Skip to main content

Replies sorted oldest to newest

When we give other imperfect people the power of life and death over us how come we are mad and angry when one of them does bad things? Do we do the same thing to others who are in a position of power? Normally no, because we agree with what they did. And those with no power remain silent and the world only gets crazier and the masses become victims each and every day. So support those in power without questioning their actions and a lot more crazy things will happen and not just to some stranger half-way across the USA.

Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Just wondering why this is such news and thread worthy, and all the others aren't.

Because of the news in leaking out of Ferguson that corroborates the officers story including eye witnesses and physical evidence.  Since the facts don't bear out in Ferguson they need to change the focus to another story about the evil white man killing a innocent black man.   It's almost election time right?

Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

When we give other imperfect people the power of life and death over us how come we are mad and angry when one of them does bad things? Do we do the same thing to others who are in a position of power? Normally no, because we agree with what they did. And those with no power remain silent and the world only gets crazier and the masses become victims each and every day. So support those in power without questioning their actions and a lot more crazy things will happen and not just to some stranger half-way across the USA.

_________________

Your little apologetic for an outrageous action is absolutely breathtaking. Even though this cop is an "imperfect" person, it is a wild stretch to blame his action on his "imperfection." He had no right to use his"power" in this deadly and inappropriate manner.  He is a disgrace to his uniform. Fifteen  bullets pumped into a mentally-ill person under the circumstances described is indeed outrageous!

 

Originally Posted by Chuck Farley:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Just wondering why this is such news and thread worthy, and all the others aren't.

Because of the news in leaking out of Ferguson that corroborates the officers story including eye witnesses and physical evidence.  Since the facts don't bear out in Ferguson they need to change the focus to another story about the evil white man killing a innocent black man.   It's almost election time right?

___

No one is changing any focus.  The Hamilton, Ohio incident would be highly newsworthy without any relationship to Ferguson, Missouri.

Originally Posted by Chuck Farley:
Originally Posted by Bestworking:

Just wondering why this is such news and thread worthy, and all the others aren't.

Because of the news in leaking out of Ferguson that corroborates the officers story including eye witnesses and physical evidence.  Since the facts don't bear out in Ferguson they need to change the focus to another story about the evil white man killing a innocent black man.   It's almost election time right?

=================

Just odd that black officers killing innocent white guys never seem to make the news or cause riots. That needs to change.

Last edited by Bestworking

What if this officer left his last call where a father had beaten his 6 month old daughter to death because she was crying, or an auto accident where a drunk driver killed a family of four and was walking around unharmed looking for a drink, or a domestic violence scene where the wife was killed with a hammer and the kids were looking on. Would that have something to do with his/your mental state afterwards or should he just have swallowed it and moved on. If he had just come from a democratic fundraiser and was mad at the republicans would he have been justified. Contendah why don't you got to Ferguson and protest with the rest of those who think they know best. I say let the law take it's course and then I will **** the offender.

Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

What if this officer left his last call where a father had beaten his 6 month old daughter to death because she was crying, or an auto accident where a drunk driver killed a family of four and was walking around unharmed looking for a drink, or a domestic violence scene where the wife was killed with a hammer and the kids were looking on. Would that have something to do with his/your mental state afterwards or should he just have swallowed it and moved on. If he had just come from a democratic fundraiser and was mad at the republicans would he have been justified. Contendah why don't you got to Ferguson and protest with the rest of those who think they know best. I say let the law take it's course and then I will **** the offender.

___

You are truly deranged if you think the law took its course in the form of pumping 15 bullets into that mentally ill man.  There were over 60 witnesses to the incident and the officer is deservedly criticized and will be appropriately disciplined and punished.

Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

And don't forget the media reported there were witness' that said he had his hands up and was surrendering. That seems to have changed somewhat.

__

I believe yu are getting the two cases confused.  

=================

He's referring to the Ferguson shooting where the witnesses have been discredited.

Btw.... In the first paragraph the writer said the officer emptied his "barrel" into the man. What does that mean?

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

When I was a young man, we had peace officers. They did what was necessary to keep the peace. They later turned into pencil pushers and wrote as many different charges for the same offense as possible. Now, they seem to be judge, jury and executioner.

_____________________________________________________________

While crime is down significantly, I doubt the extremely violent sort of criminal was as common.  That said, the policeman that is the subject of this thread appears to be in the wrong.  Too many of the left were ready to find the policeman in Ferguson guilty without a complete investigation.  THC can mellow someone out, but it can also cause serious lapses in judgment.  From the robbery video, we know Brown was in a violent mood -- shoving the small Asian man around while robbing the store.  If the same lefties experienced a violent 300 LB, 6ft plus man charging them. they would have fired as well -- probably fouling themselves, as well.

 

That said, the police have adopted paramilitary tactics that need changing.

Originally Posted by smokey1:
Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

And don't forget the media reported there were witness' that said he had his hands up and was surrendering. That seems to have changed somewhat.

__

I believe yu are getting the two cases confused.  

=================

He's referring to the Ferguson shooting where the witnesses have been discredited.

Btw.... In the first paragraph the writer said the officer emptied his "barrel" into the man. What does that mean?

____

You know what he means; you are just taking the role of gun expert and nattering about terminology.

Originally Posted by jtdavis:

What's he starting? What's not true about that post?

 

Best, you win dummy of the post

 

LOL! A dummy trying to give someone a dummy award! Priceless! This looks like, "no answers just name calling". Now who is it that always claims that? Hmmmm? Why didn't you answer the question? You have a problem with his post, why?

Last edited by Bestworking
Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by smokey1:
Originally Posted by Contendah:
Originally Posted by Bulldog63:

And don't forget the media reported there were witness' that said he had his hands up and was surrendering. That seems to have changed somewhat.

__

I believe yu are getting the two cases confused.  

=================

He's referring to the Ferguson shooting where the witnesses have been discredited.

Btw.... In the first paragraph the writer said the officer emptied his "barrel" into the man. What does that mean?

____

You know what he means; you are just taking the role of gun expert and nattering about terminology.

++++++++++++++

No contenduh, that's another example of a liberal writer adding drama to his story.

Add Reply

Post

Untitled Document
×
×
×
×
Link copied to your clipboard.
×