Tips of a Mighty Big Iceberg - so to say

https://www.buzzfeed.com/adamb...e8AqYbK1#.mav4oAgQLP

It seems, now like, everyone is starting to come out of the woodwork claiming that they, at one time or another, were propositioned, abused, or harassed sexually by someone in Hollywood.  Whether Actors, Directors, Producers etc and not to forget the Music Industry, one only wonders if everyone tells what  all has transpired where it will lead and how many will it entangle?

One thing is for sure and that is all of this transcends political leanings but sure has a lot of people sweating like crazy in an industry that almost everyone has heard had casting couches and other unspoken things that had to happen before someone could "make it".   I guess it could be argued that many other industries could be found to have exactly the same things going on with people in power using their positions to take advantage of people that wanted to advance in that respective business, politics included.   

I wonder if we ever will really hear the end of this or how many more will be revealed before it settles down?

Be as the Bereans ( Acts 17:11 )
Original Post

dangerous is a woman is okay with things til she gets mad for some reason then she will use what ever to bury a man.  They went along to become stars get their money and awards.  Now they are speaking up to get in the headlines.  

As Hillary Clinton would say, in her best imitation of an uneducated black person's voice, which for some reason doesn't seem to bother the otherwise "perpetually offended" when she does it, "that Harvey Weinstein sho is a bad thang awright, but I ain't nowheres near tired of taken' his money". 

Why can Republicans not have one conversation without mentioning Hillary? I remember each and every one of you whining , incessantly, about the sheer mention of 'W'. Yet, here we are, almost a year later, and the Republicans are still screaming Hillary in EVERY SINGLE TOPIC. What a pack of snowflakes.

SirWasabi posted:

Why can Republicans not have one conversation without mentioning Hillary? I remember each and every one of you whining , incessantly, about the sheer mention of 'W'. Yet, here we are, almost a year later, and the Republicans are still screaming Hillary in EVERY SINGLE TOPIC. What a pack of snowflakes.

Why can't Dems admit that at present the only candidate with provable ties to Russia is Hillary Clinton? Trump might have wanted to build a building with his name emblazoned upon it in Moscow, but that deal fell through. I might also note that Manafort's Ukrainian dealings didn't become known until after he was hired by the Trump campaign.

Hillary Clinton and the DNC through a British former spy paid ex-KGB agents to concoct tall tales. Also there's the Uranium deal with a formerly Canadian company that was in the process of being bought out by Russians that included major gifts to the Clinton Foundation and large speaking fees to Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

http://www.newsweek.com/fact-c...-russia-trump-688592

 

Stanky posted:
SirWasabi posted:

Why can Republicans not have one conversation without mentioning Hillary? I remember each and every one of you whining , incessantly, about the sheer mention of 'W'. Yet, here we are, almost a year later, and the Republicans are still screaming Hillary in EVERY SINGLE TOPIC. What a pack of snowflakes.

Why can't Dems admit that at present the only candidate with provable ties to Russia is Hillary Clinton? Trump might have wanted to build a building with his name emblazoned upon it in Moscow, but that deal fell through. I might also note that Manafort's Ukrainian dealings didn't become known until after he was hired by the Trump campaign.

Hillary Clinton and the DNC through a British former spy paid ex-KGB agents to concoct tall tales. Also there's the Uranium deal with a formerly Canadian company that was in the process of being bought out by Russians that included major gifts to the Clinton Foundation and large speaking fees to Bill Clinton.

Bill Clinton did receive $500,000 to deliver a speech at a Russian bank that was promoting Uranium One stock, according to The New York Times, and the company’s chairman donated $2.35 million to the foundation in four installments as Uranium One was being acquired by Rosatum between 2009 and 2013.

http://www.newsweek.com/fact-c...-russia-trump-688592

 

Also bear in mind that Bill Clinton's half million dollar speech was only a 20 minute speech.  Also bear in mind that the FBI knew that the dossier was false yet the Obama Administration's Justice department and every investigation since, into Trump/Russia collusion, was and is based upon this known false dossier so consider the extreme amount of cost in tax payer dollars and time devoted to an investigation which is predicated upon a known false document.  Not that was found out to be false or fraudulent but was known then to be, at least known by people in the position to know.  This blows the offenses of Watergate out of the water and Watergate doesn't near compare to the degree of corruption that appears to be attached to the Uranium One deal and the dossier that was bought and paid for by the Democrats and Hillary Clinton's campaign. 

I am not trying to answer for the insertion of Hillary into the conversation but it is known that Harvey Weinstein was a huge supporter of Hillary and she has refused to give back any of the money he gave to them.   IF though it had been a Republican that received the money and didn't give it back you and all other Democrats would make it a huge issue.  

Also how many years after Obama was elected did we have to hear about everything being "Bush's Fault".  There is still much relevant today associated with Hillary that could or should be investigated and hopefully prosecuted because what she and Bill did is surely a crime and more  and more that is known seems to reveal extreme cover-ups.  

I noticed that even the first George Bush was resurrected in the news lately for supposedly groping or touching women according to at least four women so if that is relevant to be brought up (which is guilty is should be) then surely Bill Clinton's offenses are fair game and so is Hillary's escapades.  Hillary and her campaign paid for this false dossier in an attempt to take down a legitimately elected president  and it's proven that it was false and financed by Hillary/Hillary's campaign so she is relevant today in the news and the comparison to George Bush is not really proper, but that is an opinion.

I wonder why the hildabeast isn't in the oval office, mobum
cheated her out of it eight years ago and she cheated Sanders out of it
this time around. She kept saying she wanted 500% more Christian
hating Islamic terrorist brought into America than what mobumer
already took in for the plan to take down this country, why else
did he implement the nation killing decisions by the dozens if that
wasn't the reason for all his actions that pointed in that direction.
 
Or maybe a bipartisan American could explain the intentions for his
disregard of proper congressional rules of procedure for the end
result he wanted. Thank God (not his, the real one) he didn't do any
more damage. But hilda was all set to continue his fight against this
country, the people realized it and slammed the door on it's foot
and in it's face. 

The payments made for Bill's speech and to the US Clinton foundation was chicken feed.  

The total was closer to $145 million paid thru the Canadian offices of the Clinton Foundation. 

"Individuals related to Uranium One and UrAsia, including Giustra, donated to the Clinton Foundation, totaling about $145 million."

http://www.masslive.com/politi...sier_uranium_de.html

Now, that is a real quid pro quo.

How many people have to approve a deal involving uranium, in the US?

Was Hillary Sec of State when the money was paid?

What year was the money paid to the Clinton Foundation?

Either Republicans are so stupid, in 8 years of investigating the Clintons, they couldn't find anything. or Republicans are so crazy they believe the same old talking points RNC keeps rolling out, to no avail.

Leave the dead horse alone. It ain't going anywhere!

direstraits posted:

Who was president when all this occurred. Congress can't prosecute anyone. DoJ works for the executive branch.

I support and supported Donald Trump and I'm so glad he was elected, over Hillary, but I am disappointed that his Justice Department hasn't already got in gear investigating events back to 2012 and Benghazi even.  I don't know what reason Jeff Sessions has for not getting involved in this or if they are just all too involved in the Russia situation which is a white rabbit anyway.  It's time to start looking into this stuff because if not now then it never will.  

That is one thing about Republicans that I can't say about Democrats and that is that they are gutless and afraid of their own shadow being afraid that anything they do will be viewed in a negative way by the media or that they are afraid of someone saying they aren't being fair.

I see Tony Podesta has quit the Podesta group.  He doesn't want to bring the entire group down, when Mueller comes for him.  The Podesta group is A and B in the charges. Its not a happy time for K St. lobbyists.  Wonder when the Demmies will realize that Manaport and Gates' Mercury group was working for Democrats when most of the charges were committed.

Demmies still don't realize that Steele's dossier on Trump would be a death sentence if Russians really supported Trump.  Any Russian who provided bad info about Trump would quickly find himself dead.  Putin doesn't suffer enemies -- they usually wind up dead, in prison or in exile.  Putin desired dissension in the US.  The Demmies have played their usually role of useful idiots well.  Another Disinformation Bureau operation.

 

If the point of the Russian interference with the US elections was to sew disinformation, the Republicans have played straight into it, and continue to do so, today. Republican's obsession with Hillary has become unhealthy for the RNC. You can only beat the same drum so long, after that people just stop dancing to that tune.

Add Reply

Likes (0)

×
×
×
×