural phenomena.

 

All in all over 40 people claimed to have seen these occurrences. One physics professor was dumbfounded to see the table levitate and he could not come up with an explanation other than there was something beyond our known world at work in the room.

 

The un-named boy’s story begins three months before his arrival at the hospital in St. Louis for the exorcism at his home on the outskirts of Washington, DC, in Mount Airy, MD. Scratching and banging sounds began to come from under the child’s bed suddenly one night in Jan. 1949.

 

This progressed till the entire bed shook violently. After several weeks of activity, which was witnessed by well-over a dozen or so people, the family finally reached out for help. No one could determine what was happening with the boy, medical, mental and social test showed him to be perfectly normal.

 

The family decided to move the boy to his aunt’s home in St. Louis, hoping a change of residence would cause the activity to cease. This was not so, events continued. The family, which was Lutheran, was told by their pastor to look towards the Catholics for help with this kind of situation. He explained to them how Catholics “know about such things.”

 

When the priests came to examine the boy they were absolutely convinced he was possessed and explained to the family an exorcism needed to be performed. There are certain criteria used to determine if a case of possession is valid. Evil can manifest itself in many ways, such as levitation, an aversion to the Bible, holy water and the crucifix. Facial shape-shifting and superhuman strength have also been reported.

 

Father William Bowdern is appointed as the head exorcist for this case. Catholics are turned to in extreme cases because they are known to have a powerfully effective exorcism ritual. Today in the United States there are approximately 50 trained Catholic exorcists. All Bishops are exorcists. Even Pope Francis is said to have performed a recent exorcism.

 

Catholic priests use the Ritual Book of Exorcism. The Rite of Exorcism is a series of prayers which demand demons to vacate the body of the possessed individual. The original rite can be traced back to about 1614. In 1999 the rite was revised. A crucifix and holy water are also used in the ritual to bless the person. These acts cause the demon to reveal itself. The desire is to have the demon submit and tell you its name. Once known, the demon can be banished from the possessed by the authority of God.

 

When the priest began the Rite of Exorcism on the boy, the child reacted wildly. Three large scratches appeared on the boy’s stomach, according to the exorcism diary, followed by the world “help” carved into his chest. In order to have become possessed, the boy had to have opened himself up and let evil inside in some way.

 

A few months before the scratching events first began in the child’s home near Washington, DC, his favorite Aunt Tilly died. The boy was devastated. It turns out that Aunt Tilly, Mathilda L. Hendricks, was a spiritualist. She was known to have used an Ouija board. It is now wondered if the boy, knowing of his Aunt Tilly beliefs and possibly even using the board with her at some point in the past, used the Ouija board to contact his aunt after she died. It is shortly after her passing events began to happen in the house.

 

Brother Greg described himself as being terrified during the exorcism. Items were flying around the room. He was almost hit in the head by a glass vase. He described the crescendo coming during an attempt to give the child communion. A crucifix was forced into the boy’s hand, it caused him great pain. No matter what they did, the priests could not get the communion wafer into the boy’s mouth.

Then, according to Brother Greg, a voice appeared in the room from behind the priests, saying,

 

“Satan, I am Michael the Arch Angel. I command you in the name of Dominium to leave now! Now! Now!” At that point the child began to have convulsions and then there was stillness and quiet.

 

The boy told the priests of a vision he had while in the convulsive state. He described a beautiful man shining in a bright, white light holding a fiery sword. The man pointed the sword towards a dark pit and ordered the Devil to leave. The child turned to the priests and told them the name of the demon that possessed him, in Latin.

 

The child named Beelzebub. In Catholic teaching, Beelzebub is the Devil and he is a very real being. He leads a hoard of demons against God and the forces of light. The priests considered the fact that the child was able to name his tormentor in Latin as proof the exorcism was effective. Brother Greg said, “Saint Michael commanded the Devil to leave and with a lot of resistance he went back into this inferno.”

 

It has been 60 years since these terrifying events took place. The young boy is now a grown man and still alive. He refuses to speak about his experiences and remains a devout Catholic. His family converted from Lutheranism during the exorcism. The Catholic Church felt the ritual would have a stronger effect if they converted.

 

The Devil’s greatest desire is for the world to denounce his existence. This would give him free reign over our realm and an opening in to our lives. He would be able to take an active role in your life without you even realizing it. Brother Greg was there in St. Louis. He witnessed these events first hand. He had this to say before he died, “I believe the Devil is still here. Possession can happen today, anyplace in the world.”

 

http://www.examiner.com/articl...-behind-the-exorcist

 

 

Original Post

Replies sorted oldest to newest

St. Louis (KSDK) -- It's one of the biggest questions about the most well documented cases of an exorcism in U.S. history.

What ever happened to the 13-year-old boy at the center of the exorcism performed by Jesuits at Saint Louis University?

The story was the basis for the best-selling book and blockbuster horror movie, "The Exorcist."

With a few rare exceptions, the boy's identity has remained a closely guarded secret for decades.

"He's still alive," said David Waide, SLU archivist.

In almost all of the accounts of the famous case, the boy is referred to as "Robbie."

Robbie's ordeal began at his home in Maryland in 1949. Bizarre, unexplained things started happening in Robbie's home, up to and including marks and welts on his body.

Robbie's parents came to St. Louis to stay with relatives, partially in hopes that a change of scenery would stop the unexplained activities.

It didn't help.

One of Robbie's cousins was a student at St. Louis University at the time. She relayed accounts of Robbie's ordeal to Jesuits at SLU.

Eventually, Fr. William Bowdern, S.J. led the exorcism with the help of Fr. Raymond Bishop and Fr. Walter Halloran, among others.

The ordeal ended at a now-demolished wing of the Alexian Brothers Hospital in south St. Louis.

It's believed Robbie would be 77 today.

"He's had several children," Waide said. "He's moved back to the Washington D.C. area. He was non-Catholic, Lutheran nominally, but he became a Catholic.  He was baptized during this whole episode."

It's been reported that Robbie named a son Michael. In the exorcism records, Robby tells the priests he was saved by St. Michael the Archangel.

Robbie returned to St. Louis two years after his ordeal ended in 1949.

In a priest's diary about the exorcism, this is the final footnote entry on page 29:

"Follow up: August 19, 1951. R and his father and mother visited the Brothers. R, now 16 is a fine young man. His father and mother also became Catholic, having received their first Holy Communion on Christmas Day, 1950."

You can read the entire diary on KSDK.COM.

Story: SLU expert talks about exorcism on campus

SLU exorcism: Where did it happen?

Then there's this:

 

Investigations and explanations[edit]

Halloran has noted on many occasions that he, Fr. Bowdern, and Fr. Bishop all believe the case to be an actual case of possession.[18]

Author Mark Opsasnick investigated these events and spoke to people involved in the case — including several people close to Roland and his family, other priests in their parish, a source at the hospital mentioned in the claims, Thomas Allen and Father Halloran.[18] He did not, however, apparently speak to the allegedly-possessed boy (now, a man) "Roland Doe," or his immediate family members.

In his article Opsasnick describes the inconsistencies he found in the reports and other testimonies which he claims brings into question the veracity of the claims as reported in Allen's book, especially the more fantastic and supernatural claims, such as the claim that Mannheim spoke languages he couldn't know. According to Opsasnick, Father Halloran admitted that he thought Roland had merely mimicked Latin words he heard the clergymen speak.[19] Opsasnick further claims that he found no evidence that Father Hughes ever attempted to exorcise the boy, nor that he received a slash or injury at that time.[19] In addition, Father Halloran himself allegedly told Opsasnick that he did not hear the boy's voice change[19] and that he didn't check the boy's fingernails and see if he made the marks himself.[20] In addition, a friend of Roland allegedly told Opsasnick that the "supernatural" events were exaggerated and that the spitting and bed shaking could be explained logically.[21]

Opsasnick's judgment is that "[t]hose involved saw what they were trained to see".[19] It has been proposed that "Roland Doe" was simply a spoiled, disturbed bully who threw deliberate tantrums to get attention or to get out of school.[22]

Skeptic Joe Nickell wrote that "there is simply no credible evidence to suggest the boy was possessed by demons or evil spirits" and maintains that "possession can be childishly simple to fake."[23] According to Nickell:

"Nothing that was reliably reported in the case was beyond the abilities of a teenager to produce. The tantrums, “trances,” moved furniture, hurled objects, automatic writing, superficial scratches, and other phenomena were just the kinds of things someone of R’s age could accomplish, just as others have done before and since. Indeed, the elements of “poltergeist phenomena,” “spirit communication,” and “demonic possession"-taken both separately and, especially, together, as one progressed to the other-suggest nothing so much as role-playing involving trickery. So does the stereotypical storybook portrayal of “the devil” throughout."

Authors Terry D. Cooper and Cindy K. Epperson devoted a chapter of their book Evil: Satan, Sin, and Psychology to the case and dismissed proposed explanations such as obsessive-compulsive disorder, multiple personality disorder, schizophrenia, Tourette's syndrome, sexual abuse, group hysteria, and paranormal phenomena in favor of a theological perspective that the case "raises some interesting and perplexing questions" about the nature of evil.[11]

Hi all,

 

Just a couple of problems with the teaching of Roman Catholic "exorcisms."   

 

First, if a person were supposedly possessed by a demon, it most likely would not be Satan, but one of his demonic spirits, i.e., fallen angels.   Do I believe a person can be possessed by a Satanic demonic spirit?  Yes.

 

However, since Satan is himself merely a fallen angel, he is NOT omniscient (all knowing), he is NOT omnipotent (all powerful), he is NOT omnipresent (all places present).   Only God has those attributes.  No created being, including Satan, has them.

 

Therefore, Satan, like you and me -- can only be in one place at any given time.  Now, ask yourself this question:  "Since Satan can only be in one place, i.e., possessing one person at a time -- would that person whom he has chosen to possess be an unknown young child in the Roman Catholic church?"

 

Of course not!  If Satan himself were going to possess anyone in the Roman Catholic church -- he would go for Number One, the Pope!   Why waste his precious time on a young unknown child?

 

However, Satan has billions of followers.  A third of the created angels in heaven followed him in rebellion against God:

 

Question: "Are demons fallen angels?"
http://www.gotquestions.org/fallen-angels.html


Answer: 
When exactly God created angels is open for debate, but what is known for sure is that God created everything good because God, in His holiness, cannot create something sinful.  So when Satan, who was once the angel Lucifer, rebelled against God and fell from heaven (Isaiah 14; Ezekiel 28), one third of the angelic host joined his insurrection (Revelation 12:3-4,9).  There is no doubt these fallen angels are now known as the demons.

 

And, we know that no demonic spirit, neither Satan nor his demonic angels, can possess a Christian believer:

 

Question: "How do we distinguish a psychological disorder from demon possession?"
http://www.gotquestions.org/psychological-demon.html


Answer:
The short answer to this question is that the Bible does not speak to distinguishing between demon possession and a psychological disorder.  Because God chose not to equip Christians for this task (exorcism), we should probably assume this is not something we are called to do. However, there are two things we know for sure from Scripture.

 

First, we know from the Bible that demons can and do possess those who do not belong to Christ, and Scripture gives some examples of people being possessed by demons.  From these descriptions, we can find some symptoms of demonic influence as well as gain insights as to how a demon possesses someone. 

 

In some of these passages, the demon possession causes physical ailments (inability to speak, epileptic symptoms, blindness, etc. [Matthew 9:32-33, Mark 9:17-18]); in other cases the demon causes the individual to do evil (Judas is the main example); in Acts 16:16-18, the spirit apparently gave a slave girl some ability to know things beyond her own learning (a spirit of divination); in the case of the demoniac of the Gadarenes who was possessed by a multitude of demons, he had superhuman strength, cut himself, went around naked, and lived among the tombstones (Mark 5:1-17).

 

King Saul, after rebelling against the LORD, was troubled by an evil spirit (1 Samuel 16:14-15; 18:10-11; 19:9-10) with the apparent effect of a melancholy mood and an increased desire and readiness to kill David (God’s next anointed king of Israel).

Second, we should be greatly encouraged to know that it is impossible for a Christian to be possessed by a demon. The believer is indwelt by the Holy Spirit of God who comes to reside in our hearts when we give our lives to Christ (2 Corinthians 1:22). 

 

The description of a possessing demon as “evil” means “unclean” in the Greek (Mark 5:2), therefore making it impossible for the Holy Spirit to share His dwelling place with such a creature.  

 

For those who do not have the Holy Spirit, however, no amount of “cleaning up their lives” will prevent a demon from possessing or influencing them.  The parable Jesus told in Matthew 12:43 makes this clear.

 

So, it makes sense to me that any priest or other religious leader -- instead of trying to exorcise a demon from a person, a power God has not given to man -- should be working to bring that person to a saving knowledge of Jesus Christ. 

 

First, that priest or religious leader should assure that he himself is a Christian believer; then he should work to lead that demonically possessed person to a saving relationship with Christ, to eternal life in Christ.

 

In other words, help that person have Jesus in his/her heart, which is the same as saying that person is indwelled and sealed by the Holy Spirit (Ephesians 1:13, 4:30, 2:8-9) -- and the Holy Spirit will drive out any Satanic or demonic spirits within that person.

 

Basically, what this tells us is that -- the ONLY Exorcist can be the Holy Spirit.  No priest can do it, no other mortal man can do it.  Only God can drive out the demons and eternally save that person.

 

God bless, have a wonderful, blessed day,

 

Bill

 

2 Peter 2-1 - Spring Park, Tuscumbia, AL

Attachments

Images (1)
  • 2 Peter 2-1 - Spring Park, Tuscumbia, AL
Last edited by Bill Gray

 

D I C K Smith, The ‘Godfather of Makeup,’ Dies at 92

The Hollywood Reporter‎Jul‎ ‎31‎, ‎2014
 

 And the way he transfigured the angelic Linda Blair into a demon on the bitter cold set of The Exorcist (1973) will never be forgotten — certainly not by the legions of frightened moviegoers who fled theaters after seeing his work on the screen.

 

And for the scene where the possessed girl spews vomit at Jason Miller’s priest character in The Exorcist, Smith created a device that fit in the mouth of Blair’s double, Eileen Dietz. Hot pea soup was then forced through channels and tubes on either side of her cheeks.

Smith called The Exorcist his favorite film.

Last edited by Bestworking

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×