Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

Contendahh posted:
giftedamateur posted:

What's wrong Contendahh? You want to dish it out but want to cry when someone else does it?

___

And just what have I "dish[ed] out" that so energizes your vague ASSertion?

You and others smugly make all kinds of accusations without any kind of proof.

Serve up the goods. 

It's served up old dude hypocrite. You're whining about this reply to your nasty thread where you tried to dish it out.

Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

Last edited by Contendahh
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

You really are a deranged hypocrite! YOU just made a thread about jan crouch, saying you could use her pic to scare small children!!! So you like/love her? Yes, I despise the ones in the photos. Unflattering? Well sorry, but they are that fugly.  What have YOU posted, always, besides blithering drivel about Trump, and attacks/lies about Mormons, Catholics, anyone that dares speak against terrorists?

Last edited by Bestworking
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

You really are a deranged hypocrite! YOU just made a thread about jan crouch, saying you could use her pic to scare small children!!! So you like/love her? Yes, I despise the ones in the photos. Unflattering? Well sorry, but they are that fugly.  What have YOU posted, always, besides blithering drivel about Trump, and attacks/lies about Mormons, Catholics, anyone that dares speak against terrorists?

_____

Any review of my threads and and comments on this forum by any objective person will disclose that I have posted much more of substance and merit than what you have described above.  Your saying that something is true does not make it true. It is an easy thing for you to gratuitously ASSert that I have lied about Mormons, Catholics, etc. But you consistently demonstrate a reluctance or incapability  to consider and respond to the actual theological information and analyses of what I have posted on various religious beliefs and practices. Instead, you simply launch a volley of raw, generalized, unexplicated, and unproven accusations.  In essence, in such discussions, you park yourself on the porch and bark meaninglessly, since you utterly lack the ability to run with the big dogs.

Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

You really are a deranged hypocrite! YOU just made a thread about jan crouch, saying you could use her pic to scare small children!!! So you like/love her? Yes, I despise the ones in the photos. Unflattering? Well sorry, but they are that fugly.  What have YOU posted, always, besides blithering drivel about Trump, and attacks/lies about Mormons, Catholics, anyone that dares speak against terrorists?

_____

Any review of my threads and and comments on this forum by any objective person will disclose that I have posted much more of substance and merit than what you have described above.  Your saying that something is true does not make it true. It is an easy thing for you to gratuitously ASSert that I have lied about Mormons, Catholics, etc. But you consistently demonstrate a reluctance or incapability  to consider and respond to the actual theological information and analyses of what I have posted on various religious beliefs and practices. Instead, you simply launch a volley of raw, generalized, unexplicated, and unproven accusations.  In essence, in such discussions, you park yourself on the porch and bark meaninglessly, since you utterly lack the ability to run with the big dogs.

Old hypocritic dude still crying!

giftedamateur posted:
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

You really are a deranged hypocrite! YOU just made a thread about jan crouch, saying you could use her pic to scare small children!!! So you like/love her? Yes, I despise the ones in the photos. Unflattering? Well sorry, but they are that fugly.  What have YOU posted, always, besides blithering drivel about Trump, and attacks/lies about Mormons, Catholics, anyone that dares speak against terrorists?

_____

Any review of my threads and and comments on this forum by any objective person will disclose that I have posted much more of substance and merit than what you have described above.  Your saying that something is true does not make it true. It is an easy thing for you to gratuitously ASSert that I have lied about Mormons, Catholics, etc. But you consistently demonstrate a reluctance or incapability  to consider and respond to the actual theological information and analyses of what I have posted on various religious beliefs and practices. Instead, you simply launch a volley of raw, generalized, unexplicated, and unproven accusations.  In essence, in such discussions, you park yourself on the porch and bark meaninglessly, since you utterly lack the ability to run with the big dogs.

Old hypocritic dude still crying!

_____

Your terse, unexplicated and cheap critique places you on the same safe porch as is occupied by Best. Pitiful!

direstraits posted:

Undertakers do a wonderful job with Harry Reid.  he looks almost alive.

___

Cheap shot there, dire. Meaningless drivel from you. Reminds me of the cheap shot that Rush Limbaugh took at California Senator Alan Cranston. Limbough referred to Cranston as "The Cadaver," presumably because of Cranston's very lean physique. In reality, Cranston was very fit.  He held age group records for the 100-yard dash. He lived to be 86. Lardass Limbaugh, given his obesity, is unlikely to live anywhere near that long.  Reed is also in good physical condition. He described his situation following his serious injury thusly:

<<<<And while Reid conceded in his video message that he was never as badly hurt after one of his bouts as a youthful amateur boxer as he was after his single round with an exercise band, the message he wants to send is clear: His age (now 75) and his physical condition aren’t stopping him from doing his job or seeking another six-year term. (That’s probably why he made it clear that he didn’t fall off a treadmill.)

“I don’t know how many people out there could sit down and do 250 push-ups or do the strengthening exercises I did with those bands hundreds and hundreds of times — hundreds of times — every week, three times a week,” Reid said. “So, no one has questioned my physical ability, I’ve always been fairly confident in my ability to fight back, and I’m going to continue to fight back.”>>>

http://articles.latimes.com/20...an/01/news/mn-7158/2

Again, dire, CHEAP SHOT!!!!

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Undertakers do a wonderful job with Harry Reid.  he looks almost alive.

___

Cheap shot there, dire. Meaningless drivel from you. Reminds me of the cheap shot that Rush Limbaugh took at California Senator Alan Cranston. Limbough referred to Cranston as "The Cadaver," presumably because of Cranston's very lean physique. In reality, Cranston was very fit.  He held age group records for the 100-yard dash. He lived to be 86. Lardass Limbaugh, given his obesity, is unlikely to live anywhere near that long.  Reed is also in good physical condition. He described his situation following his serious injury thusly:

<<<<And while Reid conceded in his video message that he was never as badly hurt after one of his bouts as a youthful amateur boxer as he was after his single round with an exercise band, the message he wants to send is clear: His age (now 75) and his physical condition aren’t stopping him from doing his job or seeking another six-year term. (That’s probably why he made it clear that he didn’t fall off a treadmill.)

“I don’t know how many people out there could sit down and do 250 push-ups or do the strengthening exercises I did with those bands hundreds and hundreds of times — hundreds of times — every week, three times a week,” Reid said. “So, no one has questioned my physical ability, I’ve always been fairly confident in my ability to fight back, and I’m going to continue to fight back.”>>>

http://articles.latimes.com/20...an/01/news/mn-7158/2

Again, dire, CHEAP SHOT!!!!

Does it remind you of all the cheap shots YOU have taken at people? You old hypocrite!!

Contendahh posted:
direstraits posted:

Undertakers do a wonderful job with Harry Reid.  he looks almost alive.

___

Cheap shot there, dire. Meaningless drivel from you. Reminds me of the cheap shot that Rush Limbaugh took at California Senator Alan Cranston. Limbough referred to Cranston as "The Cadaver," presumably because of Cranston's very lean physique. In reality, Cranston was very fit.  He held age group records for the 100-yard dash. He lived to be 86. Lardass Limbaugh, given his obesity, is unlikely to live anywhere near that long.  Reed is also in good physical condition. He described his situation following his serious injury thusly:

<<<<And while Reid conceded in his video message that he was never as badly hurt after one of his bouts as a youthful amateur boxer as he was after his single round with an exercise band, the message he wants to send is clear: His age (now 75) and his physical condition aren’t stopping him from doing his job or seeking another six-year term. (That’s probably why he made it clear that he didn’t fall off a treadmill.)

“I don’t know how many people out there could sit down and do 250 push-ups or do the strengthening exercises I did with those bands hundreds and hundreds of times — hundreds of times — every week, three times a week,” Reid said. “So, no one has questioned my physical ability, I’ve always been fairly confident in my ability to fight back, and I’m going to continue to fight back.”>>>

http://articles.latimes.com/20...an/01/news/mn-7158/2

Again, dire, CHEAP SHOT!!!!

Jay Leno made the same comment years ago.  When I steal l line, I steal from the best.  As to his supposed physical condition, too many report him hobbling around well before his "accident!"  The boys in Vegas don't like welchers.

Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:
Bestworking posted:
Contendahh posted:

Something tells me that you have little respect for forum protocols, given the way you separate yourself from a topic already posted and go flitting off to create a "new" topic from which to pitch your usual vitriol.

Forum protocol. Is that what you call the flooding of the forum with your nothing to them threads in an effort to deflect from things going on, that the rest of us are discussing, that you desperately want us to drop, such as the activities of the terrorists? How LAME is it to make a thread about a dead woman that NO ONE cares about, just to make a thread? As stated, I'd bet you aren't winning any beauty contests yourself.

___

All that blithering drivel has zero polemical value, coming as it does from someone whose primary "contributions" of late have been collections of cartoons or unflattering photos of those you despise.

You really are a deranged hypocrite! YOU just made a thread about jan crouch, saying you could use her pic to scare small children!!! So you like/love her? Yes, I despise the ones in the photos. Unflattering? Well sorry, but they are that fugly.  What have YOU posted, always, besides blithering drivel about Trump, and attacks/lies about Mormons, Catholics, anyone that dares speak against terrorists?

_____

Any review of my threads and and comments on this forum by any objective person will disclose that I have posted much more of substance and merit than what you have described above.  Your saying that something is true does not make it true. It is an easy thing for you to gratuitously ASSert that I have lied about Mormons, Catholics, etc. But you consistently demonstrate a reluctance or incapability  to consider and respond to the actual theological information and analyses of what I have posted on various religious beliefs and practices. Instead, you simply launch a volley of raw, generalized, unexplicated, and unproven accusations.  In essence, in such discussions, you park yourself on the porch and bark meaninglessly, since you utterly lack the ability to run with the big dogs.

I think I compared you to a chihuahua at one time. All you can do is shake, bark, then run! I don't hang with dogs, that's a demoslop thing (see above pics). You are nothing but a big mouth, the mouth that roars, and frankly, no one is impressed.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×